Re: [QE-users] users Digest, Vol 146, Issue 15

2019-09-23 Thread Mayuri Bora
Hi all,

Can we do PBE+GGA with SOC and VdW correction in NM/FM in QE?
Because i have tried for the same but segmentation fault is observed as
mentioned below-

cp: missing destination file operand after
‘/global/home/sushantk/mayuri/SOC/soc_vdwcorr/’
Try 'cp --help' for more information.
forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred
Image  PCRoutineLineSource
libintlc.so.5  7F49A83B4C05  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
libintlc.so.5  7F49A83B2827  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
libifcoremt.so.5   7F49AA141962  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
libifcoremt.so.5   7F49AA1417B6  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
libifcoremt.so.5   7F49AA096CAD  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
libifcoremt.so.5   7F49AA0A8FAD  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
libpthread.so.07F49AA62B100  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
pw.x   0053E3E3  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
pw.x   005354DD  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
pw.x   00529284  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
pw.x   00524E11  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
pw.x   0057C092  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
pw.x   004DB3B9  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
pw.x   00406670  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
pw.x   00406523  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
pw.x   0040648E  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
libc.so.6  7F49A7FFBB15  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
pw.x   00406399  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown

real0m27.796s
user0m49.701s
sys 0m2.100s
> Send users mailing list submissions to
>   users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>   https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>   users-requ...@lists.quantum-espresso.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>   users-ow...@lists.quantum-espresso.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. Fw: Can we do LDA+U with SOC for FM/AFM systems in QE
>   (David Kostov)
>2. Re: Error during compilation in the step of make allcommand
>   (Will DeBenedetti)
>3. Re: Fw: Can we do LDA+U with SOC for FM/AFM systems in QE
>   (Lorenzo Paulatto)
>4. QE+Wannier90 (=?gbk?B?emh5?=)
>5. Re: QE+Wannier90 (TERSOO ATSUE)
>6. Re: QE+Wannier90 (=?gbk?B?emh5?=)
>7. Re: Convergence of calculating Hubbard parameters from  DFPT
>   (Christoph Wolf)
>8. Re: Error during compilation in the step of make all command (???)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 11:57:22 + (UTC)
> From: David Kostov 
> To: Quantum ESPRESSO Users Forum 
> Subject: [QE-users] Fw: Can we do LDA+U with SOC for FM/AFM systems in
>   QE
> Message-ID: <1117481007.4909079.1569153442...@mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>  Hello again,
> I am still waiting for a support for my issue.
> Thank youD
>
>- Forwarded Message - From: David Kostov To:
> Quantum ESPRESSO Users Forum Sent:
> Friday, September 20, 2019, 5:24:39 p.m. CSTSubject: Can we do LDA+U
> with SOC for FM/AFM systems in QE
>  Dear QE community
>
> I wanted to structure optimization for my system considering both Hub-U
> and SOC. But I am getting the following error with vc-relax.
>
> Error in routine force_hub (1):
> ? forces in full LDA+U scheme are not yet implemented
> ?%%
>
>  stopping ...
>
>
>
> This is a ferromagnetic system. In the scf.in I have defined :
> ??? starting_magnetization(1)=0.5,
> ??? starting_magnetization(2)=0.0,
> ??? lda_plus_u = .true.,
> ??? lda_plus_u_kind = 1,
> ??? Hubbard_U(1) = 4.00,
> ??? noncolin= .true.
> ??? lspinorb= .true.
> I have not defined nspin there. Can someone please let me know what is
> wrong with my input?
>
>
>
> I tried removing? "lda_plus_u = .true.," and "lda_plus_u_kind = 1" , Then
> it works, but I noticed vc-relax calculation has finished in a one cycle
> (it has directly given the final structure) and it is the experimental
> structure which is in the scf.in. I am doubtful about that results too.
>
> I appreciate your support to this problem. If I brief my system again, it
> is FM and I need to include both Hub-U and SOC.
> Thank youD.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> 

Re: [QE-users] users Digest, Vol 146, Issue 15

2019-09-23 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 12:24 PM Mayuri Bora  wrote:

Can we do PBE+GGA with SOC and VdW correction in NM/FM in QE?
>

Because i have tried for the same but segmentation fault is observed as
> mentioned below
>

the code stops with an error message if you try to run noncolinear or
spinorbit calculations with a vdW-DF functional (e.g. input_dft='vdW-DF')
or with XDM (not currently impemented). DFT-D2 and DFT-D3 are completely
independent from the electronic structure. I don't know about
Tkatchenko-Scheffler but it shouldn't crash because it uses just the charge
density. Please explain under which exact circumstances the code crashes.

Paolo

cp: missing destination file operand after
> ‘/global/home/sushantk/mayuri/SOC/soc_vdwcorr/’
> Try 'cp --help' for more information.
> forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred
> Image  PCRoutineLineSource
> libintlc.so.5  7F49A83B4C05  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
> libintlc.so.5  7F49A83B2827  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
> libifcoremt.so.5   7F49AA141962  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
> libifcoremt.so.5   7F49AA1417B6  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
> libifcoremt.so.5   7F49AA096CAD  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
> libifcoremt.so.5   7F49AA0A8FAD  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
> libpthread.so.07F49AA62B100  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
> pw.x   0053E3E3  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
> pw.x   005354DD  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
> pw.x   00529284  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
> pw.x   00524E11  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
> pw.x   0057C092  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
> pw.x   004DB3B9  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
> pw.x   00406670  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
> pw.x   00406523  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
> pw.x   0040648E  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
> libc.so.6  7F49A7FFBB15  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
> pw.x   00406399  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
>
> real0m27.796s
> user0m49.701s
> sys 0m2.100s
> > Send users mailing list submissions to
> >   users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >   https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >   users-requ...@lists.quantum-espresso.org
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> >   users-ow...@lists.quantum-espresso.org
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of users digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >1. Fw: Can we do LDA+U with SOC for FM/AFM systems in QE
> >   (David Kostov)
> >2. Re: Error during compilation in the step of make allcommand
> >   (Will DeBenedetti)
> >3. Re: Fw: Can we do LDA+U with SOC for FM/AFM systems in QE
> >   (Lorenzo Paulatto)
> >4. QE+Wannier90 (=?gbk?B?emh5?=)
> >5. Re: QE+Wannier90 (TERSOO ATSUE)
> >6. Re: QE+Wannier90 (=?gbk?B?emh5?=)
> >7. Re: Convergence of calculating Hubbard parameters from  DFPT
> >   (Christoph Wolf)
> >8. Re: Error during compilation in the step of make all command (???)
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 11:57:22 + (UTC)
> > From: David Kostov 
> > To: Quantum ESPRESSO Users Forum 
> > Subject: [QE-users] Fw: Can we do LDA+U with SOC for FM/AFM systems in
> >   QE
> > Message-ID: <1117481007.4909079.1569153442...@mail.yahoo.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> >
> >  Hello again,
> > I am still waiting for a support for my issue.
> > Thank youD
> >
> >- Forwarded Message - From: David Kostov To:
> > Quantum ESPRESSO Users Forum Sent:
> > Friday, September 20, 2019, 5:24:39 p.m. CSTSubject: Can we do LDA+U
> > with SOC for FM/AFM systems in QE
> >  Dear QE community
> >
> > I wanted to structure optimization for my system considering both Hub-U
> > and SOC. But I am getting the following error with vc-relax.
> >
> > Error in routine force_hub (1):
> > ? forces in full LDA+U scheme are not yet implemented
> >
> ?%%
> >
> >  stopping ...
> >
> >
> >
> > This is a ferromagnetic system. In the scf.in I have defined :
> > ??? starting_magnetization(1)=0.5,
> > ??? starting_magnetization(2)=0.0,
> > ??? lda_plus_u = .true.,
> > ??? lda_plus_u_kind = 1,
> > ??? Hubbard_U(1) = 4.00,
> > ??? noncolin= .true.
> > ??? lspinorb= .true.
> > I have not defined nspin there. Can some