Re: [QE-users] Why do I get the message no atomic wavefunctions in pseudopotential?

2023-03-03 Thread Kazume NISHIDATE


> 2023/03/03 20:21、Iurii TIMROV via users 
> のメール:
> 
> But hybrids with US and PAW in QE are slow as far as I know


It is also true in the VASP.
I was a ‘usr'.


西館数芽
Kazume NISHIDATE Ph.D

Department of Systems Innovation Engineering,
Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Iwate University
4-3-5 Ueda, Morioka, Iwate, 020-8551 JAPAN
Phone:+81-19-621-6391
kazume.nishid...@gmail.com, nisid...@iwate-u.ac.jp
https://sites.google.com/site/nisidatelab/

___
The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian
people and expresses its concerns about the devastating
effects that the Russian military offensive has on their
country and on the free and peaceful scientific, cultural,
and economic cooperation amongst peoples
___
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [QE-users] Why do I get the message no atomic wavefunctions in pseudopotential?

2023-03-03 Thread Iurii TIMROV via users
For GGA and GGA+U there are quite a few options, but I recommend to have a look 
here: https://www.materialscloud.org/discover/sssp/table/efficiency


For PBE0, you can also try the ones mentioned above. But hybrids with US and 
PAW in QE are slow as far as I know, so better to try NC (maybe PseudoDojo or 
SG15).


HTH


Iurii


--
Dr. Iurii TIMROV
Senior Research Scientist
Theory and Simulation of Materials (THEOS)
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL)
CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
+41 21 69 34 881
http://people.epfl.ch/265334

From: NAIMI SALMA 
Sent: Friday, March 3, 2023 11:00:14 AM
To: Iurii TIMROV; Quantum ESPRESSO users Forum
Subject: Re: [QE-users] Why do I get the message no atomic wavefunctions in 
pseudopotential?

Dear Iurii,

I want to do a comparison between GGA, GGA+U and PBE0, by studying the 
electronic and optical properties. In this case which pseudopotential can I use?









--

Salma NAIMI
PhD student - Mohamed 5 University-Rabat


From: users  on behalf of Iurii 
TIMROV via users 
Sent: Friday, March 3, 2023 10:32 AM
To: users@lists.quantum-espresso.org 
Subject: Re: [QE-users] Why do I get the message no atomic wavefunctions in 
pseudopotential?


The attached input file does not correspond to GGA+U calculation but to PBE0.


Anyways, you should change the pseudopotentials for Hubbard atoms because the 
ones that you use seem do not contain the atomic orbitals which are needed to 
construct Hubbard projectors of GGA+U.


HTH


Iurii


--
Dr. Iurii TIMROV
Senior Research Scientist
Theory and Simulation of Materials (THEOS)
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL)
CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
+41 21 69 34 881
http://people.epfl.ch/265334

From: users  on behalf of NAIMI SALMA 

Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2023 10:13:24 PM
To: users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
Subject: [QE-users] Why do I get the message no atomic wavefunctions in 
pseudopotential?

Dear experts,

I tried to run 'vc-relax' calculation using NC pseudopotentials on CuI for 
GGA+U, but I got the following message in the output :


Any further DFT definition will be discarded

 Please, verify this is what you really want


 %%
 Error in routine offset_atom_wfc (1):
 no atomic wavefunctions in pseudopotential file for species # 1
use a pseudopotential file with atomic wavefunctions!
 %%

 stopping ...



Dear experts, you will find attached  my input file.
How can I fix this problem please!














Salma NAIMI
PhD student - Mohamed 5 University-Rabat

___
The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian
people and expresses its concerns about the devastating
effects that the Russian military offensive has on their
country and on the free and peaceful scientific, cultural,
and economic cooperation amongst peoples
___
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [QE-users] Why do I get the message no atomic wavefunctions in pseudopotential?

2023-03-03 Thread Iurii TIMROV via users
The attached input file does not correspond to GGA+U calculation but to PBE0.


Anyways, you should change the pseudopotentials for Hubbard atoms because the 
ones that you use seem do not contain the atomic orbitals which are needed to 
construct Hubbard projectors of GGA+U.


HTH


Iurii


--
Dr. Iurii TIMROV
Senior Research Scientist
Theory and Simulation of Materials (THEOS)
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL)
CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
+41 21 69 34 881
http://people.epfl.ch/265334

From: users  on behalf of NAIMI SALMA 

Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2023 10:13:24 PM
To: users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
Subject: [QE-users] Why do I get the message no atomic wavefunctions in 
pseudopotential?

Dear experts,

I tried to run 'vc-relax' calculation using NC pseudopotentials on CuI for 
GGA+U, but I got the following message in the output :


Any further DFT definition will be discarded

 Please, verify this is what you really want


 %%
 Error in routine offset_atom_wfc (1):
 no atomic wavefunctions in pseudopotential file for species # 1
use a pseudopotential file with atomic wavefunctions!
 %%

 stopping ...



Dear experts, you will find attached  my input file.
How can I fix this problem please!














Salma NAIMI
PhD student - Mohamed 5 University-Rabat

___
The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian
people and expresses its concerns about the devastating
effects that the Russian military offensive has on their
country and on the free and peaceful scientific, cultural,
and economic cooperation amongst peoples
___
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users