Re: [Scilab-users] compilation with OCaml 4.06
Hello, Any news about this error ? Thanks by advance, Florian On 26/02/18 09:01, Florian Blachère wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks for this patch, but it seems not enough to build as there is > still some errors with Bytes/Strings: > > File "src/modelica_compiler/optimization.ml", line 168, characters 49-50: > Error: This expression has type bytes but an expression was expected > of type > string > > Florian > > On 22/02/18 10:41, Clément David wrote: >> Hello Florian, >> >> Please find attached a patch that fix this issue; it comes from a OCaml >> 4.0.4 change which >> distinguish String and Bytes implementations and the unsafe-string flag. >> >> Quoting the documentation [1]: >>> OCaml strings used to be modifiable in place, for instance via the >>> String.set and String.blit >>> functions described below. This usage is deprecated and only possible when >>> the compiler is put >>> in "unsafe-string" mode by giving the -unsafe-string command-line option >> [1]: https://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/libref/String.html >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> Clément >> >> Le jeudi 22 février 2018 à 09:35 +0100, Florian Blachère a écrit : >>> Hello Clément, >>> >>> Thanks for the answer, I installed num and changed the compilation line to >>> use ocamlfind but now >>> the compilation fails with : >>> >>> ocamlfind ocamlopt -package num -I ./src/modelica_compiler -I >>> ./src/xml2modelica -c >>> src/modelica_compiler/optimization.ml >>> File "src/modelica_compiler/optimization.ml", line 166, characters 21-22: >>> Error: This expression has type string but an expression was expected of >>> type >>> bytes >>> >>> Is it link to the uodate to OCaml 4.06 ? >>> >>> Florian >>> >>> On 21/02/18 11:51, Clément David wrote: >>>> Hello Florian, >>>> >>>> The easier would be to depend on the external Num library for the 6.0.x >>>> family as far as this >>>> library remains available; statically build against it is the way to go >>>> for OCaml code. Num >>>> might >>>> also be packaged in your system, use ocamlfind to look for it. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Clément >>>> >>>> Le mercredi 21 février 2018 à 08:41 +0100, Florian Blachère a écrit : >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> Scilab 6.0.0 and 6.0.1 (and the master branch) cannot be build using >>>>> OCaml 4.06 because this release remove the Num library >>>>> (https://ocaml.org/releases/4.06.html#Changes class="Apple-tab-span" >>>>> style="white-space:pre"> >>>>> , >>>>> https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/1178), do you have any advice to >>>>> build Scilab with recent OCaml: integrate Num in Scilab, build Num >>>>> oustside of Scilab and link against it, ... ? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks by advance, >>>>> >>>>> Florian >>>>> >>>>> ___ >>>>> users mailing list >>>>> users@lists.scilab.org >>>>> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>>> ___ >>>> users mailing list >>>> users@lists.scilab.org >>>> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>> ___ >>> users mailing list >>> users@lists.scilab.org >>> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> users mailing list >>> users@lists.scilab.org >>> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > > ___ > users mailing list > users@lists.scilab.org > http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ users mailing list users@lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Scilab-users] compilation with OCaml 4.06
Hello, Thanks for this patch, but it seems not enough to build as there is still some errors with Bytes/Strings: File "src/modelica_compiler/optimization.ml", line 168, characters 49-50: Error: This expression has type bytes but an expression was expected of type string Florian On 22/02/18 10:41, Clément David wrote: Hello Florian, Please find attached a patch that fix this issue; it comes from a OCaml 4.0.4 change which distinguish String and Bytes implementations and the unsafe-string flag. Quoting the documentation [1]: OCaml strings used to be modifiable in place, for instance via the String.set and String.blit functions described below. This usage is deprecated and only possible when the compiler is put in "unsafe-string" mode by giving the -unsafe-string command-line option [1]:https://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/libref/String.html Regards, -- Clément Le jeudi 22 février 2018 à 09:35 +0100, Florian Blachère a écrit : Hello Clément, Thanks for the answer, I installed num and changed the compilation line to use ocamlfind but now the compilation fails with : ocamlfind ocamlopt -package num -I ./src/modelica_compiler -I ./src/xml2modelica -c src/modelica_compiler/optimization.ml File "src/modelica_compiler/optimization.ml", line 166, characters 21-22: Error: This expression has type string but an expression was expected of type bytes Is it link to the uodate to OCaml 4.06 ? Florian On 21/02/18 11:51, Clément David wrote: Hello Florian, The easier would be to depend on the external Num library for the 6.0.x family as far as this library remains available; statically build against it is the way to go for OCaml code. Num might also be packaged in your system, use ocamlfind to look for it. Thanks, -- Clément Le mercredi 21 février 2018 à 08:41 +0100, Florian Blachère a écrit : Hello, Scilab 6.0.0 and 6.0.1 (and the master branch) cannot be build using OCaml 4.06 because this release remove the Num library (https://ocaml.org/releases/4.06.html#Changes class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> , https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/1178), do you have any advice to build Scilab with recent OCaml: integrate Num in Scilab, build Num oustside of Scilab and link against it, ... ? Thanks by advance, Florian ___ users mailing list users@lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ users mailing list users@lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ users mailing list users@lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ users mailing list users@lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ users mailing list users@lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Scilab-users] compilation with OCaml 4.06
Hello Clément, Thanks for the answer, I installed num and changed the compilation line to use ocamlfind but now the compilation fails with : ocamlfind ocamlopt -package num -I ./src/modelica_compiler -I ./src/xml2modelica -c src/modelica_compiler/optimization.ml File "src/modelica_compiler/optimization.ml", line 166, characters 21-22: Error: This expression has type string but an expression was expected of type bytes Is it link to the uodate to OCaml 4.06 ? Florian On 21/02/18 11:51, Clément David wrote: Hello Florian, The easier would be to depend on the external Num library for the 6.0.x family as far as this library remains available; statically build against it is the way to go for OCaml code. Num might also be packaged in your system, use ocamlfind to look for it. Thanks, -- Clément Le mercredi 21 février 2018 à 08:41 +0100, Florian Blachère a écrit : Hello, Scilab 6.0.0 and 6.0.1 (and the master branch) cannot be build using OCaml 4.06 because this release remove the Num library (https://ocaml.org/releases/4.06.html#Changes , https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/1178), do you have any advice to build Scilab with recent OCaml: integrate Num in Scilab, build Num oustside of Scilab and link against it, ... ? Thanks by advance, Florian ___ users mailing list users@lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ users mailing list users@lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ users mailing list users@lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Scilab-users] compilation with OCaml 4.06
Hello, Scilab 6.0.0 and 6.0.1 (and the master branch) cannot be build using OCaml 4.06 because this release remove the Num library (https://ocaml.org/releases/4.06.html#Changes, https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/1178), do you have any advice to build Scilab with recent OCaml: integrate Num in Scilab, build Num oustside of Scilab and link against it, ... ? Thanks by advance, Florian ___ users mailing list users@lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Scilab-users] Fail to run scilab-6.0.0 binary
Done, I added details to this bug report: http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15145. Thanks by advance, Florian On 03/05/17 13:40, Clément David wrote: > Hello Florian, > > Just post as "Scilab" ; this is related to startup, system config or Java > basic usage. > > Thanks, > > -- > Clément > > Le mercredi 03 mai 2017 à 13:23 +0200, Florian Blachère a écrit : >> Hello, >> >> Ok, I will report the bug with all the required information. Could you >> just give me the right section where to report the bug (java or scilab >> or anything else) ? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Florian. >> >> >> On 03/05/17 12:02, Clément David wrote: >>> Hello Florian, >>> >>> Thanks for this information ; could you please open a bug with the >>> following information ? >>> >>> - What is the GTK version on your system ? >>> - Do you have a local Java installation ? >>> - paste a trace generated using : SCIVERBOSE=1 bin/scilab >>> >>> AFAIK ArchLinux ships always up-to-date versions and we should work using >>> it. A more recent >>> OpenJDK >>> version might be needed and you could enforce your distribution specific >>> one using : >>> >>> JAVA_HOME=/path/to/jdk bin/scilab >>> >>> -- >>> Clément >>> >>> Le dimanche 30 avril 2017 à 16:58 +0200, Florian Blachère a écrit : >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> With an up to date ArchLinux box, the scilab-6.0.0 binary is failing to >>>> run with the following >>>> error message: >>>>> Cannot find this look and feel: >>>>> [GTK look and feel - com.sun.java.swing.plaf.gtk.GTKLookAndFeel] not >>>>> supported on this >>>>> platform >>>>> /opt/scilab/bin/scilab: line 957: 21013 Segmentation fault (core >>>>> dumped) "$SCILABBIN" >>>>> "$@" >>>> I tested with the nightly builds and I've got the same error message. Do >>>> I need some more >>>> dependency? >>>> >>>> If it can help, the scilab compile from source on the same machine is >>>> working fine. >>>> >>>> Thanks by advance, >>>> Florian >>>> >>>> ___ >>>> users mailing list >>>> users@lists.scilab.org >>>> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>> ___ >>> users mailing list >>> users@lists.scilab.org >>> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >> ___ >> users mailing list >> users@lists.scilab.org >> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users > ___ > users mailing list > users@lists.scilab.org > http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -- Florian BLACHÈRE Ingénieur-docteur en contrat post-doctoral https://blacheref.perso.math.cnrs.fr IMOSE - https://www.imose.fr LMV - Laboratoire de mathématiques de Versailles UMR 8100 CNRS/UVSQ UVSQ - Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines ___ users mailing list users@lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Scilab-users] Fail to run scilab-6.0.0 binary
Hello, Ok, I will report the bug with all the required information. Could you just give me the right section where to report the bug (java or scilab or anything else) ? Thanks, Florian. On 03/05/17 12:02, Clément David wrote: > Hello Florian, > > Thanks for this information ; could you please open a bug with the following > information ? > > - What is the GTK version on your system ? > - Do you have a local Java installation ? > - paste a trace generated using : SCIVERBOSE=1 bin/scilab > > AFAIK ArchLinux ships always up-to-date versions and we should work using it. > A more recent OpenJDK > version might be needed and you could enforce your distribution specific one > using : > > JAVA_HOME=/path/to/jdk bin/scilab > > -- > Clément > > Le dimanche 30 avril 2017 à 16:58 +0200, Florian Blachère a écrit : >> Hello, >> >> With an up to date ArchLinux box, the scilab-6.0.0 binary is failing to run >> with the following >> error message: >>> Cannot find this look and feel: >>> [GTK look and feel - com.sun.java.swing.plaf.gtk.GTKLookAndFeel] not >>> supported on this platform >>> /opt/scilab/bin/scilab: line 957: 21013 Segmentation fault (core >>> dumped) "$SCILABBIN" "$@" >> I tested with the nightly builds and I've got the same error message. Do I >> need some more >> dependency? >> >> If it can help, the scilab compile from source on the same machine is >> working fine. >> >> Thanks by advance, >> Florian >> >> ___ >> users mailing list >> users@lists.scilab.org >> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users > ___ > users mailing list > users@lists.scilab.org > http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users > ___ users mailing list users@lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Scilab-users] Fail to run scilab-6.0.0 binary
Hello, With an up to date ArchLinux box, the scilab-6.0.0 binary is failing to run with the following error message: > |Cannot find this look and feel: [GTK look and feel - > com.sun.java.swing.plaf.gtk.GTKLookAndFeel] not supported on this > platform /opt/scilab/bin/scilab: line 957: 21013 Segmentation fault > (core dumped) "$SCILABBIN" "$@" | I tested with the nightly builds and I've got the same error message. Do I need some more dependency? If it can help, the scilab compile from source on the same machine is working fine. Thanks by advance, Florian ___ users mailing list users@lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Scilab-users] compiling scilab
I opened a bug report : http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15107
I managed to rebase the patch by deleting the part about the .depend
file, as it is not present in the 6.0.0 archive. The builds of the
master branch and the 6.0.0 tag pass with the '-j1' option.
Many thanks for the work!
Florian
On 29/03/17 11:26, Clément David wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could you open a bug report please [1] ? To enforce CHANGES.md completeness
> for 6.0.1 we require
> that a bug should be opened for each modification. The patch is easily
> rebase-able on 6.0.0 as there
> is no ML modification, you could generate it using the `git format-patch`
> command.
>
> [1]: http://bugzilla.scilab.org
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Clément
>
> Le mercredi 29 mars 2017 à 11:07 +0200, Florian Blachère a écrit :
>> Hello,
>>
>> The patch allows the build on the master branch but the '-j1' is still
>> needed.
>>
>> Would it be possible to also create a patch for the 6.0.0 tag or release
>> a new version with this bug fixed ?
>>
>> Florian
>>
>>
>> On 27/03/17 17:47, Clément David wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On my machine, with the patch [1] I am able to build scilab. Could you open
>>> a bug to track the
>>> issue
>>> and confirm that this patch works in your distribution ?
>>>
>>> [1]: https://codereview.scilab.org/#/c/19232
>>>
>>> --
>>> Clément
>>>
>>> Le dimanche 26 mars 2017 à 21:15 +0200, Martin Marmsoler a écrit :
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> it worked for me to use the --without-modelica option for the config file
>>>> and -j1 with make.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Martin
>>>>
>>>> 2017-03-24 11:17 GMT+01:00 Florian Blachère :
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> I can confirm that with a recent Ocaml compiler (4.04.0) on Archlinux
>>>>> using the PKGBUILD
>>>>> from
>>>>> the AUR (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/scilab/) and with modelica
>>>>> activated ('--with-
>>>>> modelica') the build fails even with the '-j1' option.
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Florian
>>>>> On 24/03/17 09:53, Clément David wrote:
>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry for answering that late, I can offer more :) .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The error comes from the buggy parallel OCaml compilation of the
>>>>>> Modelica compiler. This
>>>>>> is a
>>>>>> known
>>>>>> issue and I currently failed to resolve it : you should compile with
>>>>>> `make -j1` to
>>>>>> succeed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was only able to reproduce it on system using OCaml 4 and it seems to
>>>>>> be related to a
>>>>>> wrong
>>>>>> ml/mli
>>>>>> dependency order. Could you confirm that you are using the latest OCaml
>>>>>> version ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Clément
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le jeudi 23 mars 2017 à 12:21 +0300, Nikolay Strelkov a écrit :
>>>>>>> Dear Martin!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> First of all can't understand why you are trying to compile Scilab.
>>>>>>> You can get binary version, extract and use it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> At second you can get Scilab from AUR. If you still willing to compile
>>>>>>> Scilab from
>>>>>>> sources
>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>> should install its build dependencies.
>>>>>>> I think you can start building Scilab 6.0.0 (commit
>>>>>>> 22bd3a5c93489bce74fbaf25d19fe55aefca853c).
>>>>>>> After successful build of 6.0.0 you can try newer revisions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS. Here we use "apt-get build-dep scilab",
>>>>>>> "checkinstall" and so
>>>>>>> on.
>>>>>>> So I
>>>>>>> can't offer more.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> With best regards,
>>>>&g
Re: [Scilab-users] compiling scilab
Hello,
The patch allows the build on the master branch but the '-j1' is still
needed.
Would it be possible to also create a patch for the 6.0.0 tag or release
a new version with this bug fixed ?
Florian
On 27/03/17 17:47, Clément David wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On my machine, with the patch [1] I am able to build scilab. Could you open a
> bug to track the issue
> and confirm that this patch works in your distribution ?
>
> [1]: https://codereview.scilab.org/#/c/19232
>
> --
> Clément
>
> Le dimanche 26 mars 2017 à 21:15 +0200, Martin Marmsoler a écrit :
>> Hello,
>>
>> it worked for me to use the --without-modelica option for the config file
>> and -j1 with make.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> 2017-03-24 11:17 GMT+01:00 Florian Blachère :
>>> Hello,
>>> I can confirm that with a recent Ocaml compiler (4.04.0) on Archlinux using
>>> the PKGBUILD from
>>> the AUR (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/scilab/) and with modelica
>>> activated ('--with-
>>> modelica') the build fails even with the '-j1' option.
>>> Regards,
>>> Florian
>>> On 24/03/17 09:53, Clément David wrote:
>>>> Hello all,
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for answering that late, I can offer more :) .
>>>>
>>>> The error comes from the buggy parallel OCaml compilation of the Modelica
>>>> compiler. This is a
>>>> known
>>>> issue and I currently failed to resolve it : you should compile with `make
>>>> -j1` to succeed.
>>>>
>>>> I was only able to reproduce it on system using OCaml 4 and it seems to be
>>>> related to a wrong
>>>> ml/mli
>>>> dependency order. Could you confirm that you are using the latest OCaml
>>>> version ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Clément
>>>>
>>>> Le jeudi 23 mars 2017 à 12:21 +0300, Nikolay Strelkov a écrit :
>>>>> Dear Martin!
>>>>>
>>>>> First of all can't understand why you are trying to compile Scilab.
>>>>> You can get binary version, extract and use it.
>>>>>
>>>>> At second you can get Scilab from AUR. If you still willing to compile
>>>>> Scilab from sources
>>>>> you
>>>>> should install its build dependencies.
>>>>> I think you can start building Scilab 6.0.0 (commit
>>>>> 22bd3a5c93489bce74fbaf25d19fe55aefca853c).
>>>>> After successful build of 6.0.0 you can try newer revisions.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS. Here we use "apt-get build-dep scilab",
>>>>> "checkinstall" and so on.
>>>>> So I
>>>>> can't offer more.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> With best regards,
>>>>> Ph.D., assistant professor at MPEI,
>>>>> IEEE member,
>>>>> maintainer of Mathieu functions toolbox for Scilab,
>>>>> Nikolay Strelkov.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2017-03-23 1:02 GMT+03:00 Martin Marmsoler :
>>>>>> I'm using antergos and cloned the code from scilab website.
>>>>>> GNU Make 4.2.1
>>>>>> 4.10.3-1-ARCH
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2017-03-22 22:29 GMT+01:00 Tim Wescott :
>>>>>>> On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 22:19 +0100, Martin Marmsoler wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I tried to compile scilab, but I get every the the following error:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> File "_none_", line 1:
>>>>>>>> Error: Files ./src/xml2modelica/xMLParser.cmx
>>>>>>>>and ./src/xml2modelica/linenum.cmx
>>>>>>>>make inconsistent assumptions over implementation Linenum
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's revision: 8e22c1833d5be739f39ca4008582952f2d76cfdc
>>>>>>>> Tried also revision 37f503cc29e63e42902b4de384e9f7c064b76b92
>>>>>>> I do _not_ know the answer, but someone is going to ask you for
>>>>>>> platform, operating system, and the version of the tools that you're
>>>>>>> using. Then they're going to want to know where you got your source
>>>>>>> code (unless it's obvious
Re: [Scilab-users] compiling scilab
Hello,
I can confirm that with a recent Ocaml compiler (4.04.0) on Archlinux
using the PKGBUILD from the AUR
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/scilab/) and with modelica activated
('--with-modelica') the build fails even with the '-j1' option.
Regards,
Florian
On 24/03/17 09:53, Clément David wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Sorry for answering that late, I can offer more :) .
>
> The error comes from the buggy parallel OCaml compilation of the Modelica
> compiler. This is a known
> issue and I currently failed to resolve it : you should compile with `make
> -j1` to succeed.
>
> I was only able to reproduce it on system using OCaml 4 and it seems to be
> related to a wrong ml/mli
> dependency order. Could you confirm that you are using the latest OCaml
> version ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Clément
>
> Le jeudi 23 mars 2017 à 12:21 +0300, Nikolay Strelkov a écrit :
>> Dear Martin!
>>
>> First of all can't understand why you are trying to compile Scilab.
>> You can get binary version, extract and use it.
>>
>> At second you can get Scilab from AUR. If you still willing to compile
>> Scilab from sources you
>> should install its build dependencies.
>> I think you can start building Scilab 6.0.0 (commit
>> 22bd3a5c93489bce74fbaf25d19fe55aefca853c).
>> After successful build of 6.0.0 you can try newer revisions.
>>
>> I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS. Here we use "apt-get build-dep scilab",
>> "checkinstall" and so on. So I
>> can't offer more.
>>
>> --
>> With best regards,
>> Ph.D., assistant professor at MPEI,
>> IEEE member,
>> maintainer of Mathieu functions toolbox for Scilab,
>> Nikolay Strelkov.
>>
>> 2017-03-23 1:02 GMT+03:00 Martin Marmsoler :
>>> I'm using antergos and cloned the code from scilab website.
>>> GNU Make 4.2.1
>>> 4.10.3-1-ARCH
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-03-22 22:29 GMT+01:00 Tim Wescott :
On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 22:19 +0100, Martin Marmsoler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried to compile scilab, but I get every the the following error:
>
> File "_none_", line 1:
> Error: Files ./src/xml2modelica/xMLParser.cmx
>and ./src/xml2modelica/linenum.cmx
>make inconsistent assumptions over implementation Linenum
>
> It's revision: 8e22c1833d5be739f39ca4008582952f2d76cfdc
> Tried also revision 37f503cc29e63e42902b4de384e9f7c064b76b92
I do _not_ know the answer, but someone is going to ask you for
platform, operating system, and the version of the tools that you're
using. Then they're going to want to know where you got your source
code (unless it's obvious from the revision numbers).
Sorry I can't offer more...
--
Tim Wescott
www.wescottdesign.com
Control & Communications systems, circuit & software design.
Phone: 503.631.7815
Cell: 503.349.8432
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>> ___
>>> users mailing list
>>> users@lists.scilab.org
>>> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>> ___
>> users mailing list
>> users@lists.scilab.org
>> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.scilab.org
> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
