Re: [Scilab-users] ”Too complex recursion”
Hello Samuel GOUGEON, Thaks a lot. I could fix the problem. Best regards. -- View this message in context: http://mailinglists.scilab.org/Too-complex-recursion-tp4032303p4032309.html Sent from the Scilab users - Mailing Lists Archives mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ users mailing list users@lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Scilab-users] ”Too complex recursion”
Hello, - Mail original - .../... plCtrlEX1=intg(xmin_V,xTrig_V-%eps,list('payoffDenFunc',payD_V,fxValDate,fxTriger,fxFixed,mu,vol)); In the list, you may try specifying directly by its name the function to be integrated, rather than through a string giving its name: plCtrlEX1=intg(xmin_V,xTrig_V-%eps,list(payoffDenFunc,payD_V,fxValDate,fxTriger,fxFixed,mu,vol)); May be the documentation is not clear enough about this point. Regards ___ users mailing list users@lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Scilab-users] ”Too complex recursion”
Hello,Serge Steer My user function does't call 'intg'. The following is a sample code for a demo. But I have another error message. clear function rt=payoffFunc(fxSpot,fxTriger,fxFixed) if fxSpot<=10 then fxSpot=10 end rt=(fxFixed -fxSpot) if fxSpot <= fxTriger then rt=(fxSpot -(fxTriger^2)/fxSpot)*3 end endfunction function rt=payoffDenFunc(x,t,fxValDate,fxTriger,fxFixed,mu,vol) f1=fxValDate*%e^x; pl=payoffFunc(f1,fxTriger,fxFixed); vrt=t^0.5*vol; z=(x-mu)/vrt; dens=1/(sqrt(2*%pi))*%e^(-0.5*z^2)/vrt; rt=pl*dens; endfunction vol=0.09 fxTriger=95 fxFixed=150 fxValDate=100 payD_V=0.0602739726027397 discY_V=0.999747607575612 discD_V=0.996743237517026 mu=log(discD_V/discY_V)/payD_V; xTrig_V=log(fxTriger./fxValDate) xmin_V=(mu-0.5*vol^2)*payD_V-4*vol*sqrt(payD_V) if xmin_V>xTrig_V then xmin_V=xTrig_V-%eps end plCtrlEX1=intg(xmin_V,xTrig_V-%eps,list('payoffDenFunc',payD_V,fxValDate,fxTriger,fxFixed,mu,vol)); -- View this message in context: http://mailinglists.scilab.org/Too-complex-recursion-tp4032303p4032306.html Sent from the Scilab users - Mailing Lists Archives mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ users mailing list users@lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Scilab-users] ”Too complex recursion”
Le 19/05/2015 03:27, fujimoto2005 a écrit : > When I use the function 'intg', I have an message "Too complex recursion! > (recursion tables are full)" and the code stop to run. > But the user-function for the ‘intg’ calls only two user functions with same > level in it. > How can I fix this problem? > I already maximized the stack seize by stacksize('max'). The "Too complex recursion!" message has nothing to do with the stack size. It is often due to a function which calls itself (directly or indirectly) too deeply. Does your user function calls 'intg'? Serge Steer > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://mailinglists.scilab.org/Too-complex-recursion-tp4032303.html > Sent from the Scilab users - Mailing Lists Archives mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > ___ > users mailing list > users@lists.scilab.org > http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ users mailing list users@lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Scilab-users] ”Too complex recursion”
When I use the function 'intg', I have an message "Too complex recursion! (recursion tables are full)" and the code stop to run. But the user-function for the ‘intg’ calls only two user functions with same level in it. How can I fix this problem? I already maximized the stack seize by stacksize('max'). -- View this message in context: http://mailinglists.scilab.org/Too-complex-recursion-tp4032303.html Sent from the Scilab users - Mailing Lists Archives mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ users mailing list users@lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users