Re: [strongSwan] Performance of libipsec in strongswan ( kernel-vpp plugin )

2021-01-21 Thread Noel Kuntze 

Hello Venu,

I am not aware of anything in that regard. It should be adressable though.
Tobias has actual insight to any internal roadmap (I do not).

Kind regards

Noel

Am 21.01.21 um 06:50 schrieb Venumadhav Josyula:

Hi Noel,

Thanks for the quick response. Is there something in the roadmap to address 
this case ?

Thanks,
Regards,
Venu

On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 10:37, Noel Kuntze 
 wrote:

Hello Venu,

That is still the case.

Kind regards

Noel

Am 21.01.21 um 05:52 schrieb Venumadhav Josyula:
 > Hi Tobias,
 >
 > In 'Issue #964', you mentioned it was not intended for high volume 
traffic. Is this still the case in lastest strongswan too. Meaning we have vpp 
based stack, where we want to use kernel-vpp plugin for the same. In other words, 
I want to know if it can be used in security gateways.
 >
 > Any pointers would be appreciated.
 >
 > Thanks,
 > Regards,
 > Venu





OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [strongSwan] Performance of libipsec in strongswan ( kernel-vpp plugin )

2021-01-21 Thread Noel Kuntze 

Hello Venu,

That is still the case.

Kind regards

Noel

Am 21.01.21 um 05:52 schrieb Venumadhav Josyula:

Hi Tobias,

In 'Issue #964', you mentioned it was not intended for high volume traffic. Is 
this still the case in lastest strongswan too. Meaning we have vpp based stack, 
where we want to use kernel-vpp plugin for the same. In other words, I want to 
know if it can be used in security gateways.

Any pointers would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Regards,
Venu




OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [strongSwan] Performance of libipsec in strongswan ( kernel-vpp plugin )

2021-01-20 Thread Venumadhav Josyula 
Hi Noel,

Thanks for the quick response. Is there something in the roadmap to address
this case ?

Thanks,
Regards,
Venu

On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 10:37, Noel Kuntze
 wrote:

> Hello Venu,
>
> That is still the case.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Noel
>
> Am 21.01.21 um 05:52 schrieb Venumadhav Josyula:
> > Hi Tobias,
> >
> > In 'Issue #964', you mentioned it was not intended for high volume
> traffic. Is this still the case in lastest strongswan too. Meaning we have
> vpp based stack, where we want to use kernel-vpp plugin for the same. In
> other words, I want to know if it can be used in security gateways.
> >
> > Any pointers would be appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Regards,
> > Venu
>
>

[strongSwan] Performance of libipsec in strongswan ( kernel-vpp plugin )

2021-01-20 Thread Venumadhav Josyula 
Hi Tobias,

In 'Issue #964', you mentioned it was not intended for high volume traffic.
Is this still the case in lastest strongswan too. Meaning we have vpp based
stack, where we want to use kernel-vpp plugin for the same. In other words,
I want to know if it can be used in security gateways.

Any pointers would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Regards,
Venu