Re: [strongSwan] need to allow ssl restriction

2012-03-30 Thread Shukla, Sanjay
Hi Andreas,

My requirement is to pass traffic on a certain port, how can I specify the port 
numbers in connection configuration

Regards,
-sanjay


-
Please consider the environment before printing this email.

-Original Message-
From: Andreas Steffen [mailto:andreas.stef...@strongswan.org]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 2:27 PM
To: Shukla, Sanjay
Cc: users@lists.strongswan.org
Subject: Re: [strongSwan] need to allow ssl restriction

Hello Sanjay,

you can define a pass shunt policy for TCP port 443.
Just have a look at our example scenario:

 www.strongswan.org/uml/testresults/ikev2/shunt-policies/

Regards

Andreas

On 26.03.2012 20:12, Shukla, Sanjay wrote:
 I am using 4.6.2 charon with IKEv2. What approaches are suggested to
 allow TLS / 443 traffic restriction so that they are not subject to IPSec.



 Regards,

 -sanjay

==
Andreas Steffen andreas.stef...@strongswan.org
strongSwan - the Linux VPN Solution!www.strongswan.org
Institute for Internet Technologies and Applications
University of Applied Sciences Rapperswil
CH-8640 Rapperswil (Switzerland)
===[ITA-HSR]==


DISCLAIMER: This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, 
privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended 
recipient of this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it by any means. 
Please delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have 
received it in error. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action 
on the basis of information in this e-mail.E-mail messages may contain computer 
viruses or other defects, may not be accurately replicated on other systems, or 
may be intercepted, deleted or interfered with without the knowledge of the 
sender or the intended recipient. If you are not comfortable with the risks 
associated with e-mail messages, you may decide not to use e-mail to 
communicate with IPC. IPC reserves the right, to the extent and under 
circumstances permitted by applicable law, to retain, monitor and intercept 
e-mail messages to and from its systems.

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.strongswan.org
https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [strongSwan] need to allow ssl restriction

2012-03-30 Thread Andreas Steffen
Hi Sanjay,

you can define only a single port per passthrough connection, e.g.

conn p1
 also=pass
 leftprotoport=tcp/0
 rightprotoport=tcp/https
 auto=route

conn p2
 also=pass
 leftprotoport=tcp/0
 rightprotoport=tcp/imaps
 auto=route



conn pass
 type=pass
 authby=never
 leftsubnet=..
 rightsubnet=..

Regards

Andreas

On 03/30/2012 02:57 PM, Shukla, Sanjay wrote:
 Hi Andreas,
 
 My requirement is to pass traffic on a certain port, how can I
 specify the port numbers in connection configuration
 
 Regards, -sanjay
 
 
 - Please consider
 the environment before printing this email.
 
 -Original Message- From: Andreas Steffen
 [mailto:andreas.stef...@strongswan.org] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012
 2:27 PM To: Shukla, Sanjay Cc: users@lists.strongswan.org Subject:
 Re: [strongSwan] need to allow ssl restriction
 
 Hello Sanjay,
 
 you can define a pass shunt policy for TCP port 443. Just have a look
 at our example scenario:
 
 www.strongswan.org/uml/testresults/ikev2/shunt-policies/
 
 Regards
 
 Andreas
 
 On 26.03.2012 20:12, Shukla, Sanjay wrote:
 I am using 4.6.2 charon with IKEv2. What approaches are suggested
 to allow TLS / 443 traffic restriction so that they are not subject
 to IPSec.
 
 
 
 Regards,
 
 -sanjay
 
 ==

 
Andreas Steffen andreas.stef...@strongswan.org
 strongSwan - the Linux VPN Solution!
 www.strongswan.org Institute for Internet Technologies and
 Applications University of Applied Sciences Rapperswil CH-8640
 Rapperswil (Switzerland) 
 ===[ITA-HSR]==

 
 
 DISCLAIMER: This e-mail may contain information that is confidential,
 privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an
 intended recipient of this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute
 it by any means. Please delete it and any attachments and notify the
 sender that you have received it in error. Unintended recipients are
 prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this
 e-mail.E-mail messages may contain computer viruses or other defects,
 may not be accurately replicated on other systems, or may be
 intercepted, deleted or interfered with without the knowledge of the
 sender or the intended recipient. If you are not comfortable with the
 risks associated with e-mail messages, you may decide not to use
 e-mail to communicate with IPC. IPC reserves the right, to the extent
 and under circumstances permitted by applicable law, to retain,
 monitor and intercept e-mail messages to and from its systems.


-- 
==
Andreas Steffen andreas.stef...@strongswan.org
strongSwan - the Linux VPN Solution!www.strongswan.org
Institute for Internet Technologies and Applications
University of Applied Sciences Rapperswil
CH-8640 Rapperswil (Switzerland)
===[ITA-HSR]==

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.strongswan.org
https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[strongSwan] need to allow ssl restriction

2012-03-26 Thread Shukla, Sanjay
I am using 4.6.2 charon with IKEv2. What approaches are suggested to allow TLS 
/ 443 traffic restriction so that they are not subject to IPSec.

Regards,
-sanjay





[cid:tree43f6.png]Please consider the environment before printing this email.



DISCLAIMER: This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, 
privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended 
recipient of this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it by any means. 
Please delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have 
received it in error. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action 
on the basis of information in this e-mail.E-mail messages may contain computer 
viruses or other defects, may not be accurately replicated on other systems, or 
may be intercepted, deleted or interfered with without the knowledge of the 
sender or the intended recipient. If you are not comfortable with the risks 
associated with e-mail messages, you may decide not to use e-mail to 
communicate with IPC. IPC reserves the right, to the extent and under 
circumstances permitted by applicable law, to retain, monitor and intercept 
e-mail messages to and from its systems.
attachment: tree43f6.png___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.strongswan.org
https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [strongSwan] need to allow ssl restriction

2012-03-26 Thread Andreas Steffen
Hello Sanjay,

you can define a pass shunt policy for TCP port 443.
Just have a look at our example scenario:

 www.strongswan.org/uml/testresults/ikev2/shunt-policies/

Regards

Andreas

On 26.03.2012 20:12, Shukla, Sanjay wrote:
 I am using 4.6.2 charon with IKEv2. What approaches are suggested to
 allow TLS / 443 traffic restriction so that they are not subject to IPSec.
 
  
 
 Regards,
 
 -sanjay

==
Andreas Steffen andreas.stef...@strongswan.org
strongSwan - the Linux VPN Solution!www.strongswan.org
Institute for Internet Technologies and Applications
University of Applied Sciences Rapperswil
CH-8640 Rapperswil (Switzerland)
===[ITA-HSR]==



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.strongswan.org
https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users