Re: [strongSwan] revisiting problem with linux to VPN using network-manager-strongswan 1.4.5-2.1

2021-07-29 Thread Noel Kuntze

Hello David,

Yes, that shows that it is working.

Kind regards
Noel

Am 28.07.21 um 22:31 schrieb David H Durgee:

I did a bit more checking and found references to "ip xfrm policy list" and "ip xfrm 
state list" as possible sources of the confirmation of operation I am seeking.  I ran these 
commands with the VPN up and have attached the output of these commands.

I am not trained in reading these reports, but what I see does appear to 
indicate that the VPN is indeed functioning and handling the traffic as 
requested.  If someone who is trained could confirm this for me I would 
appreciate it.

Dave


Noel Kuntze wrote:  Hello David,

strongSwan by default builds policy based tunnels, not route based tunnels.
Thus no interface is needed or created.
Read up on how IPsec works on the wiki to get an understanding for it.

GUI indicators are not inherently related to if any tunnel exists, or works.

Kind regards
Noel

Am 01.07.21 um 20:31 schrieb David H Durgee:

I thought it might make sense to revisit this after the progress that has been 
made. It now appears that the connection is being established:


Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] authentication of 
'durgeeenterprises.publicvm.com' with EAP successful
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] IKE_SA Durgee Enterprises, LLC[7] 
established between 
192.168.1.114[dhdurgee]...108.31.28.59[durgeeenterprises.publicvm.com]
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] scheduling rekeying in 35705s
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] maximum IKE_SA lifetime 36305s
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] installing new virtual IP 10.10.10.1
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 avahi-daemon[750]: Registering new address record for 
10.10.10.1 on wlp5s0.IPv4.
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[CFG] selected proposal: 
ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/NO_EXT_SEQ
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] CHILD_SA Durgee Enterprises, LLC{4} 
established with SPIs c8cad4e5_i c3f2eec4_o and TS 10.10.10.1/32 === 0.0.0.0/0
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] peer supports MOBIKE
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.6991] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC",0]: VPN connection: (IP Config Get) reply received.
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.6997] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC",0]: VPN plugin: state changed: started (4)
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.6997] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC",0]: VPN connection: (IP4 Config Get) reply received
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7003] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC",0]: Data: VPN Gateway: 108.31.28.59
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7003] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC",0]: Data: Tunnel Device: (null)
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7003] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC",0]: Data: IPv4 configuration:
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7003] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC",0]: Data:   Internal Address: 10.10.10.1
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC",0]: Data:   Internal Prefix: 32
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC",0]: Data:   Internal Point-to-Point Address: 10.10.10.1
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC",0]: Data:   Internal DNS: 8.8.8.8
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC",0]: Data:   Internal DNS: 8.8.4.4
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC",0]: Data:   DNS Domain: '(none)'
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC",0]: Data: No IPv6 configuration
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7013] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC",0]: VPN connection: (IP Config Get) complete


Unfortunately I am not seeing a tunnel interface being created and routing 
added:


enp6s0: flags=4163  mtu 1500
    ether b8:70:f4:2c:6b:9f  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
    RX packets 1143393  bytes 1164336056 (

Re: [strongSwan] revisiting problem with linux to VPN using network-manager-strongswan 1.4.5-2.1

2021-07-28 Thread David H Durgee
I did a bit more checking and found references to "ip xfrm policy list" 
and "ip xfrm state list" as possible sources of the confirmation of 
operation I am seeking.  I ran these commands with the VPN up and have 
attached the output of these commands.


I am not trained in reading these reports, but what I see does appear to 
indicate that the VPN is indeed functioning and handling the traffic as 
requested.  If someone who is trained could confirm this for me I would 
appreciate it.


Dave


Noel Kuntze wrote:  Hello David,

strongSwan by default builds policy based tunnels, not route based 
tunnels.

Thus no interface is needed or created.
Read up on how IPsec works on the wiki to get an understanding for it.

GUI indicators are not inherently related to if any tunnel exists, or 
works.


Kind regards
Noel

Am 01.07.21 um 20:31 schrieb David H Durgee:
I thought it might make sense to revisit this after the progress that 
has been made. It now appears that the connection is being established:


Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] authentication of 
'durgeeenterprises.publicvm.com' with EAP successful
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] IKE_SA Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC[7] established between 
192.168.1.114[dhdurgee]...108.31.28.59[durgeeenterprises.publicvm.com]

Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] scheduling rekeying in 35705s
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] maximum IKE_SA lifetime 36305s
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] installing new virtual IP 
10.10.10.1
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 avahi-daemon[750]: Registering new address 
record for 10.10.10.1 on wlp5s0.IPv4.
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[CFG] selected proposal: 
ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/NO_EXT_SEQ
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] CHILD_SA Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC{4} established with SPIs c8cad4e5_i c3f2eec4_o and TS 
10.10.10.1/32 === 0.0.0.0/0

Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] peer supports MOBIKE
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.6991] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: VPN connection: (IP Config Get) reply received.
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.6997] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: VPN plugin: state changed: started (4)
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.6997] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: VPN connection: (IP4 Config Get) reply received
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7003] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data: VPN Gateway: 108.31.28.59
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7003] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data: Tunnel Device: (null)
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7003] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data: IPv4 configuration:
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7003] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data:   Internal Address: 10.10.10.1
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data:   Internal Prefix: 32
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data:   Internal Point-to-Point Address: 
10.10.10.1
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data:   Internal DNS: 8.8.8.8
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data:   Internal DNS: 8.8.4.4
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data:   DNS Domain: '(none)'
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data: No IPv6 configuration
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7013] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: VPN connection: (IP Config Get) complete


Unfortunately I am not seeing a tunnel interface being created and 
routing added:



enp6s0: flags=4163  mtu 1500
    ether b8:70:f4:2c:6b:9f  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
    RX packets 1143393  bytes 1164336056 (1.1 GB)
    RX errors 0  dropped 20  overruns 0  frame 0
    TX packets 912738  bytes 112966285 (

Re: [strongSwan] revisiting problem with linux to VPN using network-manager-strongswan 1.4.5-2.1

2021-07-12 Thread David H Durgee
I have done a little more looking around and would like to know if what 
I am seeing from nmcli confirms proper operation of my strongswan VPN.  
Here is what I see with wifi up but not the VPN:



wlp5s0: connected to Auto Free WiFi by Karma
    "Broadcom and subsidiaries BCM4313"
    wifi (wl), AC:81:12:A4:5E:43, hw, mtu 1500
    ip4 default
    inet4 192.168.1.114/24
    route4 0.0.0.0/0
    route4 192.168.1.0/24
    route4 169.254.0.0/16
    route4 192.168.1.0/24
    inet6 fe80::562f:7604:6d84:57ca/64
    route6 fe80::/64

enp6s0: disconnected
    "Realtek RTL810xE"
    1 connection available
    ethernet (r8169), B8:70:F4:2C:6B:9F, autoconnect, hw, mtu 1500

lo: unmanaged
    "lo"
    loopback (unknown), 00:00:00:00:00:00, sw, mtu 65536

DNS configuration:
    servers: 192.168.1.1
    interface: wlp5s0


When I enable the VPN this changes to show:


Durgee Enterprises, LLC VPN connection
    master wlp5s0, VPN
    inet4 10.10.10.1/32

wlp5s0: connected to Auto Free WiFi by Karma
    "Broadcom and subsidiaries BCM4313"
    wifi (wl), AC:81:12:A4:5E:43, hw, mtu 1500
    ip4 default
    inet4 192.168.1.114/24
    inet4 10.10.10.1/32
    route4 0.0.0.0/0
    route4 192.168.1.0/24
    route4 169.254.0.0/16
    route4 192.168.1.0/24
    route4 0.0.0.0/0
    inet6 fe80::562f:7604:6d84:57ca/64
    route6 fe80::/64

enp6s0: disconnected
    "Realtek RTL810xE"
    1 connection available
    ethernet (r8169), B8:70:F4:2C:6B:9F, autoconnect, hw, mtu 1500

lo: unmanaged
    "lo"
    loopback (unknown), 00:00:00:00:00:00, sw, mtu 65536

DNS configuration:
    servers: 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4
    interface: wlp5s0
    type: vpn

    servers: 192.168.1.1
    interface: wlp5s0


Does this confirm proper operation of the VPN?  If not, what other 
command will confirm it for me?


Assuming this does indeed indicate proper operation of the VPN I will 
contact support for the applet that fails to indicate the VPN in proper 
operation for them to correct their display.


Dave


Noel Kuntze wrote:  Hello David,

strongSwan by default builds policy based tunnels, not route based 
tunnels.

Thus no interface is needed or created.
Read up on how IPsec works on the wiki to get an understanding for it.

GUI indicators are not inherently related to if any tunnel exists, or 
works.


Kind regards
Noel

Am 01.07.21 um 20:31 schrieb David H Durgee:
I thought it might make sense to revisit this after the progress that 
has been made. It now appears that the connection is being established:


Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] authentication of 
'durgeeenterprises.publicvm.com' with EAP successful
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] IKE_SA Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC[7] established between 
192.168.1.114[dhdurgee]...108.31.28.59[durgeeenterprises.publicvm.com]

Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] scheduling rekeying in 35705s
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] maximum IKE_SA lifetime 36305s
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] installing new virtual IP 
10.10.10.1
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 avahi-daemon[750]: Registering new address 
record for 10.10.10.1 on wlp5s0.IPv4.
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[CFG] selected proposal: 
ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/NO_EXT_SEQ
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] CHILD_SA Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC{4} established with SPIs c8cad4e5_i c3f2eec4_o and TS 
10.10.10.1/32 === 0.0.0.0/0

Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] peer supports MOBIKE
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.6991] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: VPN connection: (IP Config Get) reply received.
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.6997] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: VPN plugin: state changed: started (4)
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.6997] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: VPN connection: (IP4 Config Get) reply received
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7003] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data: VPN Gateway: 108.31.28.59
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7003] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data: Tunnel Device: (null)
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7003] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data: IPv4 configuration:
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7003] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data:   Internal Address: 10.10.10.1
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data:   Internal Prefix: 32
Jun 29 11:2

Re: [strongSwan] revisiting problem with linux to VPN using network-manager-strongswan 1.4.5-2.1

2021-07-06 Thread David H Durgee
I am replying to my own post as I just noticed in the extract from 
syslog that the VPN does NOT appear to be working properly, as I just 
noticed that the VPN is be deactivated a few seconds after being 
established for some unknown reason.


Is this extract sufficient for someone to tell me how to fix this?  If 
not, what additional information do you need, either from the laptop or 
the server?  I believe I have posted configuration files from both sides 
in this thread, but let me know if you need more information.


Dave

David H Durgee wrote:  I brought up the VPN over a WiFi connection 
this morning for a few minutes in hopes of confirming it is operating 
correctly and securing the internet traffic.  Here are results in the 
terminal window:



dhdurgee@z560:~/Downloads$ ip rule
0:    from all lookup local
220:    from all lookup 220
32766:    from all lookup main
32767:    from all lookup default
dhdurgee@z560:~/Downloads$ ip route
default via 192.168.1.1 dev wlp5s0 proto dhcp metric 600
169.254.0.0/16 dev wlp5s0 scope link metric 1000
192.168.1.0/24 dev wlp5s0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.114 
metric 600

dhdurgee@z560:~/Downloads$ ifconfig
enp6s0: flags=4163  mtu 1500
    ether b8:70:f4:2c:6b:9f  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
    RX packets 6620471  bytes 6659611738 (6.6 GB)
    RX errors 0  dropped 113  overruns 0  frame 0
    TX packets 5400612  bytes 627288507 (627.2 MB)
    TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

lo: flags=73  mtu 65536
    inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0
    inet6 ::1  prefixlen 128  scopeid 0x10
    loop  txqueuelen 1000  (Local Loopback)
    RX packets 607593  bytes 59022846 (59.0 MB)
    RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
    TX packets 607593  bytes 59022846 (59.0 MB)
    TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

wlp5s0: flags=4163  mtu 1500
    inet 192.168.1.114  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 
192.168.1.255
    inet6 fe80::562f:7604:6d84:57ca  prefixlen 64  scopeid 
0x20

    ether ac:81:12:a4:5e:43  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
    RX packets 6987  bytes 5181997 (5.1 MB)
    RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 77207
    TX packets 7967  bytes 1225749 (1.2 MB)
    TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
    device interrupt 17

dhdurgee@z560:~/Downloads$ route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref    
Use Iface
default _gateway    0.0.0.0 UG    600 0    0 
wlp5s0
link-local  0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1000 0    0 
wlp5s0
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 600 0    0 
wlp5s0

dhdurgee@z560:~/Downloads$


Here is an extract from my syslog:

Jul  6 11:50:46 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:   [1625586646.5967] 
manager: rfkill: Wi-Fi hardware radio set enabled
Jul  6 11:50:46 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1625586646.5985] 
audit: op="radio-control" arg="wireless-enabled" pid=83 uid=1000 
result="success"

Jul  6 11:50:46 Z560 charon-nm: 11[KNL] interface wlp5s0 activated
Jul  6 11:50:46 Z560 systemd[1]: Starting Load/Save RF Kill Switch 
Status...
Jul  6 11:50:46 Z560 systemd[1]: Started Load/Save RF Kill Switch 
Status.
Jul  6 11:50:46 Z560 wpa_supplicant[818]: dbus: 
fill_dict_with_properties 
dbus_interface=fi.w1.wpa_supplicant1.Interface.P2PDevice 
dbus_property=P2PDeviceConfig getter failed
Jul  6 11:50:46 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1625586646.6794] 
sup-iface[0x562fdb83d4e0,wlp5s0]: supports 1 scan SSIDs
Jul  6 11:50:46 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1625586646.6808] 
device (wlp5s0): supplicant interface state: starting -> ready
Jul  6 11:50:46 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1625586646.6813] 
device (wlp5s0): state change: unavailable -> disconnected (reason 
'supplicant-available', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
Jul  6 11:50:46 Z560 wpa_supplicant[818]: wlp5s0: 
CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-FAILED ret=-22

Jul  6 11:50:46 Z560 kernel: [706888.708759] ERROR @wl_cfg80211_scan :
Jul  6 11:50:46 Z560 kernel: [706888.708762] WLC_SCAN error (-22)
Jul  6 11:50:48 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1625586648.4559] 
manager: rfkill: Wi-Fi now enabled by radio killswitch
Jul  6 11:50:49 Z560 systemd[1]: NetworkManager-dispatcher.service: 
Succeeded.
Jul  6 11:50:50 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1625586650.2774] 
policy: auto-activating connection 'Auto Free WiFi by Karma' 
(3ccc719b-3616-44f7-a914-8c7d0344c87a)
Jul  6 11:50:50 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1625586650.2819] 
device (wlp5s0): Activation: starting connection 'Auto Free WiFi by 
Karma' (3ccc719b-3616-44f7-a914-8c7d0344c87a)
Jul  6 11:50:50 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1625586650.2834] 
device (wlp5s0): state change: disconnected -> prepare (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
Jul  6 11:50:50 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1625586650.2891] 
manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTING
Jul  6 11:50:50 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1625586650.2955] 
device (wlp5s0): sta

Re: [strongSwan] revisiting problem with linux to VPN using network-manager-strongswan 1.4.5-2.1

2021-07-06 Thread David H Durgee
I brought up the VPN over a WiFi connection this morning for a few 
minutes in hopes of confirming it is operating correctly and securing 
the internet traffic.  Here are results in the terminal window:



dhdurgee@z560:~/Downloads$ ip rule
0:    from all lookup local
220:    from all lookup 220
32766:    from all lookup main
32767:    from all lookup default
dhdurgee@z560:~/Downloads$ ip route
default via 192.168.1.1 dev wlp5s0 proto dhcp metric 600
169.254.0.0/16 dev wlp5s0 scope link metric 1000
192.168.1.0/24 dev wlp5s0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.114 
metric 600

dhdurgee@z560:~/Downloads$ ifconfig
enp6s0: flags=4163  mtu 1500
    ether b8:70:f4:2c:6b:9f  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
    RX packets 6620471  bytes 6659611738 (6.6 GB)
    RX errors 0  dropped 113  overruns 0  frame 0
    TX packets 5400612  bytes 627288507 (627.2 MB)
    TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

lo: flags=73  mtu 65536
    inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0
    inet6 ::1  prefixlen 128  scopeid 0x10
    loop  txqueuelen 1000  (Local Loopback)
    RX packets 607593  bytes 59022846 (59.0 MB)
    RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
    TX packets 607593  bytes 59022846 (59.0 MB)
    TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

wlp5s0: flags=4163  mtu 1500
    inet 192.168.1.114  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.1.255
    inet6 fe80::562f:7604:6d84:57ca  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20
    ether ac:81:12:a4:5e:43  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
    RX packets 6987  bytes 5181997 (5.1 MB)
    RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 77207
    TX packets 7967  bytes 1225749 (1.2 MB)
    TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
    device interrupt 17

dhdurgee@z560:~/Downloads$ route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref    
Use Iface
default _gateway    0.0.0.0 UG    600 0    0 
wlp5s0
link-local  0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1000 0    0 
wlp5s0
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 600 0    0 
wlp5s0

dhdurgee@z560:~/Downloads$


Here is an extract from my syslog:

Jul  6 11:50:46 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:   [1625586646.5967] 
manager: rfkill: Wi-Fi hardware radio set enabled
Jul  6 11:50:46 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1625586646.5985] 
audit: op="radio-control" arg="wireless-enabled" pid=83 uid=1000 
result="success"

Jul  6 11:50:46 Z560 charon-nm: 11[KNL] interface wlp5s0 activated
Jul  6 11:50:46 Z560 systemd[1]: Starting Load/Save RF Kill Switch 
Status...

Jul  6 11:50:46 Z560 systemd[1]: Started Load/Save RF Kill Switch Status.
Jul  6 11:50:46 Z560 wpa_supplicant[818]: dbus: 
fill_dict_with_properties 
dbus_interface=fi.w1.wpa_supplicant1.Interface.P2PDevice 
dbus_property=P2PDeviceConfig getter failed
Jul  6 11:50:46 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1625586646.6794] 
sup-iface[0x562fdb83d4e0,wlp5s0]: supports 1 scan SSIDs
Jul  6 11:50:46 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1625586646.6808] 
device (wlp5s0): supplicant interface state: starting -> ready
Jul  6 11:50:46 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1625586646.6813] 
device (wlp5s0): state change: unavailable -> disconnected (reason 
'supplicant-available', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
Jul  6 11:50:46 Z560 wpa_supplicant[818]: wlp5s0: 
CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-FAILED ret=-22

Jul  6 11:50:46 Z560 kernel: [706888.708759] ERROR @wl_cfg80211_scan :
Jul  6 11:50:46 Z560 kernel: [706888.708762] WLC_SCAN error (-22)
Jul  6 11:50:48 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1625586648.4559] 
manager: rfkill: Wi-Fi now enabled by radio killswitch
Jul  6 11:50:49 Z560 systemd[1]: NetworkManager-dispatcher.service: 
Succeeded.
Jul  6 11:50:50 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1625586650.2774] 
policy: auto-activating connection 'Auto Free WiFi by Karma' 
(3ccc719b-3616-44f7-a914-8c7d0344c87a)
Jul  6 11:50:50 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1625586650.2819] 
device (wlp5s0): Activation: starting connection 'Auto Free WiFi by 
Karma' (3ccc719b-3616-44f7-a914-8c7d0344c87a)
Jul  6 11:50:50 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1625586650.2834] 
device (wlp5s0): state change: disconnected -> prepare (reason 'none', 
sys-iface-state: 'managed')
Jul  6 11:50:50 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1625586650.2891] 
manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTING
Jul  6 11:50:50 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1625586650.2955] 
device (wlp5s0): state change: prepare -> config (reason 'none', 
sys-iface-state: 'managed')
Jul  6 11:50:50 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1625586650.2994] 
device (wlp5s0): Activation: (wifi) connection 'Auto Free WiFi by 
Karma' requires no security.  No secrets needed.
Jul  6 11:50:50 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1625586650.2997] 
Config: added 'ssid' value 'Free WiFi by Karma'
Jul  6 11:50:50 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1625586650.2998] 
Config: added 'scan_ssid' value '1'
Jul  6 11:50:50 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1625586650.2999] 
Config: added 'bgscan' value 'simple:3

Re: [strongSwan] revisiting problem with linux to VPN using network-manager-strongswan 1.4.5-2.1

2021-07-02 Thread David H Durgee
So strongSwan works differently than the vpn I was using previously.  
Fine.  I see in the log messages that appear to indicate that the tunnel 
was successfully established.  How can I confirm that the configuration 
is working to secure all internet traffic via the WiFi connection?


I assume that there are some commands that I could issue in a linux 
terminal window whose output would assure me of this.  In the case of 
the previous vpn it created a tun interface and routed traffic to that 
interface, which could be confirmed with the ifconfig and route commands.


What commands would show me confirmation that my internet traffic is 
being properly encrypted?


I do not at present have the full strongSwan package installed on the 
laptop, only the packages that work with NetworkManager.  I can install 
additional packages if necessary, but would need to be sure that doing 
so would not undo work already done to reach the current point of 
successful connection.


Dave


Noel Kuntze wrote:  Hello David,

strongSwan by default builds policy based tunnels, not route based 
tunnels.

Thus no interface is needed or created.
Read up on how IPsec works on the wiki to get an understanding for it.

GUI indicators are not inherently related to if any tunnel exists, or 
works.


Kind regards
Noel

Am 01.07.21 um 20:31 schrieb David H Durgee:
I thought it might make sense to revisit this after the progress that 
has been made. It now appears that the connection is being established:


Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] authentication of 
'durgeeenterprises.publicvm.com' with EAP successful
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] IKE_SA Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC[7] established between 
192.168.1.114[dhdurgee]...108.31.28.59[durgeeenterprises.publicvm.com]

Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] scheduling rekeying in 35705s
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] maximum IKE_SA lifetime 36305s
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] installing new virtual IP 
10.10.10.1
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 avahi-daemon[750]: Registering new address 
record for 10.10.10.1 on wlp5s0.IPv4.
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[CFG] selected proposal: 
ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/NO_EXT_SEQ
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] CHILD_SA Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC{4} established with SPIs c8cad4e5_i c3f2eec4_o and TS 
10.10.10.1/32 === 0.0.0.0/0

Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] peer supports MOBIKE
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.6991] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: VPN connection: (IP Config Get) reply received.
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.6997] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: VPN plugin: state changed: started (4)
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.6997] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: VPN connection: (IP4 Config Get) reply received
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7003] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data: VPN Gateway: 108.31.28.59
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7003] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data: Tunnel Device: (null)
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7003] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data: IPv4 configuration:
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7003] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data:   Internal Address: 10.10.10.1
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data:   Internal Prefix: 32
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data:   Internal Point-to-Point Address: 
10.10.10.1
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data:   Internal DNS: 8.8.8.8
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data:   Internal DNS: 8.8.4.4
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data:   DNS Domain: '(none)'
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data: No IPv6 configuration
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:

Re: [strongSwan] revisiting problem with linux to VPN using network-manager-strongswan 1.4.5-2.1

2021-07-02 Thread Noel Kuntze

Hello David,

strongSwan by default builds policy based tunnels, not route based tunnels.
Thus no interface is needed or created.
Read up on how IPsec works on the wiki to get an understanding for it.

GUI indicators are not inherently related to if any tunnel exists, or works.

Kind regards
Noel

Am 01.07.21 um 20:31 schrieb David H Durgee:

I thought it might make sense to revisit this after the progress that has been 
made. It now appears that the connection is being established:


Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] authentication of 
'durgeeenterprises.publicvm.com' with EAP successful
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] IKE_SA Durgee Enterprises, LLC[7] 
established between 
192.168.1.114[dhdurgee]...108.31.28.59[durgeeenterprises.publicvm.com]
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] scheduling rekeying in 35705s
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] maximum IKE_SA lifetime 36305s
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] installing new virtual IP 10.10.10.1
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 avahi-daemon[750]: Registering new address record for 
10.10.10.1 on wlp5s0.IPv4.
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[CFG] selected proposal: 
ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/NO_EXT_SEQ
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] CHILD_SA Durgee Enterprises, LLC{4} 
established with SPIs c8cad4e5_i c3f2eec4_o and TS 10.10.10.1/32 === 0.0.0.0/0
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] peer supports MOBIKE
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.6991] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC",0]: VPN connection: (IP Config Get) reply received.
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.6997] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC",0]: VPN plugin: state changed: started (4)
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.6997] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC",0]: VPN connection: (IP4 Config Get) reply received
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7003] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC",0]: Data: VPN Gateway: 108.31.28.59
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7003] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC",0]: Data: Tunnel Device: (null)
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7003] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC",0]: Data: IPv4 configuration:
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7003] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC",0]: Data:   Internal Address: 10.10.10.1
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC",0]: Data:   Internal Prefix: 32
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC",0]: Data:   Internal Point-to-Point Address: 10.10.10.1
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC",0]: Data:   Internal DNS: 8.8.8.8
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC",0]: Data:   Internal DNS: 8.8.4.4
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC",0]: Data:   DNS Domain: '(none)'
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC",0]: Data: No IPv6 configuration
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7013] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC",0]: VPN connection: (IP Config Get) complete


Unfortunately I am not seeing a tunnel interface being created and routing 
added:


enp6s0: flags=4163  mtu 1500
    ether b8:70:f4:2c:6b:9f  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
    RX packets 1143393  bytes 1164336056 (1.1 GB)
    RX errors 0  dropped 20  overruns 0  frame 0
    TX packets 912738  bytes 112966285 (112.9 MB)
    TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

lo: flags=73  mtu 65536
    inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0
    inet6 ::1  prefixlen 128  scopeid 0x10
    loop  txqueuelen 1000  (Local Loopback)
    RX packets 95404  bytes 9207887 (9.2 MB)
    RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
    TX packets 95404  bytes 9207887 (9.2 MB)
    TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

wlp5s0: flags=4163  mtu 1500
    inet 192.168.1.114  netmask 255.2

[strongSwan] revisiting problem with linux to VPN using network-manager-strongswan 1.4.5-2.1

2021-07-01 Thread David H Durgee
I thought it might make sense to revisit this after the progress that 
has been made. It now appears that the connection is being established:


Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] authentication of 
'durgeeenterprises.publicvm.com' with EAP successful
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] IKE_SA Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC[7] established between 
192.168.1.114[dhdurgee]...108.31.28.59[durgeeenterprises.publicvm.com]

Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] scheduling rekeying in 35705s
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] maximum IKE_SA lifetime 36305s
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] installing new virtual IP 
10.10.10.1
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 avahi-daemon[750]: Registering new address record 
for 10.10.10.1 on wlp5s0.IPv4.
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[CFG] selected proposal: 
ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/NO_EXT_SEQ
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] CHILD_SA Durgee Enterprises, 
LLC{4} established with SPIs c8cad4e5_i c3f2eec4_o and TS 
10.10.10.1/32 === 0.0.0.0/0

Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 charon-nm: 11[IKE] peer supports MOBIKE
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.6991] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: VPN connection: (IP Config Get) reply received.
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.6997] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: VPN plugin: state changed: started (4)
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.6997] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: VPN connection: (IP4 Config Get) reply received
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7003] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data: VPN Gateway: 108.31.28.59
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7003] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data: Tunnel Device: (null)
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7003] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data: IPv4 configuration:
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7003] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data:   Internal Address: 10.10.10.1
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data:   Internal Prefix: 32
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data:   Internal Point-to-Point Address: 10.10.10.1
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data:   Internal DNS: 8.8.8.8
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data:   Internal DNS: 8.8.4.4
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data:   DNS Domain: '(none)'
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7004] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: Data: No IPv6 configuration
Jun 29 11:21:34 Z560 NetworkManager[758]:  [1624980094.7013] 
vpn-connection[0x562fdb93c2f0,72e4370d-ecfb-4e33-8572-5cf04431abb9,"Durgee 
Enterprises, LLC",0]: VPN connection: (IP Config Get) complete


Unfortunately I am not seeing a tunnel interface being created and 
routing added:



enp6s0: flags=4163  mtu 1500
    ether b8:70:f4:2c:6b:9f  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
    RX packets 1143393  bytes 1164336056 (1.1 GB)
    RX errors 0  dropped 20  overruns 0  frame 0
    TX packets 912738  bytes 112966285 (112.9 MB)
    TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

lo: flags=73  mtu 65536
    inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0
    inet6 ::1  prefixlen 128  scopeid 0x10
    loop  txqueuelen 1000  (Local Loopback)
    RX packets 95404  bytes 9207887 (9.2 MB)
    RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
    TX packets 95404  bytes 9207887 (9.2 MB)
    TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

wlp5s0: flags=4163  mtu 1500
    inet 192.168.1.114  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.1.255
    inet6 fe80::562f:7604:6d84:57ca  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20
    ether ac:81:12:a4:5e:43  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
    RX packets 5644  bytes 4264877 (4.2 MB)
    RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 62520
    TX packets 6377  bytes 1007195 (1.0 MB)
    TX errors 0  dropp