RE: no pom file found
> what am I doing wrong. Not understanding Maven 1 vs Maven 2! Maven 1.1 uses project.xml files. Maven 2.x uses pom.xml files. -Original Message- From: Mike Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2008 10:53 PM To: users@maven.apache.org Subject: no pom file found I am using maven 1.1 and navigate to a project root folder where there is a pom.xml and it points to all the sub directories. When I run maven in that directory with one of the targets in the pom.xml such as maven jar I get the Warning: No pom file was found what am I doing wrong. Ollie -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/no-pom-file-found-tp19708683p19708683.html Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ANN] Maven Reactor Plugin 1.0 Released
Dan, Congrats on the plugin. Could you maybe add to the plugin home page why this plugin is required or useful? What common problem is it trying to solve? It would be nice to know that background, because I am grasping to find its purpose. Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
no pom file found
I am using maven 1.1 and navigate to a project root folder where there is a pom.xml and it points to all the sub directories. When I run maven in that directory with one of the targets in the pom.xml such as maven jar I get the Warning: No pom file was found what am I doing wrong. Ollie -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/no-pom-file-found-tp19708683p19708683.html Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question about Change List?
We would like to document some change list information about our maven project, for example. level up from 1.2 to 1.3. wo have fix Bug connection time out in Connection.java < Improvement > ... because we use JIRA together. so we think It's great if we can combine maven change list with JIRA, anybody have some Idea about that? Thank you for help.
Maven JPA->DTO Plugin
Greetings, I am curious if there is a plugin out there that can transform JPA annotated classes and convert them into very simple DTOs? I am currently doing this conversion by hand, ouch! I need near mirror copies of my persisted classes because GWT can not work with these JPA (via Hibernate) enabled classes. I think my usage pattern will be to recursively mirror (same package layout from the base) a particular package just strip out any annotations -- I just don't want to reinvent the wheel. Thanks in advance, -jieryn -- There are 10 types of people in this world, those that can read binary and those that can not. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ANN] Maven Reactor Plugin 1.0 Released
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Reactor Plugin, version 1.0. This plugin can build a subset of interdependent projects in a reactor. It should be useful in large reactor builds that include irrelevant stuff you're not working on. http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-reactor-plugin/ The Reactor plugin is normally run from the command line, like this: * reactor:resume resumes a reactor at a certain point (e.g. when it fails in the middle) Example: mvn reactor:resume -Dfrom=bar * reactor:make builds a project X and all of the reactor projects on which X depends Example: mvn reactor:make -Dmake.folders=foo,bar * reactor:make-dependents builds a project X and all of the reactor projects that depend on X (the reverse of reactor:make) Example: mvn reactor:make-dependents -Dmake.folders=foo,bar * reactor:make-scm-changes build all reactor projects that you personally have changed (according to SCM) and all reactor projects that depend on your changes Example: mvn reactor:make-scm-changes This is the first release of the Maven Reactor Plugin. Enjoy, -The Maven team - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to name my own plugin?
2008/9/26 陈思淼 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I want to create a new Plugin to package my project in my own way witch I > call it "jcar", how should I name my plugin?If I don't use > maven-jcar-plugin, i must use com.mycompany.jcar:goal to run this plugin, Is > There good way for my to solve this problem? As Stephen mentioned, the naming convention for non-core plugins is xyz-maven-plugin. You can add the group id in settings.xml so that the mvn plugin:goal syntax works. (This is where a "custom" Maven distribution comes in-- replace settings.xml with one that has your internal repositories and plugin groups.) Another option is to submit the plugin to the Codehaus Mojo project, if it's something that would be useful to others and your company will allow it. -- Wendy
Re: disscuss the difference between unit test and integration-test.
Sorry, word mistake There is a opinion that unit test should be just independent from anything, 2008/9/27 陈思淼 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For example, my project is In a SOA environment, my test case depends on > another outer Service. should I put this kind of test into Unit test?or my > test should connection to database do some CRUD, should I put it in the Unit > Test phase. > > There is a opinion that unit test just dependent from anything, if you > dependence on outer resource, you should mock it,and test the > real function In a integration-test phase, before package-phase all the > enviroment-variable for example the database connection url have been > replace by profile. So the integration Test should connection to the real > server to test. > > Is that true? > > > 2008/9/27 Stephen Connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The first one works as designed, the second one doesn't >> >> ;-) >> >> Seriously, The test phase works well and is designed for unit tests. >> >> There are known issues with the integration-test phase that lead many >> people >> to do their integration testing in a different pom... although some people >> have managed to work around the issues... >> >> The main issue is that you want to start something before the integration >> tests and stop it afterwards... starting before hand is easy... just >> attach >> to the pre-integration-test phase... stoping looks easy, i.e. attach to >> the >> post-integration-test phase... but that will never get executed if >> _either_ >> the integration-test phase fails _or_ the developer just typed "mvn >> integration-test"... the developer needs to keep typing "mvn >> post-integration-test"... and in reality you need to check the results of >> the integration tests after post-integration-test... so they should go >> "mvn >> verify" and verify is where the integration-test results should be >> checked of course current plugins for testing are not well implemented >> to do this >> >> -Stephen >> >> 2008/9/27 陈思淼 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > Maven lifecycle have explicit define two phase: unit-test and >> > integration-test.can anybody tell me the big difference about the two >> life >> > phase? >> > >> > >
Re: disscuss the difference between unit test and integration-test.
For example, my project is In a SOA environment, my test case depends on another outer Service. should I put this kind of test into Unit test?or my test should connection to database do some CRUD, should I put it in the Unit Test phase. There is a opinion that unit test just dependent from anything, if you dependence on outer resource, you should mock it,and test the real function In a integration-test phase, before package-phase all the enviroment-variable for example the database connection url have been replace by profile. So the integration Test should connection to the real server to test. Is that true? 2008/9/27 Stephen Connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The first one works as designed, the second one doesn't > > ;-) > > Seriously, The test phase works well and is designed for unit tests. > > There are known issues with the integration-test phase that lead many > people > to do their integration testing in a different pom... although some people > have managed to work around the issues... > > The main issue is that you want to start something before the integration > tests and stop it afterwards... starting before hand is easy... just attach > to the pre-integration-test phase... stoping looks easy, i.e. attach to the > post-integration-test phase... but that will never get executed if _either_ > the integration-test phase fails _or_ the developer just typed "mvn > integration-test"... the developer needs to keep typing "mvn > post-integration-test"... and in reality you need to check the results of > the integration tests after post-integration-test... so they should go "mvn > verify" and verify is where the integration-test results should be > checked of course current plugins for testing are not well implemented > to do this > > -Stephen > > 2008/9/27 陈思淼 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Maven lifecycle have explicit define two phase: unit-test and > > integration-test.can anybody tell me the big difference about the two > life > > phase? > > >
Re: disscuss the difference between unit test and integration-test.
The first one works as designed, the second one doesn't ;-) Seriously, The test phase works well and is designed for unit tests. There are known issues with the integration-test phase that lead many people to do their integration testing in a different pom... although some people have managed to work around the issues... The main issue is that you want to start something before the integration tests and stop it afterwards... starting before hand is easy... just attach to the pre-integration-test phase... stoping looks easy, i.e. attach to the post-integration-test phase... but that will never get executed if _either_ the integration-test phase fails _or_ the developer just typed "mvn integration-test"... the developer needs to keep typing "mvn post-integration-test"... and in reality you need to check the results of the integration tests after post-integration-test... so they should go "mvn verify" and verify is where the integration-test results should be checked of course current plugins for testing are not well implemented to do this -Stephen 2008/9/27 陈思淼 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Maven lifecycle have explicit define two phase: unit-test and > integration-test.can anybody tell me the big difference about the two life > phase? >
Re: How to name my own plugin?
AFAIK you should call it jcar-maven-plugin AFAIK only plugins with the groupId org.apache.maven.plugins are allowed to use the maven-__-plugin pattern You should also look into the plugin goal prefix pararmeter and adding your groupId to the plugin search stuff in settings.xml -Stephen 2008/9/27 陈思淼 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I want to create a new Plugin to package my project in my own way witch I > call it "jcar", how should I name my plugin?If I don't use > maven-jcar-plugin, i must use com.mycompany.jcar:goal to run this plugin, > Is > There good way for my to solve this problem? >
disscuss the difference between unit test and integration-test.
Maven lifecycle have explicit define two phase: unit-test and integration-test.can anybody tell me the big difference about the two life phase?
Re: Are we blocked by central Maven repo?
On 26-Sep-08, at 9:31 PM, Beyer,Nathan wrote: I disagree. 10gb or even 20gb isn't that much data, and rsync isn't pulling that same amount down every time it runs. We're doing it and it's working quite well. It's much more stable and reliable than any other current mirroring practices. The internal DNS modification makes user setup easy, since there isn't any. The use of mirror settings per device is a non-starter for large, disparate organizations. All of the various caching servers just aren't stable enough yet, in my opinion. It is possible to get blocked by the central repo - we were contacted about our significant usage and told we were on the verge of being blacklisted, which is what lead us to rsync the mirror. There is no way you could use less bandwidth rsyncing then using a repository manager. If everyone rsynced and we allowed that against central we would get destroyed. We only allow mirrors to rsync, not users and mirrors will probably also stop providing rsync access because the first hit is just too high now if everyone did it. -Nathan -Original Message- From: Wayne Fay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 11:11 AM To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: Are we blocked by central Maven repo? IIRC Central is well over 10gb at this point (possibly 20gb) and a given organization will really only use at the most 1gb of it, so rsync'ing it is just a bad idea unless you are setting up an actual external mirror that will be available to the community. They are already using Artifactory, and I certainly hope/assume they are caching the results. This would limit their use of Central to one access per artifact (GAV) plus some hits by people not using their Artifactory instance. I would generally doubt they are actually blocked by Central, but rather this is an intermittent failure that will eventually resolve itself. Wayne 2008/9/26 Beyer,Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: It's possible that from the central repo's perspective, all traffic from your company may seem like it's coming from one IP address because of NAT. Using an internal mirror can help alleviate things. The most non- invasive mirror would be to rsync the central repo periodically and then modify internal DNS to point 'repo1.maven.org' to an internal IP address. You can save a lot of bandwidth and time this way. -Nathan -Original Message- From: 陈思淼 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 10:47 AM To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: Are we blocked by central Maven repo? we didn't do that kind of thing. we have a company-level artifactory repository.someone didn't follow the rule but most of us are good citizen, and follow the maven RULE, Is maven block strategy to block IP too strict? Can I do anything to Fix it Up? 2008/9/26 Wayne Fay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It is possible to get blocked if you are acting as a bad citizen (downloading the entire Central repo using wget, for example). Have you (or someone else at your company) attempted to do this from your IP address? If not, the repo is probably just busy, or you had some random Internet connection failure. Try again. "Normal" Maven usage of the repo will not get you blocked. Wayne On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:37 AM, 陈思淼 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This's log from artifactory. 2008-09-26 22:27:28,025 [WARN ] (RemoteRepoBase.java:259{10}) - repo1: Error in getting information for 'org/apache/maven /maven-model/2.0.4/maven-model-2.0.4.pom.sha1' (org.apache.commons.httpclient.ConnectionPoolTimeoutException: Timeout waiting for connection). we company only have one outlet IP address ,someone may download Maven from apache and didn't set the Mirror of central in the conf/ setting.xml. so they download the pom directly from central? Is that the reason why the central repo block our IP address? -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any included attachments are from Cerner Corporation and are intended only for the addressee. The information contained in this message is confidential and may constitute inside or non-public information under international, federal, or state securities laws. Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by e-mail or you may call Cerner's corporate offices in Kansas City, Missouri, U.S.A at (+1) (816)221-1024. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Jason -- Jason van Zyl Founder, Apache Maven jason at sonatype dot com