Not a bad idea to have a reference to the source somewhere but I like a URL rather
than a path. At one time I thought about this in relation to build
systems which may use the dependency information to build and rebuild
the dependent artifact if need be.
>
> From: "Eric Pugh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2003/11/11 Tue AM 06:48:38 EST
> To: "'Maven Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: including source in jar
>
> I like the idea of including src etc in the jar.. However, we should also
> think about how to work with non Maven jars.. Is there any sense to to
> adding something to the Eclipse plugin that allows you to define where to
> get src from?
>
> For instance, I keep the source for OSWorkflow, and Ant built project, on
> c:\java\oswf\src\java.. So, would it make sense to have an .xml file that
> maps the groupId/artifactID to a location?
>
>
> opensymphony
> osworkflow-2.6-dev
> c:\java\oswf\src\java
>
>
> This would at least obviate the need to change a whole bunch of things...
> Of course, every user is maintaining their own source...
>
> Eric
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 12:43 AM
> > To: Maven Users List
> > Subject: Re: including source in jar
> >
> >
> > Building a debug vs non-debug jar does sound like a good idea.
> > --
> > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
> > Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
> > Pub Key:http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/public-key.asc
> >
> >
> > Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> > on 10/11/2003
> > 03:38:49 AM:
> >
> > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-09 06:50]:
> > > > Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on
> > 09/11/2003
> > > > 12:45:46 PM:
> > > >
> > > > > * Vikas Phonsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-07 21:19]:
> > > > > > Can I have the jar goal generate a jar that includes
> > the source
> > code
> > > > file
> > > > > > also beside the .class files.
> > > > >
> > > > > I've been asking about creating separate debug and release build
> > > > > targets for some time now. A debug target would have a
> > source jar.
> > > > > This would make is easy to deploy the artifacts for use with
> > > > > Eclipse.
> > >
> > > > where did we get with this?
> > > >
> > > > Last I remember, my suggest was to use the dist plugin,
> > not the jar
> > > > plugin.
> > >
> > > I will start working on it this week. It just seems to me that Maven
> > > ought to support the two inevitable output paths, debug and release,
> > > but after reading through java, jar, and dist, I'll be able to
> > > better comment.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]