RE: Dependency report fails

2008-11-12 Thread EJ Ciramella
Yeah, the dependencies report is one of the most important things from
site generation.

We can't take the, "shut off the stuff that doesn't work" approach.

See my later post - I think this is an issue surrounding the version of
bcel used 

-Original Message-
From: Stefan Seidel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 8:04 AM
To: users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: Dependency report fails

I added a comment to the bug showing how to disable the dependencies
report.

HTH,

Stefan

On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:14:46 -0500
"EJ Ciramella" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Can the dependency report be configured to skip a series of 
> depenencies?
> 
> If it can, I don't see a way... 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: EJ Ciramella [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 4:35 PM
> To: users@maven.apache.org
> Subject: Dependency report fails
> 
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPIR-142
>  
> Any movement on this particular bug at all (or suggested workaround)?
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Dependency report fails

2008-11-12 Thread EJ Ciramella
If I turn off dependencyDetailsEnabled in the reporting section:
 
  
org.apache.maven.plugins
maven-project-info-reports-plugin
2.1

 
false

  
  
I have no issues.  Since this flag determines if the plugin counts the
number of classes and or packages, I'm thinking this is using bcel and
bcel must have a problem.  I see that some plugins are using 5.2 but if
I turn on -X -e, I can see that the dependency plugin is using 1.2.0.

Can someone update this dependency?

-Original Message-
From: EJ Ciramella [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 7:15 AM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: RE: Dependency report fails

Can the dependency report be configured to skip a series of depenencies?

If it can, I don't see a way... 

-Original Message-
From: EJ Ciramella [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 4:35 PM
To: users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Dependency report fails

http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPIR-142
 
Any movement on this particular bug at all (or suggested workaround)?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Dependency report fails

2008-11-12 Thread Stefan Seidel
I added a comment to the bug showing how to disable the dependencies
report.

HTH,

Stefan

On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:14:46 -0500
"EJ Ciramella" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Can the dependency report be configured to skip a series of
> depenencies?
> 
> If it can, I don't see a way... 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: EJ Ciramella [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 4:35 PM
> To: users@maven.apache.org
> Subject: Dependency report fails
> 
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPIR-142
>  
> Any movement on this particular bug at all (or suggested workaround)?
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Dependency report fails

2008-11-12 Thread EJ Ciramella
Can the dependency report be configured to skip a series of depenencies?

If it can, I don't see a way... 

-Original Message-
From: EJ Ciramella [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 4:35 PM
To: users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Dependency report fails

http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPIR-142
 
Any movement on this particular bug at all (or suggested workaround)?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Dependency report fails

2008-11-11 Thread EJ Ciramella
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPIR-142
 
Any movement on this particular bug at all (or suggested workaround)?