RE: License Auditing

2015-10-11 Thread Gary O'Neall
Hi Jim,

 

Although it does not directly address your needs for license auditing, there is 
a plugin to produce SPDX documents containing detailed licensing information as 
part of a Maven goal.  Many of the scanning tools such as FOSSOlogy are 
generating (or planning to generate) SPDX documents (the version of FOSSOlogy 
to generate SPDX is currently in beta).  There are also a few commercial tools 
which generate SPDX.

 

By using the plugin, you could use a scanning tool which supports SPDX and the 
plugin to capture and maintain the licensing information.  SPDX currently 
maintains license information down to the source file level and maintains 
information on relationships to dependencies.  We are planning to support 
licensing information down to the code snippet level in release 2.1 of the 
spec.  

 

The plugin is in an "alpha" state and could use a bit more user testing before 
being broadly deployed.  The project is hosted on github at 
https://github.com/goneall/spdx-maven-plugin.

 

Information on SPDX can be found at http://spdx.org/ and a list of tools that 
support SPDX can be found at http://spdx.org/tools

 

Please let me know if you would like more information or have any feedback on 
this approach.

 

Thanks,
Gary O'Neall

 

 

 

From: Jim Klo [mailto:jim@sri.com] 
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 9:13 AM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: License Auditing

 

Hi, 

Looking for some guidance on doing some source license auditing.  My needs are 
two fold.  I need to track down all the licenses of all our dependencies, which 
there seems to be an abundance of plugins. But I also need to audit the 
licenses of our committed source, as many come from open and non-open projects, 
I need to track the individual files as well.

I’ve started by using Apache RAT [1], which seems to be okay for auditing the 
source, but given that we have a significant number of modules, configuration 
of RAT is somewhat a pain (I have a bunch of custom license definitions and 
matchers) which seem to have to be added to every POM file (doesn’t like going 
into the parent POM likely because of the way we are  using Tycho).

Can anyone recommend a plugin that might be better for my use case?  I’d like 
to be able to have a single config file (or artifact) that contains the license 
declarations, and then be able to reference that from all my modules.  The 
Codehaus License Maven Plugin [2] seems close to what I want, but I can’t seem 
to figure out how to get it to show me files that are missing license headers 
or even show me a per file license summary.  If anyone can point me to some 
examples or tutorials that explain this that would be much appreciated.

[1] 
http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/examples/custom-license.html 
<http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/examples/custom-license.html>

[2] 
http://www.mojohaus.org/license-maven-plugin/examples/example-thirdparty.html 
<http://www.mojohaus.org/license-maven-plugin/examples/example-thirdparty.html>

Thanks, 

JK 

Jim Klo 
Senior Software Engineer 
Center for Software Engineering 
SRI International 
t.  @nsomnac 

 

Hi,Looking for some guidance on doing some source 
license auditing.  My needs are two fold.  I need to track down all 
the licenses of all our dependencies, which there seems to be an abundance of 
plugins. But I also need to audit the licenses of our committed source, as many 
come from open and non-open projects, I need to track the individual files as 
well.I’ve started by using 
Apache RAT [1], which seems to be okay for auditing the source, but given that 
we have a significant number of modules, configuration of RAT is somewhat a 
pain (I have a bunch of custom license definitions and matchers) which seem to 
have to be added to every POM file (doesn’t like going into the parent POM 
likely because of the way we are  using Tycho).Can anyone recommend a plugin that might be better 
for my use case?  I’d like to be able to have a single config file (or 
artifact) that contains the license declarations, and then be able to reference 
that from all my modules.  The Codehaus License Maven Plugin [2] seems 
close to what I want, but I can’t seem to figure out how to get it to show me 
files that are missing license headers or even show me a per file license 
summary.  If anyone can point me to some examples or tutorials that 
explain this that would be much appreciated.[1] http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/examples/custom-license.html";
 
class="">http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/examples/custom-license.html[2] http://www.mojohaus.org/license-maven-plugin/examples/example-thirdparty.html";
 
class="">http://www.mojohaus.org/license-maven-plugin/examples/example-thirdparty.htmlThanks,JK

Jim KloSenior Software 
EngineerCenter for Software EngineeringSRI 
Internationalt.   
@nsomnac

 

 



RE: License Auditing

2015-10-06 Thread Sander Verhagen
Hi Jim,


Another suggestion, FWIW: our organization is using 
WhiteSource<http://www.whitesourcesoftware.com/>. We have it hooked into 
TeamCity, but they also have a Maven 
plugin<https://github.com/whitesource/maven-plugin> (although seemingly not 
very actively maintained).

As the Maven advocate in our organization, I had first set us up with listings 
from the license-maven-plugin. I’m hearing that WhiteSource is giving us better 
insights. I do not know if it goes into the detail that you need. And I have no 
stakes in WhiteSource either ☺

Best regards, Sander.



Sander Verhagen
[  san...@sanderverhagen.net<mailto:san...@sanderverhagen.net>  ]

From: Jim Klo [mailto:jim@sri.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2015 8:52
To: Maven Users List 
Subject: Re: License Auditing

Thanks,

We’re an Artifactory shop - so no Nexus - however however Artifactory Pro has a 
comparable feature.  The issue really though is that the license management I 
need is more granular than either solution offers. From what I can tell from 
their documentation, Nexus and Artifactory both manage licensing at the 
artifact level (source and binaries) not really the individual file level. Both 
seem to rely upon a license declaration to be present for each module and not 
necessarily look at the individual license headers within source files.

Jim Klo
Senior Software Engineer
Center for Software Engineering
SRI International
t.  @nsomnac

On Oct 6, 2015, at 7:09 AM, 
kemet.ctr.uh...@faa.gov<mailto:kemet.ctr.uh...@faa.gov> wrote:

Hello Mark,

Nexus Pro Plus has that feature:  
http://www.sonatype.com/nexus/product-overview/nexus-pro-plus

Best Regards,

G Kemet Uhuru, PMP(r), SSGBP
SWIM COTSWG/SFDPS SW CM Lead
Communications, Information & Network Programs, Enterprise Product Support, 
AJM-3122
Engility Corporation-Engineering & Program Support Services
William J. Hughes Technical Center
Building 316 Second Floor Cubicle 2N131 (E-13)
Atlantic City International Airport, NJ 08405
Office Phone: 609-485-6154
Cell Phone: 609-254-6876



How many times per day do you say "like or you know" ?

http://sixminutes.dlugan.com/stop-um-uh-filler-words/

Don't make excusesMake Time!




Re: License Auditing

2015-10-06 Thread Jim Klo
Thanks,

We’re an Artifactory shop - so no Nexus - however however Artifactory Pro has a 
comparable feature.  The issue really though is that the license management I 
need is more granular than either solution offers. From what I can tell from 
their documentation, Nexus and Artifactory both manage licensing at the 
artifact level (source and binaries) not really the individual file level. Both 
seem to rely upon a license declaration to be present for each module and not 
necessarily look at the individual license headers within source files.

Jim Klo
Senior Software Engineer
Center for Software Engineering
SRI International
t.  @nsomnac

> On Oct 6, 2015, at 7:09 AM, kemet.ctr.uh...@faa.gov wrote:
> 
> Hello Mark,
> 
> Nexus Pro Plus has that feature:  
> http://www.sonatype.com/nexus/product-overview/nexus-pro-plus
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> G Kemet Uhuru, PMP(r), SSGBP
> SWIM COTSWG/SFDPS SW CM Lead
> Communications, Information & Network Programs, Enterprise Product Support, 
> AJM-3122
> Engility Corporation-Engineering & Program Support Services
> William J. Hughes Technical Center
> Building 316 Second Floor Cubicle 2N131 (E-13)
> Atlantic City International Airport, NJ 08405
> Office Phone: 609-485-6154
> Cell Phone: 609-254-6876
> 
> 
> 
> How many times per day do you say "like or you know" ?
> 
> http://sixminutes.dlugan.com/stop-um-uh-filler-words/
> 
> Don't make excusesMake Time!




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


RE: License Auditing

2015-10-06 Thread Kemet.CTR.Uhuru
Hello Mark,

Nexus Pro Plus has that feature:  
http://www.sonatype.com/nexus/product-overview/nexus-pro-plus

Best Regards,

G Kemet Uhuru, PMP(r), SSGBP
SWIM COTSWG/SFDPS SW CM Lead
Communications, Information & Network Programs, Enterprise Product Support, 
AJM-3122
Engility Corporation-Engineering & Program Support Services
William J. Hughes Technical Center
Building 316 Second Floor Cubicle 2N131 (E-13)
Atlantic City International Airport, NJ 08405
Office Phone: 609-485-6154
Cell Phone: 609-254-6876



How many times per day do you say "like or you know" ?

http://sixminutes.dlugan.com/stop-um-uh-filler-words/

Don't make excusesMake Time!


-Original Message-
From: Mark H. Wood [mailto:mw...@iupui.edu] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2015 9:41 AM
To: users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: License Auditing

Doesn't the pro version of Nexus do license auditing and analysis?

-- 
Mark H. Wood
Lead Technology Analyst

University Library
Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis
755 W. Michigan Street
Indianapolis, IN 46202
317-274-0749
www.ulib.iupui.edu

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: License Auditing

2015-10-06 Thread Mark H. Wood
Doesn't the pro version of Nexus do license auditing and analysis?

-- 
Mark H. Wood
Lead Technology Analyst

University Library
Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis
755 W. Michigan Street
Indianapolis, IN 46202
317-274-0749
www.ulib.iupui.edu


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: License Auditing

2015-10-05 Thread Jim Klo
Thanks Curtis,

I believe you’re correct - there really exists no perfect solution doing 
continuous license management using maven, beyond some really basic stuff. 
Almost all of what exists in maven land seems to only deal with homogenous 
licensing of a module and management of module dependencies, which is likely a 
good 80% of what most need to manage. However there is a growing pattern of 
pulling small pieces of code from disparate sources (especially so at a 
research institution such as were I am) - hence there is a need to dig down 
into each file and manage each file separately - but at the same time, you need 
to have a global view across the enterprise.

So far what I’ve found FOSSology [1] which centralizes about 80% of the work I 
need, however there’s really no direct maven integration other than via exec.  
I could see possibly using a combination of approaches:
1) RAT or maven-license-plugin to ID files that just identifies missing 
licenses
2) FOSSology to generate reports and manage exceptions

However there’s no real middle ground between the two in that I really need the 
DB from FOSSology to influence RAT or the maven-license-plugin. Maybe the ideal 
thing is to figure out a way to build a maven plugin for FOSSology… 

- JK

[1] http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology

> On Oct 5, 2015, at 2:26 PM, Curtis Rueden  wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> I struggled with licensing-related tooling too when I researched it awhile
> back—and my needs were simpler than yours. We ended up using
> license-maven-plugin to programmatically manage license headers of all our
> sources, with a single header with unified copyright date range and
> contributors list, which made things much easier. It sounds like your
> licensing situation is substantially more heterogeneous.
> 
> I do not know of any excellent licensing-related tutorials for license
> management, auditing or both. Maybe you could take the bull by the horns
> and write a guide somewhere? It would surely be of great benefit to the
> Maven community.
> 
> Regards,
> Curtis
> 
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Jim Klo  wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Looking for some guidance on doing some source license auditing.  My needs
>> are two fold.  I need to track down all the licenses of all our
>> dependencies, which there seems to be an abundance of plugins. But I also
>> need to audit the licenses of our committed source, as many come from open
>> and non-open projects, I need to track the individual files as well.
>> 
>> I’ve started by using Apache RAT [1], which seems to be okay for auditing
>> the source, but given that we have a significant number of modules,
>> configuration of RAT is somewhat a pain (I have a bunch of custom license
>> definitions and matchers) which seem to have to be added to every POM file
>> (doesn’t like going into the parent POM likely because of the way we are
>> using Tycho).
>> 
>> Can anyone recommend a plugin that might be better for my use case?  I’d
>> like to be able to have a single config file (or artifact) that contains
>> the license declarations, and then be able to reference that from all my
>> modules.  The Codehaus License Maven Plugin [2] seems close to what I want,
>> but I can’t seem to figure out how to get it to show me files that are
>> missing license headers or even show me a per file license summary.  If
>> anyone can point me to some examples or tutorials that explain this that
>> would be much appreciated.
>> 
>> [1]
>> http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/examples/custom-license.html
>> [2]
>> http://www.mojohaus.org/license-maven-plugin/examples/example-thirdparty.html
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> JK
>> 
>> *Jim KloSenior Software EngineerCenter for Software EngineeringSRI
>> International*
>> *t. @nsomnac*
>> 
>> 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: License Auditing

2015-10-05 Thread Curtis Rueden
Hi Jim,

I struggled with licensing-related tooling too when I researched it awhile
back—and my needs were simpler than yours. We ended up using
license-maven-plugin to programmatically manage license headers of all our
sources, with a single header with unified copyright date range and
contributors list, which made things much easier. It sounds like your
licensing situation is substantially more heterogeneous.

I do not know of any excellent licensing-related tutorials for license
management, auditing or both. Maybe you could take the bull by the horns
and write a guide somewhere? It would surely be of great benefit to the
Maven community.

Regards,
Curtis

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Jim Klo  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Looking for some guidance on doing some source license auditing.  My needs
> are two fold.  I need to track down all the licenses of all our
> dependencies, which there seems to be an abundance of plugins. But I also
> need to audit the licenses of our committed source, as many come from open
> and non-open projects, I need to track the individual files as well.
>
> I’ve started by using Apache RAT [1], which seems to be okay for auditing
> the source, but given that we have a significant number of modules,
> configuration of RAT is somewhat a pain (I have a bunch of custom license
> definitions and matchers) which seem to have to be added to every POM file
> (doesn’t like going into the parent POM likely because of the way we are
>  using Tycho).
>
> Can anyone recommend a plugin that might be better for my use case?  I’d
> like to be able to have a single config file (or artifact) that contains
> the license declarations, and then be able to reference that from all my
> modules.  The Codehaus License Maven Plugin [2] seems close to what I want,
> but I can’t seem to figure out how to get it to show me files that are
> missing license headers or even show me a per file license summary.  If
> anyone can point me to some examples or tutorials that explain this that
> would be much appreciated.
>
> [1]
> http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/examples/custom-license.html
> [2]
> http://www.mojohaus.org/license-maven-plugin/examples/example-thirdparty.html
>
> Thanks,
>
> JK
>
> *Jim KloSenior Software EngineerCenter for Software EngineeringSRI
> International*
> *t. @nsomnac*
>
>


License Auditing

2015-09-28 Thread Jim Klo
Hi,

Looking for some guidance on doing some source license auditing.  My needs are 
two fold.  I need to track down all the licenses of all our dependencies, which 
there seems to be an abundance of plugins. But I also need to audit the 
licenses of our committed source, as many come from open and non-open projects, 
I need to track the individual files as well.

I’ve started by using Apache RAT [1], which seems to be okay for auditing the 
source, but given that we have a significant number of modules, configuration 
of RAT is somewhat a pain (I have a bunch of custom license definitions and 
matchers) which seem to have to be added to every POM file (doesn’t like going 
into the parent POM likely because of the way we are  using Tycho).

Can anyone recommend a plugin that might be better for my use case?  I’d like 
to be able to have a single config file (or artifact) that contains the license 
declarations, and then be able to reference that from all my modules.  The 
Codehaus License Maven Plugin [2] seems close to what I want, but I can’t seem 
to figure out how to get it to show me files that are missing license headers 
or even show me a per file license summary.  If anyone can point me to some 
examples or tutorials that explain this that would be much appreciated.

[1] 
http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/examples/custom-license.html 
<http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/examples/custom-license.html>
[2] 
http://www.mojohaus.org/license-maven-plugin/examples/example-thirdparty.html 
<http://www.mojohaus.org/license-maven-plugin/examples/example-thirdparty.html>

Thanks,

JK

Jim Klo
Senior Software Engineer
Center for Software Engineering
SRI International
t.  @nsomnac



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature