Re: [m2?] SWT
what's all this future tense? It's in alpha-3... :) (not sure if there are OS dependent triggers or not, though - worst case could use a sys property -Dplatform=win32 until they are there though). - Brett On 7/4/05, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jörg Schaible wrote: Emmanuel Venisse wrote on Saturday, July 02, 2005 2:43 PM: Hi kennew, This stuff will be resolve by the build profile feature (http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Build+Profiles) Emmanuel will this be available for first release of M2? yes Emmanuel - Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [m2?] SWT
Emmanuel Venisse wrote on Saturday, July 02, 2005 2:43 PM: Hi kennew, This stuff will be resolve by the build profile feature (http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Build+Profiles) Emmanuel will this be available for first release of M2? - Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [m2?] SWT
Jörg Schaible wrote: Emmanuel Venisse wrote on Saturday, July 02, 2005 2:43 PM: Hi kennew, This stuff will be resolve by the build profile feature (http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Build+Profiles) Emmanuel will this be available for first release of M2? yes Emmanuel - Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [m2?] SWT
Hi kennew, This stuff will be resolve by the build profile feature (http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Build+Profiles) Emmanuel Kenney Westerhof wrote: Hello, Has anyone found a solution for depending on SWT in a platform independent manner? I'd like to depend on any platform implementation of SWT, and create different distributions for each platform (or some other solution). So basically I'd want to depend on SWT in general, not on for instance swt-linux-gtk... I remember a discussion once on J2EE api's which suffer the same problem. It was suggested to depend on for instance JBoss and set the scope to 'provided'. It was also mentioned that we should be able to depend on an API regardless of implementation. Are there any existing solutions or plans to accommodate this? -- Kenney Westerhof http://www.neonics.com GPG public key: http://www.gods.nl/~forge/kenneyw.key - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
