RE: "Unsatisfied dependencies" for reactor dependencies in Beta 9
Thanks Luke - that makes sense.
> -Original Message-
> From: ext Luke Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 02 July, 2003 03:05
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: "Unsatisfied dependencies" for reactor
> dependencies in Beta
> 9
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >>>This works for beta 8 but not beta 9. What ya reckon?
> >>
>
> It looks like the dependency problem is between your
> "toplevel" project
> code and one of the subprojects ("base"). Since the reactor works out
> dependencies between the subprojects it's being run on I
> don't think it
> can help you here. It may have worked OK in the past because of some
> coincidence in the order in which Maven attempted to resolve the
> dependencies - it may have done the reactor build before
> attempting to
> download the base-1.0.jar or something.
>
> Probably your best bet would be to make the current "toplevel" module
> part of the same reactor build if possible, extending all the
> project.xmls from a new root one.
>
> Luke.
>
> --
> Luke Taylor. Monkey Machine Ltd.
> PGP Key ID: 0x57E9523Chttp://www.monkeymachine.ltd.uk
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: "Unsatisfied dependencies" for reactor dependencies in Beta 9
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This works for beta 8 but not beta 9. What ya reckon?
It looks like the dependency problem is between your "toplevel" project
code and one of the subprojects ("base"). Since the reactor works out
dependencies between the subprojects it's being run on I don't think it
can help you here. It may have worked OK in the past because of some
coincidence in the order in which Maven attempted to resolve the
dependencies - it may have done the reactor build before attempting to
download the base-1.0.jar or something.
Probably your best bet would be to make the current "toplevel" module
part of the same reactor build if possible, extending all the
project.xmls from a new root one.
Luke.
--
Luke Taylor. Monkey Machine Ltd.
PGP Key ID: 0x57E9523Chttp://www.monkeymachine.ltd.uk
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: "Unsatisfied dependencies" for reactor dependencies in Beta 9
> > This works for beta 8 but not beta 9. What ya reckon? > > This is when we switched the default dependency resolver from the > commons-graph one to the werkz one so I'll take a peek later > when I get > a moment. I have to run off right now. No problem. I changed the small example I posted to use and but still had the problem. Cheers, Mike. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: "Unsatisfied dependencies" for reactor dependencies in Beta 9
On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 04:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Jason, > > I extracted my problem out into the smallest example possible. Its attached. If > you extract it into a dir and invoke maven, it should first jar:install base, the > jar:install toplevel. > > This works for beta 8 but not beta 9. What ya reckon? This is when we switched the default dependency resolver from the commons-graph one to the werkz one so I'll take a peek later when I get a moment. I have to run off right now. > Thanks, > Mike. > > > -Original Message- > > From: ext [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 01 July, 2003 11:07 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: "Unsatisfied dependencies" for reactor > > dependencies in Beta > > 9 > > > > > > Don't get it Jason. Are you saying all dependencies should > > be specified as follows in beta 9: > > > > > > junit > > junit > > 3.8.1 > > > > > > I tried this for one of the reactor-generated-dependencies > > but it didn't work. > > > > Is there a real-life deployment of Maven that uses > > reactor-generated-dependencies that I can look at? > > > > Thanks, > > Mike. > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: ext Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: 30 June, 2003 18:07 > > > To: Maven Users List > > > Subject: Re: "Unsatisfied dependencies" for reactor > > > dependencies in Beta > > > 9 > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 09:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I just moved from beta 8 to beta 9. I have about 20 > > > components that are built with the reactor. Beta 9 complains > > > that these are unsatisfied dependencies - it does not > > > understand that they are to be built from source. This > > > worked with Beta 8. What should I do to get this working? > > > > > > I haven't tested this but most likely it is the way your > > dependencies > > > are stated. Are you using and for your > > > dependencies? > > > > > > The ordering is determined by the relationship amongst the found > > > dependencies. I haven't tested this but we moved away from > > > simply using > > > for the dependencies and simply using that might be causing the > > > problem. > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Mike. > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > > > jvz. > > > > > > Jason van Zyl > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://tambora.zenplex.org > > > > > > In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational > > > and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. > > > > > > -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: "Unsatisfied dependencies" for reactor dependencies in Beta 9
On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 04:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Don't get it Jason. Are you saying all dependencies should be specified as follows > in beta 9: > > > junit > junit > 3.8.1 > > > I tried this for one of the reactor-generated-dependencies but it didn't work. > > Is there a real-life deployment of Maven that uses reactor-generated-dependencies > that I can look at? Yup, in here is the reactor used for the plexus components. http://cvs.werken.com/viewcvs.cgi/plexus-components/?cvsroot=plexus > Thanks, > Mike. > > > -Original Message- > > From: ext Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 30 June, 2003 18:07 > > To: Maven Users List > > Subject: Re: "Unsatisfied dependencies" for reactor > > dependencies in Beta > > 9 > > > > > > On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 09:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I just moved from beta 8 to beta 9. I have about 20 > > components that are built with the reactor. Beta 9 complains > > that these are unsatisfied dependencies - it does not > > understand that they are to be built from source. This > > worked with Beta 8. What should I do to get this working? > > > > I haven't tested this but most likely it is the way your dependencies > > are stated. Are you using and for your > > dependencies? > > > > The ordering is determined by the relationship amongst the found > > dependencies. I haven't tested this but we moved away from > > simply using > > for the dependencies and simply using that might be causing the > > problem. > > > > > Thanks, > > > Mike. > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > > jvz. > > > > Jason van Zyl > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://tambora.zenplex.org > > > > In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational > > and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. > > > > -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: "Unsatisfied dependencies" for reactor dependencies in Beta 9
Here is the attachment. > -Original Message- > From: ext [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 01 July, 2003 11:55 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: "Unsatisfied dependencies" for reactor > dependencies in Beta > 9 > > > Jason, > > I extracted my problem out into the smallest example > possible. Its attached. If you extract it into a dir and > invoke maven, it should first jar:install base, the > jar:install toplevel. > > This works for beta 8 but not beta 9. What ya reckon? > > Thanks, > Mike. > > > -Original Message- > > From: ext [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 01 July, 2003 11:07 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: "Unsatisfied dependencies" for reactor > > dependencies in Beta > > 9 > > > > > > Don't get it Jason. Are you saying all dependencies should > > be specified as follows in beta 9: > > > > > > junit > > junit > > 3.8.1 > > > > > > I tried this for one of the reactor-generated-dependencies > > but it didn't work. > > > > Is there a real-life deployment of Maven that uses > > reactor-generated-dependencies that I can look at? > > > > Thanks, > > Mike. > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: ext Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: 30 June, 2003 18:07 > > > To: Maven Users List > > > Subject: Re: "Unsatisfied dependencies" for reactor > > > dependencies in Beta > > > 9 > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 09:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I just moved from beta 8 to beta 9. I have about 20 > > > components that are built with the reactor. Beta 9 complains > > > that these are unsatisfied dependencies - it does not > > > understand that they are to be built from source. This > > > worked with Beta 8. What should I do to get this working? > > > > > > I haven't tested this but most likely it is the way your > > dependencies > > > are stated. Are you using and for your > > > dependencies? > > > > > > The ordering is determined by the relationship amongst the found > > > dependencies. I haven't tested this but we moved away from > > > simply using > > > for the dependencies and simply using that might be > causing the > > > problem. > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Mike. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > > > jvz. > > > > > > Jason van Zyl > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://tambora.zenplex.org > > > > > > In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational > > > and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. > > > > > > -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > example.tar.gz Description: example.tar.gz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: "Unsatisfied dependencies" for reactor dependencies in Beta 9
Jason, I extracted my problem out into the smallest example possible. Its attached. If you extract it into a dir and invoke maven, it should first jar:install base, the jar:install toplevel. This works for beta 8 but not beta 9. What ya reckon? Thanks, Mike. > -Original Message- > From: ext [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 01 July, 2003 11:07 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: "Unsatisfied dependencies" for reactor > dependencies in Beta > 9 > > > Don't get it Jason. Are you saying all dependencies should > be specified as follows in beta 9: > > > junit > junit > 3.8.1 > > > I tried this for one of the reactor-generated-dependencies > but it didn't work. > > Is there a real-life deployment of Maven that uses > reactor-generated-dependencies that I can look at? > > Thanks, > Mike. > > > -Original Message- > > From: ext Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 30 June, 2003 18:07 > > To: Maven Users List > > Subject: Re: "Unsatisfied dependencies" for reactor > > dependencies in Beta > > 9 > > > > > > On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 09:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I just moved from beta 8 to beta 9. I have about 20 > > components that are built with the reactor. Beta 9 complains > > that these are unsatisfied dependencies - it does not > > understand that they are to be built from source. This > > worked with Beta 8. What should I do to get this working? > > > > I haven't tested this but most likely it is the way your > dependencies > > are stated. Are you using and for your > > dependencies? > > > > The ordering is determined by the relationship amongst the found > > dependencies. I haven't tested this but we moved away from > > simply using > > for the dependencies and simply using that might be causing the > > problem. > > > > > Thanks, > > > Mike. > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > > jvz. > > > > Jason van Zyl > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://tambora.zenplex.org > > > > In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational > > and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. > > > > -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: "Unsatisfied dependencies" for reactor dependencies in Beta 9
Don't get it Jason. Are you saying all dependencies should be specified as follows in beta 9: junit junit 3.8.1 I tried this for one of the reactor-generated-dependencies but it didn't work. Is there a real-life deployment of Maven that uses reactor-generated-dependencies that I can look at? Thanks, Mike. > -Original Message- > From: ext Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 30 June, 2003 18:07 > To: Maven Users List > Subject: Re: "Unsatisfied dependencies" for reactor > dependencies in Beta > 9 > > > On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 09:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just moved from beta 8 to beta 9. I have about 20 > components that are built with the reactor. Beta 9 complains > that these are unsatisfied dependencies - it does not > understand that they are to be built from source. This > worked with Beta 8. What should I do to get this working? > > I haven't tested this but most likely it is the way your dependencies > are stated. Are you using and for your > dependencies? > > The ordering is determined by the relationship amongst the found > dependencies. I haven't tested this but we moved away from > simply using > for the dependencies and simply using that might be causing the > problem. > > > Thanks, > > Mike. > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- > jvz. > > Jason van Zyl > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://tambora.zenplex.org > > In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational > and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. > > -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: "Unsatisfied dependencies" for reactor dependencies in Beta 9
On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 09:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I just moved from beta 8 to beta 9. I have about 20 components that are built with > the reactor. Beta 9 complains that these are unsatisfied dependencies - it does not > understand that they are to be built from source. This worked with Beta 8. What > should I do to get this working? I haven't tested this but most likely it is the way your dependencies are stated. Are you using and for your dependencies? The ordering is determined by the relationship amongst the found dependencies. I haven't tested this but we moved away from simply using for the dependencies and simply using that might be causing the problem. > Thanks, > Mike. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
