RE: 5 minute guide - Incorrect documentation/documentation improvement?

2009-02-03 Thread Adam Leggett
>>I recently gave a talk on Maven to the Java London Users group.

Which I attended and found to be very good :-)

-Original Message-
From: Martijn Verburg [mailto:martijnverb...@gmail.com] 
Sent: 02 February 2009 10:37
To: users@maven.apache.org
Subject: 5 minute guide - Incorrect documentation/documentation
improvement?

Hi all,

I recently gave a talk on Maven to the Java London Users group.  One
small thing I noticed while researching is that the instructions at:

http://maven.apache.org/guides/getting-started/maven-in-five-minutes.htm
l

talk about using mvn archetype:create

Since that is now deprecated in favour of archetype:generate, should
the documentation be updated to use the non deprecated project
creation method?

Cheers,
Martijn

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: 5 minute guide - Incorrect documentation/documentation improvement?

2009-02-03 Thread Martijn Verburg
Yeah I'm already poking about the ear plugin code so I'll see if I can  
find the svn for the main site and make a doc patch.


Sent while on the move

On 3 Feb 2009, at 00:29, Barrie Treloar  wrote:


On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Wayne Fay  wrote:

Since that is now deprecated in favour of archetype:generate, should
the documentation be updated to use the non deprecated project
creation method?


All Maven bugs, including those in documentation, go in JIRA...


And if you checkout the code and attach a patch, it is more likely to
get fixed :)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: 5 minute guide - Incorrect documentation/documentation improvement?

2009-02-03 Thread Martijn Verburg
Yep aware of that, just wanted opinion so on whether it was a bug or  
my misunderstanding. I'll Jira it :)


Sent while on the move

On 3 Feb 2009, at 00:04, Wayne Fay  wrote:


Since that is now deprecated in favour of archetype:generate, should
the documentation be updated to use the non deprecated project
creation method?


All Maven bugs, including those in documentation, go in JIRA...

Wayne

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: 5 minute guide - Incorrect documentation/documentation improvement?

2009-02-02 Thread Barrie Treloar
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Wayne Fay  wrote:
>> Since that is now deprecated in favour of archetype:generate, should
>> the documentation be updated to use the non deprecated project
>> creation method?
>
> All Maven bugs, including those in documentation, go in JIRA...

And if you checkout the code and attach a patch, it is more likely to
get fixed :)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: 5 minute guide - Incorrect documentation/documentation improvement?

2009-02-02 Thread Wayne Fay
> Since that is now deprecated in favour of archetype:generate, should
> the documentation be updated to use the non deprecated project
> creation method?

All Maven bugs, including those in documentation, go in JIRA...

Wayne

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org