i also tried moving the common system properties into the
element of the plugin while keeping specific ones into
the configuration of each execution block..
yet without no luck: tests are not executed with the correct properties set.
On 3/14/07, Valerio Schiavoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I also tried specifing default (as suggested by jdcasey on
irc), hoping that the configurations would have been merged..but it's
not the case.
On 3/14/07, Valerio Schiavoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello,
> seems like defining system properties within the configuration of an
> execution block for the surefire plugin is not propertly supported.
>
> Consider this:
>
>
> org.apache.maven.plugins
> maven-surefire-plugin
>
>
>
>
> no-optimization
>
> test
>
> test
>
>
>
> fractal.provider
>
>
org.objectweb.fractal.julia.Julia
>
>
>
> julia.loader
>
>
org.objectweb.fractal.julia.loader.DynamicLoader
>
>
>
>
julia.loader.gen.dir
>
>
target/test-classes/generated
>
>
>
> julia.config
> julia.cfg
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> with the above configuration, tests fail. If I move the configuration
> out of the execution element (still within the plugin), property are
> correctly set, and tests pass. Since i need to configure more than 1
> (say, 4) configurations for the same suite of tests, i wonder wheter
> this is a bug, or a misuse from mine.
>
> Ideas ?
>
> Thanks,
> Valerio
>
> --
> http://jroller.com/page/vschiavoni
>
--
http://valerioschiavoni.blogspot.com
http://jroller.com/page/vschiavoni
--
http://valerioschiavoni.blogspot.com
http://jroller.com/page/vschiavoni
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]