Actually, this may be possible in the not too distant future :)
We're working on enhancements to JCoverage as part of a weekly Geek
Night. This includes pluggable filters for JCoverage enabling specific
includes and excludes at the class and method level. I plan to
incorporate these changes into a version of the JCoverage plugin as soon
as they are available.
I'll post here if/when we get there.
Cheers,
Mike
__
Mike Melia
ThoughtWorks Inc
http://www.thoughtworks.com
mikemelia AT thoughtworks.net
mmelia At thoughtworks.com
y! : Michael_A_Melia
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 21 January 2004 7:22 PM
To: Maven Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Supress JCoverage analysis of particular
classes/packages?
Actually, it isn't possible. Sorry.
But, you can run jcoverage on your different OS and after, merge all
jcoverage intrumentation files with jcoverage:merge goal.
Emmanuel
- Original Message -
From: Gareth Cronin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 12:15 AM
Subject: Supress JCoverage analysis of particular classes/packages?
I've looked through the plugin docs but I can't seem to find any
reference to this. Is it possible, or could it be made possible to
specify file patterns to ignore when making the JCoverage analysis?
We
have a number of OS-specific classes that make Runtime calls where
unit
testing is pointless (e.g. calls that spawn lpr to print files) and
they
upset the nice JCoverage statistics.
Thanks,
Gareth.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
