Re: how to EMMA-instrument dependencies

2009-03-18 Thread Stephen Connolly
What you really want is to attach additional artifacts to your build with an
"emma-instrumented" classifier...

[Random but relevant]This will probably break the maven-ear-plugin on your
build... ;-) [/Random but relevant]

My understanding is that issues with instrumented jars using classifiers and
forked builds and fun like that is why clover-maven-plugin is less than
perfect...

I know that there are changes to maven which will make the coverage
situation nicer... I suspect people are holding off to see what they are

-Stephen

2009/3/18 COURCY Michael 

> I see, well unless you instrument your local repository ... I don't really
> see a simple and *clean* solution.
>
> Emma offer an option to instrument code by providing its own classloader,
> but it means you have to inteact with classworld maven classloader and thus
> write a plugin for that :
>
> http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-maven-classloading.html
>
> Should be possible but there's a real work to do.
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : vasiliy.bara...@sun.com [mailto:vasiliy.bara...@sun.com]
> Envoyé : mercredi 18 mars 2009 16:48
> À : Maven Users List
> Objet : Re: how to EMMA-instrument dependencies
>
> Thank you, but this does not really solve my problem. The problem is not
>  that I cannot instrument dependency JARs. The problem is I cannot cleanly
> get instrumented JARs into the unit test classpath.
>
> Vasiliy
>
> COURCY Michael wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > From my experience with emma I use a ant call after the compilation
> phase.
> >
> > Ant is going much more power than the emma plugin
> >
> > 
> > 
> >   instrument
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> maven-antrun-plugin
> > 
> >
> >  process-classes
> >   
> > 
> >antfile="${basedir}/instrument_for_coverage.xml">
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > 
> >   
> >   
> > run
> >   
> > 
> >   
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
> > And use the overwrite mode in the ant, then only your class are going to
> be instrumended if you active this option  :
> >
> > 
> >
> > Instrumenting the classes
> >   
> >>  metadatafile="${metadatafile}"
> >  merge="true"
> >mode="overwrite"
> >   >
> >      
> >       
> > 
> >
> >   
> >
> > Thus running
> >
> > Mvn package -P instrument
> >
> > produce an instrumented war
> >
> > And
> >
> > Mvn package
> >
> > Produce a regular one
> >
> > Good luck, emma rocks !!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -Message d'origine-
> > De : vasiliy.bara...@sun.com [mailto:vasiliy.bara...@sun.com] Envoyé :
> > mercredi 18 mars 2009 15:32 À : users@maven.apache.org Objet : how to
> > EMMA-instrument dependencies
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a Maven 2 project that depends on a number of other Maven 2
> projects that are built locally and installed into the local repository.
> > I need to instrument some of the dependency JARs with the EMMA
> > coverage tool and have Maven run unit tests against instrumented JARs
> > rather than the original dependencies. The emma-maven-plugin
> > (http://mojo.codehaus.org/emma-maven-plugin) does not seem to be of much
> help as it does not seem to support this scenario.
> >
> > Of course, it would be ideal if the emma-maven-plugin had support for
> this. In fact, the plugin has an 'instrumentationPaths' parameter which can
> be used to instrument classes from arbitrary directories; so I think
> dependencies can be copied, unpacked, instrumented this way and passed to
> maven-surefire-plugin via the 'classesDirectory' parameter; 

RE: how to EMMA-instrument dependencies

2009-03-18 Thread COURCY Michael
I see, well unless you instrument your local repository ... I don't really see 
a simple and *clean* solution. 

Emma offer an option to instrument code by providing its own classloader, but 
it means you have to inteact with classworld maven classloader and thus write a 
plugin for that : 

http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-maven-classloading.html

Should be possible but there's a real work to do.

-Message d'origine-
De : vasiliy.bara...@sun.com [mailto:vasiliy.bara...@sun.com] 
Envoyé : mercredi 18 mars 2009 16:48
À : Maven Users List
Objet : Re: how to EMMA-instrument dependencies

Thank you, but this does not really solve my problem. The problem is not
  that I cannot instrument dependency JARs. The problem is I cannot cleanly get 
instrumented JARs into the unit test classpath.

Vasiliy

COURCY Michael wrote:
> Hi
> 
> From my experience with emma I use a ant call after the compilation phase. 
> 
> Ant is going much more power than the emma plugin
> 
> 
> 
>   instrument
>   
>   
>   
>   maven-antrun-plugin
> 
>
>  process-classes
>
> 
> 
>antfile="${basedir}/instrument_for_coverage.xml">
>   
> 
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
> run
>   
> 
>   
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> And use the overwrite mode in the ant, then only your class are going to be 
> instrumended if you active this option  : 
> 
> 
> 
> Instrumenting the classes
>   
> metadatafile="${metadatafile}"
>  merge="true"
>mode="overwrite"
>   >  
>  
>   
> 
>   
>   
> 
> Thus running
> 
> Mvn package -P instrument
> 
> produce an instrumented war
> 
> And
> 
> Mvn package
> 
> Produce a regular one
> 
> Good luck, emma rocks !!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Message d'origine-
> De : vasiliy.bara...@sun.com [mailto:vasiliy.bara...@sun.com] Envoyé : 
> mercredi 18 mars 2009 15:32 À : users@maven.apache.org Objet : how to 
> EMMA-instrument dependencies
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have a Maven 2 project that depends on a number of other Maven 2 projects 
> that are built locally and installed into the local repository. 
> I need to instrument some of the dependency JARs with the EMMA 
> coverage tool and have Maven run unit tests against instrumented JARs 
> rather than the original dependencies. The emma-maven-plugin
> (http://mojo.codehaus.org/emma-maven-plugin) does not seem to be of much help 
> as it does not seem to support this scenario.
> 
> Of course, it would be ideal if the emma-maven-plugin had support for this. 
> In fact, the plugin has an 'instrumentationPaths' parameter which can be used 
> to instrument classes from arbitrary directories; so I think dependencies can 
> be copied, unpacked, instrumented this way and passed to 
> maven-surefire-plugin via the 'classesDirectory' parameter; but in this case 
> both the instrumented classes and original dependencies both appear on the 
> test classpath, which sounds wrong.
> 
> Actually, I can bypass emma-maven-plugin and run EMMA instrumentor via 
> exec-maven-plugin, but again, it looks like the only way to pass the 
> instrumented classes to surefire is via the 'classesDirectory' or 
> 'additionalClasspathElements' parameter, which is the same problem as above, 
> which makes me think this is not solely emma-maven-plugin's problem (hence 
> posting to this list).
> 
> What would be the right Maven way to achieve the goal? I am new to Maven so I 
> am sorry if I am missing s

Re: how to EMMA-instrument dependencies

2009-03-18 Thread Vasiliy Baranov
Thank you, but this does not really solve my problem. The problem is not 
 that I cannot instrument dependency JARs. The problem is I cannot 
cleanly get instrumented JARs into the unit test classpath.


Vasiliy

COURCY Michael wrote:
Hi 

From my experience with emma I use a ant call after the compilation phase. 


Ant is going much more power than the emma plugin

  		  
		  

instrument



maven-antrun-plugin
  
 
   process-classes

  	  




	  		  



  run

  

  
  
  
  

And use the overwrite mode in the ant, then only your class are going to be instrumended if you active this option  : 




Instrumenting the classes


   metadatafile="${metadatafile}"

 merge="true"
 mode="overwrite"
  >  
 

  


  

Thus running 

Mvn package -P instrument 


produce an instrumented war

And 

Mvn package 

Produce a regular one 


Good luck, emma rocks !!





-Message d'origine-
De : vasiliy.bara...@sun.com [mailto:vasiliy.bara...@sun.com] 
Envoyé : mercredi 18 mars 2009 15:32

À : users@maven.apache.org
Objet : how to EMMA-instrument dependencies

Hi,

I have a Maven 2 project that depends on a number of other Maven 2 projects that are built locally and installed into the local repository. 
I need to instrument some of the dependency JARs with the EMMA coverage tool and have Maven run unit tests against instrumented JARs rather than the original dependencies. The emma-maven-plugin

(http://mojo.codehaus.org/emma-maven-plugin) does not seem to be of much help 
as it does not seem to support this scenario.

Of course, it would be ideal if the emma-maven-plugin had support for this. In 
fact, the plugin has an 'instrumentationPaths' parameter which can be used to 
instrument classes from arbitrary directories; so I think dependencies can be 
copied, unpacked, instrumented this way and passed to maven-surefire-plugin via 
the 'classesDirectory' parameter; but in this case both the instrumented 
classes and original dependencies both appear on the test classpath, which 
sounds wrong.

Actually, I can bypass emma-maven-plugin and run EMMA instrumentor via 
exec-maven-plugin, but again, it looks like the only way to pass the 
instrumented classes to surefire is via the 'classesDirectory' or 
'additionalClasspathElements' parameter, which is the same problem as above, 
which makes me think this is not solely emma-maven-plugin's problem (hence 
posting to this list).

What would be the right Maven way to achieve the goal? I am new to Maven so I 
am sorry if I am missing something obvious. I spent several days trying to find 
a solution, to no success.

In fact, I have some control over the dependency projects so I think I can build them so that the resulting JARs will contain instrumented classes (or I can instrument JARs separately and 'install:install-file' 
them as separate components), but this is undesirable.


I hope I am making sense.

Thank you,
Vasiliy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: how to EMMA-instrument dependencies

2009-03-18 Thread COURCY Michael
Hi 

>From my experience with emma I use a ant call after the compilation phase. 

Ant is going much more power than the emma plugin

  
  
instrument



maven-antrun-plugin
  
 
   process-classes
 

  





  


  run

  

  
  
  
  

And use the overwrite mode in the ant, then only your class are going to be 
instrumended if you active this option  : 



Instrumenting the classes


 
  


  

Thus running 

Mvn package -P instrument 

produce an instrumented war

And 

Mvn package 

Produce a regular one 

Good luck, emma rocks !!





-Message d'origine-
De : vasiliy.bara...@sun.com [mailto:vasiliy.bara...@sun.com] 
Envoyé : mercredi 18 mars 2009 15:32
À : users@maven.apache.org
Objet : how to EMMA-instrument dependencies

Hi,

I have a Maven 2 project that depends on a number of other Maven 2 projects 
that are built locally and installed into the local repository. 
I need to instrument some of the dependency JARs with the EMMA coverage tool 
and have Maven run unit tests against instrumented JARs rather than the 
original dependencies. The emma-maven-plugin
(http://mojo.codehaus.org/emma-maven-plugin) does not seem to be of much help 
as it does not seem to support this scenario.

Of course, it would be ideal if the emma-maven-plugin had support for this. In 
fact, the plugin has an 'instrumentationPaths' parameter which can be used to 
instrument classes from arbitrary directories; so I think dependencies can be 
copied, unpacked, instrumented this way and passed to maven-surefire-plugin via 
the 'classesDirectory' parameter; but in this case both the instrumented 
classes and original dependencies both appear on the test classpath, which 
sounds wrong.

Actually, I can bypass emma-maven-plugin and run EMMA instrumentor via 
exec-maven-plugin, but again, it looks like the only way to pass the 
instrumented classes to surefire is via the 'classesDirectory' or 
'additionalClasspathElements' parameter, which is the same problem as above, 
which makes me think this is not solely emma-maven-plugin's problem (hence 
posting to this list).

What would be the right Maven way to achieve the goal? I am new to Maven so I 
am sorry if I am missing something obvious. I spent several days trying to find 
a solution, to no success.

In fact, I have some control over the dependency projects so I think I can 
build them so that the resulting JARs will contain instrumented classes (or I 
can instrument JARs separately and 'install:install-file' 
them as separate components), but this is undesirable.

I hope I am making sense.

Thank you,
Vasiliy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org



how to EMMA-instrument dependencies

2009-03-18 Thread Vasiliy Baranov

Hi,

I have a Maven 2 project that depends on a number of other Maven 2 
projects that are built locally and installed into the local repository. 
I need to instrument some of the dependency JARs with the EMMA coverage 
tool and have Maven run unit tests against instrumented JARs rather than 
the original dependencies. The emma-maven-plugin 
(http://mojo.codehaus.org/emma-maven-plugin) does not seem to be of much 
help as it does not seem to support this scenario.


Of course, it would be ideal if the emma-maven-plugin had support for 
this. In fact, the plugin has an 'instrumentationPaths' parameter which 
can be used to instrument classes from arbitrary directories; so I think 
dependencies can be copied, unpacked, instrumented this way and passed 
to maven-surefire-plugin via the 'classesDirectory' parameter; but in 
this case both the instrumented classes and original dependencies both 
appear on the test classpath, which sounds wrong.


Actually, I can bypass emma-maven-plugin and run EMMA instrumentor via 
exec-maven-plugin, but again, it looks like the only way to pass the 
instrumented classes to surefire is via the 'classesDirectory' or 
'additionalClasspathElements' parameter, which is the same problem as 
above, which makes me think this is not solely emma-maven-plugin's 
problem (hence posting to this list).


What would be the right Maven way to achieve the goal? I am new to Maven 
so I am sorry if I am missing something obvious. I spent several days 
trying to find a solution, to no success.


In fact, I have some control over the dependency projects so I think I 
can build them so that the resulting JARs will contain instrumented 
classes (or I can instrument JARs separately and 'install:install-file' 
them as separate components), but this is undesirable.


I hope I am making sense.

Thank you,
Vasiliy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org