Re: is CONTINUUM-609 really in 1.0.3?

2006-04-25 Thread Mang Jun Lau
How does this actually work?  I put P:\builds into the Deployment 
Repository Directory field and the build is not copied over.  Am I missing 
some setting or something?


_Mang Lau





"Nigel Magnay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
04/25/2006 11:06 AM
Please respond to
continuum-users@maven.apache.org


To
continuum-users@maven.apache.org
cc

Subject
Re: is CONTINUUM-609 really in 1.0.3?






AHa - that fixed it (and a little local difficulty in forgetting I
needed to do mvn -U)

Is there a wiki for this kind of stuff that I could add to? I can't
believe I'll be the last to tie my own shoelaces together on that one.

On 25/04/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you have define the deployment repository field in configuration 
screen? It's empty by default.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> Nigel Magnay a écrit :
> > Hmm.. I must be doing something wrong - are there any docs for this or
> > handy pointers? It sounds a really useful feature - 1.0.3 is really
> > nice.
> >
> > On 25/04/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>It's not browsable, but it will work just fine when used from Maven.
> >>
> >>- Brett
> >>
> >>On 4/25/06, Nigel Magnay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>It's in the release note -
> >>>I try http://box:8080/continuum/repository but just get a 404 ?
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>



Re: is CONTINUUM-609 really in 1.0.3?

2006-04-25 Thread Emmanuel Venisse

You can create a patch for FAQ or other pages and I'll apply it

Emmanuel

Nigel Magnay a écrit :

AHa - that fixed it (and a little local difficulty in forgetting I
needed to do mvn -U)

Is there a wiki for this kind of stuff that I could add to? I can't
believe I'll be the last to tie my own shoelaces together on that one.

On 25/04/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Do you have define the deployment repository field in configuration screen? 
It's empty by default.

Emmanuel

Nigel Magnay a écrit :


Hmm.. I must be doing something wrong - are there any docs for this or
handy pointers? It sounds a really useful feature - 1.0.3 is really
nice.

On 25/04/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



It's not browsable, but it will work just fine when used from Maven.

- Brett

On 4/25/06, Nigel Magnay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



It's in the release note -
I try http://box:8080/continuum/repository but just get a 404 ?
















Re: is CONTINUUM-609 really in 1.0.3?

2006-04-25 Thread Nigel Magnay
AHa - that fixed it (and a little local difficulty in forgetting I
needed to do mvn -U)

Is there a wiki for this kind of stuff that I could add to? I can't
believe I'll be the last to tie my own shoelaces together on that one.

On 25/04/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you have define the deployment repository field in configuration screen? 
> It's empty by default.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> Nigel Magnay a écrit :
> > Hmm.. I must be doing something wrong - are there any docs for this or
> > handy pointers? It sounds a really useful feature - 1.0.3 is really
> > nice.
> >
> > On 25/04/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>It's not browsable, but it will work just fine when used from Maven.
> >>
> >>- Brett
> >>
> >>On 4/25/06, Nigel Magnay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>It's in the release note -
> >>>I try http://box:8080/continuum/repository but just get a 404 ?
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>


Re: is CONTINUUM-609 really in 1.0.3?

2006-04-25 Thread Emmanuel Venisse

Do you have define the deployment repository field in configuration screen? 
It's empty by default.

Emmanuel

Nigel Magnay a écrit :

Hmm.. I must be doing something wrong - are there any docs for this or
handy pointers? It sounds a really useful feature - 1.0.3 is really
nice.

On 25/04/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


It's not browsable, but it will work just fine when used from Maven.

- Brett

On 4/25/06, Nigel Magnay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


It's in the release note -
I try http://box:8080/continuum/repository but just get a 404 ?











Re: is CONTINUUM-609 really in 1.0.3?

2006-04-25 Thread Nigel Magnay
Hmm.. I must be doing something wrong - are there any docs for this or
handy pointers? It sounds a really useful feature - 1.0.3 is really
nice.

On 25/04/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not browsable, but it will work just fine when used from Maven.
>
> - Brett
>
> On 4/25/06, Nigel Magnay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's in the release note -
> > I try http://box:8080/continuum/repository but just get a 404 ?
> >
>


Re: is CONTINUUM-609 really in 1.0.3?

2006-04-25 Thread Brett Porter
It's not browsable, but it will work just fine when used from Maven.

- Brett

On 4/25/06, Nigel Magnay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's in the release note -
> I try http://box:8080/continuum/repository but just get a 404 ?
>


is CONTINUUM-609 really in 1.0.3?

2006-04-25 Thread Nigel Magnay
It's in the release note -
I try http://box:8080/continuum/repository but just get a 404 ?