Re: surefire 2.2 + JUnit4?
Hi all,
what you might also do is to write your testcases the JUnit 4 way
(whithout a suite() method,
without extending TestCase, without having your test methods named with
the "test" prefix)
and then write an additional class (which you simply can throw away in
the future)
which extends junit.framework.TestCase and provides a suite() method
returning
a JUnit4TestAdapter instance.
Yours
Stefan
-Original Message-
From: Cheng-Yang Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Maven Users List
Sent: Sat, 20 May 2006 13:44:14 +0100
Subject: RE: surefire 2.2 + JUnit4?
Hi Daun,
Thanks for your detailed explaination.
And yes, when I wrote the unit test in JUnit v3.8.1 way
everything works as expected.
Thanks very much
Louis
-Original Message-
From: Daun DeFrance [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 19/05/2006 17:01
To: Maven Users List
Subject: RE: surefire 2.2 + JUnit4?
Louis,
The only way I could get my JUnit4 tests to run is if they looked and
smelled like 3.8.1.
That is, my test had to extend TestCase (which overloads the static
import of Assert.*) and all my test methods had to begin with "test". I
also had the suite() method as you did below. With the proper JUnit4
dependency, my annotations and such compiled, but having to make my
JUnit4 test look like 3.8.1 eliminates all the benefits of writing v4
tests that will run in maven.
I downloaded the source for Surefire (trunk) and the junit provider is
pretty hardcoded to be 3.8.1. Well it looks for 3.8.1 syntax to
determine which tests to run. Until it is refactored to support JUnit 4
syntax, I don't think there's a real workaround (short of what I
mentioned above) to get it to work.
Does anyone have an idea on when this might be?
Best,
Daun
-Original Message-
From: Cheng-Yang Tang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 4:39 AM
To: Maven Users List; Maven Users List
Subject: RE: surefire 2.2 + JUnit4?
I tried to modified the variable names so that those who willing to help
me out can understand my problem a bit easier. But it seems I missed
this one. Thanks for reminding me that. the "correct problem code"
should be as you pointed out (listed below). But it still doesn't work
as expected.
Louis
import org.junit.*;
import static org.junit.Assert.*;
import junit.framework.JUnit4TestAdapter;
public class MyTest {
private int i;
@Before public void runOnceBeforeAllTests()
{
i = 10;
}
@Test public void test4()
{
assertEquals(10, i);
}
public static junit.framework.Test suite()
{
return new JUnit4TestAdapter(MyTest.class);
}
}
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey D. Brekke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 19/05/2006 02:59
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: surefire 2.2 + JUnit4?
I don't know much about surefire, but it looks like the adapter is
pointing to the incorrect class? Should be MyTest.class?
Cheng-Yang Tang wrote:
[SNIPPED]
import org.junit.*;
import static org.junit.Assert.*;
import junit.framework.JUnit4TestAdapter;
public class MyTest {
private int i;
@Before public void runOnceBeforeAllTests()
{
i = 10;
}
@Test public void test4()
{
assertEquals(10, i);
}
public static junit.framework.Test suite()
{
return new JUnit4TestAdapter(WebServiceDispatcher.class);
}
}
--
=
Jeffrey D. Brekke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wisconsin, USA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/jbrekke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Try the New Netscape Mail Today!
Virtually Spam-Free | More Storage | Import Your Contact List
http://mail.netscape.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re : log within surefire 2.2
Can we discribe surefire plugin in the pom to tell him where is the configuration file. Or, is it a missing feature ? Yan. - Message d'origine De : Wim Deblauwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> À : Maven Users List Envoyé le : Dimanche, 28 Mai 2006, 2h12mn 24s Objet : Re: log within surefire 2.2 It was through searching I got the below mail, but I saw it is unanswered, hence my mail... I hope someone can help us out... regards, Wim 2006/5/27, Andreas Guther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Did you search the mailing list archive? I think I read not too long > ago a thread on that issue with a similar problem. > > Andreas > > > > -Original Message- > From: Wim Deblauwe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 11:36 AM > To: Maven Users List; langlois yan > Subject: Re: log within surefire 2.2 > > I got the same problem, anyone got a solution for this? > > 2006/5/16, langlois yan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > The new release of the surefire plugin does not use my log4j which is > in > > the src/main/resources. How can I tell surefire to use it ? > > > > Yan. > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: log within surefire 2.2
It was through searching I got the below mail, but I saw it is unanswered, hence my mail... I hope someone can help us out... regards, Wim 2006/5/27, Andreas Guther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Did you search the mailing list archive? I think I read not too long ago a thread on that issue with a similar problem. Andreas -Original Message- From: Wim Deblauwe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 11:36 AM To: Maven Users List; langlois yan Subject: Re: log within surefire 2.2 I got the same problem, anyone got a solution for this? 2006/5/16, langlois yan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > The new release of the surefire plugin does not use my log4j which is in > the src/main/resources. How can I tell surefire to use it ? > > Yan. > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: log within surefire 2.2
Did you search the mailing list archive? I think I read not too long ago a thread on that issue with a similar problem. Andreas -Original Message- From: Wim Deblauwe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 11:36 AM To: Maven Users List; langlois yan Subject: Re: log within surefire 2.2 I got the same problem, anyone got a solution for this? 2006/5/16, langlois yan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > The new release of the surefire plugin does not use my log4j which is in > the src/main/resources. How can I tell surefire to use it ? > > Yan. > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: log within surefire 2.2
I got the same problem, anyone got a solution for this? 2006/5/16, langlois yan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: The new release of the surefire plugin does not use my log4j which is in the src/main/resources. How can I tell surefire to use it ? Yan. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Surefire-2.2-SNAPSHOT and UnsupportedClassVersionError - more info
When I run 'mvn test', I get a stacktrace from the surefire-booter saying UnsupportedClassVersionError as follows. This is a recap of my minimal project which I'm going to use as the base for a bug in jira. [INFO] Surefire report directory: C:\Projects\cortex\back-end\target\surefire-reports org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireExecutionException: com/cortex/base/domain/card/CardFinderTest (Unsupported major.minor version 49.0); nested except is java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: com/cortex/base/domain/card/CardFinderTest (Unsupported major.minor version 49.0) java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: com/cortex/base/domain/card/CardFinderTest (Unsupported major.minor version 49.0) at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass0(Native Method) at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(Unknown Source) at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(Unknown Source) at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(Unknown Source) at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$100(Unknown Source) at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(Unknown Source) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(Unknown Source) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.IsolatedClassLoader.loadClass(IsolatedC lassLoader.java:88) at org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.locateTestSet s(AbstractDirect... at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.createSuiteFromDefinition(Surefire.ja va:147) at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:108) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess(Suref ireBooter.java:220) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main(SurefireBooter.java :733) I have JDK1.5.0_06 as my JAVA_HOME and this is the compiler plugin config: org.apache.maven.plugins maven-compiler-plugin 1.5 1.5 I started with clean code base, checked for stray .class files, and the local repository is empty. I specified the following for my remote repositories: apache.snapshots http://cvs.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository apache.snapshots http://cvs.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository I specified the latest maven-surefire-plugin-2.2-SNAPSHOT org.apache.maven.plugins maven-surefire-plugin 2.2-SNAPSHOT And I can see the maven downloads the snapshots for maven-surefire-plugin-2.2 (2.2-20060507.223157-4) and surefire-2.0. It is using 2.0-20060507.230910-3 for surefire-booter, surefire-api, surefire-junit and surefire-providers. I have an associate (Marco) for whom this set-up works, so I assume that he has earlier versions of the jars. My next step is to try to run it with those versions, and if that doesn't work, to compile from source. Failing that, and if there is no more help available on the list or as a result of this new jira issue, I may have to contact the developers mentioned in the poms. Thanks Adam - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: surefire 2.2 + JUnit4?
Hi Daun,
Thanks for your detailed explaination.
And yes, when I wrote the unit test in JUnit v3.8.1 way
everything works as expected.
Thanks very much
Louis
-Original Message-
From: Daun DeFrance [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 19/05/2006 17:01
To: Maven Users List
Subject: RE: surefire 2.2 + JUnit4?
Louis,
The only way I could get my JUnit4 tests to run is if they looked and
smelled like 3.8.1.
That is, my test had to extend TestCase (which overloads the static
import of Assert.*) and all my test methods had to begin with "test". I
also had the suite() method as you did below. With the proper JUnit4
dependency, my annotations and such compiled, but having to make my
JUnit4 test look like 3.8.1 eliminates all the benefits of writing v4
tests that will run in maven.
I downloaded the source for Surefire (trunk) and the junit provider is
pretty hardcoded to be 3.8.1. Well it looks for 3.8.1 syntax to
determine which tests to run. Until it is refactored to support JUnit 4
syntax, I don't think there's a real workaround (short of what I
mentioned above) to get it to work.
Does anyone have an idea on when this might be?
Best,
Daun
-Original Message-
From: Cheng-Yang Tang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 4:39 AM
To: Maven Users List; Maven Users List
Subject: RE: surefire 2.2 + JUnit4?
I tried to modified the variable names so that those who willing to help
me out can understand my problem a bit easier. But it seems I missed
this one. Thanks for reminding me that. the "correct problem code"
should be as you pointed out (listed below). But it still doesn't work
as expected.
Louis
import org.junit.*;
import static org.junit.Assert.*;
import junit.framework.JUnit4TestAdapter;
public class MyTest {
private int i;
@Before public void runOnceBeforeAllTests()
{
i = 10;
}
@Test public void test4()
{
assertEquals(10, i);
}
public static junit.framework.Test suite()
{
return new JUnit4TestAdapter(MyTest.class);
}
}
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey D. Brekke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 19/05/2006 02:59
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: surefire 2.2 + JUnit4?
I don't know much about surefire, but it looks like the adapter is
pointing to the incorrect class? Should be MyTest.class?
Cheng-Yang Tang wrote:
[SNIPPED]
> import org.junit.*;
> import static org.junit.Assert.*;
> import junit.framework.JUnit4TestAdapter;
>
> public class MyTest {
>
> private int i;
>
> @Before public void runOnceBeforeAllTests()
> {
> i = 10;
> }
>
> @Test public void test4()
> {
> assertEquals(10, i);
> }
>
> public static junit.framework.Test suite()
> {
> return new JUnit4TestAdapter(WebServiceDispatcher.class);
> }
> }
--
=
Jeffrey D. Brekke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wisconsin, USA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/jbrekke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: surefire 2.2 + JUnit4?
Louis,
The only way I could get my JUnit4 tests to run is if they looked and
smelled like 3.8.1.
That is, my test had to extend TestCase (which overloads the static
import of Assert.*) and all my test methods had to begin with "test". I
also had the suite() method as you did below. With the proper JUnit4
dependency, my annotations and such compiled, but having to make my
JUnit4 test look like 3.8.1 eliminates all the benefits of writing v4
tests that will run in maven.
I downloaded the source for Surefire (trunk) and the junit provider is
pretty hardcoded to be 3.8.1. Well it looks for 3.8.1 syntax to
determine which tests to run. Until it is refactored to support JUnit 4
syntax, I don't think there's a real workaround (short of what I
mentioned above) to get it to work.
Does anyone have an idea on when this might be?
Best,
Daun
-Original Message-
From: Cheng-Yang Tang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 4:39 AM
To: Maven Users List; Maven Users List
Subject: RE: surefire 2.2 + JUnit4?
I tried to modified the variable names so that those who willing to help
me out can understand my problem a bit easier. But it seems I missed
this one. Thanks for reminding me that. the "correct problem code"
should be as you pointed out (listed below). But it still doesn't work
as expected.
Louis
import org.junit.*;
import static org.junit.Assert.*;
import junit.framework.JUnit4TestAdapter;
public class MyTest {
private int i;
@Before public void runOnceBeforeAllTests()
{
i = 10;
}
@Test public void test4()
{
assertEquals(10, i);
}
public static junit.framework.Test suite()
{
return new JUnit4TestAdapter(MyTest.class);
}
}
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey D. Brekke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 19/05/2006 02:59
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: surefire 2.2 + JUnit4?
I don't know much about surefire, but it looks like the adapter is
pointing to the incorrect class? Should be MyTest.class?
Cheng-Yang Tang wrote:
[SNIPPED]
> import org.junit.*;
> import static org.junit.Assert.*;
> import junit.framework.JUnit4TestAdapter;
>
> public class MyTest {
>
> private int i;
>
> @Before public void runOnceBeforeAllTests()
> {
> i = 10;
> }
>
> @Test public void test4()
> {
> assertEquals(10, i);
> }
>
> public static junit.framework.Test suite()
> {
> return new JUnit4TestAdapter(WebServiceDispatcher.class);
> }
> }
--
=
Jeffrey D. Brekke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wisconsin, USA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/jbrekke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: surefire 2.2 + JUnit4?
I tried to modified the variable names so that those who willing to help me out
can understand my problem a bit easier. But it seems I missed this one. Thanks
for reminding me that. the "correct problem code" should be as you pointed out
(listed below). But it still doesn't work as expected.
Louis
import org.junit.*;
import static org.junit.Assert.*;
import junit.framework.JUnit4TestAdapter;
public class MyTest {
private int i;
@Before public void runOnceBeforeAllTests()
{
i = 10;
}
@Test public void test4()
{
assertEquals(10, i);
}
public static junit.framework.Test suite()
{
return new JUnit4TestAdapter(MyTest.class);
}
}
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey D. Brekke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 19/05/2006 02:59
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: surefire 2.2 + JUnit4?
I don't know much about surefire, but it looks like the adapter is
pointing to the incorrect class? Should be MyTest.class?
Cheng-Yang Tang wrote:
[SNIPPED]
> import org.junit.*;
> import static org.junit.Assert.*;
> import junit.framework.JUnit4TestAdapter;
>
> public class MyTest {
>
> private int i;
>
> @Before public void runOnceBeforeAllTests()
> {
> i = 10;
> }
>
> @Test public void test4()
> {
> assertEquals(10, i);
> }
>
> public static junit.framework.Test suite()
> {
> return new JUnit4TestAdapter(WebServiceDispatcher.class);
> }
> }
--
=
Jeffrey D. Brekke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wisconsin, USA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/jbrekke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
surefire 2.2
Hi just wondering if the group has experimented with the new surefire 2.2 plugin release, and if it does indeed solve the GC issue Brett indicates below. We are seeing this issue, and looking to update the plugin, but getting by with feeding arguments to the jvm for now. Regards, Davis FYI, the upcoming 2.2 release of surefire will reduce the memory used by allowing the test cases to be garbage collected after they've run instead of at the end. It also enables assertions by default, whether you are forking or not, by setting the flag on the classloader running the tests. - Brett - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: surefire 2.2 + JUnit4?
I don't know much about surefire, but it looks like the adapter is
pointing to the incorrect class? Should be MyTest.class?
Cheng-Yang Tang wrote:
[SNIPPED]
import org.junit.*;
import static org.junit.Assert.*;
import junit.framework.JUnit4TestAdapter;
public class MyTest {
private int i;
@Before public void runOnceBeforeAllTests()
{
i = 10;
}
@Test public void test4()
{
assertEquals(10, i);
}
public static junit.framework.Test suite()
{
return new JUnit4TestAdapter(WebServiceDispatcher.class);
}
}
--
=
Jeffrey D. Brekke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wisconsin, USA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/jbrekke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
surefire 2.2 + JUnit4?
Hi,
I know the issue about how to use JUnit4 in Maven2 has been discussed for a
while.
But the adapter method:
public static junit.framework.Test suite() {
return new JUnit4TestAdapter(SimpleTest.class);
}
doesn't help much in my case.
I've heard that surefire2.2 may amend this.
However, after upgrading to sruefire2.2, this problem remains.
the test code are listed follow, which passed the JUnit test when I run it
manually without maven
Can anyone help me with that?
Thanks in advance.
Louis
import org.junit.*;
import static org.junit.Assert.*;
import junit.framework.JUnit4TestAdapter;
public class MyTest {
private int i;
@Before public void runOnceBeforeAllTests()
{
i = 10;
}
@Test public void test4()
{
assertEquals(10, i);
}
public static junit.framework.Test suite()
{
return new JUnit4TestAdapter(WebServiceDispatcher.class);
}
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
log within surefire 2.2
The new release of the surefire plugin does not use my log4j which is in the src/main/resources. How can I tell surefire to use it ? Yan. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
