Re: surefire 2.3, mvn 2.0.5 : execution blocks and system property
i also tried moving the common system properties into the element of the plugin while keeping specific ones into the configuration of each execution block.. yet without no luck: tests are not executed with the correct properties set. On 3/14/07, Valerio Schiavoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I also tried specifing default (as suggested by jdcasey on irc), hoping that the configurations would have been merged..but it's not the case. On 3/14/07, Valerio Schiavoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hello, > seems like defining system properties within the configuration of an > execution block for the surefire plugin is not propertly supported. > > Consider this: > > > org.apache.maven.plugins > maven-surefire-plugin > > > > > no-optimization > > test > > test > > > > fractal.provider > > org.objectweb.fractal.julia.Julia > > > > julia.loader > > org.objectweb.fractal.julia.loader.DynamicLoader > > > > julia.loader.gen.dir > > target/test-classes/generated > > > > julia.config > julia.cfg > > > > > > > > with the above configuration, tests fail. If I move the configuration > out of the execution element (still within the plugin), property are > correctly set, and tests pass. Since i need to configure more than 1 > (say, 4) configurations for the same suite of tests, i wonder wheter > this is a bug, or a misuse from mine. > > Ideas ? > > Thanks, > Valerio > > -- > http://jroller.com/page/vschiavoni > -- http://valerioschiavoni.blogspot.com http://jroller.com/page/vschiavoni -- http://valerioschiavoni.blogspot.com http://jroller.com/page/vschiavoni - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: surefire 2.3, mvn 2.0.5 : execution blocks and system property
I also tried specifing default (as suggested by jdcasey on irc), hoping that the configurations would have been merged..but it's not the case. On 3/14/07, Valerio Schiavoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hello, seems like defining system properties within the configuration of an execution block for the surefire plugin is not propertly supported. Consider this: org.apache.maven.plugins maven-surefire-plugin no-optimization test test fractal.provider org.objectweb.fractal.julia.Julia julia.loader org.objectweb.fractal.julia.loader.DynamicLoader julia.loader.gen.dir target/test-classes/generated julia.config julia.cfg with the above configuration, tests fail. If I move the configuration out of the execution element (still within the plugin), property are correctly set, and tests pass. Since i need to configure more than 1 (say, 4) configurations for the same suite of tests, i wonder wheter this is a bug, or a misuse from mine. Ideas ? Thanks, Valerio -- http://jroller.com/page/vschiavoni -- http://valerioschiavoni.blogspot.com http://jroller.com/page/vschiavoni - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
surefire 2.3, mvn 2.0.5 : execution blocks and system property
hello, seems like defining system properties within the configuration of an execution block for the surefire plugin is not propertly supported. Consider this: org.apache.maven.plugins maven-surefire-plugin no-optimization test test fractal.provider org.objectweb.fractal.julia.Julia julia.loader org.objectweb.fractal.julia.loader.DynamicLoader julia.loader.gen.dir target/test-classes/generated julia.config julia.cfg with the above configuration, tests fail. If I move the configuration out of the execution element (still within the plugin), property are correctly set, and tests pass. Since i need to configure more than 1 (say, 4) configurations for the same suite of tests, i wonder wheter this is a bug, or a misuse from mine. Ideas ? Thanks, Valerio -- http://jroller.com/page/vschiavoni - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
