Re: According to the Myfaces Wiki the Tree component is considered obsolete?
please use adf lists for that. Lot's of Oracle ADF Faces developers are around there. -Matthias On 6/5/06, Todd Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Matthias: Thank you. My thought was, start using Oracle ADF then when ADF was ready, migrate over. However, how much would break in the migration, if anything. Will it be an easy transition for developers using the current Oracle ADF to use ADF? Thanks, --Todd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthias Wessendorf Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 10:08 AM To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: According to the Myfaces Wiki the Tree component is considered obsolete? well, the name ... and instead of oracle.*** there is some apache based namespaces. Please take over such discussions to the ADF lists. (currently they are named ADF ...) -Matthias On 6/5/06, Todd Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matthias: Thank you, my concern is how much will ADF change when > migrating to Apache incubation? > > Thanks, > > --Todd > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Matthias Wessendorf > Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 10:11 AM > To: MyFaces Discussion > Subject: Re: According to the Myfaces Wiki the Tree component is > considered obsolete? > > tree2 has not be used as a "tree table" > > ADF Faces contains also a treeTable. > But using treeTable from tomahawk is fine too for now. > But looking at Adf Faces is perhaps the better choice. > > -Matthias > > On 6/2/06, Todd Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > According to the Myfaces Wiki the Tree component is considered > obsolete? > > > > I'd like to use a Tree Table, can Tree2 have multiple columns of > > data displayed at the leaf and children level? > > > > Thanks, > > > > --Todd > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > Aechterhoek 18 > 48282 Emsdetten > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > -- Matthias Wessendorf Aechterhoek 18 48282 Emsdetten blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com -- Matthias Wessendorf Aechterhoek 18 48282 Emsdetten blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
RE: According to the Myfaces Wiki the Tree component is considered obsolete?
Matthias: Thank you. My thought was, start using Oracle ADF then when ADF was ready, migrate over. However, how much would break in the migration, if anything. Will it be an easy transition for developers using the current Oracle ADF to use ADF? Thanks, --Todd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthias Wessendorf Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 10:08 AM To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: According to the Myfaces Wiki the Tree component is considered obsolete? well, the name ... and instead of oracle.*** there is some apache based namespaces. Please take over such discussions to the ADF lists. (currently they are named ADF ...) -Matthias On 6/5/06, Todd Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matthias: Thank you, my concern is how much will ADF change when > migrating to Apache incubation? > > Thanks, > > --Todd > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Matthias Wessendorf > Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 10:11 AM > To: MyFaces Discussion > Subject: Re: According to the Myfaces Wiki the Tree component is > considered obsolete? > > tree2 has not be used as a "tree table" > > ADF Faces contains also a treeTable. > But using treeTable from tomahawk is fine too for now. > But looking at Adf Faces is perhaps the better choice. > > -Matthias > > On 6/2/06, Todd Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > According to the Myfaces Wiki the Tree component is considered > obsolete? > > > > I'd like to use a Tree Table, can Tree2 have multiple columns of > > data displayed at the leaf and children level? > > > > Thanks, > > > > --Todd > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > Aechterhoek 18 > 48282 Emsdetten > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > -- Matthias Wessendorf Aechterhoek 18 48282 Emsdetten blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: According to the Myfaces Wiki the Tree component is considered obsolete?
well, the name ... and instead of oracle.*** there is some apache based namespaces. Please take over such discussions to the ADF lists. (currently they are named ADF ...) -Matthias On 6/5/06, Todd Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Matthias: Thank you, my concern is how much will ADF change when migrating to Apache incubation? Thanks, --Todd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthias Wessendorf Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 10:11 AM To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: According to the Myfaces Wiki the Tree component is considered obsolete? tree2 has not be used as a "tree table" ADF Faces contains also a treeTable. But using treeTable from tomahawk is fine too for now. But looking at Adf Faces is perhaps the better choice. -Matthias On 6/2/06, Todd Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > According to the Myfaces Wiki the Tree component is considered obsolete? > > I'd like to use a Tree Table, can Tree2 have multiple columns of data > displayed at the leaf and children level? > > Thanks, > > --Todd > -- Matthias Wessendorf Aechterhoek 18 48282 Emsdetten blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com -- Matthias Wessendorf Aechterhoek 18 48282 Emsdetten blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
RE: According to the Myfaces Wiki the Tree component is considered obsolete?
Matthias: Thank you, my concern is how much will ADF change when migrating to Apache incubation? Thanks, --Todd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthias Wessendorf Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 10:11 AM To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: According to the Myfaces Wiki the Tree component is considered obsolete? tree2 has not be used as a "tree table" ADF Faces contains also a treeTable. But using treeTable from tomahawk is fine too for now. But looking at Adf Faces is perhaps the better choice. -Matthias On 6/2/06, Todd Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > According to the Myfaces Wiki the Tree component is considered obsolete? > > I'd like to use a Tree Table, can Tree2 have multiple columns of data > displayed at the leaf and children level? > > Thanks, > > --Todd > -- Matthias Wessendorf Aechterhoek 18 48282 Emsdetten blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: According to the Myfaces Wiki the Tree component is considered obsolete?
tree2 has not be used as a "tree table" ADF Faces contains also a treeTable. But using treeTable from tomahawk is fine too for now. But looking at Adf Faces is perhaps the better choice. -Matthias On 6/2/06, Todd Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: According to the Myfaces Wiki the Tree component is considered obsolete? I'd like to use a Tree Table, can Tree2 have multiple columns of data displayed at the leaf and children level? Thanks, --Todd -- Matthias Wessendorf Aechterhoek 18 48282 Emsdetten blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
