Re: Re: Re: Using Tree2 without Javascript
And apparently there doesnt seem to be any way in which this can degrade gracefully in case JS is not available Thanks for your help guys. Sawan On 11/15/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It's a basic principle of JSF that every link needs JavaScript. The problem is with the sizes of the state of a modern web-application: it is (almost) impossible to cut this state down to sizes which can be transferred via a link without IE restricting this. So what JSF does is posting the form with a click on a link - as tree2 relies on links, you have the same issue here... regards, Martin On 11/15/06, Sawan Vithlani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So it's not possible to do this, for example, with the node being an > HTML link back to the appropriate submission? > > Sawan > > On 11/15/06, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > JavaScript is required. Even with server side state toggling, the > > javascript is what submits the tree when the icon is clicked. > > > > On 11/14/06, Sawan Vithlani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > > > I'm currently evaluating some JSF controls and one of our requirements > > > is that we be able to use the Tree control when Javascript is > > > unavailable on the client side. > > > > > > I have downloaded and tried the Tomahawk examples. > > > > > > The Tree2 control example given > > > (http://localhost:8080/myfaces-example-simple-1.1.5-SNAPSHOT/tree2.jsf, > > > assuming a local installation) does not seem to work without > > > Javascript. The description here: > > > http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk/tree2.html says that "...there is > > > an option for client-side or server-side toggling of the > > > expand/collapse state. " I take this to mean that the whole tree is > > > submit to the server, and comes back with the clicked node expanded, > > > and that this operation was performed without Javascript. > > > > > > Was I correct in assuming this? If no, is there any other way in which > > > this behaviour can be acheived? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Sawan > > > > > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: Re: Using Tree2 without Javascript
It's a basic principle of JSF that every link needs JavaScript. The problem is with the sizes of the state of a modern web-application: it is (almost) impossible to cut this state down to sizes which can be transferred via a link without IE restricting this. So what JSF does is posting the form with a click on a link - as tree2 relies on links, you have the same issue here... regards, Martin On 11/15/06, Sawan Vithlani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So it's not possible to do this, for example, with the node being an HTML link back to the appropriate submission? Sawan On 11/15/06, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > JavaScript is required. Even with server side state toggling, the > javascript is what submits the tree when the icon is clicked. > > On 11/14/06, Sawan Vithlani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I'm currently evaluating some JSF controls and one of our requirements > > is that we be able to use the Tree control when Javascript is > > unavailable on the client side. > > > > I have downloaded and tried the Tomahawk examples. > > > > The Tree2 control example given > > (http://localhost:8080/myfaces-example-simple-1.1.5-SNAPSHOT/tree2.jsf, > > assuming a local installation) does not seem to work without > > Javascript. The description here: > > http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk/tree2.html says that "...there is > > an option for client-side or server-side toggling of the > > expand/collapse state. " I take this to mean that the whole tree is > > submit to the server, and comes back with the clicked node expanded, > > and that this operation was performed without Javascript. > > > > Was I correct in assuming this? If no, is there any other way in which > > this behaviour can be acheived? > > > > Thanks > > > > Sawan > > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: Re: Using Tree2 without Javascript
So it's not possible to do this, for example, with the node being an HTML link back to the appropriate submission? Sawan On 11/15/06, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: JavaScript is required. Even with server side state toggling, the javascript is what submits the tree when the icon is clicked. On 11/14/06, Sawan Vithlani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm currently evaluating some JSF controls and one of our requirements > is that we be able to use the Tree control when Javascript is > unavailable on the client side. > > I have downloaded and tried the Tomahawk examples. > > The Tree2 control example given > (http://localhost:8080/myfaces-example-simple-1.1.5-SNAPSHOT/tree2.jsf, > assuming a local installation) does not seem to work without > Javascript. The description here: > http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk/tree2.html says that "...there is > an option for client-side or server-side toggling of the > expand/collapse state. " I take this to mean that the whole tree is > submit to the server, and comes back with the clicked node expanded, > and that this operation was performed without Javascript. > > Was I correct in assuming this? If no, is there any other way in which > this behaviour can be acheived? > > Thanks > > Sawan >
