jTestField

[mmouer]

I hope you folks will bear with me. It’s been 12 years since I retired and used 
Java and I never coded the GUI. My job was the backend.

I’ve designed the form using NetBeans and it does most of the work.
But I’m having trouble with events and focus in jTextField.

Entering data and depressing entry allows access to the contents the user has 
entered but doesn’t go to the next field. Depressing tab moves the focus to the 
next field but does not allow access to the data in the first field.

I’ve tried to find a .setFocus and am rewarded with about 6 options none of 
which do what I want.

I have searched docs and tutorials and obviously not found the right one.

Any help will be appreciated.

There are 10 types of people in the world,
those that understand binary and those that don't.

Re: Error: JavaFX runtime components are missing, and are required to run this application

[Geertjan Wielenga]

Thanks, done!

Gj

On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 at 23:24, David Green  wrote:

> Thanks for the blog entry as well as the source content.  Very helpful.
>
> Should “(Incubating)” be removed from blog title?
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 5:47 AM Geertjan Wielenga 
> wrote:
>
>> Created a blog entry listing your three great articles:
>>
>>
>> https://blogs.apache.org/netbeans/entry/apache-netbeans-openjfx-and-adoptopenjdk
>>
>> Gj
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:56 AM Geertjan Wielenga 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, that would be cool, e.g., at blogs.apache.org/netbeans or at
>>> http://jaxenter.com/netbeans.
>>>
>>> Gj
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 5:09 PM Luff,Chris  wrote:
>>>
 Agree with @Geertjan here….you need to choose an approach. I prefer
 maven which is by no means perfect but has good resource!

 I published some articles on modular JavaFX in NetBeans on DZone[1],
 probably should start blogging for Apache NetBeans (Geertjan?).

 [1]: https://dzone.com/articles/adoptopenjdk-11-openjfx-netbeans


 On 6 Jun 2019, at 13:16, Geertjan Wielenga  wrote:

 The key problem is that you need to make a choice: are you using Ant or
 Maven? Are you creating a modular application or not?

 No one can help you if in each and every mail you send you're trying
 something completely different -- i.e., now you suddenly mention
 module-info.java, which means you're creating a modular application.

 What is it that you want to achieve? No one can help you, if you don't
 know.

 Gj

 On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 2:13 PM Eef Custers 
 wrote:

> Hi Jose,
>
> Thanks for your respons.
>
> This commandline was generated by Netbeans in case one did not wanted
> to use Ant. This generated line contains errors ( colons instead of
> semecolons), which I ofcourse removed. The rest of the config is collected
> from internal settings. Indeed the mods directory is also configured in
> Netbeans. In another programs I used the module-info.java. That build went
> OK, but alo the run failed. I am really amased that these new versions do
> not match. I am now almost two weeks going over the internet and trying 
> all
> kinds of ways of working, but I did not find a solution. Maybe the advise
> will be: stay at version 8 for Java/JavaFX and Netbeans?
>
> Regards,
>
> Eef
>
>
>
>
> Op do 6 jun. 2019 om 13:50 schreef jose.per...@gluonhq.com <
> jose.per...@gluonhq.com>:
>
>> Hi Eef,
>>
>> Your command line says otherwise, but it tells what it is ultimately
>> running:
>>
>> c:\java_lib\jdk-12.0.1/bin/java \
>> -p C:\java_lib\javafx-jmods-12.0.1;
>>C:\java_lib\javafx-jmods-12.0.1;
>>
>>  
>> C:\java_lib\javafx-sdk-12.0.1\lib\javafx-swt.jar;C:\java_lib\javafx-sdk-12.0.1\lib\javafx.base.jar;
>> *C:\java_lib\javafx-sdk-12.0.1\lib\javafx.controls.jar;
>> *C:\java_lib\javafx-sdk-12.0.1\lib\javafx.fxml.jar;... \
>>  -cp C:\java_lib\javafx-sdk-12.0.1\lib\javafx-swt.jar;
>> C:\java_lib\javafx-sdk-12.0.1\lib\javafx.base.jar;
>>  *C:\java_lib\javafx-sdk-12.0.1\lib\javafx.controls.jar;...
>> ;D:\NbProjects\FxApp01_c\dist\FxApp01_c.jar \
>>  fxapp01_c.FxApp01_c
>>
>> In this command line there are a few issues:
>> - No "--add-modules javafx.controls,javafx.fxml"
>> - JavaFX jmods and SDK mixed in the same module-path
>> - Weird path " *C:\...", this looks bad.
>>
>> Please follow the sample:
>> https://github.com/openjfx/samples/tree/master/IDE/NetBeans/Non-Modular/Java
>> 
>>
>> And make sure you have the right libraries and Path.
>>
>> Jose
>>
>> On 2019/06/06 11:36:17, Eef Custers  wrote:
>> > Hi Jose,
>> >
>> > I did not missed step 5, I had that configured. As you can read in
>> my other
>> > reply to Geertjan something is going wrong at the initialisation of
>> the
>> > boot layer. The VM parameters processing is complaining about the
>> last
>> > value in the list, no matter what the value is.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Eef
>> >
>> > Op do 6 jun. 2019 om 10:34 schreef jose.per...@gluonhq.com <
>> > jose.per...@gluonhq.com>:
>> >
>> > > Hi, you can still use Ant, of course, but as Geertjan already
>> pointed out,
>> > > you are missing this:
>> > >
>> > > --add-modules javafx.fxml,javafx.controls
>> > >
>> > > (no need for javafx.base nor javafx.graphics, as these are
>> transitive
>> > > dependencies of 

Re: Error: JavaFX runtime components are missing, and are required to run this application

[David Green]

Thanks for the blog entry as well as the source content.  Very helpful.

Should “(Incubating)” be removed from blog title?

On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 5:47 AM Geertjan Wielenga 
wrote:

> Created a blog entry listing your three great articles:
>
>
> https://blogs.apache.org/netbeans/entry/apache-netbeans-openjfx-and-adoptopenjdk
>
> Gj
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:56 AM Geertjan Wielenga 
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, that would be cool, e.g., at blogs.apache.org/netbeans or at
>> http://jaxenter.com/netbeans.
>>
>> Gj
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 5:09 PM Luff,Chris  wrote:
>>
>>> Agree with @Geertjan here….you need to choose an approach. I prefer
>>> maven which is by no means perfect but has good resource!
>>>
>>> I published some articles on modular JavaFX in NetBeans on DZone[1],
>>> probably should start blogging for Apache NetBeans (Geertjan?).
>>>
>>> [1]: https://dzone.com/articles/adoptopenjdk-11-openjfx-netbeans
>>>
>>>
>>> On 6 Jun 2019, at 13:16, Geertjan Wielenga  wrote:
>>>
>>> The key problem is that you need to make a choice: are you using Ant or
>>> Maven? Are you creating a modular application or not?
>>>
>>> No one can help you if in each and every mail you send you're trying
>>> something completely different -- i.e., now you suddenly mention
>>> module-info.java, which means you're creating a modular application.
>>>
>>> What is it that you want to achieve? No one can help you, if you don't
>>> know.
>>>
>>> Gj
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 2:13 PM Eef Custers 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Hi Jose,

 Thanks for your respons.

 This commandline was generated by Netbeans in case one did not wanted
 to use Ant. This generated line contains errors ( colons instead of
 semecolons), which I ofcourse removed. The rest of the config is collected
 from internal settings. Indeed the mods directory is also configured in
 Netbeans. In another programs I used the module-info.java. That build went
 OK, but alo the run failed. I am really amased that these new versions do
 not match. I am now almost two weeks going over the internet and trying all
 kinds of ways of working, but I did not find a solution. Maybe the advise
 will be: stay at version 8 for Java/JavaFX and Netbeans?

 Regards,

 Eef




 Op do 6 jun. 2019 om 13:50 schreef jose.per...@gluonhq.com <
 jose.per...@gluonhq.com>:

> Hi Eef,
>
> Your command line says otherwise, but it tells what it is ultimately
> running:
>
> c:\java_lib\jdk-12.0.1/bin/java \
> -p C:\java_lib\javafx-jmods-12.0.1;
>C:\java_lib\javafx-jmods-12.0.1;
>
>  
> C:\java_lib\javafx-sdk-12.0.1\lib\javafx-swt.jar;C:\java_lib\javafx-sdk-12.0.1\lib\javafx.base.jar;
> *C:\java_lib\javafx-sdk-12.0.1\lib\javafx.controls.jar;
> *C:\java_lib\javafx-sdk-12.0.1\lib\javafx.fxml.jar;... \
>  -cp C:\java_lib\javafx-sdk-12.0.1\lib\javafx-swt.jar;
> C:\java_lib\javafx-sdk-12.0.1\lib\javafx.base.jar;
>  *C:\java_lib\javafx-sdk-12.0.1\lib\javafx.controls.jar;...
> ;D:\NbProjects\FxApp01_c\dist\FxApp01_c.jar \
>  fxapp01_c.FxApp01_c
>
> In this command line there are a few issues:
> - No "--add-modules javafx.controls,javafx.fxml"
> - JavaFX jmods and SDK mixed in the same module-path
> - Weird path " *C:\...", this looks bad.
>
> Please follow the sample:
> https://github.com/openjfx/samples/tree/master/IDE/NetBeans/Non-Modular/Java
> 
>
> And make sure you have the right libraries and Path.
>
> Jose
>
> On 2019/06/06 11:36:17, Eef Custers  wrote:
> > Hi Jose,
> >
> > I did not missed step 5, I had that configured. As you can read in
> my other
> > reply to Geertjan something is going wrong at the initialisation of
> the
> > boot layer. The VM parameters processing is complaining about the
> last
> > value in the list, no matter what the value is.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Eef
> >
> > Op do 6 jun. 2019 om 10:34 schreef jose.per...@gluonhq.com <
> > jose.per...@gluonhq.com>:
> >
> > > Hi, you can still use Ant, of course, but as Geertjan already
> pointed out,
> > > you are missing this:
> > >
> > > --add-modules javafx.fxml,javafx.controls
> > >
> > > (no need for javafx.base nor javafx.graphics, as these are
> transitive
> > > dependencies of javafx.controls).
> > >
> > > which is also shown in the pic
> > >
> https://openjfx.io/openjfx-docs/images/ide/netbeans/ide/netbeans07.png
> 

Re: Unused method highlighting

[Laszlo Kishalmi]

The editor already has that function, though you need to be very 
pragmatic when you are writing your classes.


It is can only been determined for  private methods safely whatever is 
public/package private are can be potentially called from outside. The 
current usage can be checked the find usages (Alt+F7) for public and 
package private members/classes.


On 6/10/19 5:47 AM, Mohammad Mohsen Nourafkan wrote:

Hi everyone
Is there possible to highlight those methods never called in editor
Thanks
--
MOHSENTM

Re: Unused method highlighting

[Peter Steele]

It's possible, intelij does it, it's just a question if netbeans does it.
If not I'd advise raising a new Jira or adding the functionality yourself
if you have the expertise. Netbeans definitely highlights unused methods
and fields to a certain extent.

On Mon, 10 Jun 2019, 17:38 Greenberg, Gary,  wrote:

> I do not think it feasible, because methods (unless they are private) can
> be called from outside of the class.
>
> Editor have to parse the whole project or may be more than one, if this
> project listed as dependency in another one.
>
> You can always check if particular method is used, using ‘Find usage’
> feature.
>
>
>
> Gary Greenberg
>
> Staff Software Engineer
>
> Data Product Development, BI-A
>
> E: ggree...@visa.com
>
> M: 650-269-7902
>
>
>
> [image: EmailSig-TaglineVersion]
>
>
>
> *From:* Mohammad Mohsen Nourafkan 
> *Sent:* Monday, June 10, 2019 5:47 AM
> *To:* users@netbeans.apache.org
> *Subject:* Unused method highlighting
>
>
>
> Hi everyone
>
> Is there possible to highlight those methods never called  in editor
> Thanks
>
> --
>
> MOHSENTM
>

RE: Unused method highlighting

[Greenberg, Gary]

I do not think it feasible, because methods (unless they are private) can be 
called from outside of the class.
Editor have to parse the whole project or may be more than one, if this project 
listed as dependency in another one.
You can always check if particular method is used, using ‘Find usage’ feature.

Gary Greenberg
Staff Software Engineer
Data Product Development, BI-A
E: ggree...@visa.com
M: 650-269-7902

[EmailSig-TaglineVersion]

From: Mohammad Mohsen Nourafkan 
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 5:47 AM
To: users@netbeans.apache.org
Subject: Unused method highlighting

Hi everyone
Is there possible to highlight those methods never called  in editor
Thanks
--
MOHSENTM

Unused method highlighting

[Mohammad Mohsen Nourafkan]

Hi everyone
Is there possible to highlight those methods never called  in editor
Thanks
-- 
MOHSENTM

Re: Error: JavaFX runtime components are missing, and are required to run this application

[Luff,Chris]

Awesome!

On 10 Jun 2019, at 11:47, Geertjan Wielenga 
mailto:geert...@apache.org>> wrote:

https://blogs.apache.org/netbeans/entry/apache-netbeans-openjfx-and-adoptopenjdk



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any included attachments are from 
Cerner Corporation and are intended only for the addressee. The information 
contained in this message is confidential and may constitute inside or 
non-public information under international, federal, or state securities laws. 
Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of such 
information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the 
addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the 
delivery error by e-mail or you may call Cerner's corporate offices in Kansas 
City, Missouri, U.S.A at (+1) (816)221-1024. Cerner Limited, Registered in 
England no 2519305, Registered Office 37 North Wharf Road, London W2 1AF.

Re: Error: JavaFX runtime components are missing, and are required to run this application

[Geertjan Wielenga]

Created a blog entry listing your three great articles:

https://blogs.apache.org/netbeans/entry/apache-netbeans-openjfx-and-adoptopenjdk

Gj

On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:56 AM Geertjan Wielenga 
wrote:

> Yes, that would be cool, e.g., at blogs.apache.org/netbeans or at
> http://jaxenter.com/netbeans.
>
> Gj
>
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 5:09 PM Luff,Chris  wrote:
>
>> Agree with @Geertjan here….you need to choose an approach. I prefer maven
>> which is by no means perfect but has good resource!
>>
>> I published some articles on modular JavaFX in NetBeans on DZone[1],
>> probably should start blogging for Apache NetBeans (Geertjan?).
>>
>> [1]: https://dzone.com/articles/adoptopenjdk-11-openjfx-netbeans
>>
>>
>> On 6 Jun 2019, at 13:16, Geertjan Wielenga  wrote:
>>
>> The key problem is that you need to make a choice: are you using Ant or
>> Maven? Are you creating a modular application or not?
>>
>> No one can help you if in each and every mail you send you're trying
>> something completely different -- i.e., now you suddenly mention
>> module-info.java, which means you're creating a modular application.
>>
>> What is it that you want to achieve? No one can help you, if you don't
>> know.
>>
>> Gj
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 2:13 PM Eef Custers  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jose,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your respons.
>>>
>>> This commandline was generated by Netbeans in case one did not wanted to
>>> use Ant. This generated line contains errors ( colons instead of
>>> semecolons), which I ofcourse removed. The rest of the config is collected
>>> from internal settings. Indeed the mods directory is also configured in
>>> Netbeans. In another programs I used the module-info.java. That build went
>>> OK, but alo the run failed. I am really amased that these new versions do
>>> not match. I am now almost two weeks going over the internet and trying all
>>> kinds of ways of working, but I did not find a solution. Maybe the advise
>>> will be: stay at version 8 for Java/JavaFX and Netbeans?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Eef
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Op do 6 jun. 2019 om 13:50 schreef jose.per...@gluonhq.com <
>>> jose.per...@gluonhq.com>:
>>>
 Hi Eef,

 Your command line says otherwise, but it tells what it is ultimately
 running:

 c:\java_lib\jdk-12.0.1/bin/java \
 -p C:\java_lib\javafx-jmods-12.0.1;
C:\java_lib\javafx-jmods-12.0.1;

  
 C:\java_lib\javafx-sdk-12.0.1\lib\javafx-swt.jar;C:\java_lib\javafx-sdk-12.0.1\lib\javafx.base.jar;
 *C:\java_lib\javafx-sdk-12.0.1\lib\javafx.controls.jar;
 *C:\java_lib\javafx-sdk-12.0.1\lib\javafx.fxml.jar;... \
  -cp C:\java_lib\javafx-sdk-12.0.1\lib\javafx-swt.jar;
 C:\java_lib\javafx-sdk-12.0.1\lib\javafx.base.jar;
  *C:\java_lib\javafx-sdk-12.0.1\lib\javafx.controls.jar;...
 ;D:\NbProjects\FxApp01_c\dist\FxApp01_c.jar \
  fxapp01_c.FxApp01_c

 In this command line there are a few issues:
 - No "--add-modules javafx.controls,javafx.fxml"
 - JavaFX jmods and SDK mixed in the same module-path
 - Weird path " *C:\...", this looks bad.

 Please follow the sample:
 https://github.com/openjfx/samples/tree/master/IDE/NetBeans/Non-Modular/Java
 

 And make sure you have the right libraries and Path.

 Jose

 On 2019/06/06 11:36:17, Eef Custers  wrote:
 > Hi Jose,
 >
 > I did not missed step 5, I had that configured. As you can read in my
 other
 > reply to Geertjan something is going wrong at the initialisation of
 the
 > boot layer. The VM parameters processing is complaining about the last
 > value in the list, no matter what the value is.
 >
 > Regards,
 > Eef
 >
 > Op do 6 jun. 2019 om 10:34 schreef jose.per...@gluonhq.com <
 > jose.per...@gluonhq.com>:
 >
 > > Hi, you can still use Ant, of course, but as Geertjan already
 pointed out,
 > > you are missing this:
 > >
 > > --add-modules javafx.fxml,javafx.controls
 > >
 > > (no need for javafx.base nor javafx.graphics, as these are
 transitive
 > > dependencies of javafx.controls).
 > >
 > > which is also shown in the pic
 > >
 https://openjfx.io/openjfx-docs/images/ide/netbeans/ide/netbeans07.png
 
 > > that is part of the mentioned tutorial 

Re: Error: JavaFX runtime components are missing, and are required to run this application

[Geertjan Wielenga]

Yes, that would be cool, e.g., at blogs.apache.org/netbeans or at
http://jaxenter.com/netbeans.

Gj

On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 5:09 PM Luff,Chris  wrote:

> Agree with @Geertjan here….you need to choose an approach. I prefer maven
> which is by no means perfect but has good resource!
>
> I published some articles on modular JavaFX in NetBeans on DZone[1],
> probably should start blogging for Apache NetBeans (Geertjan?).
>
> [1]: https://dzone.com/articles/adoptopenjdk-11-openjfx-netbeans
>
>
> On 6 Jun 2019, at 13:16, Geertjan Wielenga  wrote:
>
> The key problem is that you need to make a choice: are you using Ant or
> Maven? Are you creating a modular application or not?
>
> No one can help you if in each and every mail you send you're trying
> something completely different -- i.e., now you suddenly mention
> module-info.java, which means you're creating a modular application.
>
> What is it that you want to achieve? No one can help you, if you don't
> know.
>
> Gj
>
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 2:13 PM Eef Custers  wrote:
>
>> Hi Jose,
>>
>> Thanks for your respons.
>>
>> This commandline was generated by Netbeans in case one did not wanted to
>> use Ant. This generated line contains errors ( colons instead of
>> semecolons), which I ofcourse removed. The rest of the config is collected
>> from internal settings. Indeed the mods directory is also configured in
>> Netbeans. In another programs I used the module-info.java. That build went
>> OK, but alo the run failed. I am really amased that these new versions do
>> not match. I am now almost two weeks going over the internet and trying all
>> kinds of ways of working, but I did not find a solution. Maybe the advise
>> will be: stay at version 8 for Java/JavaFX and Netbeans?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Eef
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Op do 6 jun. 2019 om 13:50 schreef jose.per...@gluonhq.com <
>> jose.per...@gluonhq.com>:
>>
>>> Hi Eef,
>>>
>>> Your command line says otherwise, but it tells what it is ultimately
>>> running:
>>>
>>> c:\java_lib\jdk-12.0.1/bin/java \
>>> -p C:\java_lib\javafx-jmods-12.0.1;
>>>C:\java_lib\javafx-jmods-12.0.1;
>>>
>>>  
>>> C:\java_lib\javafx-sdk-12.0.1\lib\javafx-swt.jar;C:\java_lib\javafx-sdk-12.0.1\lib\javafx.base.jar;
>>> *C:\java_lib\javafx-sdk-12.0.1\lib\javafx.controls.jar;
>>> *C:\java_lib\javafx-sdk-12.0.1\lib\javafx.fxml.jar;... \
>>>  -cp C:\java_lib\javafx-sdk-12.0.1\lib\javafx-swt.jar;
>>> C:\java_lib\javafx-sdk-12.0.1\lib\javafx.base.jar;
>>>  *C:\java_lib\javafx-sdk-12.0.1\lib\javafx.controls.jar;...
>>> ;D:\NbProjects\FxApp01_c\dist\FxApp01_c.jar \
>>>  fxapp01_c.FxApp01_c
>>>
>>> In this command line there are a few issues:
>>> - No "--add-modules javafx.controls,javafx.fxml"
>>> - JavaFX jmods and SDK mixed in the same module-path
>>> - Weird path " *C:\...", this looks bad.
>>>
>>> Please follow the sample:
>>> https://github.com/openjfx/samples/tree/master/IDE/NetBeans/Non-Modular/Java
>>> 
>>>
>>> And make sure you have the right libraries and Path.
>>>
>>> Jose
>>>
>>> On 2019/06/06 11:36:17, Eef Custers  wrote:
>>> > Hi Jose,
>>> >
>>> > I did not missed step 5, I had that configured. As you can read in my
>>> other
>>> > reply to Geertjan something is going wrong at the initialisation of the
>>> > boot layer. The VM parameters processing is complaining about the last
>>> > value in the list, no matter what the value is.
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> > Eef
>>> >
>>> > Op do 6 jun. 2019 om 10:34 schreef jose.per...@gluonhq.com <
>>> > jose.per...@gluonhq.com>:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi, you can still use Ant, of course, but as Geertjan already
>>> pointed out,
>>> > > you are missing this:
>>> > >
>>> > > --add-modules javafx.fxml,javafx.controls
>>> > >
>>> > > (no need for javafx.base nor javafx.graphics, as these are transitive
>>> > > dependencies of javafx.controls).
>>> > >
>>> > > which is also shown in the pic
>>> > >
>>> https://openjfx.io/openjfx-docs/images/ide/netbeans/ide/netbeans07.png
>>> 
>>> > > that is part of the mentioned tutorial (step 5 VM options).
>>> > >
>>> > > About your module-path, there is an issue too: you shouldn't mix
>>> > > javafx-jmods with javafx-sdk paths. Mods are only required to do a
>>> custom
>>> > > image from a modular project, which doesn't seem to be your case now.
>>> > >
>>> > > Jose
>>> > >
>>> > > On 2019/06/06 05:08:23, Geertjan 

Re: Support for Oracle Weblogic

[Geertjan Wielenga]

https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/915

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2433948e114e326bf788aaee2eef6993efc6b6c1374dd188f17b94d5@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E

Gj

On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 11:33 PM Robert Erdt  wrote:

> Okay
>
>
>
> Where is the Oracle Weblogic source code for NetBeans 9.0?
>
>
>
> The new glassfish does not work, as the J2EE name has changed to “jakarta”.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rob Erdt
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Geertjan Wielenga [mailto:geert...@apache.org]
> *Sent:* Saturday, June 08, 2019 1:32 AM
> *To:* Robert Erdt 
> *Cc:* users@netbeans.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Support for Oracle Weblogic
>
>
>
> If you make it happen, since you’re apparently someone who wants it, then
> yes.
>
>
>
> Gj
>
>
>
> On Sat, 8 Jun 2019 at 02:42, Robert Erdt  wrote:
>
> Is there going to be support for Oracle weblogic server?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Rob Erdt
>
>