Re: [users] Open Office 3.2 for 64-bit Windows 7 did not install

2010-05-10 Thread Jan van Hoek
 Maybe an installer issue?
 
Maybe, maybe not. Anyway, it was NOT an Open Office 3.2 issue. I got more and 
more pieces of 
software that refused to install, exactly as described: keeping the CPU busy 
for 25% and not 
showing any progress. The same happened to e.g. Java and LFI LANGuard.
 
I stumbled upon a solution by accident. After running CCleaner (for other 
reasons), all these 
problems disappeared by itself. But please don't ask me why.
-- 
-- Jan van Hoek
-- Mon, 10 May 2010 09:47 uur
 
 
 reply-to: users@openoffice.org
 to: users@openoffice.org
 from: NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net
 date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:15:37 -0700
 subject: [users] Re: Open Office for Windows 7
 
 On 03/24/2010 07:28 AM, Jan van Hoek wrote:
  Questions/suggestions:
   
  In the mean time, I combined all your hints: I upgraded Java to 
  version 6 upd 18, and I downloaded an OOo installer executable 
  without JRE. Both to no avail.
   
  In other words, I got stuck with OOo 3.1 (on this one PC only, so 
  I can live with it). Two other PC's got upgraded to OOo 3.2 
  without incident.
   
  ---
   
  RE your item 3: The process that consumes 25% CPU while attempting 
  to install OOo 3.2, is
 C:\Windows\SysWOW64\msiexec.exe
  showing in Task Manager as msiexec.exe *32. The 64 resp 32 seem 
  a contradition, but what do I know.
   
  I see no office processes active.
 
 Hmmm...
 http://www.google.com/search?hl=encomplete=0q=C%3A\Windows\SysWOW64\msiexec.exebtnG=Search
 
 Maybe an installer issue?
 







-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.org



Re: [users] Open Office for Windows 7

2010-03-24 Thread Jan van Hoek
 You must use a 32bit Java runtime with OO.o,
 a 64bit runtime will not work

It shows build 1.6.0_18-b07 as version number. Can you deduce from that 
whether I have 32-bit or 64-bit??

A further hint: Java has been installed in the Program files (x86) 
directory, indicating that it is 32-bit rather than 64-bit.

In the mean time, I combined all the hints I received from NoOp: I upgraded 
Java to version 18, and I downloaded an OOo installer executable without 
JRE. Both to no avail.

In other words, I got stuck with OOo 3.1 (on this one PC only, so I can live 
with it). Two other PC's got upgraded to OOo 3.2 without incident.
-- 
-- Jan van Hoek
-- Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:56 uur




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.org



Re: [users] Open Office for Windows 7

2010-03-24 Thread Jan van Hoek
 Questions/suggestions:
 
In the mean time, I combined all your hints: I upgraded Java to 
version 6 upd 18, and I downloaded an OOo installer executable 
without JRE. Both to no avail.
 
In other words, I got stuck with OOo 3.1 (on this one PC only, so 
I can live with it). Two other PC's got upgraded to OOo 3.2 
without incident.
 
---
 
RE your item 3: The process that consumes 25% CPU while attempting 
to install OOo 3.2, is
   C:\Windows\SysWOW64\msiexec.exe
showing in Task Manager as msiexec.exe *32. The 64 resp 32 seem 
a contradition, but what do I know.
 
I see no office processes active.
-- 
-- Jan van Hoek
-- Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:21 uur




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.org



Re: [users] Open Office for Windows 7

2010-03-24 Thread Jan van Hoek
 I was referring to the version of OO.o
 and indicating that it was the English variant (...) 
 
You are right in this. I overlooked what you were trying to get accross.
 
Anyway, the version that I downloaded and attempted to install was named 
OOo_3.2.0_Win32Intel_install_wJRE_en-US.exe, which is obviously US-
english en not UK-english.

 
 Your attachment did not make this list.
 If you think it relevant you may
 send it to me privately.
 
Maybe this time it does reach you (I added your e-mail address in the TO 
field).

In the mean time, I combined all the hints I received from NoOp: I 
upgraded Java to version 18, and I downloaded an OOo installer executable 
without Java. Both to no avail.

In other words, I got stuck with OOo 3.1 (on this one PC only, so I can 
live with it). Two other PC's got upgraded to OOo 3.2 without incident.
-- 
-- Jan van Hoek
-- Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:19 uur



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.org

Re: [users] Open Office for Windows 7

2010-03-22 Thread Jan van Hoek
 I've had no 
 problems using OOo 3.1.1
 
I had neither, until...
 
 
 so OOo 3.2 (the current version)
 should work
 
I've (re)tried to install OOo 3.2, but the install consistently just 
hangs and produces, while using 25% CPU for hours, no workable version.
 
I've also tried a few workarounds that I saw on various forums, but to 
no avail. For example, removing the old 3.1 version, or cleaning the 
Windows Installer.
 
The only difference that MAY be relevant, is that I run a 64-bit version 
of Windows 7. That is the only deviation that I can think of.
 
In other words, I'm still running OOo 3.1 without a problem. And as long 
as I see no urgent reasons to make a move to OOo 3.2, I stay with that I 
have.
-- 
-- Jan van Hoek
-- Mon 22 Mar 2010 12:10 uur




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.org



Re: [users] Open Office for Windows 7

2010-03-22 Thread Jan van Hoek
 I'm running the English 3.2.0
 on 64 bit Windows 7 (Home Premium).
 It installed without problems,
 
Thanks for this. I have Windows 7 Home Ultimate, but that should not make 
much difference. And, not withstanding my Dutch background, I've also an 
English version of Windows, so that should not be a factor either.
 
 
 (...) although, as a matter of principle,
 I removed 3.1.1 first which may, or may not be relevant.
 
After a few failed attempts to install 3.2, I've also removed the old 
3.1 version. That did not help.

My Windows 7 PC is relatively new. Does not contain (yet) an overload of 
software. See ATTACHMENT. Nothing out of the ordinary, I should say.

By the way: I installed 3.2 on two other PC's (both Vista, 32-bit) without 
incident, superseding the 3.1 version. Given your experience that the 64-
bit does not seem to matter, plus that the 7 in windows 7 does not matter 
as well, I'm at a loss what really goes wrong in my case.
-- 
-- Jan van Hoek (NL)
-- Tue 23 Mar 2010 01:11 uur



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.org