Re: [users] Microsoft's OOXML trophy is conditional

2008-04-16 Thread James Knott

Fred A. Miller wrote:

Those that giveth can also taketh away


Given the FAQ ISO published, that might not be so likely.  It's quite 
obvious that this standard was bought and they're bending over 
backwards to make sure it stays one.


http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080415150233162

--
Use OpenOffice.org http://www.openoffice.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[users] Microsoft's OOXML trophy is conditional

2008-04-15 Thread Fred A. Miller

Those that giveth can also taketh away

By Mark Ballard 
http://www.theinquirer.net/articles/flameAuthor/gb/inquirer/news/2008/04/15/ooxml-trophy-conditional: 
Tuesday, 15 April 2008, 1:24 PM


*THE COVETED* international standard gong which the ISO awarded to 
Microsoft's OOXML could be retracted if the software giant starts 
getting mean over patents it has invested in the standard, the 
organisation said today.


Otherwise, the body expects Microsoft's OOXML and the open source ODF 
document formats to face one another in a direct competition for 
survival. The outcome will be decided by the market, it said.


In the wake of Microsoft's promise 
http://www.microsoft.com/interop/osp/default.mspx to make its OOXML 
specification freely http://standardslaw.com/wordpress/ available (a 
move that has been met with scepticism), the International Standards 
Organisation issued a statement 
http://www.iso.org/iso/pressrelease/faqs_isoiec29500.htm today that 
said how it would hold Microsoft to its promise, with the most severe of 
penalties for any shirking.


The ISO said how its patent policy 
http://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink/fetch/2000/2122/3770791/customview.html?func=llobjId=3770791objAction=browse 
demanded that licences were awarded on RAND (reasonable and 
non-discriminatory) terms.


If, after publication of the standard, it is determined that licences 
to all required patents are not so available, one option would be to 
withdraw the International Standard, it said.


If Microsoft doesn't misbehave, the standards body said that the 
standards would be left to prove themselves: After a period of 
co-existence, it is basically the market that decides which survives, a 
spokesman said.


The market had already determined through the ISO voting procedures that 
OOXML would become an official international standard, it said.


The statement also said that it had put OOXML into its fast-track for 
adoption after it was proposed by Ecma International, the commercial 
custodian of the standard. ยต



http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/04/15/ooxml-trophy-conditional


--
Q: what's the difference between a teddy bear and Steve Ballmer?
A: they both have sawdust for brains but one is smart enough to
   keep his mouth shut.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]