Re: [Users] sysctl to hide VE processes from HN ps?
Gregor Mosheh wrote: I was glad to hear about bug 511. I am running 2.6.24-ovz005 and was surprised to see that I had this great new feature. But it doesn't seem to be working. Maybe I'm doing it wrong? # sysctl kernel.pid_ns_hide_child=1 A 'ps ax' or 'ls /proc' shows the same thing regardless of this setting: VPSs' PostgreSQL and httpd and so on. Processes are hidden for all containers started _after_ you have changed the setting. ___ Users mailing list Users@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Netatalk in kernel?
Paul wrote: Who would I ask about getting the AppleTalk module built in the normal openvz kernel? I know I can build a whole new kernel but it would be great to just be able to update with normal openvz community kernel. Does anyone know how I can just build that module for the current one? I have everything needed but get an error when I load it about an unknown swmbol. You can recompile the kernel using these instructions: http://wiki.openvz.org/Kernel_build#Rebuilding_kernel_from_SRPM ___ Users mailing list Users@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] sysctl to hide VE processes from HN ps?
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 6:13 AM, Kir Kolyshkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Processes are hidden for all containers started _after_ you have changed the setting. Is 2.6.24 considered stable yet? Roberto -- http://blog.divisiblebyfour.org/ ___ Users mailing list Users@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] sysctl to hide VE processes from HN ps?
Kir Kolyshkin wrote: # sysctl kernel.pid_ns_hide_child=1 Processes are hidden for all containers started _after_ you have changed the setting. A, I get it. Too bad it can't change the view more dynamically. I'd love to be able to toggle the view of HN or HN+VPSs. But I'll likely not be making that patch; I'll be patient. :) -- Gregor Mosheh / Greg AllensworthBS, A+, Network+, Security+, Server+ System Administrator, Lead Programmer HostGIS development hosting services, http://www.HostGIS.com/ Remember that no one cares if you can back up, only if you can restore. - AMANDA ___ Users mailing list Users@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] 2.6.24 stable
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Gregor Mosheh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Roberto Mello wrote: Is 2.6.24 considered stable yet? When I installed it three weeks ago, it was considered development. I've been using it with DRBD, NIC bonding, and a 3ware 9650 controller for the last three weeks and so far so good! I have been using it since February at home and since May in my production units at work. For the most part it is stable, although I do still have a rare problem that pops up every once and a while that causes me to have to restart the application (usually a console app). When this happens I get a message in my dmesg output about scheduling while atomic This is with 2.6.24-ovz005 #1 SMP PREEMPT but I do not see this at home with the git version. John ___ Users mailing list Users@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
