Re: [Users] New setup - deploy OpenVZ or wait for VZ7?

[Raghavendra Bhat]

spameden posts

>> Please understand me correctly, we don't want to support a variety of all
>> Linux zoo.
>> It requires much more time of development, testing and support.
>
> That's a shame. Another nail in the coffin of OpenVZ.. :(
>

Sergey as spameden aptly posts, unsupported GNU/Linux should not
happen as Virtuozzo runs on top of many, many different distributions.
At least Parallels OpenVZ Project does.  Try to be as portable as you
can, VZ7 should not get isolated and unused due to your rigid stance.
It might be a nightmare to support various distros but it enhances the
reach of VZ (Virtuozzo).

You have to seriously consider support.  Your product will get rugged
in the process of testing, development and support.

-- 
Regards
Raghavendra Bhat
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 80D98731
gpg --fingerprint 80D98731
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] venet ip question

[Raghavendra Bhat]

Gerhard Gappmeier posts

 problem is I run out of external IPs and want to use the external IPs of CT0 
 (eth1) for new containers.
 Is this possible?

You may want to read this relevant doc at the OpenVZ Wiki

http://wiki.openvz.org/Using_NAT_for_VE_with_private_IPs

A similar issue was resolved here using this method, but you may have
to fine tune your run-level scripts to
make this rule persistent across reboots.

YMMV
-- 
Ragu Bhat
Help stop net censorship in India.
Censorship of Google, Yahoo, Facebook and Twitter has to stomped down!
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users