Re: [Users] fs capacity difference
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Gregor at HostGIS wrote: Richard Ray wrote: That is good to know but I did not do that The container is a vzdump restore Oh, okay. Dunno about that one then. How do I get the quota back in sync Shut down the VE. Rename or delete its quota file in /var/vzquota Start it up. The quota will be recalculated as it starts. Restarting to fix quotas is kind of unpleasant, but it's the method I know. Perhaps someone can suggest a way of recalculating the quota file without restarting? That worked, thanks Is there not a more elegant way to resync the quota Richard ___ Users mailing list Users@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] fs capacity difference
Richard Ray wrote: That is good to know but I did not do that The container is a vzdump restore Oh, okay. Dunno about that one then. How do I get the quota back in sync Shut down the VE. Rename or delete its quota file in /var/vzquota Start it up. The quota will be recalculated as it starts. Restarting to fix quotas is kind of unpleasant, but it's the method I know. Perhaps someone can suggest a way of recalculating the quota file without restarting? -- HostGIS, Open Source solutions for the global GIS community Greg Allensworth - SysAdmin, Programmer, GIS Person, Security Network+ Server+ A+ Security+ Linux+ PHP PostgreSQL MySQL DHTML/JavaScript/AJAX "No one cares if you can back up — only if you can recover." ___ Users mailing list Users@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] fs capacity difference
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Gregor at HostGIS wrote: Why is the fs 37% filled on the hardware node and 75% filled on the container Your quota files are out of date. A very common cause of this, would be copying files directly into /vz/private/3251 from the HN. Copying directly into a VE's directory will bypass the quota calculation. For copying files from the HN into a VE, I use SFTP or similar. Seems silly to SFTP to what's basically localhost, but it does avoid hosing your quotas. That is good to know but I did not do that The container is a vzdump restore The container dump that I used does not show a difference between it and the hardware node How do I get the quota back in sync Richard ___ Users mailing list Users@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] fs capacity difference
Why is the fs 37% filled on the hardware node and 75% filled on the container Your quota files are out of date. A very common cause of this, would be copying files directly into /vz/private/3251 from the HN. Copying directly into a VE's directory will bypass the quota calculation. For copying files from the HN into a VE, I use SFTP or similar. Seems silly to SFTP to what's basically localhost, but it does avoid hosing your quotas. -- HostGIS, Open Source solutions for the global GIS community Greg Allensworth - SysAdmin, Programmer, GIS Person, Security Network+ Server+ A+ Security+ Linux+ PHP PostgreSQL MySQL DHTML/JavaScript/AJAX "No one cares if you can back up — only if you can recover." ___ Users mailing list Users@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] fs capacity difference
Because if you see how much is your AVAILABLE space on each container hardware node has 2.2GB free and the container has 524mb free the size of the HD vary on both containers. Ing. Alejandro M. --- Hospedaje Web y Servidores Dedicados http://www.dedicados.com.mx --- ven...@dedicados.com.mx --- El 22/04/2010 04:06 p.m., Richard Ray escribió: I know I am going to feel stupid for asking this but Hardware node and container are Centos 5.4 Kernel is ovzkernel-2.6.18-164.15.1.el5.028stab068.9 On the hardware node [r...@d3 ~]# df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/vg00-lvol00 3.9G 1.6G 2.2G 43% / /dev/md0 99M 42M 52M 45% /boot tmpfs1013M 0 1013M 0% /dev/shm /dev/mapper/vg00-lvol01 2.0G 744M 1.3G 37% /vz/private/3251 Inside the container [r...@d3srv ~]# df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/simfs2.0G 1.5G 524M 75% / none 1013M 4.0K 1013M 1% /dev Why is the fs 37% filled on the hardware node and 75% filled on the container Richard ___ Users mailing list Users@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] fs capacity difference
I know I am going to feel stupid for asking this but Hardware node and container are Centos 5.4 Kernel is ovzkernel-2.6.18-164.15.1.el5.028stab068.9 On the hardware node [r...@d3 ~]# df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/vg00-lvol00 3.9G 1.6G 2.2G 43% / /dev/md0 99M 42M 52M 45% /boot tmpfs1013M 0 1013M 0% /dev/shm /dev/mapper/vg00-lvol01 2.0G 744M 1.3G 37% /vz/private/3251 Inside the container [r...@d3srv ~]# df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/simfs2.0G 1.5G 524M 75% / none 1013M 4.0K 1013M 1% /dev Why is the fs 37% filled on the hardware node and 75% filled on the container Richard ___ Users mailing list Users@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
