[Users] oVirt-Live-0.6.iso - alpha version Oct 12th 2012

2012-10-12 Thread Moran Goldboim


 oVirt-Live-0.6.iso - alpha version Oct 12th 2012

wiki: http://wiki.ovirt.org/wiki/OVirt_Live


   Download

download oVirt-Live-0.6.iso 
http://ovirt.org/releases/3.1/tools/oVirt-Live-0.6.iso



   change-log

-selinux disabled - workaround to sanlock problem

-added ovirt_live plugin - performs attachment of iso domain to the DC, 
and creating vm with disk and network- thanks to Ofer


-changed ovirt-setup icons

-shorten host installation time by around 4 minutes


 Problems/Bugs

-persistent storage is slow - bigger it gets - slower it does

-currently working with selinux in permissive - problem running vms 
(sanlock)


-ovirt-setup should run as autostart


so a bit more stable version now that actually brings you to a working 
system with vm ready to go (almost) - Thanks to Ofer, and few optimizations.


currently persistent storage is making the system very slow.
i have been starting to look on some FS optimizations, would be nice if 
someone can give a hand here.

some references:
-  http://www.raspberrypi.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=9t=850
- 
http://cptl.org/wp/index.php/2010/03/30/tuning-solid-state-drives-in-linux/


Moran.

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[Users] Here we go again - Error adding host , incorrect vdsm version

2012-10-12 Thread Ricky Schneberger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

When I try to add a new host from Webadmin I got Unable to fetch VDSM
with minimal version of vdsm-4.9. Please check.
I have patched as told from this post,
http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2012-June/002466.html, but it
does not solved my problem.

Here is the install-log.

Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:10:20 DEBUG Start VDS Validation 
Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:10:20 DEBUGEntered VdsValidation(subject =
'10.10.1.191', random_num = '6685b8f2-6bfe-4d14-8ad6-205c087fb189',
rev_num = 'None', installVirtualizationService = 'True',
installGlusterService = 'False')
Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:10:20 DEBUGSetting up Package Sacks
Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:10:20 DEBUGyumSearch: found vdsm entries:
[YumAvailablePackageSqlite : vdsm-4.10.1-0.19.18.el6.x86_64
(0x28b87d0), YumAvailablePackageSqlite :
vdsm-4.10.0-0.42.13.el6.x86_64 (0x28b8810)]
Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:10:20 DEBUGHost properly registered with
RHN/Satellite.
Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:10:20 DEBUGBSTRAP component='RHN_REGISTRATION'
status='OK' message='Host properly registered with RHN/Satellite.'/
Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:10:20 DEBUGyumSearchVersion: pkg
vdsm-4.10.1-0.19.18.el6.x86_64 does not start with: vdsm-4.9
Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:10:20 DEBUGyumSearchVersion: pkg
vdsm-4.10.0-0.42.13.el6.x86_64 does not start with: vdsm-4.9
Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:10:20 ERRORUnable to fetch VDSM with minimal
version of vdsm-4.9. Please check if host is properly registered with
updated yum repository
Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:10:20 DEBUGBSTRAP component='VDSM_MAJOR_VER'
status='FAIL' message='Unable to fetch VDSM with minimal version of
vdsm-4.9. Please check if host is properly registered with updated yum
repository'/
Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:10:20 ERRORcheckMajorVersion test failed
Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:10:20 DEBUGBSTRAP component='RHEV_INSTALL'
status='FAIL'/
Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:10:20 DEBUG End VDS Validation 

What can I do to solve the problem?

Regards //Ricky



-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlB4YVwACgkQOap81biMC2NqOACdEMe7af7C38U6QkAG+GHcC/Ul
k4YAoIxy8s9pLZo8/2qnMAYbNAnziGez
=0DwA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


0xB88C0B63.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys


0xB88C0B63.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] how to convince oVirt a VM is down

2012-10-12 Thread Alan Johnson
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Roy Golan rgo...@redhat.com wrote:


 since the VM run_on_vds was empty, the confirm host... didn't clear its
 status because its not selected from the DB as one of the host VMs.
 I'll try to dig in to see at what point this value was cleared - probably
 around the failed migration.


Cool.  Let me know if you need anything else from me.  Again, I have the
USB stick from cloudhost02 when it failed, if there is a log for vdsmd or
something that might have something useful in it, just send me the path.

Are transactions in use in the system anywhere, either in the DB or the app
layer?  If not, have they been considered?  I ask because this seems like
the kind of thing they would address nicely.  Specifically, if migration
recipient is up and happy, but does not confirm VM is up or migration in
progress, and sender node is no longer responsive, roll back to assuming
the VM is still running on sender.  This would avoid the inconsistent state
I had of not-down-but-not-running-on-any-responding-host either and allow
confirm host... to clear the unknown state of the VM.

Sorry if I am stating the obvious or over simplifying.  It has been a long
time since I wrote any significant code.  =)
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users