Re: [Users] 3.2 beta and f18 host on dell R815 problem
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:57:38PM +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: Output of command # virsh capabilities on this host https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwoPbcrMv8mveG5OaVBZN1VENlU/edit I, and list archive viewers, prefer in-lining such output. It seems to be lacking svm - could it be that you need to enable it in BIOS? host uuid44454c4c-5600-1059-8047-cac04f4e344a/uuid cpu archx86_64/arch modelOpteron_G3/model vendorAMD/vendor topology sockets='1' cores='6' threads='1'/ feature name='nodeid_msr'/ feature name='wdt'/ feature name='skinit'/ feature name='ibs'/ feature name='osvw'/ feature name='3dnowprefetch'/ feature name='cr8legacy'/ feature name='extapic'/ feature name='cmp_legacy'/ feature name='3dnow'/ feature name='3dnowext'/ feature name='pdpe1gb'/ feature name='fxsr_opt'/ feature name='mmxext'/ feature name='ht'/ feature name='vme'/ /cpu ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Problems with upgrade to 3.3 nightly
- Original Message - From: Gianluca Cecchi gianluca.cec...@gmail.com To: users users@ovirt.org Sent: Saturday, February 2, 2013 3:02:10 PM Subject: [Users] Problems with upgrade to 3.3 nightly Hello, passing from an all-in-one setup based on F18 and nightly: ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-allinone-3.2.0-1.20130125.git032a91f.fc18.noarch to the proposed new nightly I get these errors: [root@tekkaman ~]# engine-upgrade Checking for updates... (This may take several minutes)...[ DONE ] 9 Updates available: * ovirt-engine-3.3.0-0.1.20130201070537.20130201.git357cdaa.fc18.noarch * ovirt-engine-backend-3.3.0-0.1.20130201070537.20130201.git357cdaa.fc18.noarch * ovirt-engine-config-3.3.0-0.1.20130201070537.20130201.git357cdaa.fc18.noarch * ovirt-engine-dbscripts-3.3.0-0.1.20130201070537.20130201.git357cdaa.fc18.noarch * ovirt-engine-notification-service-3.3.0-0.1.20130201070537.20130201.git357cdaa.fc18.noarch * ovirt-engine-restapi-3.3.0-0.1.20130201070537.20130201.git357cdaa.fc18.noarch * ovirt-engine-tools-common-3.3.0-0.1.20130201070537.20130201.git357cdaa.fc18.noarch * ovirt-engine-userportal-3.3.0-0.1.20130201070537.20130201.git357cdaa.fc18.noarch * ovirt-engine-webadmin-portal-3.3.0-0.1.20130201070537.20130201.git357cdaa.fc18.noarch During the upgrade process, oVirt Engine will not be accessible. All existing running virtual machines will continue but you will not be able to start or stop any new virtual machines during the process. Would you like to proceed? (yes|no): yes Stopping ovirt-engine service...[ DONE ] Stopping DB related services... [ DONE ] Starting DB related services... [ DONE ] Starting ovirt-engine service...[ DONE ] [Errno 8] Exec format error Error: Upgrade failed. please check log at /var/log/ovirt-engine/ovirt-engine-upgrade_2013_02_02_13_05_15.log Is this expected and I have to start from clean environment or should the upgrade go ok? CC Alex L Alex, it fails in the zombieTasksFound() in engine-upgrade, please take a look engine-upgrade log here: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwoPbcrMv8mvU2ZYX3lOV2V3Tkk/edit?usp=sharing Gianluca ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] 3.2 beta: Amd Opteron 6174 wrongly detected as 8 socket
It's a libvirt issue.
See http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-November/msg00365.html
Y.
- Original Message -
Hello,
after deploy of a node that has 4 sockets with 12cores each, it is
wrongly detected in web admin gui.
See:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwoPbcrMv8mvdjdYNjVfT2NWY0U/edit
It says 8 sockets each with 6 cores
Output of
# virsh capabilities
here:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwoPbcrMv8mveG5OaVBZN1VENlU/edit
output of cpuid here:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwoPbcrMv8mvUFFRYkZEX0lmRG8/edit
also run this
[root@f18ovn03 ~]# vdsClient -s 0 getVdsCaps
HBAInventory = {'iSCSI': [{'InitiatorName':
'iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:f9baf5a8f6c3'}], 'FC': []}
ISCSIInitiatorName = iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:f9baf5a8f6c3
bondings = {'bond4': {'addr': '', 'cfg': {}, 'mtu': '1500',
'netmask':
'', 'slaves': [], 'hwaddr': '00:00:00:00:00:00'}, 'bond0': {'addr':
'', 'cfg': {}, 'mtu': '1500', 'netmask': '', 'slaves': [], 'hwaddr':
'00:00:00:00:00:00'}}
bridges = {'ovirtmgmt': {'addr': '192.168.1.102', 'cfg': {'DOMAIN':
'localdomain.local', 'UUID': '60d40d4a-d8ab-4f5b-bd48-2e807df36be4',
'DNS3': '82.113.193.3', 'IPADDR0': '192.168.1.102', 'DNS1':
'192.168.1.103', 'PREFIX0': '24', 'DEFROUTE': 'yes',
'IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL': 'no', 'DELAY': '0', 'NM_CONTROLLED': 'no',
'BOOTPROTO': 'none', 'GATEWAY0': '192.168.1.1', 'DNS2': '8.8.8.8',
'DEVICE': 'ovirtmgmt', 'TYPE': 'Bridge', 'ONBOOT': 'yes', 'IPV6INIT':
'no'}, 'mtu': '1500', 'netmask': '255.255.255.0', 'stp': 'off',
'ports': ['em1']}}
clusterLevels = ['3.0', '3.1', '3.2']
cpuCores = 48
cpuFlags =
fpu,vme,de,pse,tsc,msr,pae,mce,cx8,apic,sep,mtrr,pge,mca,cmov,pat,pse36,clflush,mmx,fxsr,sse,sse2,ht,syscall,nx,mmxext,fxsr_opt,pdpe1gb,rdtscp,lm,3dnowext,3dnow,constant_tsc,rep_good,nopl,nonstop_tsc,extd_apicid,amd_dcm,pni,monitor,cx16,popcnt,lahf_lm,cmp_legacy,svm,extapic,cr8_legacy,abm,sse4a,misalignsse,3dnowprefetch,osvw,ibs,skinit,wdt,nodeid_msr,hw_pstate,npt,lbrv,svm_lock,nrip_save,pausefilter,model_athlon,model_Opteron_G3,model_Opteron_G1,model_phenom,model_Opteron_G2
cpuModel = AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6174
cpuSockets = 8
cpuSpeed = 800.000
cpuThreads = 48
emulatedMachines = ['pc-1.2', 'none', 'pc', 'pc-1.1', 'pc-1.0',
'pc-0.15', 'pc-0.14', 'pc-0.13', 'pc-0.12', 'pc-0.11', 'pc-0.10',
'isapc', 'pc-1.2', 'none', 'pc', 'pc-1.1', 'pc-1.0', 'pc-0.15',
'pc-0.14', 'pc-0.13', 'pc-0.12', 'pc-0.11', 'pc-0.10', 'isapc']
guestOverhead = 65
hooks = {}
kvmEnabled = true
lastClient = 192.168.1.111
lastClientIface = ovirtmgmt
management_ip =
memSize = 64418
netConfigDirty = False
networks = {'ovirtmgmt': {'iface': 'ovirtmgmt', 'addr':
'192.168.1.102', 'cfg': {'DOMAIN': 'localdomain.local', 'UUID':
'60d40d4a-d8ab-4f5b-bd48-2e807df36be4', 'DNS3': '82.113.193.3',
'IPADDR0': '192.168.1.102', 'DNS1': '192.168.1.103', 'PREFIX0': '24',
'DEFROUTE': 'yes', 'IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL': 'no', 'DELAY': '0',
'NM_CONTROLLED': 'no', 'BOOTPROTO': 'none', 'GATEWAY0':
'192.168.1.1',
'DNS2': '8.8.8.8', 'DEVICE': 'ovirtmgmt', 'TYPE': 'Bridge', 'ONBOOT':
'yes', 'IPV6INIT': 'no'}, 'mtu': '1500', 'netmask': '255.255.255.0',
'stp': 'off', 'bridged': True, 'gateway': '0.0.0.0', 'ports':
['em1']}}
nics = {'em4': {'addr': '', 'cfg': {'PEERROUTES': 'yes', 'UUID':
'bed68125-4345-4995-ba49-a6e5580c58dd', 'NAME': 'em4', 'TYPE':
'Ethernet', 'IPV6_PEERDNS': 'yes', 'DEFROUTE': 'yes', 'PEERDNS':
'yes', 'IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL': 'no', 'HWADDR': '00:25:64:F9:76:82',
'BOOTPROTO': 'dhcp', 'IPV6_AUTOCONF': 'yes', 'IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL':
'no', 'IPV6_PEERROUTES': 'yes', 'IPV6_DEFROUTE': 'yes', 'ONBOOT':
'yes', 'IPV6INIT': 'yes'}, 'mtu': '1500', 'netmask': '', 'hwaddr':
'00:25:64:f9:76:82', 'speed': 0}, 'em1': {'addr': '', 'cfg':
{'BRIDGE': 'ovirtmgmt', 'DOMAIN': 'localdomain.local', 'DEVICE':
'em1', 'UUID': '60d40d4a-d8ab-4f5b-bd48-2e807df36be4', 'DNS3':
'82.113.193.3', 'IPADDR0': '192.168.1.102', 'DNS1': '192.168.1.103',
'PREFIX0': '24', 'DEFROUTE': 'yes', 'IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL': 'no',
'NM_CONTROLLED': 'no', 'GATEWAY0': '192.168.1.1', 'DNS2': '8.8.8.8',
'HWADDR': '00:25:64:f9:76:7c', 'ONBOOT': 'yes', 'IPV6INIT': 'no'},
'mtu': '1500', 'netmask': '', 'hwaddr': '00:25:64:f9:76:7c', 'speed':
1000}, 'em3': {'addr': '', 'cfg': {'PEERROUTES': 'yes', 'UUID':
'2984885c-fbd8-4ad1-a393-00f0a205ae79', 'NAME': 'em3', 'TYPE':
'Ethernet', 'IPV6_PEERDNS': 'yes', 'DEFROUTE': 'yes', 'PEERDNS':
'yes', 'IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL': 'no', 'HWADDR': '00:25:64:F9:76:80',
'BOOTPROTO': 'dhcp', 'IPV6_AUTOCONF': 'yes', 'IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL':
'no', 'IPV6_PEERROUTES': 'yes', 'IPV6_DEFROUTE': 'yes', 'ONBOOT':
'yes', 'IPV6INIT': 'yes'}, 'mtu': '1500', 'netmask': '', 'hwaddr':
'00:25:64:f9:76:80', 'speed': 0}, 'em2': {'addr': '', 'cfg':
{'PEERROUTES': 'yes', 'UUID': 'ebd889bc-57ae-4ee9-8db2-4595309ee81c',
'NAME': 'em2', 'TYPE': 'Ethernet', 'IPV6_PEERDNS': 'yes', 'DEFROUTE':
'yes', 'PEERDNS': 'yes', 'IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL': 'no', 'HWADDR':
'00:25:64:F9:76:7E',
[Users] Cannot add local storage on 3.2
Hi All, I have made a successfull install of 3.2 but there seems to be changed a lot about local storage comparing to 3.1 When I want to add storage on a local host there is a Datacenter and Cluster created for this Host, named by the name of the host. After this, the local storage is not available and I'm not able to add extra also. I have looked at adding a new storage domains and when I select my host I still need to set my path, but I did this already by configuring local storage before. The message I receive while configuring the local storage is: error cannot add storage. internal error storage connection doesn't exist What goes wrong here ? This was much easier on 3.1! ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Cannot add local storage on 3.2
nothing changed. you can create local storage from the hosts tab or from the storage tab, but you still need to create the directory in the host and change the permissions to 36:36 from the error you are getting there is no directory or permissions are not 36:36 On 02/03/2013 03:16 PM, Matt . wrote: Hi All, I have made a successfull install of 3.2 but there seems to be changed a lot about local storage comparing to 3.1 When I want to add storage on a local host there is a Datacenter and Cluster created for this Host, named by the name of the host. After this, the local storage is not available and I'm not able to add extra also. I have looked at adding a new storage domains and when I select my host I still need to set my path, but I did this already by configuring local storage before. The message I receive while configuring the local storage is: error cannot add storage. internal error storage connection doesn't exist What goes wrong here ? This was much easier on 3.1! ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Dafna Ron ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] oVirt 3.2 testday
Thanks for all the ones participating this day. we would like to get some feedback from you after testing this beta version. how do you feel with respect to: -stability - basic flows -new features -blocker bugs (should be added to this version tracker [1]) [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881006 Thanks, Moran. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] 3.2 beta: Amd Opteron 6174 wrongly detected as 8 socket
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote: It's a libvirt issue. See http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-November/msg00365.html Y. - Original Message - Hello, after deploy of a node that has 4 sockets with 12cores each, it is wrongly detected in web admin gui. See: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwoPbcrMv8mvdjdYNjVfT2NWY0U/edit It says 8 sockets each with 6 cores Do you know if there is a package for Fedora 18 to test or if I have to explicitly create a bugzilla for it? Gianluca ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Cannot add local storage on 3.2
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Dafna Ron wrote: nothing changed. you can create local storage from the hosts tab or from the storage tab, but you still need to create the directory in the host and change the permissions to 36:36 from the error you are getting there is no directory or permissions are not 36:36 I had the same error a few days ago on 3.2 beta and I confirm that after creating the directory and setting permissions I was able to add a local_on_host storage domain HIH, Gianluca ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] 3.2 beta: Amd Opteron 6174 wrongly detected as 8 socket
On 03/02/13 15:43, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote: It's a libvirt issue. See http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-November/msg00365.html Y. - Original Message - Hello, after deploy of a node that has 4 sockets with 12cores each, it is wrongly detected in web admin gui. See: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwoPbcrMv8mvdjdYNjVfT2NWY0U/edit It says 8 sockets each with 6 cores Do you know if there is a package for Fedora 18 to test or if I have to explicitly create a bugzilla for it? Gianluca I did not see it in http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=91 . Y. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] oVirt 3.2 testday
removing non-relevant list. On 02/03/2013 03:37 PM, Moran Goldboim wrote: Thanks for all the ones participating this day. we would like to get some feedback from you after testing this beta version. how do you feel with respect to: -stability - basic flows -new features -blocker bugs (should be added to this version tracker [1]) [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881006 Thanks, Moran. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Cannot add local storage on 3.2
This is strange than. When I configure local storage from the hosts tab, I get a new DC and Cluster added. When I add the local storage from the storage tab I cannot add it also. What is the idea about the local storage ? I cannot remeber from 3.1 at the moment but I thought I always added it as NFS share on the Host itself. 2013/2/3 Gianluca Cecchi gianluca.cec...@gmail.com On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Dafna Ron wrote: nothing changed. you can create local storage from the hosts tab or from the storage tab, but you still need to create the directory in the host and change the permissions to 36:36 from the error you are getting there is no directory or permissions are not 36:36 I had the same error a few days ago on 3.2 beta and I confirm that after creating the directory and setting permissions I was able to add a local_on_host storage domain HIH, Gianluca ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] 3.2 beta and f18 host on dell R815 problem
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: I see that /proc/cpuinfo DOES have svm, but libvirt does not recognize it. Maybe our friendly libvirt developers (CCed) could help with the debugging. Which version of libvirt are you using? Could you dump your /proc/cpuinfo somewhere? Dan. libvirt-0.10.2.2-3.fc18.x86_64 full cpuinfo output here: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwoPbcrMv8mvMUVkNWp0SC11MTQ/edit?usp=sharing BTW: when I configure a server as an oVirt node its libvirtd.conf is modified by vdsm, so that I can't run anymore the command virsh capabilities My host, after successfully install now gives me: [root@f18ovn03 ~]# virsh capabilities Please enter your authentication name: do I have to pass any particular connection parameters for vdsm to get the output again? What to use as authentication name and password? Gianluca ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Cannot add local storage on 3.2
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Matt . wrote: This is strange than. When I configure local storage from the hosts tab, I get a new DC and Cluster added. When I add the local storage from the storage tab I cannot add it also. What is the idea about the local storage ? I cannot remeber from 3.1 at the moment but I thought I always added it as NFS share on the Host itself. I don't know for 3.1, but in my 3.2 beta with an ISO DOMAIN (exported by the engine server) and a local domain under /home/LDATA (only /home is a mount point by itself) I have this df -h ... /dev/mapper/fedora_f18ovn03-home 456G 205M 432G 1% /home f18engine.localdomain.local:/ISO 45G 9.9G 33G 24% /rhev/data-center/mnt/f18engine.localdomain.local:_ISO mount ... /dev/mapper/fedora_f18ovn03-home on /home type ext4 (rw,relatime,seclabel,data=ordered) f18engine.localdomain.local:/ISO on /rhev/data-center/mnt/f18engine.localdomain.local:_ISO type nfs (rw,relatime,vers=3,rsize=524288,wsize=524288,namlen=255,soft,nosharecache,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=6,sec=sys,mountaddr=192.168.1.111,mountvers=3,mountport=20048,mountproto=udp,local_lock=none,addr=192.168.1.111) [root@f18ovn03 ~]# ll /home/LDATA/ total 4 drwxr-xr-x. 5 vdsm kvm 4096 Feb 1 23:02 a5c8c654-7c47-4ca5-b440-5cbf92d3fc7d [root@f18ovn03 ~]# ll /home/LDATA/a5c8c654-7c47-4ca5-b440-5cbf92d3fc7d/ total 12 drwxr-xr-x. 2 vdsm kvm 4096 Feb 3 16:59 dom_md drwxr-xr-x. 3 vdsm kvm 4096 Feb 1 23:53 images drwxr-xr-x. 4 vdsm kvm 4096 Feb 1 23:02 master Gianluca ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] 3.2 beta and f18 host on dell R815 problem
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 04:55:11PM +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: I see that /proc/cpuinfo DOES have svm, but libvirt does not recognize it. Maybe our friendly libvirt developers (CCed) could help with the debugging. Which version of libvirt are you using? Could you dump your /proc/cpuinfo somewhere? Dan. libvirt-0.10.2.2-3.fc18.x86_64 full cpuinfo output here: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwoPbcrMv8mvMUVkNWp0SC11MTQ/edit?usp=sharing I suppose that the problem you are seeing is indeed the libvirt issue pointed out by Kaul. BTW: when I configure a server as an oVirt node its libvirtd.conf is modified by vdsm, so that I can't run anymore the command virsh capabilities My host, after successfully install now gives me: [root@f18ovn03 ~]# virsh capabilities Please enter your authentication name: do I have to pass any particular connection parameters for vdsm to get the output again? What to use as authentication name and password? You can pass -r (read-only), or use `-c qemu+tcp://hostname/system`. Not that the latter option would allow you to change things under the feet of oVirt, which does not end well usually. Dan. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Cannot add local storage on 3.2
OK, thanks! So you don't have local storage on a KVM node, so not the management server. I would like to have this again and I think I need to setup an export with NFS. 2013/2/3 Gianluca Cecchi gianluca.cec...@gmail.com On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Matt . wrote: This is strange than. When I configure local storage from the hosts tab, I get a new DC and Cluster added. When I add the local storage from the storage tab I cannot add it also. What is the idea about the local storage ? I cannot remeber from 3.1 at the moment but I thought I always added it as NFS share on the Host itself. I don't know for 3.1, but in my 3.2 beta with an ISO DOMAIN (exported by the engine server) and a local domain under /home/LDATA (only /home is a mount point by itself) I have this df -h ... /dev/mapper/fedora_f18ovn03-home 456G 205M 432G 1% /home f18engine.localdomain.local:/ISO 45G 9.9G 33G 24% /rhev/data-center/mnt/f18engine.localdomain.local:_ISO mount ... /dev/mapper/fedora_f18ovn03-home on /home type ext4 (rw,relatime,seclabel,data=ordered) f18engine.localdomain.local:/ISO on /rhev/data-center/mnt/f18engine.localdomain.local:_ISO type nfs (rw,relatime,vers=3,rsize=524288,wsize=524288,namlen=255,soft,nosharecache,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=6,sec=sys,mountaddr=192.168.1.111,mountvers=3,mountport=20048,mountproto=udp,local_lock=none,addr=192.168.1.111) [root@f18ovn03 ~]# ll /home/LDATA/ total 4 drwxr-xr-x. 5 vdsm kvm 4096 Feb 1 23:02 a5c8c654-7c47-4ca5-b440-5cbf92d3fc7d [root@f18ovn03 ~]# ll /home/LDATA/a5c8c654-7c47-4ca5-b440-5cbf92d3fc7d/ total 12 drwxr-xr-x. 2 vdsm kvm 4096 Feb 3 16:59 dom_md drwxr-xr-x. 3 vdsm kvm 4096 Feb 1 23:53 images drwxr-xr-x. 4 vdsm kvm 4096 Feb 1 23:02 master Gianluca ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Cannot add local storage on 3.2
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Matt . wrote: OK, thanks! So you don't have local storage on a KVM node, so not the management server. I would like to have this again and I think I need to setup an export with NFS. My vdsm node is a server with 5x146Gb sas disks configured in RAID5, so that the OS sees a disk with about 580Gb. Fedora 18 installation configured a big /home filesystem on that disk, and it is ok for me to use as a base for local storage domain. I created /home/LDATA, gave it the right permissions and pointed to that for local storage domain On the same server, with different DCs configured in web admin gui (so that I attach the host to one or another DC depending on what testing) I plan to test also - iSCSI pointing to a iSCSI target in sw with CentOS 6.3 VM (on another standalone fedora server) - iSCSI pointing to an equallogic storage array Gianluca ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Cannot add local storage on 3.2
Hi, I have it working again. It had something todo with the 36:36 permissions indeed and a restart of NFS on the Node. Thanks! 2013/2/3 Gianluca Cecchi gianluca.cec...@gmail.com On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Matt . wrote: OK, thanks! So you don't have local storage on a KVM node, so not the management server. I would like to have this again and I think I need to setup an export with NFS. My vdsm node is a server with 5x146Gb sas disks configured in RAID5, so that the OS sees a disk with about 580Gb. Fedora 18 installation configured a big /home filesystem on that disk, and it is ok for me to use as a base for local storage domain. I created /home/LDATA, gave it the right permissions and pointed to that for local storage domain On the same server, with different DCs configured in web admin gui (so that I attach the host to one or another DC depending on what testing) I plan to test also - iSCSI pointing to a iSCSI target in sw with CentOS 6.3 VM (on another standalone fedora server) - iSCSI pointing to an equallogic storage array Gianluca ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] Connecting with vnc to a VM defined as spice
Hello, I have a Windows XP VM in 3.2 beta defined as spice. If I want to connect from a client that only has vnc (a Mac for example) how can I do from User Portal? Even if the VM is powered off then I power it on, on the right I see only spice as an option... Does the user need any special right? And if I select run once form user portal and select vnc then it tries to fire up spice protocol and if I click on ... icon, only spice is present and selected... Any pre-requisite on engine/node/vm/client? Thanks, Gianluca ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Testday aftermath
Vijay Bellur wrote: On 02/01/2013 07:38 PM, Kanagaraj wrote: On 02/01/2013 06:47 PM, Joop wrote: Shireesh Anjal wrote: On 02/01/2013 05:13 PM, noc wrote: On 1-2-2013 11:07, Kanagaraj wrote: Hi Joop, Looks like the problem is because of the glusterfs version you are using. vdsm could not parse the output from gluster. Can you update the glusterfs to http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/v3.4.0qa7/x86_64/ and check it out? How?? I tried adding this repo but but yum says that there are no updates available, atleast yesterday it did. [gluster-nieuw] name=GlusterFS baseurl=http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/stage/ gpgcheck=0 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-Gluster enabled=1 My yumfoo isn't that good so I don't know how to force it. Besides I tried through yum localinstall but it will revert when yum update is run. It looks like it thinks that 3.3.1 is newer than 3.4 The problem is that, released glusterfs rpms in fedora repository are of the form 3.3.1-8, whereas the ones from above QA release are v3.4.0qa7. I think because of the v before 3.4, these are considered as lower version, and by default yum picks up the rpms from fedora repository. The 'v' is 99.9% the culprit. I had 3.4.0qa6 before I wiped and just had a look that folder and repo doesn't have the 'v' in front of it. Thats correct. [kanagaraj@localhost ~]$ rpmdev-vercmp glusterfs-3.3.1-8.fc18.x86_64 glusterfs-v3.4.0qa7-1.el6.x86_64 glusterfs-3.3.1-8.fc18.x86_64 glusterfs-v3.4.0qa7-1.el6.x86_64 Is there someone on this list that has the 'powers' to change that ?? [Adding Vijay] 3.4.0qa8 is available now. Can you please check with that? Thanks, Vijay I can report back that 3.4.0qa8 does work. oVirt also picked up on the volumes that I created but didn't show up in the interface. Could start them an will test if they are fully usable. Thanks for the quick respons. Joop ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] [3.2 Beta]Creating DB fails
Did you try to see if postgresql is listening on 5432? 013-02-03 21:11:43::DEBUG::common_utils::291::root:: output = 2013-02-03 21:11:43::DEBUG::common_utils::292::root:: stderr = psql: could not connect to server: Connection refused Is the server running on host localhost (::1) and accepting TCP/IP connections on port 5432? could not connect to server: Connection refused Is the server running on host localhost (127.0.0.1) and accepting TCP/IP connections on port 5432? 2013-02-03 21:11:43::DEBUG::common_utils::293::root:: retcode = 2 2013-02-03 21:11:43::DEBUG::setup_sequences::59::root:: running _encryptDBPass 2013-02-03 21:11:43::DEBUG::common_utils::309::root:: Executing command -- '/etc/pki/ovirt-engine/encryptpasswd.sh ' 2013-02-03 21:11:44::DEBUG::common_utils::335::root:: output = /usr/share/ovirt-engine - Original Message - From: Nicholas Kesick cybertimber2...@hotmail.com To: oVirt Mailing List users@ovirt.org Sent: Monday, February 4, 2013 4:18:42 AM Subject: [Users] [3.2 Beta]Creating DB fails Hey guys, I'm having a problem with engine-setup. When it gets to the creating database part, it fails. I've tried rebuilding the system (this time from Fedora minimal install) and I had the same problem. Any suggestions? I've attached the engine setup log and it basically ends with the engine database is not currently accepting connections. ovirt-engine-setup-3.1.0-4.fc17.noarch kernel 3.7.4-204.fc18.x86_64 (also tried with what came on the dvd) sytemctl status postgresql.service reports postgresql is active (running). - Nick ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] How to connect to console after another user logged out
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 23:43:21 +0100 Gianluca Cecchi gianluca.cec...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have 3.2 beta and a Fedra 18 VM configured with spice access. One user connects to portal and access it, then terminates his session and closes the spice console window and log out from portal. Another user connects to portal and tries to connect to the same VM that is still powered on. It receives this message: Error: F18: Console connection denied. Another user has already accessed the console of this VM. The VM should be rebooted to allow another user to access it, or changed by an admin to not enforce reboot between users accessing its console. Check VM properties - Console - Advanced params - Disable strict user checking. jbelka ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Glusterfs HA doubts
Hey Adrian, I'm jumping in now because you haven't had any nibbles yet, not because I know for sure I'm right. I only have something to say about the 3rd part of your email: 3) Mount dns resolution If you check Jason Brooks howto you will see that it uses a hostname for refering to nfs mount. If you want to perform HA you need your storage to be mounted and if the server1 host is down it doesn't help that the nfs mount point associated to the storage is server1:/vms/ and not server2:/vms/. Checking Middleswarth howto I think that he does the same thing. Let's explain a bit more so that understand. My example setup is the one where you have two host machines where you run a set of virtual machines on one and the other one doesn't have any virtual machine running. Where is the virtual machines storage located? It's located at the glusterfs volume. So the first one of the machines mounts the glusterfs volume as nfs (It's an example). If it uses its own hostname for the nfs mount then if itself goes down the second host isn't going to mount it when it's restarted in the HA mode. So the first one of the machines mounts the glusterfs volume as nfs (It's an example). If it uses the second host hostname for the nfs mount then if the second host goes down the virtual machine cannot access its virtual disks. From what I can tell, you are asking about using storage local to hypervisors, combined into a gluster volume, and used as a POSIX data center. I don't think anyone would disagree about that being a bad idea. In the RHEV documentation, we try and make it clear that one of the weaknesses of using storage that is local to they hypervisors is that when something happens, you lose two pieces of infrastructure in one shot, rather than one. I think that for the availability you are talking about, you'll want at least three nodes. I've cc'd John Walker, the Gluster Community Guy (whom I met recently at LCA, g'day John!), he can probably say something specific. Tim Hildred, RHCE Content Author II - Engineering Content Services, Red Hat, Inc. Brisbane, Australia Email: thild...@redhat.com Internal: 8588287 Mobile: +61 4 666 25242 IRC: thildred - Original Message - From: Adrian Gibanel adrian.giba...@btactic.com To: users users@ovirt.org Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 9:35:42 PM Subject: [Users] Glusterfs HA doubts In oVirt 3.1 GlusterFS support was added. It was an easy way to replicate your virtual machine storage without too much hassle. There are two main howtos: * http://www.middleswarth.net/content/installing-ovirt-31-and-glusterfs-using-either-nfs-or-posix-native-file-system-engine (Robert Middleswarth) * http://blog.jebpages.com/archives/ovirt-3-1-glusterized/ (Jason Brooks). 1) What about performance? I've done some tests with rsync backups (even using the suggested --inplace rsync switch) that implies small files. These backups were done into local mounted glusterfs volumes. Backups instead of lasting about 2 hours they lasted like 15 hours long. Is there maybe something that only happens with small files and with big files performance is ok? 2) How to know the current status? In DRBD you know it checking a proc file if I remember it well. I remember too that GlusterFS doesn't have an equivalent thing and there's no evident way to know if all the files are synced. If you have tried it how do you know if both sets of virtual disks images are synced? 3) Mount dns resolution If you check Jason Brooks howto you will see that it uses a hostname for refering to nfs mount. If you want to perform HA you need your storage to be mounted and if the server1 host is down it doesn't help that the nfs mount point associated to the storage is server1:/vms/ and not server2:/vms/. Checking Middleswarth howto I think that he does the same thing. Let's explain a bit more so that understand. My example setup is the one where you have two host machines where you run a set of virtual machines on one and the other one doesn't have any virtual machine running. Where is the virtual machines storage located? It's located at the glusterfs volume. So the first one of the machines mounts the glusterfs volume as nfs (It's an example). If it uses its own hostname for the nfs mount then if itself goes down the second host isn't going to mount it when it's restarted in the HA mode. So the first one of the machines mounts the glusterfs volume as nfs (It's an example). If it uses the second host hostname for the nfs mount then if the second host goes down the virtual machine cannot access its virtual disks. A workaround for this situation which I have thought is to use /etc/hosts on both machines so that: whatever.domain.com resolves in both hosts to the host self's ip. I think that glusterfs has a way of mounting their share through -t glusterfs that somehow can ignore these hostnames problems but I haven't read it
Re: [Users] [3.2 Beta]Creating DB fails
On Feb 4, 2013 3:18 AM, Nicholas Kesick cybertimber2...@hotmail.com wrote: Hey guys, I'm having a problem with engine-setup. When it gets to the creating database part, it fails. I've tried rebuilding the system (this time from Fedora minimal install) and I had the same problem. Any suggestions? I've attached the engine setup log and it basically ends with the engine database is not currently accepting connections. ovirt-engine-setup-3.1.0-4.fc17.noarch kernel 3.7.4-204.fc18.x86_64 (also tried with what came on the dvd) sytemctl status postgresql.service reports postgresql is active (running). - Nick ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users You wrote with 3.2 beta tag in subject, but you are using a 3.1 engine-setup? Can you detail better your environment? Gianluca ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
