Re: [Users] Short delay in 3.3 release-- was [Re: oVirt 3.3 Release Go/No-Go Meeting Minutes]
- Original Message - > On 09/06/2013 08:37 AM, Dave Neary wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > > > Just following up - I had set some time aside today to test the install > > & diwnload, and update the Download page in the wiki, but I dan't figure > > out the 3.3 equivalent to the instructions we have up there. > > > > How does one install 3.3, as of today? > > Should be basically the same instructions as 3.2, just use the "beta" > repo instead of stable. > > I'll review the wiki and update it accordingly. > > Mike The setup component has been changed, if that Dave was referring to. We might want to update our setup instruction. > > > > > Thanks! > > Dave. > > > > On 09/05/2013 03:58 PM, Mike Burns wrote: > >> On 09/03/2013 11:00 AM, Mike Burns wrote: > >>> Just to summarize the meeting: > >>> > >>> There is an issue with the EL6 repo missing spice-html5 (fixed) > >>> There is an issue with current sdk (build coming today) > >>> There is a bug with gluster-only installs (build coming today) > >>> > >>> Due to these issues, we're delaying until Monday 09-September for the > >>> release. > >>> > >>> Mike > >> > >> A new issue relating to vdsm failing to start on Fedora 19 hosts has > >> been found [1]. This causes issues on oVirt Node as well as stock > >> Fedora 19 systems. A fix has been proposed and should be available > >> shortly. > >> > >> This will likely cause an additional day or 2 slip in the release due to > >> critical people not being available this week. > >> > >> Mike > >> > >>> > >>> On 09/03/2013 10:24 AM, Ofer Schreiber wrote: > Minutes: > http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2013/ovirt.2013-09-03-13.08.html > Minutes (text): > http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2013/ovirt.2013-09-03-13.08.txt > Log: > http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2013/ovirt.2013-09-03-13.08.log.html > > == > #ovirt: oVirt 3.3 Release go/no-go > == > > > Meeting started by oschreib at 13:08:21 UTC. The full logs are available > at http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2013/ovirt.2013-09-03-13.08.log.html > . > > Meeting summary > --- > * Agenda and roll call (oschreib, 13:08:37) > * Open issues from last week (oschreib, 13:08:52) > * blocker review (oschreib, 13:09:04) > * release communication (oschreib, 13:09:30) > > * open issues (oschreib, 13:11:32) > * ACTION: mburns to add the spice-html rpm to el6 build (oschreib, > 13:15:54) > * ACTION: mburns and oschreib to get new SDK build (oschreib, > 13:18:03) > > * Release blockers (oschreib, 13:18:17) > * All-In-One is broken due to missing ovirt-engine-sdk-python build > (oschreib, 13:28:21) > * el6 is broken due to missing spice-html build (oschreib, > 13:28:41) > * new ovirt-engine-sdk-python is needed before we can release > (oschreib, 13:47:57) > * ACTION: jhernand to test AIO once we have such build (oschreib, > 13:48:10) > * ACTION: oschreib to get a new build from mpastern asap (oschreib, > 13:48:50) > * no other blockers from 3.3 tracker (oschreib, 13:50:07) > > * decision (oschreib, 13:50:20) > * agreed to release tomorrow one AIO works (oschreib, 13:57:49) > > * release communication (oschreib, 13:58:06) > * rebuild of engine and sdk today (mburns, 14:06:36) > * ACTION: oschreib to update mburns with location of new rpms > (mburns, 14:06:53) > * new engine is rpm version change only (remove rc2) (mburns, > 14:07:04) > * ACTION: mburns to upload new sdk and engine to stable location > (mburns, 14:07:23) > * ACTION: mburns to get everything prepped for 3.3 release on Monday > 9-Sep (mburns, 14:07:35) > * dneary and others to test AIO install today and next couple days > (mburns, 14:07:55) > * release to go out on Monday (mburns, 14:08:01) > * ACTION: mburns to push release live on monday (mburns, 14:08:12) > * LINK: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/18762/ - we had pushed to 3.3 > branch (sahina, 14:11:10) > * 1 bugfix included in engine build (mburns, 14:12:49) > * related to gluster-only mode installation of engine (mburns, > 14:13:00) > > Meeting ended at 14:13:54 UTC. > > Action Items > > * mburns to add the spice-html rpm to el6 build > * mburns and oschreib to get new SDK build > * jhernand to test AIO once we have such build > * oschreib to get a new build from mpastern asap > * oschreib to update mburns with location of new rpms > * mburns to upload new sdk and engine to stable location > * mburns to get everything p
Re: [Users] Minor question concerning ServerException class
Hi Ricky, On 09/06/2013 09:31 PM, Hopper, Richard wrote: > Hi Michael, > > While working with the ovirt-engine-sdk-java, > I came across a small issue concerning the ServerException class. I wrote a > utility to handle different types of exceptions > (ServerException being one of those) for our plugin and found that > ServerException does not meet GWT's specific serialization requirements due > to the lack of a no-arg > constructor of any visibility level. Is there an explicit reason for the lack > of such a constructor? no, not at all, addressed at [1]. [1] http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/18960/ thanks for reporting this. > I was able to work around this, it's just a minor concern as far as GWT > goes, and it could be useful to others if such types were serializable as > well. > > Thanks, > > - Ricky -- Michael Pasternak RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] oVirt-sdk to fetch individual cpu stats
Hi Deepthi,
On 09/06/2013 01:12 PM, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was trying to get the cpu statistics of a host using the oVirt python
> sdk. But beyond a point I am unable to deference to the actual cpu stats
> field and the data.
>
> h_list = api.hosts.list()
> for h in h_list:
> y = h.statistics.list()
> for i in y:
> print i.get_values()
>
> O/P:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Can some one please let me know how I can get individual fields like
> cpu.current.system or cpu.current.idle stats from here.
you can use sdk client side filtering on collections using
map based constraints [1], just note that you cannot use
same constrain (name) twice [2] as following entry will always
override the former one,
to work this out, just use your private inline filtering [3] (it will have
same complexity as using sdk filtering)
[1]
for h in h_list:
statistics = h.statistics.list(**{
'name':'cpu.current.system'
}
)
for statistic in statistics:
print "%s=%0.4f %s" % (
statistic.get_name(),
statistic.get_values().get_value()[0].datum,
statistics[0].get_unit()
)
[2]
statistics = h.statistics.list(**{
'name':'cpu.current.system',
'name':'cpu.current.idle'
}
)
[3]
h_list = api.hosts.list()
stats_to_show = ['cpu.current.system', 'cpu.current.idle']
for h in h_list:
statistics = h.statistics.list()
for statistic in statistics:
if statistic.get_name() in stats_to_show:
print "%s=%0.4f %s" % (
statistic.get_name(),
statistic.get_values().get_value()[0].datum
,
statistics[0].get_unit()
)
hope it helps.
>
> Thanks!
> Deepthi
>
--
Michael Pasternak
RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] deep dive - scheduling in 3.3
Doron Fediuck wrote: Hi all, session will start momentarily. Join us, Doron - Original Message - From: "Doron Fediuck" To: "users" , "arch" Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 12:26:44 PM Subject: [Users] deep dive - scheduling in 3.3 Hi all, Next Tuesday (September 3rd) at 16:00 UTC+3, we're going to have a deep dive session on the new oVirt scheduling. You're more than welcome to join us using: - Audio only bridge * Dial your local access number in: https://www.intercallonline.com/portlets/scheduling/viewNumbers/listNumbersByCode.do?confCode=972545636785 * Use the following bridge ID: 972545636785 - Visual session (Elluminate) * Browse to: https://sas.elluminate.com/m.jnlp?sid=819&password=M.97AA703D4B077C9D0263B1D791D482 Slides will be available after the session. See you then, Doron Do you have a link? Regards, Joop ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Introductory email
welcome aboard! - Original Message - > From: "Liviu Elama" > To: users@ovirt.org > Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2013 5:11:19 AM > Subject: [Users] Introductory email > Hi all > My name is Liviu Elama and I'm from New Zealand. > My day to day job is Unix/Linux technical consultant for an outsourcing > company here in NZ. > I have around 10 years of UNIX (Solaris, AIX, RHEL,SLES) , storage, backup, > virtualization (VCP) and I'm very interested in ovirt as an alternative for > VMware and the integration with glusterfs and foreman/puppet. > Good to be here > Cheers > Liviu > ___ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] NFS sanlock fails on Fedora 19 - 3.3RC (was add NFS Domain fails)
> Hello,
>
> after some further investigation I think I found the reason
> but do not know how to fix it best. On my Fedora 19 host
> sanlock is running as user sanlock (id 179). That user has
> no access to files created by user vdsm (id 36). See logs
> attached.
>
> The node installation was done the standard way through
> ovirt-engine 3.3. Maybe I missed some setp in the installation
> process but I would expect this to work out of the box.
>
> Can anyone tell me what the expected setup is. Should I file
> a bug for that?
>
> Markus
>
> [root@colovn1 etc]# ps -ef | grep sanlock
> sanlock 1125 1 0 10:19 ?00:00:00 sanlock daemon -U sanlock -G
> sanlock
> root 1126 1125 0 10:19 ?00:00:00 sanlock daemon -U sanlock -G
> sanlock
> root 1128 1 0 10:19 ?00:00:00 wdmd -G sanlock
> root 2307 1401 0 10:39 pts/000:00:00 grep --color=auto sanlock
>
> strace -p 1125 -F
> ...
> 2094 mprotect(0x7fa02000, 135168, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) = 0
> 2094
> open("/rhev/data-center/mnt/10.10.30.251:_var_nas5_ovirt/4250f423-459c-40da-9a0e-d5b6fe853b1b/dom_md/ids",
> O_RDWR|O_SYNC|O_DIRECT) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
> 2094 gettid() = 2094
> ...
>
> [root@colovn1 etc]# cat /etc/sysconfig/sanlock
> # SANLOCKOPTS -- set the command line options for the sanlock daemon
> # See sanlock man page for full list of command line options.
> #
> # Include "-U sanlock -G sanlock" in the option string unless
> # also changing the SANLOCKUSER above.
> #
> # To disable use of watchdog via wdmd
> #SANLOCKOPTS="-U sanlock -G sanlock -w 0"
> #
> # To disable use of watchdog via wdmd and disable high priority features
> #SANLOCKOPTS="-U sanlock -G sanlock -w 0 -h 0"
>
Too stupid. In case someone else faces this problem. The error
comes from a missing "all_squash" parameter in /etc/exports
Markus
Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte
Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail
irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und
vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte
Weitergabe dieser Mail ist nicht gestattet.
Ãber das Internet versandte E-Mails können unter fremden Namen erstellt oder
manipuliert werden. Deshalb ist diese als E-Mail verschickte Nachricht keine
rechtsverbindliche Willenserklärung.
Collogia
Unternehmensberatung AG
Ubierring 11
D-50678 Köln
Vorstand:
Kadir Akin
Dr. Michael Höhnerbach
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates:
Hans Kristian Langva
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Köln
Registernummer: HRB 52 497
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error)
please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any
unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this
e-mail is strictly forbidden.
e-mails sent over the internet may have been written under a wrong name or
been manipulated. That is why this message sent as an e-mail is not a
legally binding declaration of intention.
Collogia
Unternehmensberatung AG
Ubierring 11
D-50678 Köln
executive board:
Kadir Akin
Dr. Michael Höhnerbach
President of the supervisory board:
Hans Kristian Langva
Registry office: district court Cologne
Register number: HRB 52 497
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] deep dive - hosted engine
- Original Message - > From: "Andrew Lau" > To: "Doron Fediuck" > Cc: "arch" , "users" > Sent: Sunday, September 8, 2013 3:48:58 AM > Subject: Re: [Users] deep dive - hosted engine > > On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Doron Fediuck < dfedi...@redhat.com > wrote: > > > Hi all, > Next Tuesday (September 9) at 16:00 UTC+3, we're going to have > a deep dive session on the cool hosted engine. > > You're more than welcome to join us using: > > - Audio only bridge > * Dial your local access number in: > https://www.intercallonline.com/portlets/scheduling/viewNumbers/listNumbersByCode.do?confCode=0543004646 > * Use the following bridge ID: 0543004646 > > - Visual session (Elluminate) > * Browse to: > https://sas.elluminate.com/m.jnlp?sid=819&password=M.2BA8BA41E5D0E38D2CC8C19918A932 > > Slides will be available after the session. > See you then, > Doron > ___ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > Hi Doron, > > Does that mean hosted-engine is ready to be used? Also Sept 9 is a Monday. > > I'm excited! > > Andrew. > > Hi Andrew, This is a technical session, explaining the design, architecture, flows and various aspects. The actual implementation is still being tested, thus not ready yet for release. Thanks for noticing the day issue, the session will be held on Monday, September 9. See you then ;) Doron. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] deep dive - hosted engine
Just clarifying my typo- Session will be on September 9, which is Monday ;) - Original Message - > From: "Doron Fediuck" > To: "users" , "arch" > Sent: Saturday, September 7, 2013 10:41:27 PM > Subject: [Users] deep dive - hosted engine > > Hi all, > Next Tuesday (September 9) at 16:00 UTC+3, we're going to have > a deep dive session on the cool hosted engine. > > You're more than welcome to join us using: > > - Audio only bridge > * Dial your local access number in: > > https://www.intercallonline.com/portlets/scheduling/viewNumbers/listNumbersByCode.do?confCode=0543004646 > * Use the following bridge ID: 0543004646 > > - Visual session (Elluminate) > * Browse to: > > https://sas.elluminate.com/m.jnlp?sid=819&password=M.2BA8BA41E5D0E38D2CC8C19918A932 > > Slides will be available after the session. > See you then, > Doron > ___ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] so, what do you want next in oVirt?
- Original Message - > From: "René Koch (ovido)" > To: "Itamar Heim" > Cc: "ovirt-users" > Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2013 11:31:57 AM > Subject: Re: [Users] so, what do you want next in oVirt? > > Hi, > > Thanks for starting this thread again. > > > > On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 17:19 -0400, Itamar Heim wrote: > > earlier in the year we did a survey for feature requests / improvements > > / etc. > > > > since a lot of things were added, and priorities usually change, I'd > > like to ask again for "what do you need the most from oVirt / what are > > your pain points" next? > > > > below[1] I've listed my understanding of what already went in from > > previous survey requests (to various degrees of coverage). > > > > Thanks, > > Itamar > > > > [1] from the top 12 > > V Allow disk resize > > > Great! > > > > V Integrate Nagios/Zabbix monitoring - via a ui plugin > > > Zabbix isn't working yet with my ui plugin (is there maybe another one > which integrates Zabbix?) - but it will be available in a future > release. > Btw, there will be a new version of the monitoring ui plugin with new > features available out at the end of this week... > > > > V Highly Available engine - via hosted engine[2] > > V Open vSwitch integration - via neutron integration > > X Allow cloning VMs without template > > > This is definitely one feature I would like to see. > > > > ? Enable hypervisor upgrade/updates through engine[3] > > > The next feature I would like to request. > > > > V Allow engine on an oVirt hosted VM - via hosted engine[2] > > V Enable guest configuration (root password, SSH keys, network) via > >guest agent in engine - via cloud-init > > > Cool. Can this be done on oVirt-node as well or only on > CentOS/RHEL/Fedora hosts? > > > > X Integrate v2v into engine > > > Vote for this again :) > > > > ? Bond/extend ovirtmgmt with a second network for HA/increased > >bandwidth[4] > > X Integrate scheduling of snapshots and VM export for backups in > >engine[5] > > V Spice – support Google Chrome - via mime based launch > > > At the moment spice support is really a pain (especially on Windows as > the SpiceX.cab is missing). Great to hear that spice support has > improved and Chrome can be used as well! > > > > > > > Other items mentioned in previous survey which should be covered by now: > > - Fix timeout when adding local host during all-in-one configuration > > - Fix engine set-up when SELinux is disabled > > - Provide packages for el6 (CentOS, Red Hat Enterprise Linux) > > - Allow multiple VMs to be deployed from the same template at the same > >time > > - ISO domains on local/GlusterS > > > ISO and export domains on FC/iSCSI would be good to have as well. > > > > - Show IP addresses in Virtual Machines->Network Interfaces > > - OpenStack Quantum support (now called Neutron) > > - noVNC support > > - Support spice.html5 and websocket proxy > > - Add other guest OSes to list > > > Good to hear that other Linux distributions will be added as well. > > > > - Port oVirt guest agent to Ubuntu[6] > > - SLA - Allow resource time-sharing > > - Spice - Mac client (via mime based launch) > > - Spice - port XPI plug-in to Windows (not sure this will happen, but > >mime based launch allows using firefox now) > > - Spice - client for Ubuntu/Debian (should be covered via mime based > >launch) > > > Additional features I would like to see are: > - oVirt guest agent for Ubuntu/openSUSE/SLES/Debian * > > *Ubuntu is already available thanks to Zhou Zheng Sheng > > - Resource pools > At the moment only Quotas are available (which is great, btw), but in > some cases it's necessary to implement resource pools. E.g. Limit CPU, > Memory and Network for group of test vms, but give full resources to > production vms. Maybe this could be done with cgroups? > So e.g. I don't want to give a compile machine a full cpu core, but only > 1 core with 500MHz or limit the bandwith to e.g. 10Mbit/s. > Hi René, Due to time constraints, it did not make it into the 3.3 release, however in master we already have network QoS allowing you to limit bandwidth for vNICs. Also, we managed to implement CPU shares which allows you to handle priorities. Both will be included in the next version, and hopefuly some more. So if you ever feel like taking a ride with the bleeding edge, you have both network QoS and CPU shares waiting there. > - Upload ISOs within the GUI to ISO domain > > - Use existing share for ISO domain > When creating an ISO domain, oVirt creates it's own directory > structure with IDs. It would be nice if an existing share could be used > (e.g. an ISO share on NFS server which is used by other service, too) > without creating the structure with IDs. I know that the IDs are needed > internally but I think it should be possible to reuse an existing share. > > > Last but not least I want to thank all contributors of this project for > their great work so f
Re: [Users] so, what do you want next in oVirt?
Hi Jose, the latter is available by hosted engine, which is a highly available VM which will be migrated / restarted on a different host if something goes wrong. - Original Message - > From: supo...@logicworks.pt > To: users@ovirt.org > Sent: Friday, September 6, 2013 1:43:04 PM > Subject: Re: [Users] so, what do you want next in oVirt? > > Could be great o have on the Engine: > - An upload option for the ISO files > - A backup and restore option > - An high availability for the engine: install the engine on 2 platforms > (hardware?), than integrate them for synchronization > > Jose > > > From: "noc" > Cc: users@ovirt.org > Sent: Sexta-feira, 6 de Setembro de 2013 10:28:09 > Subject: Re: [Users] so, what do you want next in oVirt? > > On 6-9-2013 10:12, Itamar Heim wrote: > > On 09/05/2013 10:30 AM, noc wrote: > On 08/21/2013 12:11 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: > > On 08/21/2013 02:40 AM, Joop van de Wege wrote: > >> > >> What I would like to see in the ! next version is pxe boot of the > >> nodes. > >> Probably not easy to achieve because of dependency on dhcp. > > > > Hi Joop, > > > > can you please give a bit more information on the use case / how you > > envision this? > > > > current thinking around bare metal provisioning of hosts is to extend > > the functionality around the foreman provider for this, but you may > > have other suggestions? > > I think Joop means to be able to add hosts (nodes) to a cluster by > adding their MAC address to the dhcp list for PXE boot into ovirt-node > and thus join the cluster. This would make it easy to add new physical > nodes without any spinning disks or other local storage requirements. > >>> > >>> we started adding foreman integration in 3.3: > >>> http://www.ovirt.org/Features/ForemanIntegration > >>> > >>> adding ohad and oved for their thoughts on this. > >>> > > I suppose this may not be easy with complex network connections (bonds > on mgmt network, mgmt network on a tagged vlan, etc), but it should be > possible if the management network interface is plain and physical. > > /Simon > > PS, Perhaps Joop can confirm this idea, we've talked about it IRL. > ___ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > >>> > >> This isn't about provisioning with Foreman. Its about having the compute > >> nodes NOT having any spinning disks. So the only way to start a node is > >> to pxeboot it and then let it (re)connect with the engine. Then it will > >> be identified by engine as either a new node or a reconnecting node and > >> it will get its configuration from the engine. For reference: thats how > >> VirtualIron works. It has a managment network, just like ovirt, and on > >> that it runs a tftp and dhcp server. Nodes are plugged into the > >> managment network, without disk, and then pxe booted after which they > >> appear in the webui as new unconfigured nodes. You then can set various > >> settings and upon rebooting the nodes will recieve these settings > >> because it is recognised by its mac address. The advantage of this > >> construct is that you can place a new server into a rack, cable it, > >> power on and go back to you office where you'll find the new node > >> waiting to be configured. No messing around with CDs to install an OS, > >> not being in the datacenter for hours on end, just in and out. > >> > >> Yes, disks are cheap but they brake down, need maintenance, means > >> downtime and in general more admin time then when you don't have them. ( > >> its a shame to have a raid1 of 2 1Tb disk just to install an OS of less > >> then 10G) > > > > just wondering, how do they prevent a rogue node/guest from > > masquerading as such a host, getting access/secrets/VMs to be launched > > on such an untrusted node (they could easily report a different mac > > address if the layer 2 isn't hardened against that)? > > > They would need physical access to your rack which ofcourse is locked, > you would need to powerdown/up which would trigger an alert, switch port > down/up would trigger an alert, so probably you're notified that > something not quite right is happening. I haven't gone through the > source to see if there is more then just the mac address check. > > > other than that, yes. we actually used to have this via the > > AutoApprovePatterns config option, which would have the engine approve > > a pending node as it registers (I admit i don't think anyone used this > > last several years, and it may be totally broken by now). > > > > please note this doesn't solve the need for a disk, just the > > auto-registration part (if it still works) > What I would like is to have the ovirt Node pxe booting and getting its > config from engine or autoregister. I know there is a script which > converts the iso into
Re: [Users] deep dive - scheduling in 3.3
- Original Message - > From: "Joop" > Cc: "users" > Sent: Sunday, September 8, 2013 2:37:59 PM > Subject: Re: [Users] deep dive - scheduling in 3.3 > > Doron Fediuck wrote: > > Hi all, > > session will start momentarily. > > > > Join us, > > Doron > > > > - Original Message - > > > >> From: "Doron Fediuck" > >> To: "users" , "arch" > >> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 12:26:44 PM > >> Subject: [Users] deep dive - scheduling in 3.3 > >> > >> Hi all, > >> Next Tuesday (September 3rd) at 16:00 UTC+3, we're going to have > >> a deep dive session on the new oVirt scheduling. > >> > >> You're more than welcome to join us using: > >> > >> - Audio only bridge > >> * Dial your local access number in: > >> > >> https://www.intercallonline.com/portlets/scheduling/viewNumbers/listNumbersByCode.do?confCode=972545636785 > >> * Use the following bridge ID: 972545636785 > >> > >> - Visual session (Elluminate) > >> * Browse to: > >> > >> https://sas.elluminate.com/m.jnlp?sid=819&password=M.97AA703D4B077C9D0263B1D791D482 > >> > >> Slides will be available after the session. > >> See you then, > >> Doron > >> > Do you have a link? > Sure. Look at the last session in: http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.3_release_notes#Deep_dives > Regards, > > Joop > ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
