Re: [Users] ovirt 3.3 vdsm use glusterfs on centos

2013-09-11 Thread James A. Peltier
It doesn't currently work, but it may work with 6.5 when released. 

- Original Message -

| hi all;
| i use ovirt 3.3 on centos,I want native glusterfs as storage , but
| using native glusterfs need qemu 1.3 and libvirt 1.0 or later. Ask
| these two versions of the rpm package where you can download .
| tks.
| ___
| Users mailing list
| Users@ovirt.org
| http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

-- 

James A. Peltier 
Manager, IT Services - Research Computing Group 
Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus 
Phone : 778-782-6573 
Fax : 778-782-3045 
E-Mail : jpelt...@sfu.ca 
Website : http://www.sfu.ca/itservices 

“A successful person is one who can lay a solid foundation from the bricks 
others have thrown at them.” -David Brinkley via Luke Shaw 
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] Ubuntu/Debian ovirt-guest-agent

2013-09-11 Thread Vinzenz Feenstra

On 09/11/2013 05:44 AM, Zhou Zheng Sheng wrote:

Hi Jakub,

No problem. I'll try to write SysV init script for it. I'm not sure
Ubuntu PPA can build and host Debian packages. Once it's over (ready or
fail) I'll inform you.

Hi Zhou Zheng Sheng,

Could you please rebuild the ubuntu package from the current master?
We've merged the solution of the broken master yesterday.

It'd be great. Thanks.


on 2013/09/10 21:52, Jakub Bittner wrote:

Hello Zhou Zheng Sheng,

I tested your ovirt-guest-agent PPA which you provided and it works on
Ubuntu Precise (12.04) as expected, but I can not install it on Debian
Wheezy because that package needs upstart-job from Ubuntu which is not
in Debian...
Would you be so kind and provide even Debian packages on your PPA? :-)
I dont know if sysvinit style file for launching daemon is included by
oVirt.

Thank you.

Jakub Bittner
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users




--
Regards,

Vinzenz Feenstra | Senior Software Engineer
RedHat Engineering Virtualization R & D
Phone: +420 532 294 625
IRC: vfeenstr or evilissimo

Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[Users] ovirt 3.3 vdsm use glusterfs on centos

2013-09-11 Thread Joy
hi all;  i use ovirt 3.3 on centos,I want native glusterfs as storage , but 
using native glusterfs need qemu 1.3  and libvirt 1.0 or later. Ask these two 
versions of the rpm package where you  can download .
tks.___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] NFS troubleshooting page

2013-09-11 Thread Federico Simoncelli
- Original Message -
> From: "Itamar Heim" 
> To: "Markus Stockhausen" 
> Cc: "Ayal Baron" , "Federico Simoncelli" 
> , users@ovirt.org, "Allon Mureinik"
> 
> Sent: Monday, September 9, 2013 3:45:56 PM
> Subject: Re: AW: [Users] NFS troubleshooting page
> 
> On 09/09/2013 04:42 PM, Markus Stockhausen wrote:
> >> ayal/federico - thoughts on how we can make things better? warn? etc?
> >
> > Got my account and already modified the wiki.
> >
> > Thanks for the help.
> >
> > Markus
> >
> 
> thanks markus. my question to ayal/federico is on how to fix the
> original issue to at least warn about the issue.

Good question. I don't have an answer yet, but I'll look into it.

-- 
Federico
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] VM Crash at end of disk move

2013-09-11 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: Markus Stockhausen
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. September 2013 21:43
> An: users@ovirt.org
> Betreff: VM Crash at end of disk move
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Thanks for the assistance to get this all running.  But now
> I'm working on the next error on my new ovirt cluster.
> 
> I migrated a Windows 7 64Bit VMware VM into ovirt using
> virt-v2v. VMWare tools were deinstalled in advance. After
> two boots on ovirt everything seems fine. Just for curiousity
> I moved the boot disk to another storage domain. At the
> end the machine crashes without any indication of the
> reason. ovirt webinterface log reads:
> 
> 2013-Sep-10, 21:32 User admin@internal have failed to move disk 
> colvm40_1IB_win7x64_Office2010_Test_Disk to domain NAS3_IB.
> 2013-Sep-10, 21:32 VM colvm40_1IB_win7x64_Office2010_Test is down. Exit 
> message: Lost connection with qemu process.
> 2013-Sep-10, 21:19 User admin@internal moving disk 
> colvm40_1IB_win7x64_Office2010_Test_Disk1 to domain NAS3_IB.
> 2013-Sep-10, 21:19 Snapshot 'Auto-generated for Live Storage Migration' 
> creation for VM 'colvm40_1IB_win7x64_Office2010_Test' has been completed.
> 2013-Sep-10, 21:18 Snapshot 'Auto-generated for Live Storage Migration' 
> creation for VM 'colvm40_1IB_win7x64_Office2010_Test' was initiated by 
> admin@internal.
> 2013-Sep-10, 21:17 VM colvm40_1IB_win7x64_Office2010_Test started on Host 
> colovn1
> 
> After this crash VM can be started again. The disk image is
> taken from the target storage domain. So it seems as if the
> move was successful. Another (SLES 11 SP3) VM that was
> newly created inside the cluster does not show this problem.
> 
> As I did not find qemu logs, what would be the best place to
> start analysis with.
> 
> Best regards.
> 
> Markus

Memo for myself: Install ALL Windows VIRTIO drivers. virt-v2v
only does the basics to get the VM up after the migration.



Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte
Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail
irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und
vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte
Weitergabe dieser Mail ist nicht gestattet.

Über das Internet versandte E-Mails können unter fremden Namen erstellt oder
manipuliert werden. Deshalb ist diese als E-Mail verschickte Nachricht keine
rechtsverbindliche Willenserklärung.

Collogia
Unternehmensberatung AG
Ubierring 11
D-50678 Köln

Vorstand:
Kadir Akin
Dr. Michael Höhnerbach

Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates:
Hans Kristian Langva

Registergericht: Amtsgericht Köln
Registernummer: HRB 52 497

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error)
please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any
unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this
e-mail is strictly forbidden.

e-mails sent over the internet may have been written under a wrong name or
been manipulated. That is why this message sent as an e-mail is not a
legally binding declaration of intention.

Collogia
Unternehmensberatung AG
Ubierring 11
D-50678 Köln

executive board:
Kadir Akin
Dr. Michael Höhnerbach

President of the supervisory board:
Hans Kristian Langva

Registry office: district court Cologne
Register number: HRB 52 497


___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] oVIRT 3.3 Failed to acces Master Domain

2013-09-11 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:50:44AM -0400, Hans-Joachim wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I run in troubles
> 
> For a testing I completly powered off the oVirt Cluster (Engine as well as 
> the the host).. and now my host
> is unable to fine the Master Domain
> 
> System: CentOS 6.4, vdsm-4.12.1-1.el6, oVirt Engine Version: 3.3.0-1.el6
> 
> Trace vdsm.log
> 
> Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 16:35:06,859::BindingXMLRPC::177::vds::(wrapper) 
> client [192.168.1.29]
> Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
> 16:35:06,859::task::579::TaskManager.Task::(_updateState) 
> Task=`b2a7a44f-8cb0-453a-bf52-16a200f992f9`::moving from state init -> state 
> preparing
> Thread-98::INFO::2013-09-11 16:35:06,860::logUtils::44::dispatcher::(wrapper) 
> Run and protect: 
> connectStoragePool(spUUID='5849b030-626e-47cb-ad90-3ce782d831b3', hostID=1, 
> scsiKey='5849b030-626e-47cb-ad90-3ce782d831b3', 
> msdUUID='3401420d-6918-49f9-b9e2-23ba47949f29', masterVersion=1, options=None)
> Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
> 16:35:06,860::resourceManager::197::ResourceManager.Request::(__init__) 
> ResName=`Storage.5849b030-626e-47cb-ad90-3ce782d831b3`ReqID=`079c6f43-9453-4598-a9f3-7056ad3a595e`::Request
>  was made in '/usr/share/vdsm/storage/hsm.py' line '1020' at 
> '_connectStoragePool'
> Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
> 16:35:06,860::resourceManager::541::ResourceManager::(registerResource) 
> Trying to register resource 'Storage.5849b030-626e-47cb-ad90-3ce782d831b3' 
> for lock type 'exclusive'
> Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
> 16:35:06,861::resourceManager::600::ResourceManager::(registerResource) 
> Resource 'Storage.5849b030-626e-47cb-ad90-3ce782d831b3' is free. Now locking 
> as 'exclusive' (1 active user)
> Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
> 16:35:06,861::resourceManager::237::ResourceManager.Request::(grant) 
> ResName=`Storage.5849b030-626e-47cb-ad90-3ce782d831b3`ReqID=`079c6f43-9453-4598-a9f3-7056ad3a595e`::Granted
>  request
> Thread-98::INFO::2013-09-11 
> 16:35:06,861::sp::680::Storage.StoragePool::(connect) Connect host #1 to the 
> storage pool 5849b030-626e-47cb-ad90-3ce782d831b3 with master domain: 
> 3401420d-6918-49f9-b9e2-23ba47949f29 (ver = 1)
> Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
> 16:35:06,862::lvm::483::OperationMutex::(_invalidateAllPvs) Operation 'lvm 
> invalidate operation' got the operation mutex
> Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
> 16:35:06,862::lvm::485::OperationMutex::(_invalidateAllPvs) Operation 'lvm 
> invalidate operation' released the operation mutex
> Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
> 16:35:06,862::lvm::494::OperationMutex::(_invalidateAllVgs) Operation 'lvm 
> invalidate operation' got the operation mutex
> Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
> 16:35:06,862::lvm::496::OperationMutex::(_invalidateAllVgs) Operation 'lvm 
> invalidate operation' released the operation mutex
> Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
> 16:35:06,863::lvm::514::OperationMutex::(_invalidateAllLvs) Operation 'lvm 
> invalidate operation' got the operation mutex
> Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
> 16:35:06,863::lvm::516::OperationMutex::(_invalidateAllLvs) Operation 'lvm 
> invalidate operation' released the operation mutex
> Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
> 16:35:06,863::misc::807::SamplingMethod::(__call__) Trying to enter sampling 
> method (storage.sdc.refreshStorage)
> Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
> 16:35:06,863::misc::809::SamplingMethod::(__call__) Got in to sampling method
> Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
> 16:35:06,863::misc::807::SamplingMethod::(__call__) Trying to enter sampling 
> method (storage.iscsi.rescan)
> Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
> 16:35:06,864::misc::809::SamplingMethod::(__call__) Got in to sampling method
> Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
> 16:35:06,864::iscsiadm::91::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(_runCmd) '/usr/bin/sudo -n 
> /sbin/iscsiadm -m session -R' (cwd None)
> Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
> 16:35:06,875::iscsiadm::91::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(_runCmd) FAILED:  = 
> 'iscsiadm: No session found.\n';  = 21

Before the connectStoragePool attempt, vdsm.log should have had
connectStorageServer. Does it? Is it successful?


> Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
> 16:35:06,875::misc::817::SamplingMethod::(__call__) Returning last result
> Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
> 16:35:08,902::multipath::111::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(rescan) '/usr/bin/sudo -n 
> /sbin/multipath' (cwd None)
> Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
> 16:35:08,916::multipath::111::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(rescan) SUCCESS:  = 
> '';  = 0
> Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
> 16:35:08,917::lvm::483::OperationMutex::(_invalidateAllPvs) Operation 'lvm 
> invalidate operation' got the operation mutex
> Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
> 16:35:08,917::lvm::485::OperationMutex::(_invalidateAllPvs) Operation 'lvm 
> invalidate operation' released the operation mutex
> Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
> 16:35:08,918::lvm::494::OperationMutex::(_invalidateAllVgs) Operation 'lvm 
> invalidate operation' got the operation mutex
> Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
> 16:35:08,918::lvm::496::OperationMutex::(_invalidateAllVgs) Operation

Re: [Users] VM Crash at end of disk move

2013-09-11 Thread Yeela Kaplan
Hi Markus,
Relevant logs you can look at are: 
on the hypervisor: 
under /var/log/libvirt/..
The vdsm log under /var/log/vdsm/vdsm.log

and on the engine host:
under /var/log/ovirt-engine/engine.log

hope this helps,
Yeela

- Original Message -
> From: "Markus Stockhausen" 
> To: users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 7:48:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [Users] VM Crash at end of disk move
> 
> > Von: Markus Stockhausen
> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. September 2013 21:43
> > An: users@ovirt.org
> > Betreff: VM Crash at end of disk move
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Thanks for the assistance to get this all running.  But now
> > I'm working on the next error on my new ovirt cluster.
> > 
> > I migrated a Windows 7 64Bit VMware VM into ovirt using
> > virt-v2v. VMWare tools were deinstalled in advance. After
> > two boots on ovirt everything seems fine. Just for curiousity
> > I moved the boot disk to another storage domain. At the
> > end the machine crashes without any indication of the
> > reason. ovirt webinterface log reads:
> > 
> > 2013-Sep-10, 21:32 User admin@internal have failed to move disk
> > colvm40_1IB_win7x64_Office2010_Test_Disk to domain NAS3_IB.
> > 2013-Sep-10, 21:32 VM colvm40_1IB_win7x64_Office2010_Test is down. Exit
> > message: Lost connection with qemu process.
> > 2013-Sep-10, 21:19 User admin@internal moving disk
> > colvm40_1IB_win7x64_Office2010_Test_Disk1 to domain NAS3_IB.
> > 2013-Sep-10, 21:19 Snapshot 'Auto-generated for Live Storage Migration'
> > creation for VM 'colvm40_1IB_win7x64_Office2010_Test' has been completed.
> > 2013-Sep-10, 21:18 Snapshot 'Auto-generated for Live Storage Migration'
> > creation for VM 'colvm40_1IB_win7x64_Office2010_Test' was initiated by
> > admin@internal.
> > 2013-Sep-10, 21:17 VM colvm40_1IB_win7x64_Office2010_Test started on Host
> > colovn1
> > 
> > After this crash VM can be started again. The disk image is
> > taken from the target storage domain. So it seems as if the
> > move was successful. Another (SLES 11 SP3) VM that was
> > newly created inside the cluster does not show this problem.
> > 
> > As I did not find qemu logs, what would be the best place to
> > start analysis with.
> > 
> > Best regards.
> > 
> > Markus
> 
> Memo for myself: Install ALL Windows VIRTIO drivers. virt-v2v
> only does the basics to get the VM up after the migration.
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] Bridge for logical network

2013-09-11 Thread Juan Pablo Lorier
Hi,

I've decided to solve the issue externally to avoid experimenting with
the production environment.
Anyway, I'll open a bug to explain in detail the use case and see if
it's applicable for a general purpose.
I thank you all for the help.
By the way, I was looking at neutron integration and it looks promising,
I'm not sure I totally get how it'll work and how complex the setup can
be, but looks like it can give a hand on cases like mine.
Regards,



On 10/09/13 09:17, Moti Asayag wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Juan Pablo Lorier" 
>> To: "Dan Kenigsberg" 
>> Cc: "users" 
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 2:50:08 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Users] Bridge for logical network
>>
>> Hi Dan
>>
>> By hiding the eths, will I be able to use the bridge to assign it to a vm?
>> Regards,
>>
> As long as the bridge is defined on engine side and reported by VDSM you 
> should
> be able to assign vms to it.
>
> Please report if hiding the additional nics (only one nic shouldn't be 
> hidden) works
> for you.
>
>> El 09/09/13 19:48, Dan Kenigsberg escribió:
>>> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:19:48PM -0300, Juan Pablo Lorier wrote:
 Hi,

 Another question: I need to connect 2 eths to a Fortigate cluster so I
 need them to be in a bridge with single ip so it can connect to the DMZ.
 As far as I can see, ovirt 3.2 is allowing me to create bonds and assign
 logical network to them, but not to create a bridge. Can I create it
 manually and get ovirt to handle it?
>>> Indeed, ovirt does not support setting up a bridge with multiple
>>> physical legs.
>>>
>>> I do not recall having tried that, but I have a suspition that Engine
>>> may be confused if such a bridge is to be reported by Vdsm.
> The engine do complains about a bridge created on more than a single 
> interface.
>
>>> If that happens, I suggest that you list these two eths in vdsm.conf's
>>> hidden_nics. Then, they would not show up on ovirt's network editing
>>> tools and would not tempt admins to use them for other purposes.
>>>
>>> Dan.
>>> Please test it out and r
>> ___
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] oVirt Weekly Meeting Minutes -- 2013-09-11

2013-09-11 Thread Thomas Suckow

On 09/11/2013 08:09 AM, Mike Burns wrote:

* 3.3 release status  (mburns, 14:03:53)
* no open blockers at the moment, release just pending successful
  testi


If you guys are looking for another tester of all-in-one before monday, 
I am willing to try in our environment on a clean install of F19.


I would follow the instructions on http://www.ovirt.org/Feature/AllInOne 
Unless you have some other instructions you would like me to follow.
I would just need to know where you would like me to acquire the 
ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-allinone rpm.
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[Users] oVirt Weekly Meeting schedule -- next 2 weeks

2013-09-11 Thread Mike Burns
Many of the people who contribute on a weekly basis to the weekly 
meeting have indicated that they're unavailable the next 2 weeks due to 
Holidays.


Are there any objections to moving the Weekly meeting to Tuesday at 9AM 
EDT (13:00 UTC) for the next 2 weeks?


If I don't get any objections, I'll reschedule the meeting on Friday.

Thanks

Mike
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[Users] oVIRT 3.3 Failed to acces Master Domain

2013-09-11 Thread Hans-Joachim
Hello,

I run in troubles

For a testing I completly powered off the oVirt Cluster (Engine as well as the 
the host).. and now my host
is unable to fine the Master Domain

System: CentOS 6.4, vdsm-4.12.1-1.el6, oVirt Engine Version: 3.3.0-1.el6

Trace vdsm.log

Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 16:35:06,859::BindingXMLRPC::177::vds::(wrapper) 
client [192.168.1.29]
Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
16:35:06,859::task::579::TaskManager.Task::(_updateState) 
Task=`b2a7a44f-8cb0-453a-bf52-16a200f992f9`::moving from state init -> state 
preparing
Thread-98::INFO::2013-09-11 16:35:06,860::logUtils::44::dispatcher::(wrapper) 
Run and protect: 
connectStoragePool(spUUID='5849b030-626e-47cb-ad90-3ce782d831b3', hostID=1, 
scsiKey='5849b030-626e-47cb-ad90-3ce782d831b3', 
msdUUID='3401420d-6918-49f9-b9e2-23ba47949f29', masterVersion=1, options=None)
Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
16:35:06,860::resourceManager::197::ResourceManager.Request::(__init__) 
ResName=`Storage.5849b030-626e-47cb-ad90-3ce782d831b3`ReqID=`079c6f43-9453-4598-a9f3-7056ad3a595e`::Request
 was made in '/usr/share/vdsm/storage/hsm.py' line '1020' at 
'_connectStoragePool'
Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
16:35:06,860::resourceManager::541::ResourceManager::(registerResource) Trying 
to register resource 'Storage.5849b030-626e-47cb-ad90-3ce782d831b3' for lock 
type 'exclusive'
Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
16:35:06,861::resourceManager::600::ResourceManager::(registerResource) 
Resource 'Storage.5849b030-626e-47cb-ad90-3ce782d831b3' is free. Now locking as 
'exclusive' (1 active user)
Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
16:35:06,861::resourceManager::237::ResourceManager.Request::(grant) 
ResName=`Storage.5849b030-626e-47cb-ad90-3ce782d831b3`ReqID=`079c6f43-9453-4598-a9f3-7056ad3a595e`::Granted
 request
Thread-98::INFO::2013-09-11 
16:35:06,861::sp::680::Storage.StoragePool::(connect) Connect host #1 to the 
storage pool 5849b030-626e-47cb-ad90-3ce782d831b3 with master domain: 
3401420d-6918-49f9-b9e2-23ba47949f29 (ver = 1)
Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
16:35:06,862::lvm::483::OperationMutex::(_invalidateAllPvs) Operation 'lvm 
invalidate operation' got the operation mutex
Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
16:35:06,862::lvm::485::OperationMutex::(_invalidateAllPvs) Operation 'lvm 
invalidate operation' released the operation mutex
Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
16:35:06,862::lvm::494::OperationMutex::(_invalidateAllVgs) Operation 'lvm 
invalidate operation' got the operation mutex
Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
16:35:06,862::lvm::496::OperationMutex::(_invalidateAllVgs) Operation 'lvm 
invalidate operation' released the operation mutex
Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
16:35:06,863::lvm::514::OperationMutex::(_invalidateAllLvs) Operation 'lvm 
invalidate operation' got the operation mutex
Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
16:35:06,863::lvm::516::OperationMutex::(_invalidateAllLvs) Operation 'lvm 
invalidate operation' released the operation mutex
Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
16:35:06,863::misc::807::SamplingMethod::(__call__) Trying to enter sampling 
method (storage.sdc.refreshStorage)
Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
16:35:06,863::misc::809::SamplingMethod::(__call__) Got in to sampling method
Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
16:35:06,863::misc::807::SamplingMethod::(__call__) Trying to enter sampling 
method (storage.iscsi.rescan)
Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
16:35:06,864::misc::809::SamplingMethod::(__call__) Got in to sampling method
Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
16:35:06,864::iscsiadm::91::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(_runCmd) '/usr/bin/sudo -n 
/sbin/iscsiadm -m session -R' (cwd None)
Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
16:35:06,875::iscsiadm::91::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(_runCmd) FAILED:  = 
'iscsiadm: No session found.\n';  = 21
Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
16:35:06,875::misc::817::SamplingMethod::(__call__) Returning last result
Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
16:35:08,902::multipath::111::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(rescan) '/usr/bin/sudo -n 
/sbin/multipath' (cwd None)
Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
16:35:08,916::multipath::111::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(rescan) SUCCESS:  = 
'';  = 0
Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
16:35:08,917::lvm::483::OperationMutex::(_invalidateAllPvs) Operation 'lvm 
invalidate operation' got the operation mutex
Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
16:35:08,917::lvm::485::OperationMutex::(_invalidateAllPvs) Operation 'lvm 
invalidate operation' released the operation mutex
Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
16:35:08,918::lvm::494::OperationMutex::(_invalidateAllVgs) Operation 'lvm 
invalidate operation' got the operation mutex
Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
16:35:08,918::lvm::496::OperationMutex::(_invalidateAllVgs) Operation 'lvm 
invalidate operation' released the operation mutex
Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
16:35:08,918::lvm::514::OperationMutex::(_invalidateAllLvs) Operation 'lvm 
invalidate operation' got the operation mutex
Thread-98::DEBUG::2013-09-11 
16:35:08,918::lvm::516::OperationMutex::(_invalidateAllLvs) Operation 'lvm 
invalidate operation' released the operation mutex
Threa

[Users] oVirt Weekly Meeting Minutes -- 2013-09-11

2013-09-11 Thread Mike Burns
Minutes: 
http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2013/ovirt.2013-09-11-14.00.html
Minutes (text): 
http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2013/ovirt.2013-09-11-14.00.txt
Log: 
http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2013/ovirt.2013-09-11-14.00.log.html




#ovirt: oVirt Weekly Meeting



Meeting started by mburns at 14:00:01 UTC. The full logs are available
at http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2013/ovirt.2013-09-11-14.00.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---
* Agenda and Roll Call  (mburns, 14:00:12)
  * 3.3 Release Status  (mburns, 14:00:18)
  * tentative planning for 3.3.1  (mburns, 14:00:31)
  * 3.4.0 planning  (mburns, 14:00:38)
  * conferences and workshops  (mburns, 14:00:41)
  * infra update  (mburns, 14:00:47)
  * other topics  (mburns, 14:00:50)

* 3.3 release status  (mburns, 14:03:53)
  * final RC builds posted between yesterday and today for engine, vdsm,
node  (mburns, 14:04:13)
  * ovirt-node-iso rpms will be uploaded shortly  (mburns, 14:05:51)
  * node iso images are available in releases/3.3/iso  (mburns,
14:06:04)
  * ACTION: mburns to get things set for release today  (mburns,
14:09:17)
  * ACTION: mburns to coordinate release for Monday  (mburns, 14:09:29)
  * ACTION: mburns to solicit feedback on beta rpms  (mburns, 14:18:14)
  * no open blockers at the moment, release just pending successful
testing of current packages  (mburns, 14:19:11)

* 3.3.1 planning  (mburns, 14:19:54)
  * engine exploring pulling all master changes (primarily bug fixes)
into 3.3.1  (mburns, 14:24:22)
  * target should be before developer meetings in October  (mburns,
14:25:13)
  * ACTION: oschreib to get a decision on 3.3.1 rebase  (oschreib,
14:28:25)
  * tentative plan:  build new 3.3.1 packages by 25-Sep, test-day on
1-Oct, rebuild between 9-Oct and 14-Oct for test day issues, release
prior to 20-Oct  (mburns, 14:30:15)

* 3.4.0 planning  (mburns, 14:33:05)
  * please comment/request/commit to new features on arch@ and users@
mailing lists  (mburns, 14:34:26)
  * we'll start talking dates and release planning in the next few weeks
(mburns, 14:35:14)

* workshops and conferences  (mburns, 14:39:57)
  * oVirt Developers Meeting during KVM Forum in Edinburgh, UK 21-23
October  (mburns, 14:40:22)
  * to attend, please register for KVM Forum  (mburns, 14:40:59)
  * first 200 people to register get free admission  (mburns, 14:41:06)
  * 6 talks in CloudOpen track of LinuxCon (requires separate
registration to LinuxCon)  (mburns, 14:47:14)
  * 5 talks at KVM Forum on oVirt  (mburns, 14:47:33)
  * 3 talks currently planned for developer meetings  (mburns, 14:48:01)
  * schedule still being worked for oVirt Dev Meetings  (mburns,
14:49:03)
  * see full meeting transcript for details of what the presentations
are  (mburns, 14:50:02)
  * 2 presentations at LinuxCon NA  (mburns, 14:50:56)
  * progress has been made on RTP workshop, but details not defined yet
(mburns, 14:51:41)
  * Case study added to the wiki  (mburns, 14:53:29)
  * LINK: http://www.ovirt.org/Alter_Way_case_study   (dneary, 14:53:36)
  * 3.3 promotional push being worked on  (mburns, 14:55:25)

* infra update  (mburns, 14:57:27)
  * unit tests running per-patch for engine patches  (mburns, 14:58:48)
  * new storage added to rackspace servers  (mburns, 14:59:55)
  * planned for backups and jenkins slaves  (mburns, 15:00:07)
  * plans for new ovirt tools jobs soon (image/iso uploader)  (mburns,
15:01:47)
  * puppet/foreman running with all hosts reporting, base install mostly
up and done  (mburns, 15:02:31)
  * working on deployment procedure to get changes through gerrit to
production  (mburns, 15:03:10)
  * next steps:  move more hosts to foreman (resources/lists/gerrit)
(mburns, 15:03:30)
  * and documentation of the setup  (mburns, 15:03:53)

* Other Topics  (mburns, 15:04:43)
  * no other topics  (mburns, 15:06:43)

Meeting ended at 15:06:47 UTC.




Action Items

* mburns to get things set for release today
* mburns to coordinate release for Monday
* mburns to solicit feedback on beta rpms
* oschreib to get a decision on 3.3.1 rebase




Action Items, by person
---
* mburns
  * mburns to get things set for release today
  * mburns to coordinate release for Monday
  * mburns to solicit feedback on beta rpms
* oschreib
  * oschreib to get a decision on 3.3.1 rebase
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)




People Present (lines said)
---
* mburns (121)
* dneary (50)
* oschreib (39)
* ewoud (6)
* sahina (5)
* eedri (4)
* ovirtbot (4)
* itamar1 (2)
* yzaslavs|mtg (2)
* sgotliv (1)
* cultavix (1)
* damnski (1)
* yzaslavs (1)




Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] so, what do you want next in oVirt?

2013-09-11 Thread Chris Smith
What about using ATA over ethernet (AoE) as an optional storage transport
within ovirt?  Is this feasible?  It seems that the protocol is fast
efficient and cleaner than than fcoe.

Thanks for considering it as a possible feature request.
On Sep 10, 2013 11:58 AM, "Baptiste AGASSE" <
baptiste.aga...@lyra-network.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> - Mail original -
> > De: "Itamar Heim" 
> > À: users@ovirt.org
> > Envoyé: Mardi 20 Août 2013 23:19:16
> > Objet: [Users] so, what do you want next in oVirt?
> >
> > earlier in the year we did a survey for feature requests /
> > improvements
> > / etc.
> >
> > since a lot of things were added, and priorities usually change, I'd
> > like to ask again for "what do you need the most from oVirt / what
> > are
> > your pain points" next?
> >
> > below[1] I've listed my understanding of what already went in from
> > previous survey requests (to various degrees of coverage).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Itamar
> >
> > [1] from the top 12
> > V Allow disk resize
> > V Integrate Nagios/Zabbix monitoring - via a ui plugin
> > V Highly Available engine - via hosted engine[2]
> > V Open vSwitch integration - via neutron integration
> > X Allow cloning VMs without template
> > ? Enable hypervisor upgrade/updates through engine[3]
> > V Allow engine on an oVirt hosted VM - via hosted engine[2]
> > V Enable guest configuration (root password, SSH keys, network) via
> >guest agent in engine - via cloud-init
> > X Integrate v2v into engine
> > ? Bond/extend ovirtmgmt with a second network for HA/increased
> >bandwidth[4]
> > X Integrate scheduling of snapshots and VM export for backups in
> >engine[5]
> > V Spice – support Google Chrome - via mime based launch
> >
> >
> > Other items mentioned in previous survey which should be covered by
> > now:
> > - Fix timeout when adding local host during all-in-one configuration
> > - Fix engine set-up when SELinux is disabled
> > - Provide packages for el6 (CentOS, Red Hat Enterprise Linux)
> > - Allow multiple VMs to be deployed from the same template at the
> > same
> >time
> > - ISO domains on local/GlusterS
> > - Show IP addresses in Virtual Machines->Network Interfaces
> > - OpenStack Quantum support (now called Neutron)
> > - noVNC support
> > - Support spice.html5 and websocket proxy
> > - Add other guest OSes to list
> > - Port oVirt guest agent to Ubuntu[6]
> > - SLA - Allow resource time-sharing
> > - Spice - Mac client (via mime based launch)
> > - Spice - port XPI plug-in to Windows (not sure this will happen, but
> >mime based launch allows using firefox now)
> > - Spice - client for Ubuntu/Debian (should be covered via mime based
> >launch)
> >
> >
> > [2] hosted engine is in active development, but not released yet.
> > [3] host update is supported, but not for general yum update.
> > [4] a lot of improvements were done in this space, but i'm not sure
> > if
> >  they cover this exact use case
> > [5] backup api is now being pushed to master, and orchestration of
> >  backups should probably happen via 3rd part backup vendors?
> > [6] I'm not sure packaging exists yet, but ubuntu is covered for the
> >  basic functionality of the guest agent.
> > ___
> > Users mailing list
> > Users@ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
>
> Thanks for this thread !
>
> - ISCSI EqualLogic SAN support or use standard iscsi tools/configuration
> - SSO for webui and cli (IPA integration)
> - PXE boot for nodes
> - VMs dependencies on startup
>
> Have a nice day.
>
> Regards.
>
> ---
> Baptiste
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] so, what do you want next in oVirt?

2013-09-11 Thread Sandro Bonazzola
Il 20/08/2013 23:19, Itamar Heim ha scritto:
> earlier in the year we did a survey for feature requests / improvements / etc.
> 
> since a lot of things were added, and priorities usually change, I'd like to 
> ask again for "what do you need the most from oVirt / what are your pain
> points" next?
> 
> below[1] I've listed my understanding of what already went in from previous 
> survey requests (to various degrees of coverage).
> 
> Thanks,
>Itamar
> 
> [1] from the top 12
> V Allow disk resize
> V Integrate Nagios/Zabbix monitoring - via a ui plugin
> V Highly Available engine - via hosted engine[2]
> V Open vSwitch integration - via neutron integration
> X Allow cloning VMs without template
> ? Enable hypervisor upgrade/updates through engine[3]
> V Allow engine on an oVirt hosted VM - via hosted engine[2]
> V Enable guest configuration (root password, SSH keys, network) via
>   guest agent in engine - via cloud-init
> X Integrate v2v into engine
> ? Bond/extend ovirtmgmt with a second network for HA/increased
>   bandwidth[4]
> X Integrate scheduling of snapshots and VM export for backups in
>   engine[5]
> V Spice – support Google Chrome - via mime based launch
> 
> 
> Other items mentioned in previous survey which should be covered by now:
> - Fix timeout when adding local host during all-in-one configuration
> - Fix engine set-up when SELinux is disabled
> - Provide packages for el6 (CentOS, Red Hat Enterprise Linux)
> - Allow multiple VMs to be deployed from the same template at the same
>   time
> - ISO domains on local/GlusterS
> - Show IP addresses in Virtual Machines->Network Interfaces
> - OpenStack Quantum support (now called Neutron)
> - noVNC support
> - Support spice.html5 and websocket proxy
> - Add other guest OSes to list
> - Port oVirt guest agent to Ubuntu[6]
> - SLA - Allow resource time-sharing
> - Spice - Mac client (via mime based launch)
> - Spice - port XPI plug-in to Windows (not sure this will happen, but
>   mime based launch allows using firefox now)
> - Spice - client for Ubuntu/Debian (should be covered via mime based
>   launch)
> 
> 
> [2] hosted engine is in active development, but not released yet.
> [3] host update is supported, but not for general yum update.
> [4] a lot of improvements were done in this space, but i'm not sure if
> they cover this exact use case
> [5] backup api is now being pushed to master, and orchestration of
> backups should probably happen via 3rd part backup vendors?
> [6] I'm not sure packaging exists yet, but ubuntu is covered for the
> basic functionality of the guest agent.
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


I think we should consider also to ensure compatibility with OVF 2.0.1 standard:
http://schemas.dmtf.org/ovf/envelope/2/dsp8023_2.0.xsd
Not sure about the actual compatibility level


-- 
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[Users] ovirt-engine-sdk-python 3.3.0.6-1 released

2013-09-11 Thread Michael Pasternak

For more details see [1],
(note: change-log for [2] describing changes that took place from the last 
release 3.3.0.3-1)

[1] http://wiki.ovirt.org/Python-sdk-changelog
[2] 3.3.0.5-1, 3.3.0.4-1

-- 

Michael Pasternak
RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[Users] ovirt-engine-sdk-java 1.0.0.17-1 released

2013-09-11 Thread Michael Pasternak

More details can be found at [1],
(note: change-log for [2] describing changes that took place from the last 
release 1.0.0.11-1)

[1] http://www.ovirt.org/Java-sdk-changelog
[2] 1.0.0.16 -1, 1.0.0.15 -1, 1.0.0.14 -1, 1.0.0.13 -1

-- 

Michael Pasternak
RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users