[Users] oVirt vdsm network problem
Hello, I found strange problem in vdsm 4.13.0 with oVirt 3.3.1. After 30 hours from update (ovirt -> 3.3.1, vdsm -> 4.13) my one vlan network does not work. There is nothing in log, I can see network trafic from not working vlan on node in tcpdump, but it not come to VM. After vdsm restart on node it works like expected. I take a look in to oVirt -> Host -> Network Interface and all nodes has bond interface changed from "Mode 4 Dynamic link agregation" to "Custom: mode=4" and Custom mode is filled by "mode=4" Mabe it is the same, but who change that? I can have one node in this status if someone will want more info or logs. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Documentation: Storage Domain conversion from Data Domain to Export Domain
- Original Message - > From: "Bob Doolittle" > To: d...@redhat.com > Cc: users@ovirt.org > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 12:16:30 AM > Subject: Re: [Users] Documentation: Storage Domain conversion from Data > Domain to Export Domain > > > On 11/26/2013 03:27 PM, Dafna Ron wrote: > > sql -U postgres engine -c 'select connection from > > storage_server_connections;' > > So now that we determined that I have stale connection state in my DB, > any suggestions as to how I might clear it out safely? > > I tried rebooting my Engine, but the connection is still in the DB and > it still doesn't show in the Admin Portal. Hi Bob, you can try the following command: engine=# delete FROM storage_server_connections where connection = '172.16.0.58:/export/VM_EXPORTDOMAIN'; this should allow you re-create your storage domain. I would appreciate if you could file a bug against it. > > Thanks, > Bob > > > > > > > > > > > On 11/26/2013 08:21 PM, Bob Doolittle wrote: > >> > >> On 11/26/2013 03:11 PM, Dafna Ron wrote: > >>> can you check the engine data base for the connection? > >> > >> Sorry, will need more guidance for that :( > >> > >> -Bob > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 11/26/2013 07:12 PM, Bob Doolittle wrote: > On 11/26/2013 02:00 PM, Dafna Ron wrote: > > can you run mount and see if you have stale connections to the > > domain? > > The only existing mounts on the Host are the loopback mount for the > Data Domain, and the mount from Engine for the ISO Domain. > > I can import another Export domain on the same host which was > created in the normal manner (and then 'destroy' it), but I can't > import the converted one. > > -Bob > > > > > > > > > > On 11/26/2013 06:22 PM, Bob Doolittle wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I am having to recreate my engine, and want to recover my old VMs > >> from > >> the previous Storage Master Data Domain. > >> > >> A while back, Michael Ayers posted this recipe (the gmane reply > >> feature > >> won't allow lines longer than 80 chars, even if they were from > >> the original > >> post :(, so I apologize for the link ) : > >> > >> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.ovirt.user/4428 > >> > >> Should this method still work? I have tried to recreate this with > >> 3.3.1 > >> and can't. I copied over the old Data Domain to a new directory, and > >> edited the dom_md/metadata file as follows: > >> > >> http://pastebin.com/U4xJawR8 > >> > >> But when I try to import it, I get: > >> > >> "Error while executing action: Cannot add Storage Connection. > >> Storage connection already exists." > >> > >> and > >> > >> "Failed to retrieve existing storage domain information." > >> > >> Here's output from engine.log: > >> > >> http://pastebin.com/NVdzLDXb > >> > >> Any clues? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Bob > >> > >> ___ > >> Users mailing list > >> Users@ovirt.org > >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > > > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > ___ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] Fedora host install fails
Both ovirt engine & host run F19. oVirt Engine Version: 3.3.1-2.fc19 I get an "unexpected connection termination" when trying to install host (see attached log). Can someone help ? Thanks in advance *Pascal * 2013-11-28 09:52:53,285 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Loaded file "/usr/share/ovirt-engine/services/ovirt-engine/ovirt-engine.conf". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,286 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Loaded file "/etc/ovirt-engine/engine.conf". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,286 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Loaded file "/etc/ovirt-engine/engine.conf.d/10-setup-database.conf". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,287 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Loaded file "/etc/ovirt-engine/engine.conf.d/10-setup-jboss.conf". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,287 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Loaded file "/etc/ovirt-engine/engine.conf.d/10-setup-pki.conf". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,287 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Loaded file "/etc/ovirt-engine/engine.conf.d/10-setup-protocols.conf". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,288 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Value of property "ENGINE_AJP_ENABLED" is "true". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,288 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Value of property "ENGINE_AJP_PORT" is "8702". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,288 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Value of property "ENGINE_APPS" is "engine.ear". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,288 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Value of property "ENGINE_CACHE" is "/var/cache/ovirt-engine". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,288 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Value of property "ENGINE_DB_CHECK_INTERVAL" is "1000". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,289 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Value of property "ENGINE_DB_CONNECTION_TIMEOUT" is "30". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,289 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Value of property "ENGINE_DB_DATABASE" is "engine". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,289 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Value of property "ENGINE_DB_DRIVER" is "org.postgresql.Driver". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,289 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Value of property "ENGINE_DB_HOST" is "localhost". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,290 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Value of property "ENGINE_DB_MAX_CONNECTIONS" is "100". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,290 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Value of property "ENGINE_DB_MIN_CONNECTIONS" is "1". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,290 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Value of property "ENGINE_DB_PASSWORD" is "***". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,290 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Value of property "ENGINE_DB_PORT" is "5432". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,291 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Value of property "ENGINE_DB_SECURED" is "False". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,291 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Value of property "ENGINE_DB_SECURED_VALIDATION" is "False". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,291 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Value of property "ENGINE_DB_SSL" is "false". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,292 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Value of property "ENGINE_DB_URL" is "jdbc:postgresql://localhost:5432/engine?&sslfactory=org.postgresql.ssl.NonValidatingFactory". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,292 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Value of property "ENGINE_DB_USER" is "engine". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,292 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Value of property "ENGINE_DEBUG_ADDRESS" is "". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,292 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Value of property "ENGINE_DOC" is "/usr/share/doc/ovirt-engine". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,293 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Value of property "ENGINE_ETC" is "/etc/ovirt-engine". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,293 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Value of property "ENGINE_FQDN" is "lab1.home". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,293 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Value of property "ENGINE_GROUP" is "ovirt". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,294 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Value of property "ENGINE_HEAP_MAX" is "1g". 2013-11-28 09:52:53,294 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.LocalConfig] (MSC service thread 1-13) Value of
Re: [Users] oVirt vdsm network problem
- Original Message - > Hello, Hi Jakub, > > I found strange problem in vdsm 4.13.0 with oVirt 3.3.1. After 30 hours > from update (ovirt -> 3.3.1, vdsm -> 4.13) my one vlan network does not > work. There is nothing in log, I can see network trafic from not working > vlan on node in tcpdump, but it not come to VM. Did it stop working all of the sudden or did you change something? > > After vdsm restart on node it works like expected. Seems like VDSM restored configuration to last known config on that host, maybe there's something in vdsm.log to indicate what went wrong. > > I take a look in to oVirt -> Host -> Network Interface and all nodes has > bond interface changed from "Mode 4 Dynamic link agregation" to "Custom: > mode=4" and Custom mode is filled by "mode=4" Mabe it is the same, but > who change that? This is a know behavior but it's still mode 4 it's just the way it displays it. > > I can have one node in this status if someone will want more info or logs. > ___ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Fedora host install fails
- Original Message - > From: "Pascal Jakobi" > To: users@ovirt.org > Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2013 11:09:39 AM > Subject: [Users] Fedora host install fails > > > Both ovirt engine & host run F19. > oVirt Engine Version: 3.3.1-2.fc19 > I get an "unexpected connection termination" when trying to install host (see > attached log). > > Can someone help ? Known issue[1]. Please temporary downgrade apache-sshd-0.9.0 to apache-sshd-0.7.0. I hope it will resolved soon in fedora updates so you have newer(older) package of this. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021273 > > Thanks in advance > > Pascal > > ___ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] backups
On 11/27/2013 10:41 PM, Lindsay Mathieson wrote: On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 06:28:26 AM you wrote: Yes and no. Backups of the VM for disaster recover purposes, and regular *separate* data backups done from within the VM. NB - quiescising/ windows stylle VSS for vm backups is desirable to ensure DB tables etc aren't corrupted on restore, but it isn't a replacement for data backups. just a btw that the qemu-guest-agent if installed on a windows guest is supposed to interact with VSS during live snapshot. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Live migration
On 11/27/2013 03:59 PM, Neil Schulz wrote: Hello, We are in the process of testing oVirt and replacing citrix all together. A few things we are curious about but can't find any concrete information on: Can oVirt live migrate data (VM's, etc.) to another machine in the pool/cluster in the event of a hardware failure, if the data is stored locally on the machine? For this to be possible, does it have to be on a shared storage? not yet. live storage migration is currently only supported between storage domains in same storage pool (data center) where the host see both domains. we are working to remove the limitations in the pool design, which will allow this in a future version. oVirt supports managing VMs in host local storage, but the more powerful features are around clusters of hosts using shared storage. shared storage these days can benefit from multiple hosts local storage, via technologies like gluster, though at this point i think most run the storage nodes separatly from the virtualization hosts. NFS shared storage seems to be the easiest, iscsi, FC and posixfs are also supported. HTH, Itamar ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] RFE/Bug? Cloud-Init in oVirt 3.3.1 / IPv6 Support
Hi, currently, you can not set a static network via Cloud-Init. How to reproduce: Select a shutdown vm, click run once. Click Initial Run, select Cloud-Init Now select "Network" and "add new" Name your interface, e.g. eth0 Do not configure DHCP, instead, fill in IP Address, Netmask, Gateway, etc. I would suppose that this would pass the following options into the meta-data: iface eth0 inet static but if you mount the meta-data cd-rom into any vm and read the meta-data.json it says: iface eth0 inet none the rest of the information seems to be correct, though. You can see this from 2 point of views: 1. If I do not select DHCP and I configure IP Address etc. I want a static configuration, therefore "static" should be in the meta-data. If I would have wanted "none", I wouldn't bother configuring the interface, would I? -> Bug 2. There is no button for "static" in the GUI, therefore the option get's not passed, "none" may be the default option. In this case, it would be cool to have a checkbox for "static". --> RFE I didn't test this from the API yet, but I hope there is an option to set the networking to static from there? What do you think? Bug or RFE? Can this be fixed in 3.3.1.1 maybe (fix should be small, without looking into the code)? I can't always do full upgrades (3.3.2 would be next). My second topic would be IPv6 Support: It simply does not exist in Cloud-Init to pass this option to the guest, I read this old thread: http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/engine-devel/2013-June/004893.html My Question: Are there any plans to improve this? I will work around it maybe through custom parsing and file injecting the IPv6 data through Cloud-Init, but would prefer to pass this information simply to Cloud-Init. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards Sven Kieske Systemadministrator Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG Königsberger Straße 6 32339 Espelkamp T: +49-5772-293-100 F: +49-5772-293-333 https://www.mittwald.de Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] simple networking?
Resend to the list for others to benefit, I hope :-) Joop On 27-11-2013 18:18, Ted Miller wrote: I am trying to set up a testing network using o-virt, but the networking is refusing to cooperate. I am testing for possible use in two different production setups. My previous experience has been with VMWare. I have always set up a single bridged network on each host. All my hosts, VMs, and non-VM computers were peers on the LAN. They could all talk to each other, and things worked very well. There was a firewall/gateway that provided access to the Internet, and hosts, VMs, and could all communicate with the Internet as needed. o-virt seems to be compartmentalizing things beyond all reason. That is a way to use oVirt, but the following simple setup should work and give you a way to check against your setup. I have two setups, one at home and one at work. The one at home is a setup of 2 hosts and one of those is a hacked up host/engine. engine/host1: standard fedora19 kde install, static ip (192.168.1.11) configured with my NAS (192.168.1.16) as dhcp/dns server and my internet router (192.168.1.254) as gateway Just make sure that NetworkManager is off and that your interfaces are not NM managed, network on. This was a allinone setup but I got a NAS with NFS so I turned my aio setup into a engine/host system. It has problems with that but nothing network related. Host2: same as above but without the engine install, ip:192.168.1.22, gw 192.168.1.254 DNS:192.168.1.16. How does it all come together? Well in your case, and mine if I were to start over, start with a static network which is NOT managed by NetworkManager. Use either Fedora or Centos which ever you more comfortable with and it also depends on whether you want to test/use all the features in oVirt. Currently, there are a few features not available in Centos because the versions of libvirt/kvm/qemu/gluster are too old in Centos. Install ovirt-engine on your first 'server', probably choose NFS as your storage domain, either on your engine server or from somewhere else on your network. Make sure its nfs-v3 and not v4!, local default is v4! Make sure that ip addresses on you network are resolvable, either through /etc/hosts or through DNS! Engine-setup will complain if this doesn't work, using localhost will not work either! On the engine server there will be no bridge and nothing will change the network config. Next the first host. Prepare the host in a similar way you did the engine server. You can choose a minimal install of either Centos or Fedora or install a full desktop but make sure that ips are static and NOT managed by NetworkManager, hostname resolvable, ovirt repo available. From the webui add your prepared host and if everything went OK you'll see that on that host you will now have a bridge, ovirtmgmt, which acts as the primary interface. Create a VMs and choose ovirtmgmt as a network for its nics, can't choose anything else. Either give the VMs a static address or use a dhcp server but the VMs should be able to talk to each other, to the host(s), the engine and to the internet. Every host that you add after the first will also has its network turned into a bridge, ovirtmgmt, and communication/migration/display/etc will take place over this network. One caveat, storage domain mapping is from the host to the storage, the engine, if it is NOT the NFS server, doesn't have to have access to the storage. If you have servers with more that 1 nic then you can create additional networks using the webui of oVirt and assign these to clusters and to VMs. If you need vlans to coexist with ovirtmgmt on the same physical nic, I think that is possible but haven't tried it myself. In theory you need to setup the network first outside of oVirt, including you vlan structure and then install ovirt. Some concepts: oVirt engine: is just the manager, does 'nothing' related to running VMs itself. You can turn it off and all hosts with their VMs will keep running. You just can't start new ones, in short manage them. oVirt host: is the real workhorse and is managed using oVirt-engine. Runs VDSM which communicates with engine and starts/manages the VMs on the host on behalf of engine. oVirt node: is a special slimmed down Fedora distro that includes VDSM and a small setup so that it can be used as a oVirt host People tend to mix and match ovirt-host and ovirt-node which makes for nice communication problems :-) If you haven't done so, there is an irc channel, ovirt, on irc.oftc.net with helpful people, if they are awake. Joop -- #irc jvandewege ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] [vdsm] [QE] oVirt 3.3.2 beta status
[resent, accidentally took out the list] On Nov 28, 2013, at 08:30 , Itamar Heim wrote: > On 11/27/2013 05:42 PM, Michal Skrivanek wrote: >>> virt1029885 cloud-init testcase does not work in engine 3.3.1 >> this is about current CentOS containing a quite dated version of cloud-init. >> There's little we can do except encourage people to build/use 0.7.2+ >> Awaiting reporter's feedback > > as rhel 6.5 GA'd and has these properly, shouldn't be an issue, and should be > in CentOS 6.5 as well. Yes, but this still leaves older guests without a solution. Maybe we should really push for virt-sysprep as it is much more mature in sense of legacy compatibility, nothing extra needed inside the guest. At least a simple passthrough of some basic stuff (we have only a basic stuff in cloud-init anyway). It's slightly different approcha than cloud-init, but may be really worth it even long term... ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] Fedora 20 support, Was: oVirt Weekly Meeting Minutes -- 2013-11-27
We've forgotten to discuss an important issue: Fedora 20, which is expected to be out in two weeks: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule. I believe that ovirt-3.4 must support it, and that ovirt-3.3.2 would better do so. Toni has fixed two issues regarding Vdsm-networking, and they are going into ovirt-3.3.2 beta. However, we must perform much more comprehensive testing. We'd need to have f20 Jenkins slave(s), and someone in each team responsible to testing functionality. Who can cover for storage, virt, infra and integration? Dan. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] RFE/Bug? Cloud-Init in oVirt 3.3.1 / IPv6 Support
- Original Message - > Hi, Hi Sven, > > currently, you can not set > a static network via Cloud-Init. > > How to reproduce: > Select a shutdown vm, click run once. > Click Initial Run, select Cloud-Init > > Now select "Network" and "add new" > Name your interface, e.g. eth0 > Do not configure DHCP, instead, > fill in IP Address, Netmask, Gateway, etc. > > I would suppose that this would pass the following options > into the meta-data: > > iface eth0 inet static > > but if you mount the meta-data cd-rom into any vm and read > the meta-data.json it says: > > iface eth0 inet none > > the rest of the information seems to be correct, though. > > You can see this from 2 point of views: > > 1. If I do not select DHCP and I configure IP Address etc. I want > a static configuration, therefore "static" should be in the meta-data. > If I would have wanted "none", I wouldn't bother configuring the > interface, would I? -> Bug > > 2. There is no button for "static" in the GUI, therefore the option > get's not passed, "none" may be the default option. > In this case, it would be cool to have a checkbox for "static". > --> RFE Did you see the static IP/Netmask/Gateway parameters passed? > > I didn't test this from the API yet, but I hope there is an option > to set the networking to static from there? > > What do you think? Bug or RFE? Can this be fixed in 3.3.1.1 maybe (fix > should be small, without looking into the code)? > > I can't always do full upgrades (3.3.2 would be next). > > > My second topic would be IPv6 Support: > > It simply does not exist in Cloud-Init to pass this option to the > guest, I read this old thread: > > http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/engine-devel/2013-June/004893.html > > My Question: Are there any plans to improve this? > > I will work around it maybe through custom parsing and file injecting > the IPv6 data through Cloud-Init, but would prefer to pass this > information simply to Cloud-Init. > > -- > Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards > > Sven Kieske > > Systemadministrator > Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG > Königsberger Straße 6 > 32339 Espelkamp > T: +49-5772-293-100 > F: +49-5772-293-333 > https://www.mittwald.de > Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer > St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen > Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen > ___ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] [vdsm] [QE] oVirt 3.3.2 beta status
Am 28.11.2013 11:10, schrieb Michal Skrivanek: > [resent, accidentally took out the list] > > On Nov 28, 2013, at 08:30 , Itamar Heim wrote: > >> On 11/27/2013 05:42 PM, Michal Skrivanek wrote: virt 1029885 cloud-init testcase does not work in engine 3.3.1 >>> this is about current CentOS containing a quite dated version of >>> cloud-init. There's little we can do except encourage people to build/use >>> 0.7.2+ >>> Awaiting reporter's feedback >> >> as rhel 6.5 GA'd and has these properly, shouldn't be an issue, and should >> be in CentOS 6.5 as well. > > Yes, but this still leaves older guests without a solution. Maybe we should > really push for virt-sysprep as it is much more mature in sense of legacy > compatibility, nothing extra needed inside the guest. At least a simple > passthrough of some basic stuff (we have only a basic stuff in cloud-init > anyway). > It's slightly different approcha than cloud-init, but may be really worth it > even long term... Well, I reported the cloud-init bug. atm I write a helper script to parse the cloud-init data myself. virt-sysprep cannot set IP-Information beside the MAC out of the box, so this is also no solution. I feel like there must be made some huge efforts to be able to automate vm deployment. I can't believe I'm the only one who needs this features. how do you deploy vms? set everything up by hand? do you always install $latest_OS_version with selfcompiled software? that's not always possible, especially for production environments. See also my other mail regarding IPv6 Support in Cloud-Init and no proper static networking support. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards Sven Kieske Systemadministrator Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG Königsberger Straße 6 32339 Espelkamp T: +49-5772-293-100 F: +49-5772-293-333 https://www.mittwald.de Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] RFE/Bug? Cloud-Init in oVirt 3.3.1 / IPv6 Support
- Original Message - > From: "Sven Kieske" > To: users@ovirt.org > Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2013 11:41:17 AM > Subject: [Users] RFE/Bug? Cloud-Init in oVirt 3.3.1 / IPv6 Support > > Hi, > > currently, you can not set > a static network via Cloud-Init. > > How to reproduce: > Select a shutdown vm, click run once. > Click Initial Run, select Cloud-Init > > Now select "Network" and "add new" > Name your interface, e.g. eth0 > Do not configure DHCP, instead, > fill in IP Address, Netmask, Gateway, etc. > > I would suppose that this would pass the following options > into the meta-data: > > iface eth0 inet static > > but if you mount the meta-data cd-rom into any vm and read > the meta-data.json it says: > > iface eth0 inet none > > the rest of the information seems to be correct, though. > > You can see this from 2 point of views: > > 1. If I do not select DHCP and I configure IP Address etc. I want > a static configuration, therefore "static" should be in the meta-data. > If I would have wanted "none", I wouldn't bother configuring the > interface, would I? -> Bug yes, please open a bug > > 2. There is no button for "static" in the GUI, therefore the option > get's not passed, "none" may be the default option. > In this case, it would be cool to have a checkbox for "static". > --> RFE > i think it should really look like the nic setting for hosts, a selection between none/dhcp/static and allow setting ips only for static. i guess start on boot should be available for all. > I didn't test this from the API yet, but I hope there is an option > to set the networking to static from there? yes in rest you can set it: eth0 STATIC true > > What do you think? Bug or RFE? Can this be fixed in 3.3.1.1 maybe (fix > should be small, without looking into the code)? > > I can't always do full upgrades (3.3.2 would be next). > > > My second topic would be IPv6 Support: > > It simply does not exist in Cloud-Init to pass this option to the > guest, I read this old thread: > > http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/engine-devel/2013-June/004893.html > > My Question: Are there any plans to improve this? > > I will work around it maybe through custom parsing and file injecting > the IPv6 data through Cloud-Init, but would prefer to pass this > information simply to Cloud-Init. > going forward we would like to allow user scripts with cloud init so you could do it with that. > -- > Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards > > Sven Kieske > > Systemadministrator > Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG > Königsberger Straße 6 > 32339 Espelkamp > T: +49-5772-293-100 > F: +49-5772-293-333 > https://www.mittwald.de > Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer > St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen > Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen > ___ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] [vdsm] [QE] oVirt 3.3.2 beta status
On 11/28/2013 12:31 PM, Sven Kieske wrote: Am 28.11.2013 11:10, schrieb Michal Skrivanek: [resent, accidentally took out the list] On Nov 28, 2013, at 08:30 , Itamar Heim wrote: On 11/27/2013 05:42 PM, Michal Skrivanek wrote: virt1029885 cloud-init testcase does not work in engine 3.3.1 this is about current CentOS containing a quite dated version of cloud-init. There's little we can do except encourage people to build/use 0.7.2+ Awaiting reporter's feedback as rhel 6.5 GA'd and has these properly, shouldn't be an issue, and should be in CentOS 6.5 as well. Yes, but this still leaves older guests without a solution. Maybe we should really push for virt-sysprep as it is much more mature in sense of legacy compatibility, nothing extra needed inside the guest. At least a simple passthrough of some basic stuff (we have only a basic stuff in cloud-init anyway). It's slightly different approcha than cloud-init, but may be really worth it even long term... Well, I reported the cloud-init bug. atm I write a helper script to parse the cloud-init data myself. virt-sysprep cannot set IP-Information beside the MAC out of the box, so this is also no solution. I feel like there must be made some huge efforts to be able to automate vm deployment. I can't believe I'm the only one who needs this features. how do you deploy vms? set everything up by hand? do you always install $latest_OS_version with selfcompiled software? I expect most use dhcp for ip management, rather than allocate them. or provision from tools like foreman, that orchestrate the mac/ip association for the provisioned vm. cloud-init solves other interesting problems as well, like setting the ssh key for root access. that's not always possible, especially for production environments. See also my other mail regarding IPv6 Support in Cloud-Init and no proper static networking support. for el6 guests, i think using cloud-init based on the rhel 6.5 versions should work now? ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] backups
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 11:34:13 AM Itamar Heim wrote: > just a btw that the qemu-guest-agent if installed on a windows guest is > supposed to interact with VSS during live snapshot. I was wondering that - do you have a reference to the docs online? thanks, -- Lindsay signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] backups
On 11/28/2013 12:58 PM, Lindsay Mathieson wrote: On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 11:34:13 AM Itamar Heim wrote: just a btw that the qemu-guest-agent if installed on a windows guest is supposed to interact with VSS during live snapshot. I was wondering that - do you have a reference to the docs online? thanks, best i can offer, from rhel 6.5: Bug 948017 - VSS support for qemu-ga-win ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Problem starting VM in oVirt 3.3.1-2
Hello, thank you. It solved my problem. Hans-Joachim - Original Message - From: Gilad Chaplik Sent: 11/27/13 05:46 PM To: Hans-Joachim Subject: Re: [Users] Problem starting VM in oVirt 3.3.1-2 - Original Message - > From: "Hans-Joachim" > To: users@ovirt.org > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 4:47:11 PM > Subject: [Users] Problem starting VM in oVirt 3.3.1-2 > > Hello, > > I'm running in troubles. > After migrating the storage of an powered off VM to a different iSCSI > storage, my CentOS 4 VM does not start any more (well, it's not the reality, > but for the system the VM stays in Wait for launch for hours). In reality, > the VM starts on the node. Hi, we've already solve this issue and it probably be included in the next release. a simple workaround: either disable ballooning in the cluster (edit cluster -> Optimization -> uncheck Enable balloon) or enable ballooning for the vm (edit vm -> Resource Allocation -> check Memory Balloon Device Enabled) Thanks, Gilad. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Fedora 20 support, Was: oVirt Weekly Meeting Minutes -- 2013-11-27
- Original Message - > From: "Dan Kenigsberg" > To: bo...@ovirt.org, "users" > Cc: "Doron Fediuck" , ee...@redhat.com > Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2013 12:19:05 PM > Subject: Fedora 20 support, Was: [Users] oVirt Weekly Meeting Minutes -- > 2013-11-27 > > We've forgotten to discuss an important issue: Fedora 20, which is > expected to be out in two weeks: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule. > I believe that ovirt-3.4 must support it, and that ovirt-3.3.2 would > better do so. > > Toni has fixed two issues regarding Vdsm-networking, and they are going > into ovirt-3.3.2 beta. However, we must perform much more comprehensive > testing. > > We'd need to have f20 Jenkins slave(s), and someone in each team > responsible to testing functionality. Who can cover for storage, virt, > infra and integration? > > Dan. > Indeed so, thanks Dan. David, is this something we have resources for? ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] oVirt vdsm network problem
Dne 28.11.2013 10:12, Mike Kolesnik napsal(a): - Original Message - Hello, Hi Jakub, I found strange problem in vdsm 4.13.0 with oVirt 3.3.1. After 30 hours from update (ovirt -> 3.3.1, vdsm -> 4.13) my one vlan network does not work. There is nothing in log, I can see network trafic from not working vlan on node in tcpdump, but it not come to VM. Did it stop working all of the sudden or did you change something? After vdsm restart on node it works like expected. Seems like VDSM restored configuration to last known config on that host, maybe there's something in vdsm.log to indicate what went wrong. I take a look in to oVirt -> Host -> Network Interface and all nodes has bond interface changed from "Mode 4 Dynamic link agregation" to "Custom: mode=4" and Custom mode is filled by "mode=4" Mabe it is the same, but who change that? This is a know behavior but it's still mode 4 it's just the way it displays it. I can have one node in this status if someone will want more info or logs. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users It works in the evening and when I came to work this morning it was not working. The last think I changed was "Operating system" from "Other" to "Windows 2008 R2 x64" and "Timezone" to "GMT" on that VM. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] oVirt vdsm network problem
- Original Message - > Dne 28.11.2013 10:12, Mike Kolesnik napsal(a): > > - Original Message - > >> Hello, > > Hi Jakub, > > > >> I found strange problem in vdsm 4.13.0 with oVirt 3.3.1. After 30 hours > >> from update (ovirt -> 3.3.1, vdsm -> 4.13) my one vlan network does not > >> work. There is nothing in log, I can see network trafic from not working > >> vlan on node in tcpdump, but it not come to VM. > > Did it stop working all of the sudden or did you change something? > > > >> After vdsm restart on node it works like expected. > > Seems like VDSM restored configuration to last known config on that host, > > maybe there's something in vdsm.log to indicate what went wrong. > > > >> I take a look in to oVirt -> Host -> Network Interface and all nodes has > >> bond interface changed from "Mode 4 Dynamic link agregation" to "Custom: > >> mode=4" and Custom mode is filled by "mode=4" Mabe it is the same, but > >> who change that? > > This is a know behavior but it's still mode 4 it's just the way it displays > > it. > > > >> I can have one node in this status if someone will want more info or logs. > > It works in the evening and when I came to work this morning it was not > working. The last think I changed was "Operating system" from "Other" to > "Windows 2008 R2 x64" and "Timezone" to "GMT" on that VM. > Does the VM have IP details defined? If this situation occurs, can you try to ping from inside the VM and see (with tcpdump) it the traffic flows on the bridge, and if it gets from the bridge to the actual interface (or bond)? Also, there might be something interesting from the vdsm log about network changes? ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Trouble upgrading
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 01:06:06AM -0500, Balamurugan Arumugam wrote: > > > On 11/21/2013 11:32 AM, Bob Doolittle wrote: > > > But I don't know how to upgrade my RH 6.4 KVM host. When I try to run > > > "yum update" it fails due to dependency errors notably in: > > > glusterfs > > > qemu > > > vdsm > > > > > > and also to a multilib version error due to vdsm-python 4.12 and 4.13. > > > > > > What's the proper upgrade procedure for a Host? > > > > Just to summarize: > > > > There is a bug (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033587) > > which prevents updates of the Host/Node for users of the Red Hat 6 > > official channels. A fix will be forthcoming. > > > > In the meantime, a workaround is to edit > > /etc/yum.repos.d/glusterfs-epel.repo to globally change the version > > string "3.4.0" to "LATEST". > > > > I sent a fix [1] to vdsm to add glusterfs dependency conditionally. Please > let me know if this helps. > > > Regards, > Bala > > [1] http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/21705/ I think that this is unhelpful for two reasons: 1. Bob complains about ovirt-3.3, and you patch master. 2. We cannot take your patch to master since we already have code that expects glusterfs>=3.4.1 (http://gerrit.ovirt.org/10200). I believe that taking http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/21794/ into ovirt-release would fix Bob's issues. Dan. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] backups
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 01:16:28 PM you wrote: > best i can offer, from rhel 6.5: > Bug 948017 - VSS support for qemu-ga-win Thanks Itamer from my reading of the bug report can I assume its implemented and made its way into the windows packages Oct-30th? thanks, -- Lindsay signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] backups
On 11/28/2013 02:22 PM, Lindsay Mathieson wrote: On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 01:16:28 PM you wrote: best i can offer, from rhel 6.5: Bug 948017 - VSS support for qemu-ga-win Thanks Itamer from my reading of the bug report can I assume its implemented and made its way into the windows packages Oct-30th? that's my understanding. the packages were released with rhel 6.5 last week probably. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] backups
- Original Message - > From: "Itamar Heim" > To: "Lindsay Mathieson" , users@ovirt.org > Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2013 7:24:09 AM > Subject: Re: [Users] backups > > On 11/28/2013 02:22 PM, Lindsay Mathieson wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 01:16:28 PM you wrote: > >> best i can offer, from rhel 6.5: > >> Bug 948017 - VSS support for qemu-ga-win > > > > Thanks Itamer > > > > from my reading of the bug report can I assume its implemented and > > made its > > way into the windows packages Oct-30th? > > that's my understanding. the packages were released with rhel 6.5 > last > week probably. yes, VSS support for QEMU-GA was added and released in RHEL 6.5 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1729.html > > ___ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] backups
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 07:43:50 AM Andrew Cathrow wrote: > yes, VSS support for QEMU-GA was added and released in RHEL 6.5 > http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1729.html Thanks Andrew, Itamar -- Lindsay signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Fedora host install fails
Done. However, next issue was that the default DC is set to 3.3 compatibility version when the fedora host seems to be installed with 3.2 -> incompatible versions Of course, I can create a 3.2 DC (in which case I get "libvirt: Network Driver error : Network not found: no network with matching name 'vdsm-ovirtmgmt'" at host deply stage). However, the fact that I cannot run 3.?3 seems strage. Can u pls advise ? Thxs again 2013/11/28 Alon Bar-Lev > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Pascal Jakobi" > > To: users@ovirt.org > > Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2013 11:09:39 AM > > Subject: [Users] Fedora host install fails > > > > > > Both ovirt engine & host run F19. > > oVirt Engine Version: 3.3.1-2.fc19 > > I get an "unexpected connection termination" when trying to install host > (see > > attached log). > > > > Can someone help ? > > Known issue[1]. > > Please temporary downgrade apache-sshd-0.9.0 to apache-sshd-0.7.0. > > I hope it will resolved soon in fedora updates so you have newer(older) > package of this. > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021273 > > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > Pascal > > > > ___ > > Users mailing list > > Users@ovirt.org > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > -- *Pascal Jakobi* 116 rue de Stalingrad 93100 Montreuil, France *+33 6 87 47 58 19*pascal.jak...@gmail.com ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Fedora host install fails
- Original Message - > From: "Pascal Jakobi" > To: "Alon Bar-Lev" > Cc: users@ovirt.org > Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2013 3:34:42 PM > Subject: Re: [Users] Fedora host install fails > > Done. > However, next issue was that the default DC is set to 3.3 compatibility > version when the fedora host seems to be installed with 3.2 -> incompatible > versions > Of course, I can create a 3.2 DC (in which case I get "libvirt: Network > Driver error : Network not found: no network with matching name > 'vdsm-ovirtmgmt'" at host deply stage). > However, the fact that I cannot run 3.?3 seems strage. > Can u pls advise ? Use this[1] repository? [1] http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/3.3/rpm/Fedora/19/ > > Thxs again > > > 2013/11/28 Alon Bar-Lev > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Pascal Jakobi" > > > To: users@ovirt.org > > > Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2013 11:09:39 AM > > > Subject: [Users] Fedora host install fails > > > > > > > > > Both ovirt engine & host run F19. > > > oVirt Engine Version: 3.3.1-2.fc19 > > > I get an "unexpected connection termination" when trying to install host > > (see > > > attached log). > > > > > > Can someone help ? > > > > Known issue[1]. > > > > Please temporary downgrade apache-sshd-0.9.0 to apache-sshd-0.7.0. > > > > I hope it will resolved soon in fedora updates so you have newer(older) > > package of this. > > > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021273 > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > > > Pascal > > > > > > ___ > > > Users mailing list > > > Users@ovirt.org > > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > > > > > > -- > *Pascal Jakobi* > 116 rue de Stalingrad > 93100 Montreuil, France > > *+33 6 87 47 58 19*pascal.jak...@gmail.com > ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] oVirt Weekly Meeting Minutes
Hi Sandro These are the PPC features and its status: Target Status Description 3.4 - Under review - Architecture support when importing/exporting VM and Templates 3.4 - Under review - Ability to specify architecture in the OSInfo file 3.4 - Under review - Ability to specify supported video cards and display protocols in the OSInfo file 3.4 - Under review - Ability to specify watch dog in the OSInfo file 3.4 - Done - Ability to specify hotplug of nic and disk in the OSInfo file 3.4 - Under review - Ability to search by architecture 3.4 - Under review - Create Cluster, VM and Templates for PPC64 3.4 - Under review - Add PPC64 Hosts 3.4 - Under review - Support for sPAPR VLAN and sPAPR VSCSI 3.4 - Under review - Run fake power hosts 3.4 - Under review - Obtain capabilities of PPC64 hosts 3.4 - Under review - Obtain the CPU topology of PPC64 hosts 3.4 - Under review - Ability to run power machines on x86 hosts Some basic patches for PPC support were merged but not enough to enable any PPC feature. We are focused on the patches 18938, 19010 and 18220 (see below), since they are the base for all PPC features. Engine 18938 (Initial support for alternative architectures) |_19010 (Architecture parameter on search backend) |_18220 (New OS for IBM POWER support) |_21503 (Architecture dependent commands) |_21522 (Avoid migration in ppc64) 20294 (Architecture dependent commands) |_18622 (sPAPR SCSI on PPC64 VMs) |_20630 (Limit the number of SCSI and VirtIO blk devices) |_17972 (Show only compatible OSes) |_18347 (OS type validation) |_20667 (Fix VM creation with blank template) |_18702 (Fill and check arch when importing VM and Template) |_19012 (OVF import for multiple architectures) |_18226 (Cluster and arch related changes) |_19132 (Prevent arch mismatches in the FE) |_18227 (Added arch support for VM and Template) |_19487 (Selection of incompatible templates) VDSM 19395 (Hardware information about POWER hosts) |_17437 (Adding ppc64 handling to getVdsCaps) |_19396 (Report fake capabilities) |_18718 (Create VMs for the POWER architecture) |_19875 (Handling topology for ppc64) Regards Leonardo Bianconi Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 17:14:37 +0100 From: Sandro Bonazzola To: "Users@ovirt.org" , engine-devel Subject: [Engine-devel] oVirt PPC status update Message-ID: <52961a6d.4090...@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Hi, anybody can report about PPC status for 3.3.2 and 3.4.0 target releases? It would be nice having someone for PPC at ovirt-sync meeting from next week on, so please join :-) Thanks, -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] oVirt vdsm network problem
Dne 28.11.2013 13:11, Mike Kolesnik napsal(a): - Original Message - Dne 28.11.2013 10:12, Mike Kolesnik napsal(a): - Original Message - Hello, Hi Jakub, I found strange problem in vdsm 4.13.0 with oVirt 3.3.1. After 30 hours from update (ovirt -> 3.3.1, vdsm -> 4.13) my one vlan network does not work. There is nothing in log, I can see network trafic from not working vlan on node in tcpdump, but it not come to VM. Did it stop working all of the sudden or did you change something? After vdsm restart on node it works like expected. Seems like VDSM restored configuration to last known config on that host, maybe there's something in vdsm.log to indicate what went wrong. I take a look in to oVirt -> Host -> Network Interface and all nodes has bond interface changed from "Mode 4 Dynamic link agregation" to "Custom: mode=4" and Custom mode is filled by "mode=4" Mabe it is the same, but who change that? This is a know behavior but it's still mode 4 it's just the way it displays it. I can have one node in this status if someone will want more info or logs. It works in the evening and when I came to work this morning it was not working. The last think I changed was "Operating system" from "Other" to "Windows 2008 R2 x64" and "Timezone" to "GMT" on that VM. Does the VM have IP details defined? If this situation occurs, can you try to ping from inside the VM and see (with tcpdump) it the traffic flows on the bridge, and if it gets from the bridge to the actual interface (or bond)? Also, there might be something interesting from the vdsm log about network changes? Hi, we found problem. It was in network infrastructure. So nothink with oVirt. I am sorry ;-) ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] Fedora host deployment fails
Both ovirt engine & host run F19.
oVirt Engine Version: 3.3.1-2.fc19
I get an "unexpected connection termination" when trying to install host.
Going further I have more than my doubts about what's executed on the fedora
host as described in the logs :
umask 0077; MYTMP="$(mktemp -t ovirt-XX)"; trap "chmod -R u+rwX
\"${MYTMP}\" > /dev/null 2>&1; rm -fr \"${MYTMP}\" > /dev/null 2>&1" 0; rm -fr
"${MYTMP}" && mkdir "${MYTMP}" && tar --warning=no-timestamp -C "${MYTMP}" -x
&& "${MYTMP}"/setup DIALOG/dialect=str:machine DIALOG/customization=bool:True
Is this really correct ? Has an scp been ran before to transfer the tar file ?
Thanks in advance2013-11-25 08:54:54,073 WARN [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.SearchQuery] (ajp--127.0.0.1-8702-4) ResourceManager::searchBusinessObjects - erroneous search text - Vms: Hosts.name = lab2
2013-11-25 08:55:18,805 WARN [org.ovirt.engine.core.compat.backendcompat.PropertyInfo] (ajp--127.0.0.1-8702-7) Unable to get value of property: vdsName for class org.ovirt.engine.core.common.businessentities.VdsStatic
2013-11-25 08:55:18,805 WARN [org.ovirt.engine.core.compat.backendcompat.PropertyInfo] (ajp--127.0.0.1-8702-7) Unable to get value of property: vdsName for class org.ovirt.engine.core.common.businessentities.VdsStatic
2013-11-25 08:55:18,806 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.UpdateVdsCommand] (ajp--127.0.0.1-8702-7) Running command: UpdateVdsCommand internal: false. Entities affected : ID: c5eefb0c-0c60-4586-b414-8a6d5e51518d Type: VDS
2013-11-25 08:55:18,880 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.SetVdsStatusVDSCommand] (ajp--127.0.0.1-8702-7) START, SetVdsStatusVDSCommand(HostName = lab2, HostId = c5eefb0c-0c60-4586-b414-8a6d5e51518d, status=Installing, nonOperationalReason=NONE), log id: 777c4d64
2013-11-25 08:55:18,898 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.SetVdsStatusVDSCommand] (ajp--127.0.0.1-8702-7) FINISH, SetVdsStatusVDSCommand, log id: 777c4d64
2013-11-25 08:55:18,899 WARN [org.ovirt.engine.core.compat.backendcompat.PropertyInfo] (ajp--127.0.0.1-8702-7) Unable to get value of property: vdsName for class org.ovirt.engine.core.common.businessentities.VdsStatic
2013-11-25 08:55:18,899 WARN [org.ovirt.engine.core.compat.backendcompat.PropertyInfo] (ajp--127.0.0.1-8702-7) Unable to get value of property: vdsName for class org.ovirt.engine.core.common.businessentities.VdsStatic
2013-11-25 08:55:18,905 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.InstallVdsCommand] (ajp--127.0.0.1-8702-7) [53d6fc5] Lock Acquired to object EngineLock [exclusiveLocks= key: c5eefb0c-0c60-4586-b414-8a6d5e51518d value: VDS
, sharedLocks= ]
2013-11-25 08:55:18,906 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.InstallVdsCommand] (pool-6-thread-4) [53d6fc5] Running command: InstallVdsCommand internal: true. Entities affected : ID: c5eefb0c-0c60-4586-b414-8a6d5e51518d Type: VDS
2013-11-25 08:55:18,907 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.InstallVdsCommand] (pool-6-thread-4) [53d6fc5] Before Installation host c5eefb0c-0c60-4586-b414-8a6d5e51518d, lab2
2013-11-25 08:55:18,910 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] (ajp--127.0.0.1-8702-7) [53d6fc5] Correlation ID: null, Call Stack: null, Custom Event ID: -1, Message: Failed to verify Power Management configuration for Host lab2.
2013-11-25 08:55:18,921 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.SetVdsStatusVDSCommand] (pool-6-thread-4) [53d6fc5] START, SetVdsStatusVDSCommand(HostName = lab2, HostId = c5eefb0c-0c60-4586-b414-8a6d5e51518d, status=Installing, nonOperationalReason=NONE), log id: 29dfc78c
2013-11-25 08:55:18,939 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.SetVdsStatusVDSCommand] (pool-6-thread-4) [53d6fc5] FINISH, SetVdsStatusVDSCommand, log id: 29dfc78c
2013-11-25 08:55:18,952 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] (ajp--127.0.0.1-8702-7) [53d6fc5] Correlation ID: 60a86dcf, Call Stack: null, Custom Event ID: -1, Message: Host lab2 configuration was updated by admin@internal.
2013-11-25 08:55:19,146 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.InstallerMessages] (pool-6-thread-4) [53d6fc5] Installation lab2.home: Connected to host lab2.home with SSH key fingerprint: 79:00:d9:40:c0:b6:5e:a4:af:81:49:05:4d:c2:7b:a0
2013-11-25 08:55:19,180 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] (pool-6-thread-4) [53d6fc5] Correlation ID: 53d6fc5, Call Stack: null, Custom Event ID: -1, Message: Installing Host lab2. Connected to host lab2.home with SSH key fingerprint: 79:00:d9:40:c0:b6:5e:a4:af:81:49:05:4d:c2:7b:a0.
2013-11-25 08:55:19,410 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.VdsDeploy] (pool-6-thread-4) [53d6fc5] Installation of lab2.home. Executing command via SSH umask 0077; MYTMP="$(mktemp -t ovirt-XX)"; trap "chmod -R u+rwX \"${MYTMP}\" > /dev/null 2>&1; rm -fr \"${MYTMP}\" > /dev/null 2>&1" 0; rm -fr "${MYTMP}" && mkdir "${MYTMP}" && tar --warning=no-timestamp -C "${MYTMP}" -x && "${MYTMP}"/setup DIALOG/dialect=str:machine DIALOG/customization=bool:True < /var/c
Re: [Users] Fedora host deployment fails
- Original Message -
> From: "Pascal Jakobi"
> To: users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 10:05:05 AM
> Subject: [Users] Fedora host deployment fails
>
>
> Both ovirt engine & host run F19.
> oVirt Engine Version: 3.3.1-2.fc19
> I get an "unexpected connection termination" when trying to install host.
>
> Going further I have more than my doubts about what's executed on the fedora
> host as described in the logs :
> umask 0077; MYTMP="$(mktemp -t ovirt-XX)"; trap "chmod -R u+rwX
> \"${MYTMP}\" > /dev/null 2>&1; rm -fr \"${MYTMP}\" > /dev/null 2>&1" 0; rm
> -fr "${MYTMP}" && mkdir "${MYTMP}" && tar --warning=no-timestamp -C
> "${MYTMP}" -x && "${MYTMP}"/setup DIALOG/dialect=str:machine
> DIALOG/customization=bool:True
>
> Is this really correct ? Has an scp been ran before to transfer the tar file
> ?
known issue[1]
please downgrade apache-sshd to 0.7.0.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021273
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Trouble upgrading
Il 28/11/2013 13:15, Dan Kenigsberg ha scritto: > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 01:06:06AM -0500, Balamurugan Arumugam wrote: >> >>> On 11/21/2013 11:32 AM, Bob Doolittle wrote: But I don't know how to upgrade my RH 6.4 KVM host. When I try to run "yum update" it fails due to dependency errors notably in: glusterfs qemu vdsm and also to a multilib version error due to vdsm-python 4.12 and 4.13. What's the proper upgrade procedure for a Host? >>> >>> Just to summarize: >>> >>> There is a bug (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033587) >>> which prevents updates of the Host/Node for users of the Red Hat 6 >>> official channels. A fix will be forthcoming. >>> >>> In the meantime, a workaround is to edit >>> /etc/yum.repos.d/glusterfs-epel.repo to globally change the version >>> string "3.4.0" to "LATEST". A new ovirt-release-9-1 rpm has been published in stable repo updating glusterfs release to LATEST. >>> >> >> I sent a fix [1] to vdsm to add glusterfs dependency conditionally. Please >> let me know if this helps. >> >> >> Regards, >> Bala >> >> [1] http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/21705/ > > I think that this is unhelpful for two reasons: > 1. Bob complains about ovirt-3.3, and you patch master. > 2. We cannot take your patch to master since we already have code that >expects glusterfs>=3.4.1 (http://gerrit.ovirt.org/10200). > > I believe that taking http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/21794/ into > ovirt-release would fix Bob's issues. > > Dan. > ___ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] Introductory email
Hi, Just to introduce myself, I am Peter Lerche co-founder of a Danish hosting provider. We have for some years been looking at cloud/VPS solutions for our customers but until now have not found a suitable platform. oVirt looks promising... on paper and now we want to test it. -- Best regards Peter Lerche EasySpeedy ApS 377, Diplomvej Scion-DTU Science Park DK-2800, Kgs. Lyngby Denmark Phone: +45 4594 1401 http://EasySpeedy.com _ European Quality Unmanaged Server Hosting Permanent KVMoIP included in all dedicated servers Network and Power Uptime - 99,98% Since 16 Jan 2006 Follow us on Twitter - https://twitter.com/easyspeedy _ ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] oVirt vdsm network problem
- Original Message - > Dne 28.11.2013 13:11, Mike Kolesnik napsal(a): > > - Original Message - > >> Dne 28.11.2013 10:12, Mike Kolesnik napsal(a): > >>> - Original Message - > Hello, > >>> Hi Jakub, > >>> > I found strange problem in vdsm 4.13.0 with oVirt 3.3.1. After 30 hours > from update (ovirt -> 3.3.1, vdsm -> 4.13) my one vlan network does not > work. There is nothing in log, I can see network trafic from not working > vlan on node in tcpdump, but it not come to VM. > >>> Did it stop working all of the sudden or did you change something? > >>> > After vdsm restart on node it works like expected. > >>> Seems like VDSM restored configuration to last known config on that host, > >>> maybe there's something in vdsm.log to indicate what went wrong. > >>> > I take a look in to oVirt -> Host -> Network Interface and all nodes has > bond interface changed from "Mode 4 Dynamic link agregation" to "Custom: > mode=4" and Custom mode is filled by "mode=4" Mabe it is the same, but > who change that? > >>> This is a know behavior but it's still mode 4 it's just the way it > >>> displays > >>> it. The default bond modes changed from previous versions to be with miimon=100 so if you add that to your bond definition (or just select mode 4 again) then you should see the default mode 4 selected in the list. > >>> > I can have one node in this status if someone will want more info or > logs. > >> It works in the evening and when I came to work this morning it was not > >> working. The last think I changed was "Operating system" from "Other" to > >> "Windows 2008 R2 x64" and "Timezone" to "GMT" on that VM. > >> > > Does the VM have IP details defined? > > If this situation occurs, can you try to ping from inside the VM and see > > (with tcpdump) > > it the traffic flows on the bridge, and if it gets from the bridge to the > > actual interface (or bond)? > > > > Also, there might be something interesting from the vdsm log about network > > changes? > Hi, > > we found problem. It was in network infrastructure. So nothink with > oVirt. I am sorry ;-) > Great, I'm happy you found the problem, don't be sorry :) ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] oVirt 3.4 SLA & Scheduling feature overview
BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:Zimbra-Calendar-Provider VERSION:2.0 METHOD:REQUEST BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Asia/Jerusalem BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T02 TZOFFSETTO:+0200 TZOFFSETFROM:+0300 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;WKST=MO;INTERVAL=1;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU TZNAME:IST END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T02 TZOFFSETTO:+0300 TZOFFSETFROM:+0200 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;WKST=MO;INTERVAL=1;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1FR TZNAME:IDT END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT UID:4191272a-a49b-42d1-8571-2384c9793ddd SUMMARY:oVirt 3.4 SLA & Scheduling feature overview ATTENDEE;CN=oVirt Mailing List;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RS VP=TRUE:mailto:users@ovirt.org ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:arch@ov irt.org ORGANIZER;CN=Gilad Chaplik:mailto:gchap...@redhat.com DTSTART;TZID="Asia/Jerusalem":20131202T17 DTEND;TZID="Asia/Jerusalem":20131202T18 STATUS:CONFIRMED CLASS:PUBLIC X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INTENDEDSTATUS:BUSY TRANSP:OPAQUE LAST-MODIFIED:20131128T161811Z DTSTAMP:20131128T161811Z SEQUENCE:0 DESCRIPTION:The following is a new meeting request:\n\nSubject: oVirt 3.4 SL A &\; Scheduling feature overview \nOrganizer: "Gilad Chaplik" \n\nTime: Monday\, December 2\, 2013\, 5:00:00 PM - 6:00:00 PM G MT +02:00 Jerusalem\n \nInvitees: users@ovirt.org\; a...@ovirt.org \n\n\n*~* ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*\n\nHi all\, \n\nI invite you to a overview for planed SLA & Scheduling features for oVirt 3.4.\nWe will talk briefly about every sugges ted feature including:\n- positive/negative affinity between group of VMs\n- power saving policy moving hosts to sleep\n- time based policy (SLA during the day\, power saving at night)\n- application level HA (monitor the servic e inside the VM) \n\nPeople are welcome to join in the #ovirt channel on irc .OFTC.net.\n\nThanks\n\n BEGIN:VALARM ACTION:DISPLAY TRIGGER;RELATED=START:-PT5M DESCRIPTION:Reminder END:VALARM END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Introductory email
- Original Message - > From: "Peter Lerche" > To: users@ovirt.org > Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2013 5:47:21 PM > Subject: [Users] Introductory email > > Hi, > > Just to introduce myself, I am Peter Lerche co-founder of a Danish hosting > provider. We have for some years been looking at cloud/VPS solutions for our > customers but until now have not found a suitable platform. > > oVirt looks promising... on paper and now we want to test it. > > > > -- > Best regards > > Peter Lerche > > EasySpeedy ApS > 377, Diplomvej > Scion-DTU Science Park > DK-2800, Kgs. Lyngby > Denmark > Phone: +45 4594 1401 > > http://EasySpeedy.com > _ > European Quality Unmanaged Server Hosting > Permanent KVMoIP included in all dedicated servers > Network and Power Uptime - 99,98% Since 16 Jan 2006 > Follow us on Twitter - https://twitter.com/easyspeedy > _ Hi Peter, welcome to oVirt. Feel free to experiment and ask. If you have plans to visit FOSDEM, you'll be able to meet some of the community members F2F. Doron ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] Installation fails on Fedora 19 - Failed to execute stage 'Closing up': Engine unreachable
Hi, I new to oVirt want to install a all-in-one package for testing only. Installed a vanilla Fedora 19 64bit and followed the guide. sudo yum localinstall http://ovirt.org/releases/ovirt-release-fedora.noarch.rpm sudo yum install -y ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-allinone sudo engine-setup I get following error when running engine-setup: [ INFO ] Starting engine service [ INFO ] Restarting httpd [ ERROR ] Failed to execute stage 'Closing up': Engine unreachable [ INFO ] Stage: Clean up Log file is located at /var/log/ovirt-engine/setup/ovirt-engine-setup-20131128155012.log [ INFO ] Stage: Pre-termination [ INFO ] Stage: Termination [ ERROR ] Execution of setup failed When trying to access the webinterface i get: javax.ejb.EJBException: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Could not obtain connection to the database. Please make sure that DB is up and accepting connections, and restart the application. org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.handleExceptionInOurTx(CMTTxInterceptor.java:166) I have tried to re-run the engine-setup and re-install Fedora/oVirt several times but it does not help. Is this a common error which I just can't find the documentation ? Here is the full installation output and the last part of the logfile: --- [ INFO ] Stage: Initializing [ INFO ] Stage: Environment setup Configuration files: ['/etc/ovirt-engine-setup.conf.d/10-packaging-aio.conf', '/etc/ovirt-engine-setup.conf.d/10-packaging.conf'] Log file: /var/log/ovirt-engine/setup/ovirt-engine-setup-20131128155012.log Version: otopi-1.1.2 (otopi-1.1.2-1.fc19) [ INFO ] Hardware supports virtualization [ INFO ] Stage: Environment packages setup [ INFO ] Stage: Programs detection [ INFO ] Stage: Environment setup [ INFO ] Stage: Environment customization --== PACKAGES ==-- [ INFO ] Checking for product updates... [ INFO ] No product updates found --== ALL IN ONE CONFIGURATION ==-- Configure VDSM on this host? (Yes, No) [No]: yes Local storage domain path [/var/lib/images]: Local storage domain name [local_storage]: --== NETWORK CONFIGURATION ==-- Host fully qualified DNS name of this server [mydomain.com]: firewalld was detected on your computer. Do you wish Setup to configure it? (yes, no) [yes]: --== DATABASE CONFIGURATION ==-- Where is the database located? (Local, Remote) [Local]: Setup can configure the local postgresql server automatically for the engine to run. This may conflict with existing applications. Would you like Setup to automatically configure postgresql, or prefer to perform that manually? (Automatic, Manual) [Automatic]: Using existing credentials --== OVIRT ENGINE CONFIGURATION ==-- Engine admin password: Confirm engine admin password: Application mode (Both, Virt, Gluster) [Both]: Virt Default storage type: (NFS, FC, ISCSI, POSIXFS) [NFS]: --== PKI CONFIGURATION ==-- Organization name for certificate [myCompany.com]: myCompany --== APACHE CONFIGURATION ==-- Setup can configure the default page of the web server to present the application home page. This may conflict with existing applications. Do you wish to set the application as the default page of the web server? (Yes, No) [Yes]: Setup can configure apache to use SSL using a certificate issued from the internal CA. Do you wish Setup to configure that, or prefer to perform that manually? (Automatic, Manual) [Automatic]: --== SYSTEM CONFIGURATION ==-- Configure an NFS share on this server to be used as an ISO Domain? (Yes, No) [Yes]: Local ISO domain path [/var/lib/exports/iso]: Local ISO domain name [ISO_DOMAIN]: Configure WebSocket Proxy on this machine? (Yes, No) [Yes]: --== END OF CONFIGURATION ==-- [ INFO ] Stage: Setup validation --== CONFIGURATION PREVIEW ==-- Database name : engine Database secured connection: False Database host : localhost Database user name : engine Database host name validation : False Datbase port : 5432 NFS setup : True PKI organization : myCompany NFS mount point: /var/lib/exports/iso Application mode : virt Firewall manager : firewalld Configur
Re: [Users] Installation fails on Fedora 19 - Failed to execute stage 'Closing up': Engine unreachable
Hi, I will need the entire setup log file and the entire engine.log. Also, please look into /var/lib/pgsql/data/pg_log/postgresql-*.log if there is something relevant. It is quite strange that the setup succeed in accessing database while the java application not. Regards, Alon - Original Message - > From: "Peter Lerche" > To: users@ovirt.org > Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2013 6:29:36 PM > Subject: [Users] Installation fails on Fedora 19 - Failed to execute stage > 'Closing up': Engine unreachable > > Hi, > > I new to oVirt want to install a all-in-one package for testing only. > > Installed a vanilla Fedora 19 64bit and followed the guide. > > sudo yum localinstall > http://ovirt.org/releases/ovirt-release-fedora.noarch.rpm > sudo yum install -y ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-allinone > sudo engine-setup > > I get following error when running engine-setup: > > [ INFO ] Starting engine service > [ INFO ] Restarting httpd > > [ ERROR ] Failed to execute stage 'Closing up': Engine unreachable > [ INFO ] Stage: Clean up > Log file is located at > /var/log/ovirt-engine/setup/ovirt-engine-setup-20131128155012.log > [ INFO ] Stage: Pre-termination > [ INFO ] Stage: Termination > [ ERROR ] Execution of setup failed > > > When trying to access the webinterface i get: > > javax.ejb.EJBException: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Could not obtain > connection to the database. Please make sure that DB is up and accepting > connections, and restart the application. > org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.handleExceptionInOurTx(CMTTxInterceptor.java:166) > > > I have tried to re-run the engine-setup and re-install Fedora/oVirt several > times but it does not help. > > Is this a common error which I just can't find the documentation ? > > > Here is the full installation output and the last part of the logfile: > --- > > > > > [ INFO ] Stage: Initializing > [ INFO ] Stage: Environment setup > Configuration files: > ['/etc/ovirt-engine-setup.conf.d/10-packaging-aio.conf', > '/etc/ovirt-engine-setup.conf.d/10-packaging.conf'] > Log file: > /var/log/ovirt-engine/setup/ovirt-engine-setup-20131128155012.log > Version: otopi-1.1.2 (otopi-1.1.2-1.fc19) > [ INFO ] Hardware supports virtualization > [ INFO ] Stage: Environment packages setup > [ INFO ] Stage: Programs detection > [ INFO ] Stage: Environment setup > [ INFO ] Stage: Environment customization > > --== PACKAGES ==-- > > [ INFO ] Checking for product updates... > [ INFO ] No product updates found > > --== ALL IN ONE CONFIGURATION ==-- > > Configure VDSM on this host? (Yes, No) [No]: yes > Local storage domain path [/var/lib/images]: > Local storage domain name [local_storage]: > > --== NETWORK CONFIGURATION ==-- > > Host fully qualified DNS name of this server [mydomain.com]: > firewalld was detected on your computer. Do you wish Setup to > configure it? (yes, no) [yes]: > > --== DATABASE CONFIGURATION ==-- > > Where is the database located? (Local, Remote) [Local]: > Setup can configure the local postgresql server automatically for > the engine to run. This may conflict with existing applications. > Would you like Setup to automatically configure postgresql, or > prefer to perform that manually? (Automatic, Manual) [Automatic]: > Using existing credentials > > --== OVIRT ENGINE CONFIGURATION ==-- > > Engine admin password: > Confirm engine admin password: > Application mode (Both, Virt, Gluster) [Both]: Virt > Default storage type: (NFS, FC, ISCSI, POSIXFS) [NFS]: > > --== PKI CONFIGURATION ==-- > > Organization name for certificate [myCompany.com]: myCompany > > --== APACHE CONFIGURATION ==-- > > Setup can configure the default page of the web server to present > the application home page. This may conflict with existing > applications. > Do you wish to set the application as the default page of the web > server? (Yes, No) [Yes]: > Setup can configure apache to use SSL using a certificate issued > from the internal CA. > Do you wish Setup to configure that, or prefer to perform that > manually? (Automatic, Manual) [Automatic]: > > --== SYSTEM CONFIGURATION ==-- > > Configure an NFS share on this server to be used as an ISO Domain? > (Yes, No) [Yes]: > Local ISO domain path [/var/lib/exports/iso]: > Local ISO domain name [ISO_DOMAIN]: >
Re: [Users] Self contained engine ETA
Thanks, just what I needed to know. Regards, On 28/11/13 04:29, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > Il 27/11/2013 18:01, Juan Pablo Lorier ha scritto: >> Hi, >> >> Is there any estimated time for self contained engine release? > Hosted Engine Feature [1] should land on oVirt 3.3.2 release. > 3.3.2 beta build is due to this Friday. > >> Will it >> be possible to migrate engine to existing DC? > The Hosted Engine VM will require a dedicated storage. > For the migration to the Hosted Engine solution you can read [2] > >> I'm now buying a new >> server just for the engine that actually runs in a vm on a different >> virtualization platform, and I'll like to know if it's woth the effort >> of migration at this time our I should wait a bit to get the feature. >> Regards, >> ___ >> Users mailing list >> Users@ovirt.org >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > [1] http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Self_Hosted_Engine > [2] http://www.ovirt.org/Migrate_to_Hosted_Engine > > ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] VMX validation failing
Hi, We got two PowerEdge 2950 out of production and I'm trying to add them to the DC just to get extra CPU and RAM but though the X5450 xeons have VMX, ovirt fails to install on the hosts with the error: Failed to execute stage 'Setup validation': Hardware does not support virtualization. I've searched the web and found a tip in vdsm-developer about updating vdsm-bootstrap but didn't work for me. Package version in the engine are: bea-stax-api.noarch 1.2.0-4.el6.centos.alt @ovirt_test glusterfs.x86_64 3.4.0-8.el6 @ovirt-stable glusterfs-libs.x86_643.4.0-8.el6 @ovirt-stable jboss-as.x86_64 7.1.1-11.el6 @ovirt-stable jpackage-utils.noarch5.0.0-7.el6.alt @ovirt_test maven.x86_64 3.0.4-1.el6.alt @ovirt_test otopi.noarch 1.1.2-1.el6 @ovirt-stable otopi-java.noarch1.1.2-1.el6 @ovirt-stable ovirt-engine.noarch 3.3.1-2.el6 @ovirt-stable ovirt-engine-backend.noarch 3.3.1-2.el6 @ovirt-stable ovirt-engine-cli.noarch 3.3.0.4-1.el6 @epel ovirt-engine-dbscripts.noarch3.3.1-2.el6 @ovirt-stable ovirt-engine-lib.noarch 3.3.1-2.el6 @ovirt-stable ovirt-engine-restapi.noarch 3.3.1-2.el6 @ovirt-stable ovirt-engine-sdk-python.noarch 3.3.0.6-1.el6 @epel ovirt-engine-setup.noarch3.3.1-2.el6 @ovirt-stable ovirt-engine-tools.noarch3.3.1-2.el6 @ovirt-stable ovirt-engine-userportal.noarch 3.3.1-2.el6 @ovirt-stable ovirt-engine-webadmin-portal.noarch 3.3.1-2.el6 @ovirt-stable ovirt-engine-websocket-proxy.noarch 3.3.1-2.el6 @ovirt-stable ovirt-host-deploy.noarch 1.1.1-1.el6 @ovirt-stable ovirt-host-deploy-java.noarch1.1.1-1.el6 @ovirt-stable ovirt-image-uploader.noarch 3.3.1-1.el6 @ovirt-stable ovirt-iso-uploader.noarch3.3.1-1.el6 @ovirt-stable ovirt-log-collector.noarch 3.3.1-1.el6 @ovirt-stable ovirt-release-el6.noarch 8-1 @ovirt-stable postgresql-jdbc.x86_64 8.4.701-8.1.el6.centos.alt @ovirt_test python-kitchen.noarch1.1.1-1.el6.centos.alt @ovirt_test vdsm-bootstrap.noarch4.13.0-11.el6 @ovirt-stable Regards, ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] VMX validation failing
Hi Juan Please make sure that you have virtualization enabled in BIOS. It's not enable by default for 2950 as far as I remember Regards, Liviu On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Juan Pablo Lorier wrote: > Hi, > > We got two PowerEdge 2950 out of production and I'm trying to add them > to the DC just to get extra CPU and RAM but though the X5450 xeons have > VMX, ovirt fails to install on the hosts with the error: > > Failed to execute stage 'Setup validation': Hardware does not support > virtualization. > > I've searched the web and found a tip in vdsm-developer about updating > vdsm-bootstrap but didn't work for me. > Package version in the engine are: > > bea-stax-api.noarch 1.2.0-4.el6.centos.alt > @ovirt_test > glusterfs.x86_64 3.4.0-8.el6 > @ovirt-stable > glusterfs-libs.x86_643.4.0-8.el6 > @ovirt-stable > jboss-as.x86_64 7.1.1-11.el6 > @ovirt-stable > jpackage-utils.noarch5.0.0-7.el6.alt > @ovirt_test > maven.x86_64 3.0.4-1.el6.alt > @ovirt_test > otopi.noarch 1.1.2-1.el6 > @ovirt-stable > otopi-java.noarch1.1.2-1.el6 > @ovirt-stable > ovirt-engine.noarch 3.3.1-2.el6 > @ovirt-stable > ovirt-engine-backend.noarch 3.3.1-2.el6 > @ovirt-stable > ovirt-engine-cli.noarch 3.3.0.4-1.el6 > @epel > ovirt-engine-dbscripts.noarch3.3.1-2.el6 > @ovirt-stable > ovirt-engine-lib.noarch 3.3.1-2.el6 > @ovirt-stable > ovirt-engine-restapi.noarch 3.3.1-2.el6 > @ovirt-stable > ovirt-engine-sdk-python.noarch 3.3.0.6-1.el6 > @epel > ovirt-engine-setup.noarch3.3.1-2.el6 > @ovirt-stable > ovirt-engine-tools.noarch3.3.1-2.el6 > @ovirt-stable > ovirt-engine-userportal.noarch 3.3.1-2.el6 > @ovirt-stable > ovirt-engine-webadmin-portal.noarch 3.3.1-2.el6 > @ovirt-stable > ovirt-engine-websocket-proxy.noarch 3.3.1-2.el6 > @ovirt-stable > ovirt-host-deploy.noarch 1.1.1-1.el6 > @ovirt-stable > ovirt-host-deploy-java.noarch1.1.1-1.el6 > @ovirt-stable > ovirt-image-uploader.noarch 3.3.1-1.el6 > @ovirt-stable > ovirt-iso-uploader.noarch3.3.1-1.el6 > @ovirt-stable > ovirt-log-collector.noarch 3.3.1-1.el6 > @ovirt-stable > ovirt-release-el6.noarch 8-1 > @ovirt-stable > postgresql-jdbc.x86_64 8.4.701-8.1.el6.centos.alt > @ovirt_test > python-kitchen.noarch1.1.1-1.el6.centos.alt > @ovirt_test > vdsm-bootstrap.noarch4.13.0-11.el6 > @ovirt-stable > > Regards, > > ___ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] VMX validation failing
On 11/28/2013 09:44 PM, Liviu Elama wrote: Hi Juan Please make sure that you have virtualization enabled in BIOS. It's not enable by default for 2950 as far as I remember and make sure to perform a cold boot after changing it in the bios ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] windows Server 2012R2 Spice Driver support
Is redhat working on this? -- Lindsay signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] Gluster storage
Hello everybody, i'm successful using ovirt with 16 physical node, in a FC cluster with a very BIG dell compellent (and so expensive) enterprise storage ;) I'm researching a new architecture for a new cluster, and i want to understand more better the glusterFS integration in ovirt. As i understand you have to install a normal physical node, with also the glusterFS package… right ? after that you have to create a new cluster in ovirt , new datacenter and put in this new node. in that datacenter you can create a new data domain ( glusterFS ) that reside on that host. right ? and… after that ? ok i have 1 node that are also my " storage ", and if i want to all more compute node ? … every new compute node are a new " brick " for glusterFS so i can expand/redundant the first one ? i don't have the architecture very clear in my mind, and the documentation don't clarify the final architecture for this type of usage. Thanks for help guys Luke ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] windows Server 2012R2 Spice Driver support
On 11/28/2013 11:34 PM, Lindsay Mathieson wrote: Is redhat working on this? ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users adding spice-devel ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Self contained engine ETA
Hi Sandro I'm a bit confused on the storage requirements for the Self hosted engine. Some places say it requires NFS , other that i supports both GlusterFS and NFS. I'm interested in the GlusterFS option. Does hosted engine support GlusterFS on the same physical node as where the engine VM will reside(basically running both vdsm and gluster on the same physical host). If yes, can the hosted-engine --deploy create glusterfs or it has to be created manually prior and after engine install imported into Ovirt? Regards, Liviu On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > Il 27/11/2013 18:01, Juan Pablo Lorier ha scritto: > > Hi, > > > > Is there any estimated time for self contained engine release? > > Hosted Engine Feature [1] should land on oVirt 3.3.2 release. > 3.3.2 beta build is due to this Friday. > > > Will it > > be possible to migrate engine to existing DC? > > The Hosted Engine VM will require a dedicated storage. > For the migration to the Hosted Engine solution you can read [2] > > > I'm now buying a new > > server just for the engine that actually runs in a vm on a different > > virtualization platform, and I'll like to know if it's woth the effort > > of migration at this time our I should wait a bit to get the feature. > > Regards, > > ___ > > Users mailing list > > Users@ovirt.org > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > [1] http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Self_Hosted_Engine > [2] http://www.ovirt.org/Migrate_to_Hosted_Engine > > > -- > Sandro Bonazzola > Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. > See how it works at redhat.com > ___ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Self contained engine ETA
Hi Liviu. For the current release hosted engine requires NFS. GlusterFS will be supported in the near future. Leonid. - Original Message - From: "Liviu Elama" To: "Sandro Bonazzola" Cc: "Juan Pablo Lorier" , users@ovirt.org Sent: Friday, November 29, 2013 12:21:14 AM Subject: Re: [Users] Self contained engine ETA Hi Sandro I'm a bit confused on the storage requirements for the Self hosted engine. Some places say it requires NFS , other that i supports both GlusterFS and NFS. I'm interested in the GlusterFS option. Does hosted engine support GlusterFS on the same physical node as where the engine VM will reside(basically running both vdsm and gluster on the same physical host). If yes, can the hosted-engine --deploy create glusterfs or it has to be created manually prior and after engine install imported into Ovirt? Regards, Liviu On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Sandro Bonazzola < sbona...@redhat.com > wrote: Il 27/11/2013 18:01, Juan Pablo Lorier ha scritto: > Hi, > > Is there any estimated time for self contained engine release? Hosted Engine Feature [1] should land on oVirt 3.3.2 release. 3.3.2 beta build is due to this Friday. > Will it > be possible to migrate engine to existing DC? The Hosted Engine VM will require a dedicated storage. For the migration to the Hosted Engine solution you can read [2] > I'm now buying a new > server just for the engine that actually runs in a vm on a different > virtualization platform, and I'll like to know if it's woth the effort > of migration at this time our I should wait a bit to get the feature. > Regards, > ___ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users [1] http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Self_Hosted_Engine [2] http://www.ovirt.org/Migrate_to_Hosted_Engine -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Self contained engine ETA
Il 29/11/2013 00:29, Leonid Natapov ha scritto: > Hi Liviu. > For the current release hosted engine requires NFS. GlusterFS will be > supported in the near future. > > Leonid. > > - Original Message - > From: "Liviu Elama" > To: "Sandro Bonazzola" > Cc: "Juan Pablo Lorier" , users@ovirt.org > Sent: Friday, November 29, 2013 12:21:14 AM > Subject: Re: [Users] Self contained engine ETA > > Hi Sandro > > I'm a bit confused on the storage requirements for the Self hosted engine. > Some places say it requires NFS , other that i supports both GlusterFS and > NFS. I'm interested in the GlusterFS option. Does hosted engine support > GlusterFS on the same physical node as where the engine VM will > reside(basically running both vdsm and gluster on the same physical host). If > yes, can the hosted-engine --deploy create glusterfs or it has to be created > manually prior and after engine install imported into Ovirt? > > Regards, > Liviu > > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Sandro Bonazzola < sbona...@redhat.com > > wrote: > > > Il 27/11/2013 18:01, Juan Pablo Lorier ha scritto: >> Hi, >> >> Is there any estimated time for self contained engine release? > > Hosted Engine Feature [1] should land on oVirt 3.3.2 release. > 3.3.2 beta build is due to this Friday. About having Hosted Engine Feature backported to stable 3.3.2, we're still discussing introducing its support in VDSM on vdsm-devel list. https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/vdsm-devel/2013-November/thread.html Thread: "Pending Self-Hosted-Engine Patches in ovirt-3.3.2" In the mean time, you can use nightly for testing. > >> Will it >> be possible to migrate engine to existing DC? > > The Hosted Engine VM will require a dedicated storage. > For the migration to the Hosted Engine solution you can read [2] > >> I'm now buying a new >> server just for the engine that actually runs in a vm on a different >> virtualization platform, and I'll like to know if it's woth the effort >> of migration at this time our I should wait a bit to get the feature. >> Regards, >> ___ >> Users mailing list >> Users@ovirt.org >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > [1] http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Self_Hosted_Engine > [2] http://www.ovirt.org/Migrate_to_Hosted_Engine > > -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] RFE/Bug? Cloud-Init in oVirt 3.3.1 / IPv6 Support
Hi, yes, the IP/Netmask and Gateway get passed to the vm, but not with option "static". I'll open a bug report. Am 28.11.2013 11:30, schrieb Mike Kolesnik: > - Original Message - > > Did you see the static IP/Netmask/Gateway parameters passed? > -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards Sven Kieske Systemadministrator Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG Königsberger Straße 6 32339 Espelkamp T: +49-5772-293-100 F: +49-5772-293-333 https://www.mittwald.de Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] oVirt Weekly Meeting Minutes -- 2013-11-27
Il 27/11/2013 17:34, Doron Fediuck ha scritto: > Minutes: > http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2013/ovirt.2013-11-27-15.02.html > Minutes (text): > http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2013/ovirt.2013-11-27-15.02.txt > Log: > http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2013/ovirt.2013-11-27-15.02.log.html > > = > #ovirt: oVirt Weekly Sync > = > > > Meeting started by doron at 15:02:27 UTC. The full logs are available at > http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2013/ovirt.2013-11-27-15.02.log.html . > > > > Meeting summary > --- > * Agenda and roll Call (doron, 15:02:42) > * 3.3 update releases (doron, 15:04:23) > * 3.4 planning (doron, 15:04:24) > * conferences and workshops (doron, 15:04:26) > * infra update (doron, 15:04:27) > * other topics (doron, 15:04:29) > * LINK: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/admin/projects/ovirt-release ~ > (danken, 15:12:58) > * LINK: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/21794 (mburns, 15:15:04) > * LINK: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-release/16800/ (mburns, > 15:15:48) > * mburns to add sbonazzo as a maintainer to support ovirt-release > project (doron, 15:18:17) ovirt-release-9 released yesterday > * 3.3.2 beta delayed to include an NPE fix. (doron, 15:19:02) > * sbonazzo to track maintenance version in new > http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.3.z_release-management (doron, > 15:26:23) http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.3.z_release-management is ready with tentative dates for 3.3.2 release. > * 3.3.1.1 released by Friday 29/11. (doron, 15:31:23) > * 3.3.2 release due on Friday 29/11. (doron, 15:31:39) > * 3.3.2 beta1 due on Friday 29/11. (doron, 15:32:16) > * vdsm 3.3.2 will include hosted engine support. (doron, 15:35:50) waiting for vdsm packages (and maybe others) for releasing beta. > > * 3.4 planning (doron, 15:36:05) > * integration team may slip on 3.4 due to holidays (doron, 15:41:38) > * gluster to report next week on 3.4 deadline readiness. (doron, > 15:44:19) > * network team doing good progress. NIC ordering unsure. Should report > next week on deadline readiness. (doron, 15:50:43) > * node to update next week on task status and readiness for 3.4 > deadline (doron, 15:52:28) > * sbonazzoto update on PPC status next week. (doron, 15:54:44) PPC sent status to users yesterday. > * SLA working on design. Unsure about application HA and will report > next wee on deadline readiness. (doron, 15:55:32) > * storage to make sure they have a representative in weekly sync. > (doron, 15:58:55) > * storage to update next week on 3,4 status and readiness for > deadline. (doron, 15:59:16) > * UX making progress. No changes with regards to 3.4 deadline. > (doron, 16:01:39) > * virt has no changes for 3.4 status. Will update next week on > deadline readiness (doron, 16:05:34) > * infra should send a representative for ovirt weekly. (doron, > 16:07:37) > > * conferences and workshops (doron, 16:08:56) > * no updates on conferences and workshops since last week. (doron, > 16:10:02) > > * infra update (doron, 16:10:21) > * possible oVirt stand at SCALE, Jason Brooks has proposed a talk > (doron, 16:11:10) > * infra-team 3.4 tasks: no changes (doron, 16:12:22) > * infra no updates (doron, 16:15:07) > > * other topics (doron, 16:15:20) > * doron to check what's the issue in ovirt infra. (doron, 16:18:56) > * doron to follow up on ovirt infra issues. (doron, 16:24:09) > * dcaro to report next week on Rackspace issue and consider escalation > if needed. (doron, 16:32:25) > > Meeting ended at 16:33:08 UTC. > > > > > Action Items > > > > > > > Action Items, by person > --- > * **UNASSIGNED** > * (none) > > > > > People Present (lines said) > --- > * doron (142) > * danken (75) > * sbonazzo (39) > * orc_orc (29) > * dneary (27) > * ybronhei (24) > * knesenko (20) > * mburns (12) > * fabiand (12) > * apuimedo (11) > * dcaro (10) > * lvernia (9) > * itamar1 (5) > * ecohen (5) > * ofrenkel (4) > * sahina (3) > * dougsland (2) > * aweiteka (2) > * abaron (2) > * ovirtbot (2) > * Guest7159 (1) > * mskrivanek (1) > * obasan (1) > > > > > Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 > > .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot > ___ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
