Re: [ovirt-users] Upside-Down Effect with HTML5-SPICE on Ovirt 3.5 and Windows Guest
But removing iirc driver I won't loose any video redirection performance when accessing via SPICE? BRgds, F. On May 16, 2014, at 8:42 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: > On 05/15/2014 05:52 PM, Felipe Herrera Martinez wrote: >> Hi all, >> There is any fix or workaround to avoid the Up-Side effect when using >> HTML5-SPICE to access Windows Guest? I'm testing with Windows 7 and HTML5, >> present the Window inverted, while with Linux Guest it properly works. >> >> >> Any help would be appreciated. >> > > iirc, removing the qxl driver in the guest "resolves" this. > also: > Bug 1014066 - [spice-html5] Windows desktop is turned upside down in > spice-html5 console > ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] Upside-Down Effect with HTML5-SPICE on Ovirt 3.5 and Windows Guest
On 05/15/2014 05:52 PM, Felipe Herrera Martinez wrote: Hi all, There is any fix or workaround to avoid the Up-Side effect when using HTML5-SPICE to access Windows Guest? I'm testing with Windows 7 and HTML5, present the Window inverted, while with Linux Guest it properly works. Any help would be appreciated. iirc, removing the qxl driver in the guest "resolves" this. also: Bug 1014066 - [spice-html5] Windows desktop is turned upside down in spice-html5 console ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] newbee questions
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: > > I still hope that it would, despite the need to tweak and hack it a bit, > and we'd be here to help. > Guess ill take a look at that NAT-based network / vdsm-hook-extnet approach you mentioned then. Regards, John Smith. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] newbee questions
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Itamar Heim wrote: > > hacking it a bit... > this will show you how/where: > git clone git://gerrit.ovirt.org/ovirt-live > grep -r wlan > Which shows the following results : - add a 'etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0' interface script for the wifi interface (which is 'wlp2s0' in my case and not 'wlan0') - remove 'wlan*' from the line (which isnt present at all in my config to begin with) that reads 'hidden_nics = wlan\*,usb\*' in /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf - add 'fake_nics = dummy0' to /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf Somehow I doubt that making only these changes to my All-In-One install on Fedora19 will results in a working wifi ovirt setup. ;) Anyway, I noticed that ovirt-live is based on RHEL6/CentOS 6. I tried to install CentOS 6.5 on this system earlier, and failed at the network/wifi/interface connection/configuration/setup step so I couldnt get networking working at all with RHEL6/CentOS 6, and if ovirt-live is based on that I guess the same will happen when booting ovirt-live. I couldnt figure out what the issue was but i guess it's a driver and/or kernel issue with CentOS 6.5 . ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] Fedora 20 as hypervisor
Il 05/05/2014 01:28, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto: > Possibly this Fedora initiative could also help to have it both as a stable > "supported" oVirt engine and hypervisor due to its planned lifecycle of 18 > months: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server > > ? I hope so, but looks like before we'll have Fedora Server 1.0 we have ~2 years to wait > It is not completely clear to me how does it fit with the recent announce of > CentOS sponsored by Red Hat and several CentOS SIGs... but nevertheless > it could bring value too... > > Gianluca > > > ___ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[ovirt-users] oVirt 3.5.0 Alpha postponed due to blocker
Hi, We're postponing oVirt 3.5.0 Alpha release due to the following blocker bug discovered while running basic sanity tests: Bug 1098539 - failed to create VM if no NUMA set is specified On a clean install no VM can be created. New tentative release date for 3.5.0 Alpha is 2014-05-20. Thanks, -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] Fedora 20 vdsm error
Il 16/05/2014 16:00, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto: On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Alessandro Bianchiwrote: I edited the repo url and got vdsm updated and the hos came up Thank you very much for your help Now I'll do some testing Alessandro OK. following the quick start guide you had better to install yum install http://plain.resources.ovirt.org/pub/yum-repo/ovirt-release34.rpm that should have given you the right repo info... Gianluca -- Il messaggio è stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da SkyNet Srl, ed è risultato non infetto. This message has been checked for virus or dangerous content by SkyNet SRL and seems to be clean. Thank you again Gianluca I had to exclude sos from yum upgrade since it conflicts with ovirt-log-collector il file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sos/plugins/postgresql.py dell'installazione di sos-3.0-23.fc19.noarch entra in conflitto con il file del pacchetto ovirt-log-collector-3.4.2-1.fc19.noarch il file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sos/plugins/postgresql.pyc dell'installazione di sos-3.0-23.fc19.noarch entra in conflitto con il file del pacchetto ovirt-log-collector-3.4.2-1.fc19.noarch il file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sos/plugins/postgresql.pyo dell'installazione di sos-3.0-23.fc19.noarch entra in conflitto con il file del pacchetto ovirt-log-collector-3.4.2-1.fc19.noarch Best regards AB -- SkyNet SRL Via Maggiate 67/a - 28021 Borgomanero (NO) - tel. +39 0322-836487/834765 - fax +39 0322-836608 http://www.skynet.it Autorizzazione Ministeriale n.197 Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio sono riservate e confidenziali ed è vietata la diffusione in qualunque modo eseguita. Qualora Lei non fosse la persona a cui il presente messaggio è destinato, La invitiamo ad eliminarlo ed a distruggerlo non divulgandolo, dandocene gentilmente comunicazione. Per qualsiasi informazione si prega di contattare i...@skynet.it (e-mail dell'azienda). Rif. D.L. 196/2003 ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[ovirt-users] Jpackage down
Hi guys, I'm doing an urgent ovirt upgrade from 3.2(dreyou) to 3.4 (official) but I see that www.jpackage.org is down. I've managed to install jboss-as-7.1.1-11.el6.x86_64 from another location, however I'm not sure if this will be compatible with 3.4, as per the instructions from "http://wiki.dreyou.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=ovirt_rpm_start33"; I've tested browsing to the site on two different internet links, as well as from the remote server but I'm just getting... RepoError: Cannot retrieve repository metadata (repomd.xml) for repository: ovirt-jpackage-6.0-generic. Please verify its path and try again Can I go ahead and attempt the upgrade using 7.1.1-11? Thanks! Regards. Neil Wilson. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] Fedora 20 vdsm error
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Alessandro Bianchi wrote: > > I edited the repo url and got vdsm updated and the hos came up > > Thank you very much for your help > > Now I'll do some testing > > Alessandro > > > OK. following the quick start guide you had better to install yum install http://plain.resources.ovirt.org/pub/yum-repo/ovirt-release34.rpm that should have given you the right repo info... Gianluca ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] Fedora 20 vdsm error
Il 16/05/2014 14:50, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto: On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Alessandro Bianchiwrote: mmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078312 it seems there is no vdsm in updates-testing repo rpm -q vdsm vdsm-4.14.6-0.fc20.x86_64 yum upgrade vdsm --enablerepo=updates-testing Plugin abilitati:versionlock No packages marked for update I see this on repo http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.4/rpm/fc20/x86_64/vdsm-4.14.8.1-0.fc20.x86_64.rpm There was also a problem with vdsm due to python-ethtool Do you have 3.4.1 or 3.4.0? I edited the repo url and got vdsm updated and the hos came up Thank you very much for your help Now I'll do some testing Alessandro ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] Fedora 20 vdsm error
Il 16/05/2014 14:50, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto: On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Alessandro Bianchiwrote: mmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078312 it seems there is no vdsm in updates-testing repo rpm -q vdsm vdsm-4.14.6-0.fc20.x86_64 yum upgrade vdsm --enablerepo=updates-testing Plugin abilitati:versionlock No packages marked for update I see this on repo http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.4/rpm/fc20/x86_64/vdsm-4.14.8.1-0.fc20.x86_64.rpm There was also a problem with vdsm due to python-ethtool Do you have 3.4.1 or 3.4.0? You are right Doing a wget I've got the RIGHT vdsm also needed http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.4/rpm/fc20/noarch/vdsm-python-zombiereaper-4.14.8.1-0.fc20.noarch.rpm http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.4/rpm/fc20/x86_64/vdsm-python-4.14.8.1-0.fc20.x86_64.rpm http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.4/rpm/fc20/noarch/vdsm-xmlrpc-4.14.8.1-0.fc20.noarch.rpm rpm -q python-ethtool python-ethtool-0.10-1.fc20.x86_64 so it means 0.10.1 -- SkyNet SRL Via Maggiate 67/a - 28021 Borgomanero (NO) - tel. +39 0322-836487/834765 - fax +39 0322-836608 http://www.skynet.it Autorizzazione Ministeriale n.197 Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio sono riservate e confidenziali ed è vietata la diffusione in qualunque modo eseguita. Qualora Lei non fosse la persona a cui il presente messaggio è destinato, La invitiamo ad eliminarlo ed a distruggerlo non divulgandolo, dandocene gentilmente comunicazione. Per qualsiasi informazione si prega di contattare i...@skynet.it (e-mail dell'azienda). Rif. D.L. 196/2003 ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] IO errors when adding new disk on iSCSI storage
so there is a problem extending... perhaps I missed it, but can you attach the vm qemu log, libvirt and vdsm logs? On 05/16/2014 02:05 PM, Morten A. Middelthon wrote: On 16. mai 2014 15:04, Dafna Ron wrote: adding federico since I think he can probably add more info here. when we use thin provisionining we have to extend the disk during writing (it's set to do that every 2GB I think). during extend the vm pauses and resumes. However, this action should not be noticeable by the vm user. Does the vm pause and resumes or pauses completely? is it noticeable by the vm user? Hi, the vm pauses completely, and I can't resume it without deactivating/disconnecting the new disk Morten -- Dafna Ron ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] IO errors when adding new disk on iSCSI storage
On 16. mai 2014 15:04, Dafna Ron wrote: adding federico since I think he can probably add more info here. when we use thin provisionining we have to extend the disk during writing (it's set to do that every 2GB I think). during extend the vm pauses and resumes. However, this action should not be noticeable by the vm user. Does the vm pause and resumes or pauses completely? is it noticeable by the vm user? Hi, the vm pauses completely, and I can't resume it without deactivating/disconnecting the new disk Morten ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] IO errors when adding new disk on iSCSI storage
adding federico since I think he can probably add more info here. when we use thin provisionining we have to extend the disk during writing (it's set to do that every 2GB I think). during extend the vm pauses and resumes. However, this action should not be noticeable by the vm user. Does the vm pause and resumes or pauses completely? is it noticeable by the vm user? Thanks, Dafna On 05/16/2014 01:40 PM, John Taylor wrote: Hi Morten, My understanding of thin disks on a block domain is that vdsm traps ENOSPC on the thin lv and uses the mailbox to get the SPM to extend it. See a presentation by Nir http://www.ovirt.org/File:Storage-mailbox.odp I thought I saw somewhere there were some changes/bugs around that for allowing mixed data centers (both block and file domains). ...just looked now and this bz looks relevant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083476 So maybe you could check the engine logs and spm logs for that flow (sorry I can't tell you any specifics about what you should look for ) -John On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Morten A. Middelthon wrote: Hi, I just re-ran the test with adding a preallocated disk, and the problem did _not_ appear. I tried a few times to write large files with dd, but the vm continued to run without problems with regards, -- Morten A. Middelthon Email: mor...@flipp.net Phone: +47 907 83 708 ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Dafna Ron ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] Fedora 20 vdsm error
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Alessandro Bianchi wrote: > > mmm > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078312 > > it seems there is no vdsm in updates-testing repo > > rpm -q vdsm > vdsm-4.14.6-0.fc20.x86_64 > > yum upgrade vdsm --enablerepo=updates-testing > Plugin abilitati:versionlock > No packages marked for update > > > I see this on repo http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.4/rpm/fc20/x86_64/vdsm-4.14.8.1-0.fc20.x86_64.rpm There was also a problem with vdsm due to python-ethtool Do you have 3.4.1 or 3.4.0? ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] Fedora 20 vdsm error
Il 16/05/2014 14:26, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto: On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Alessandro Bianchiwrote: I migrated the engin on a F19 and reimported the db so I'm ok So I'playing with F20 to see if it may run as node but have this error on vdsm vdsm vds ERROR unexpected error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/vdsm/BindingXMLRPC.py", line 1070, in wrapper res = f(*args, **kwargs) File "/usr/share/vdsm/BindingXMLRPC.py", line 393, in getCapabilities ret = api.getCapabilities() File "/usr/share/vdsm/API.py", line 1185, in getCapabilities c = caps.get() File "/usr/share/vdsm/caps.py", line 369, in get caps.update(netinfo.get()) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/netinfo.py", line 557, in get netAttr.get('qosOutbound')) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/netinfo.py", line 487, in _getNetInfo ipv4addr, ipv4netmask, ipv6addrs = getIpInfo(iface) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/netinfo.py", line 317, in getIpInfo ipv6addrs = devInfo.get_ipv6_addresses() SystemError: error return without exception set Any idea someone? Thank you Best regards See this thread where Jason contributed: http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2014-May/023986.html (keep away the "dot" in bugzilla link) HIH, Gianluca -- Il messaggio è stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da SkyNet Srl, ed è risultato non infetto. This message has been checked for virus or dangerous content by SkyNet SRL and seems to be clean. mmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078312 it seems there is no vdsm in updates-testing repo rpm -q vdsm vdsm-4.14.6-0.fc20.x86_64 yum upgrade vdsm --enablerepo=updates-testing Plugin abilitati:versionlock No packages marked for update ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] IO errors when adding new disk on iSCSI storage
Hi Morten, My understanding of thin disks on a block domain is that vdsm traps ENOSPC on the thin lv and uses the mailbox to get the SPM to extend it. See a presentation by Nir http://www.ovirt.org/File:Storage-mailbox.odp I thought I saw somewhere there were some changes/bugs around that for allowing mixed data centers (both block and file domains). ...just looked now and this bz looks relevant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083476 So maybe you could check the engine logs and spm logs for that flow (sorry I can't tell you any specifics about what you should look for ) -John On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Morten A. Middelthon wrote: > Hi, > > I just re-ran the test with adding a preallocated disk, and the problem did > _not_ appear. I tried a few times to write large files with dd, but the vm > continued to run without problems > > with regards, > > > -- > Morten A. Middelthon > Email: mor...@flipp.net > Phone: +47 907 83 708 > ___ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[ovirt-users] Sizing Recommendations For oVirt+Gluster
I am planning on doing a small-scale oVirt setup to prepare for a larger deployment at $JOB. I've looked over the mailing list and done some research via Google, but I am having trouble getting a sizing recommendation for what I want to do. I plan to run 8-10 VMs, each with 1-2 GB RAM and 1 or 2 virtual processors. On the storage side, I have 4.5 TB of various media that I would like to make available along side VM storage, the bulk of which is non-compressable Nikon NEFs. I was looking at a pair of servers: Quad-core Xeon's with HyperThreading, 32 GB of RAM, quad gigE Intel NICs. I have 8 2TB SATA hard drives and 6 750GB SATA hard drives to spread between the servers. I know it's possible to run the gluster storage on the same nodes that oVirt VMs are running, but I am wondering if this is wise, with the load I'm suggesting and the server specs I've outlined here. Ideally, if either node has to be taken down, I'd like to be able to move/migrate all the VMs to the other node, do the maintenance needed, and bring the node back online. I'm willing to take a performance hit while one node is down, but I need all VMs and storage services to be available. thanks, -- Breandan Dezendorf brean...@dezendorf.com http://gurucollege.net https://gurufoto.net ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] Fedora 20 vdsm error
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Alessandro Bianchi wrote: > I migrated the engin on a F19 and reimported the db so I'm ok > > So I'playing with F20 to see if it may run as node but have this error on > vdsm > > vdsm vds ERROR unexpected error > Traceback (most recent call > last): > File > "/usr/share/vdsm/BindingXMLRPC.py", line 1070, in wrapper > res = f(*args, **kwargs) > File > "/usr/share/vdsm/BindingXMLRPC.py", line 393, in getCapabilities > ret = api.getCapabilities() > File > "/usr/share/vdsm/API.py", line 1185, in getCapabilities > c = caps.get() > File > "/usr/share/vdsm/caps.py", line 369, in get > caps.update(netinfo.get()) > File > "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/netinfo.py", line 557, in get > netAttr.get('qosOutbound')) > File > "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/netinfo.py", line 487, in > _getNetInfo > ipv4addr, ipv4netmask, > ipv6addrs = getIpInfo(iface) > File > "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/netinfo.py", line 317, in getIpInfo > ipv6addrs = > devInfo.get_ipv6_addresses() > SystemError: error return > without exception set > > Any idea someone? > > Thank you > > Best regards > > > See this thread where Jason contributed: http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2014-May/023986.html (keep away the "dot" in bugzilla link) HIH, Gianluca ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[ovirt-users] Fedora 20 vdsm error
I migrated the engin on a F19 and reimported the db so I'm ok So I'playing with F20 to see if it may run as node but have this error on vdsm vdsm vds ERROR unexpected error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/vdsm/BindingXMLRPC.py", line 1070, in wrapper res = f(*args, **kwargs) File "/usr/share/vdsm/BindingXMLRPC.py", line 393, in getCapabilities ret = api.getCapabilities() File "/usr/share/vdsm/API.py", line 1185, in getCapabilities c = caps.get() File "/usr/share/vdsm/caps.py", line 369, in get caps.update(netinfo.get()) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/netinfo.py", line 557, in get netAttr.get('qosOutbound')) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/netinfo.py", line 487, in _getNetInfo ipv4addr, ipv4netmask, ipv6addrs = getIpInfo(iface) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/netinfo.py", line 317, in getIpInfo ipv6addrs = devInfo.get_ipv6_addresses() SystemError: error return without exception set Any idea someone? Thank you Best regards ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users