Re: [ovirt-users] Slide Templates--New for 2015!

2015-01-26 Thread Marcelo Barbosa
Thank you Brian.

Cheers,

firemanxbr

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Brian Proffitt  wrote:

> All:
>
> I have been asked to provide slide templates for presentations that might
> be created for future events. Through 2014, we have been using the
> green-on-white slide template, and now, thanks to Eidan Hildesheim, we have
> a new 2015 edition that is based more on the Patternfly interface.
>
> These template presentations are provided to build new slides for oVirt
> presentations. They can be downloaded and used as-is, or Saved As template
> files within OpenOffice and LibreOffice.
>
> The templates, as well as a whole host of pre-made presentations (which
> are all under the Creative Commons license), are available on the oVirt.org
> slide page[1].
>
> Thanks!
> BKP
>
> [1] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_Slide_Decks
>
> --
> Brian Proffitt
>
> Community Liaison
> oVirt
> Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
> Phone: +1 574 383 9BKP
> IRC: bkp @ OFTC
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [ovirt-users] python-pthreading 0.1.3-2

2014-07-10 Thread Marcelo Barbosa
Douglas,

  I tested it and it worked for me.

Thanks,

firemanxbr


On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf <
dougsl...@redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> python-pthreading 0.1.3-2 is available to test. Please help giving karmas
> to achieve this version to stable branch as soon as possible.
>
> Changes included:
> - monkey_patch: Fail if it is too late to monkey-patch
> - Add the missing locked() interface
>
>
> F19:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pthreading-0.1.3-2.fc19
>
> F20:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pthreading-0.1.3-2.fc20
>
> EL6:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pthreading-0.1.3-2.el6
>
> --
> Cheers
> Douglas
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [ovirt-users] FISL15 Conference - report

2014-05-12 Thread Marcelo Barbosa
Douglas,

   Great post, thankz.


firemanxbr


On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf <
dougsl...@redhat.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> We had people in FISL15 conference talking about oVirt, if you are
> interested, please see my report below:
> http://dougsland.livejournal.com/123103.html
>
> --
> Cheers
> Douglas
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] oVirt translations on Transifex

2013-10-29 Thread Marcelo Barbosa
Hi,

I believe that both projects(Zanata and Transifex) are excellent
choices for oVirt, but I have doubts about the largest membership of one or
another independent of features.
I think it would be interesting to accomplish a test aimed at the
adoption oVirt, where a version would be submitted to Transifex and myself
will take care to disclose to the community, to feel how people receive,
after we evaluating, what think about this plan ?

Thanks.

Marcelo Barbosa
Fedora Project Packager/Ambassador
fireman...@fedoraproject.org


On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Dave Neary  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 10/21/2013 11:12 PM, Marcelo Barbosa wrote:
> > We have several Fedora related projects[1] using transifex as
> > translation platform. I myself have been using transifex for some
> > time, but searching for oVirt, I noticed it isn't there. Actually it
> > is on Zanata platform.
> > I'm wondering if we could take advantage of the big transifex
> > subscribed user base and get oVirt in line with main fedora projects
> > by migrating oVirt translations to transifex. Not sure if we have
> > discussed this matter before. Anyway, I'm able to help with migration
> > (if needed) and further help with oVirt translations.
> >
> > Could you guys share your thoughts?
>
> I'm a big fan of Transifex, which is, like Zanata, open source. I also
> think that translation communities work in ecosystems, and it makes
> sense ot have oVirt where there is the biggest gathering of systems
> related & virt management projects - which looks to me to be around
> Transifex.
>
> Isaac, Carlos, what would be involved in moving to Transifex? What would
> we gain and lose from the move?
>
> Thanks,
> Dave.
>
> --
> Dave Neary - Community Action and Impact
> Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
> Ph: +33 9 50 71 55 62 / Cell: +33 6 77 01 92 13
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[Users] oVirt translations on Transifex

2013-10-21 Thread Marcelo Barbosa
We have several Fedora related projects[1] using transifex as
translation platform. I myself have been using transifex for some
time, but searching for oVirt, I noticed it isn't there. Actually it
is on Zanata platform.
I'm wondering if we could take advantage of the big transifex
subscribed user base and get oVirt in line with main fedora projects
by migrating oVirt translations to transifex. Not sure if we have
discussed this matter before. Anyway, I'm able to help with migration
(if needed) and further help with oVirt translations.

Could you guys share your thoughts?

[1]
- Libvirt: https://fedora.transifex.com/projects/p/libvirt/
- Virt-manager: https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/virt-manager/
- Fedora : https://fedora.transifex.com/projects/p/fedora/
- Spacewalk : https://fedora.transifex.com/projects/p/spacewalk/
- FreeIPA : https://fedora.transifex.com/projects/p/freeipa/

Best Regards.

Marcelo Barbosa
Fedora Project Packager/Ambassador
fireman...@fedoraproject.org
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] How can oVirt use glusterfs ?

2013-08-15 Thread Marcelo Barbosa
Hi Higkoo,

   Two good links for you:

   http://www.ovirt.org/images/5/59/Ovirt-fosdem2013-gluster.pdf
   and
   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0iIuHCz8L04

Regards.


Marcelo Barbosa
Fedora Project Packager/Ambassador
fireman...@fedoraproject.org


On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:06 AM, higkoohk  wrote:

> Hello everyone :)
>
>
> How can oVirt use glusterfs  as a storage ?
>
>
> Many thanks !
>
> - higkoo
> 2013-08-16
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[Users] Gerrit oVirt problem access

2013-07-12 Thread Marcelo Barbosa
eys: mode 0
debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received
debug1: Roaming not allowed by server
debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent
debug2: service_accept: ssh-userauth
debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received
debug2: key: /home/marcelo.barbosa/.ssh/id_rsa (0x7fe08fd0c520),
debug2: key: marcelo.barbosa@firelap.local (0x7fe08fd0d810),
debug2: key: /home/marcelo.barbosa/.ssh/id_dsa ((nil)),
debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey
debug1: Next authentication method: publickey
debug1: Offering RSA public key: /home/marcelo.barbosa/.ssh/id_rsa
debug2: we sent a publickey packet, wait for reply
debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey
debug1: Offering RSA public key: marcelo.barbosa@firelap.local
debug2: we sent a publickey packet, wait for reply
debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey
debug1: Trying private key: /home/marcelo.barbosa/.ssh/id_dsa
debug2: we did not send a packet, disable method
debug1: No more authentication methods to try.
Permission denied (publickey).

someone can help me please ?

Best Regards.

Marcelo Barbosa
Fedora Project Packager/Ambassador
fireman...@fedoraproject.org
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] Portuguese Brazilian List about oVirt

2013-07-12 Thread Marcelo Barbosa
Hi,

   Thank your for all attention about portuguese users, i believe a
great contribution with project oVirt.

Marcelo Barbosa
Fedora Project Packager/Ambassador
fireman...@fedoraproject.org


On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Dave Neary  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I will create a new list with the new name, and delete the old one. Easiest 
> way now.
>
> Cheers,
> Dave.
>
> - Original Message -
>> On 07/12/2013 11:05 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>> > On 07/12/2013 11:38 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> How about ovirt-pt? Or are pt and pt_BR very different languages?
>> >
>> > kind of redundnat with ovirt.org?
>> > why not users...@ovirt.org?
>>
>> Makes sense. Dave?
>>
>> >
>> > (i assume this is only about users issues, not replacing devel lists)
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Dave.
>> >>
>> >> On 07/12/2013 03:39 AM, Marcelo Barbosa wrote:
>> >>> Hi Dave,
>> >>>
>> >>> It would be great! Could you create it as ovirt-bra...@ovirt.org?
>> >>> Adding APahim and Douglas in the loop (CC).
>> >>> Thank you very much .
>> >>>
>> >>> Marcelo Barbosa
>> >>> Fedora Project Packager/Ambassador
>> >>> fireman...@fedoraproject.org
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Dave Neary  wrote:
>> >>>> Hi Marcelo,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I have a definite preference to having this list on ovirt.org - would
>> >>>> you be happy with that, instead of Google Groups?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks,
>> >>>> Dave.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 07/11/2013 09:15 PM, Marcelo Barbosa wrote:
>> >>>>> Hey everybody,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I know what is very difficult communicate in english for some
>> >>>>> users, i wish promote this list in portuguese brazilian about our
>> >>>>> project oVirt,  sorry if I'm wrong about some rule this list, but my
>> >>>>> intention is help more users is possible.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> List: ovirt-bra...@googlegroups.com
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Thanks for advance
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Marcelo Barbosa
>> >>>>> Fedora Project Packager/Ambassador
>> >>>>> fireman...@fedoraproject.org
>> >>>>> ___
>> >>>>> Users mailing list
>> >>>>> Users@ovirt.org
>> >>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> Dave Neary - Community Action and Impact
>> >>>> Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
>> >>>> Ph: +33 9 50 71 55 62 / Cell: +33 6 77 01 92 13
>> >>
>> >
>> > ___
>> > Users mailing list
>> > Users@ovirt.org
>> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] Portuguese Brazilian List about oVirt

2013-07-11 Thread Marcelo Barbosa
Hi Dave,

It would be great! Could you create it as ovirt-bra...@ovirt.org?
Adding APahim and Douglas in the loop (CC).
Thank you very much .

Marcelo Barbosa
Fedora Project Packager/Ambassador
fireman...@fedoraproject.org


On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Dave Neary  wrote:
> Hi Marcelo,
>
> I have a definite preference to having this list on ovirt.org - would
> you be happy with that, instead of Google Groups?
>
> Thanks,
> Dave.
>
> On 07/11/2013 09:15 PM, Marcelo Barbosa wrote:
>> Hey everybody,
>>
>>I know what is very difficult communicate in english for some
>> users, i wish promote this list in portuguese brazilian about our
>> project oVirt,  sorry if I'm wrong about some rule this list, but my
>> intention is help more users is possible.
>>
>>List: ovirt-bra...@googlegroups.com
>>
>> Thanks for advance
>>
>> Marcelo Barbosa
>> Fedora Project Packager/Ambassador
>> fireman...@fedoraproject.org
>> ___
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
> --
> Dave Neary - Community Action and Impact
> Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
> Ph: +33 9 50 71 55 62 / Cell: +33 6 77 01 92 13
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[Users] Portuguese Brazilian List about oVirt

2013-07-11 Thread Marcelo Barbosa
Hey everybody,

   I know what is very difficult communicate in english for some
users, i wish promote this list in portuguese brazilian about our
project oVirt,  sorry if I'm wrong about some rule this list, but my
intention is help more users is possible.

   List: ovirt-bra...@googlegroups.com

Thanks for advance

Marcelo Barbosa
Fedora Project Packager/Ambassador
fireman...@fedoraproject.org
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] FISL14 Conference Report - oVirt and Cloud EcoSystem

2013-07-09 Thread Marcelo Barbosa
Douglas,

   Thank you friend, nice report.

Marcelo Barbosa
Fedora Project Packager/Ambassador
fireman...@fedoraproject.org


On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf
 wrote:
> http://dougsland.livejournal.com/122744.html
>
> See you there next year!
>
> --
> Cheers
> Douglas
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] Problem install

2013-03-06 Thread Marcelo Barbosa
Alex,

   Thankyou for attention. This return should not happen, because I have my
hostname registered and running on my DNS servers, but i'm inserted in
/etc/hosts my hostname and retry setup, but return new error:


2013-03-06 17:35:14::DEBUG::all_in_one_100::297::root:: Waiting for host to
become operational
2013-03-06 17:35:14::DEBUG::all_in_one_100::300::root:: current host status
is: up
2013-03-06 17:35:14::DEBUG::all_in_one_100::302::root:: The host is up.
2013-03-06 17:35:14::DEBUG::setup_sequences::59::root:: running
addStorageDomain
2013-03-06 17:35:14::DEBUG::all_in_one_100::317::root:: Adding local
storage domain
2013-03-06 17:35:14::INFO::all_in_one_100::322::root:: Creating local
storage
2013-03-06 17:35:14::INFO::all_in_one_100::326::root:: Creating local
storage domain
2013-03-06 17:35:14::INFO::all_in_one_100::334::root:: Adding local storage
domain
2013-03-06 17:35:15::ERROR::all_in_one_100::337::root:: Traceback (most
recent call last):
  File "/usr/share/ovirt-engine/scripts/plugins/all_in_one_100.py", line
335, in addStorageDomain
controller.CONF["API_OBJECT"].storagedomains.add(sdParams)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk/infrastructure/brokers.py", line
5151, in add
headers={"Expect":expect, "Correlation-Id":correlation_id})
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk/infrastructure/proxy.py",
line 118, in add
return self.request('POST', url, body, headers)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk/infrastructure/proxy.py",
line 129, in request
last=last)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk/infrastructure/proxy.py",
line 159, in __doRequest
raise RequestError, response
RequestError:
status: 400
reason: Bad Request
detail: Cannot add Storage. Internal error, Storage Connection doesn't
exist.

2013-03-06 17:35:15::DEBUG::setup_sequences::62::root:: Traceback (most
recent call last):
  File "/usr/share/ovirt-engine/scripts/setup_sequences.py", line 60, in run
function()
  File "/usr/share/ovirt-engine/scripts/plugins/all_in_one_100.py", line
338, in addStorageDomain
raise Exception(ERROR_ADD_LOCAL_DOMAIN)
Exception: Error: could not add local storage domain

2013-03-06 17:35:15::DEBUG::engine-setup::1948::root:: *** The following
params were used as user input:
2013-03-06 17:35:15::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root::
override-httpd-config: yes
2013-03-06 17:35:15::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: http-port: 80
2013-03-06 17:35:15::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: https-port: 443
2013-03-06 17:35:15::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: random-passwords: no
2013-03-06 17:35:15::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: mac-range:
00:1A:4A:10:FF:00-00:1A:4A:10:FF:FF
2013-03-06 17:35:15::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: host-fqdn:
firelap.usc.unirede.net
2013-03-06 17:35:15::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: auth-pass: 
2013-03-06 17:35:15::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: org-name: firelap
2013-03-06 17:35:15::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: application-mode:
both
2013-03-06 17:35:15::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: default-dc-type: NFS
2013-03-06 17:35:15::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: db-remote-install:
local
2013-03-06 17:35:15::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: db-host: localhost
2013-03-06 17:35:15::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: db-local-pass:

2013-03-06 17:35:15::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: nfs-mp:
/firebackup//iso
2013-03-06 17:35:15::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: iso-domain-name:
ISO_DOMAIN
2013-03-06 17:35:15::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: config-nfs: yes
2013-03-06 17:35:15::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: override-firewall:
IPTables
2013-03-06 17:35:15::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: config-allinone: yes
2013-03-06 17:35:15::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: storage-path:
/firebackup//vms
2013-03-06 17:35:15::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: superuser-pass:

2013-03-06 17:35:15::ERROR::engine-setup::2369::root:: Traceback (most
recent call last):
  File "/bin/engine-setup", line 2363, in 
main(confFile)
  File "/bin/engine-setup", line 2146, in main
runSequences()
  File "/bin/engine-setup", line 2068, in runSequences
controller.runAllSequences()
  File "/usr/share/ovirt-engine/scripts/setup_controller.py", line 54, in
runAllSequences
sequence.run()
  File "/usr/share/ovirt-engine/scripts/setup_sequences.py", line 154, in
run
step.run()
  File "/usr/share/ovirt-engine/scripts/setup_sequences.py", line 60, in run
function()
  File "/usr/share/ovirt-engine/scripts/plugins/all_in_one_100.py", line
338, in addStorageDomain
raise Exception(ERROR_ADD_LOCAL_DOMAIN)
Exception: Error: could not add local storage domain

   Any ideas to solve this problem?

Marcelo Barbosa
*mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com*


On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Ale

[Users] Problem install

2013-03-06 Thread Marcelo Barbosa
:DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: application-mode:
both
2013-03-06 14:35:56::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: default-dc-type: NFS
2013-03-06 14:35:56::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: db-remote-install:
local
2013-03-06 14:35:56::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: db-host: localhost
2013-03-06 14:35:56::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: db-local-pass:

2013-03-06 14:35:56::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: nfs-mp:
/firebackup//iso
2013-03-06 14:35:56::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: iso-domain-name:
ISO_DOMAIN
2013-03-06 14:35:56::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: config-nfs: yes
2013-03-06 14:35:56::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: override-firewall:
IPTables
2013-03-06 14:35:56::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: config-allinone: yes
2013-03-06 14:35:56::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: storage-path:
/firebackup//vms
2013-03-06 14:35:56::DEBUG::engine-setup::1953::root:: superuser-pass:

2013-03-06 14:35:56::ERROR::engine-setup::2369::root:: Traceback (most
recent call last):
  File "/bin/engine-setup", line 2363, in 
main(confFile)
  File "/bin/engine-setup", line 2146, in main
runSequences()
  File "/bin/engine-setup", line 2068, in runSequences
controller.runAllSequences()
  File "/usr/share/ovirt-engine/scripts/setup_controller.py", line 54, in
runAllSequences
sequence.run()
  File "/usr/share/ovirt-engine/scripts/setup_sequences.py", line 154, in
run
step.run()
  File "/usr/share/ovirt-engine/scripts/setup_sequences.py", line 60, in run
function()
  File "/usr/share/ovirt-engine/scripts/plugins/all_in_one_100.py", line
294, in waitForHostUp
utils.retry(isHostUp, tries=120, timeout=600, sleep=5)
  File "/usr/share/ovirt-engine/scripts/common_utils.py", line 1009, in
retry
raise e
RetryFailException: Error: Host was found in a 'Failed' state. Please check
engine and bootstrap installation logs.

   Thnkz for attention.

Marcelo Barbosa
*mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com*
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?

2013-01-09 Thread Marcelo Barbosa
Siggi,

   As far as my knowledge reaches, I believe the engine off does not
interfere with us, or you will lose HA and other resources, and if we all
just outside the world: D so the engine will not help much, I think, good
test for all.


Rgds.

Marcelo Barbosa
*mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com*


On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Sigbjorn Lie  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> What will happen in case of a shutdown of all nodes and both ovirt-engine
> vm's?
>
> Will the nodes be able to start it's virtual machines without a connection
> to the ovirt-engine?
>
>
> Rgds,
> Siggi
>
>
>
> On Wed, January 9, 2013 13:27, Marcelo Barbosa wrote:
> > Siggi,
> >
> >
> > Great idea is running this oVIrt-engine to two or more vm's in to oVirt,
> > example:
> >
> >
> > * Install 2 nodes or more and running oVirt-engine provisory in laptop,
> > for example, after create 2 vm's HA for permanent engine virtualized and
> HA.
> >
> > Only suggestion.
> >
> >
> > Marcelo Barbosa
> > *mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com*
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Sigbjorn Lie 
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> On Thu, January 3, 2013 17:08, Itamar Heim wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Everyone,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they
> >> find good/useful in oVirt,
> >>> and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions?
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >> +1 for clustered ovirt manager for availability.
> >>
> >>
> >> I've seen a pdf document describing how to configure Red Hat Cluster and
> >> GFS with RHEV-M, but I
> >> feel Red Hat Cluster and GFS adds too much complexity compared to what
> is required for ovirt
> >> manager.
> >>
> >> Perhaps the use of glusterfs and keepalived (http://www.keepalived.org/
> )
> >> would be sufficient to create an easy to configure ovirt manager
> failover cluster?
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Siggi
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> Users mailing list
> >> Users@ovirt.org
> >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?

2013-01-09 Thread Marcelo Barbosa
Siggi,

   Great idea is running this oVIrt-engine to two or more vm's in to oVirt,
example:

   * Install 2 nodes or more and running oVirt-engine provisory in laptop,
for example, after create 2 vm's HA for permanent engine virtualized and HA.

  Only suggestion.

Marcelo Barbosa
*mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com*


On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Sigbjorn Lie  wrote:

>
> On Thu, January 3, 2013 17:08, Itamar Heim wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> >
> > as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they
> find good/useful in oVirt,
> > and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions?
>
> Hi,
>
> +1 for clustered ovirt manager for availability.
>
> I've seen a pdf document describing how to configure Red Hat Cluster and
> GFS with RHEV-M, but I
> feel Red Hat Cluster and GFS adds too much complexity compared to what is
> required for ovirt
> manager.
>
> Perhaps the use of glusterfs and keepalived (http://www.keepalived.org/)
> would be sufficient to
> create an easy to configure ovirt manager failover cluster?
>
>
> Regards,
> Siggi
>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] Best practice to resize a WM disk image

2013-01-09 Thread Marcelo Barbosa
Alex,

   Suggestion for use GlusterFS to oVirt, look:


http://www.gluster.org/2012/07/installing-ovirt-3-1-and-glusterfs-using-either-nfs-or-posix-native-file-system-node-install-2/

Marcelo Barbosa
*mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com*


On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Alexandre Santos wrote:

> 2013/1/9 Karli Sjöberg :
> > tis 2013-01-08 klockan 11:03 -0500 skrev Yeela Kaplan:
> >
> > So, first of all, you should know that resizing a disk is not yet
> supported
> > in oVirt.
> > If you decide that you must use it anyway, you should know in advance
> that
> > it's not recommended,
> > and that your data is at risk when you perform these kind of actions.
> >
> > There are several ways to perform this.
> > One of them is to create a second (larger) disk for the vm,
> > run the vm from live cd and use dd to copy the first disk contents into
> the
> > second one,
> > and finally remove the first disk and make sure that the new disk is
> > configured as your system disk.
> >
> > Here you guide for the dd operation to be done from within the guest
> system,
> > but booted from live.
> > Can this be done directly from the NFS storage itself instead?
> >
> >
> > The second, riskier, option is to export the vm to an export domain,
> > resize the image volume size to the new larger size using qemu-img and
> also
> > modify the vm's metadata in its ovf,
> > as you can see this option is more complicated and requires deeper
> > understanding and altering of the metadata...
> > finally you'll need to import the vm back.
> >
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> From: "Rocky" 
> >> To: "Yeela Kaplan" 
> >> Cc: Users@ovirt.org
> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2013 11:30:00 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [Users] Best practice to resize a WM disk image
> >>
> >> Its just a theoretical question as I think the issue will come for us
> >> and other users.
> >>
> >> I think there can be one or more snapshots in the WM over the time.
> >> But
> >> if that is an issue we can always collapse them I think.
> >> If its a base image it should be RAW, right?
> >> In this case its on file storage (NFS).
> >>
> >> Regards //Ricky
> >>
> >> On 2013-01-08 10:07, Yeela Kaplan wrote:
> >> > Hi Ricky,
> >> > In order to give you a detailed answer I need additional details
> >> > regarding the disk:
> >> > - Is the disk image composed as a chain of volumes or just a base
> >> > volume?
> >> > (if it's a chain it will be more complicated, you might want to
> >> > collapse the chain first to make it easier).
> >> > - Is the disk image raw? (you can use qemu-img info to check)
> >> > - Is the disk image on block or file storage?
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> > Yeela
> >> >
> >> > - Original Message -
> >> >> From: "Ricky" 
> >> >> To: Users@ovirt.org
> >> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2013 10:40:27 AM
> >> >> Subject: [Users] Best practice to resize a WM disk image
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> If I have a VM that has run out of disk space, how can I increase
> >> >> the
> >> >> space in best way? One way is to add a second bigger disk to the
> >> >> WM
> >> >> and then use dd or similar to copy. But is it possible to stretch
> >> >> the
> >> >> original disk inside or outside oVirt and get oVirt to know the
> >> >> bigger
> >> >> size?
> >> >>
> >> >> Regards //Ricky
> >> >> ___
> >> >> Users mailing list
> >> >> Users@ovirt.org
> >> >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> > ___
> > Users mailing list
> > Users@ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Users mailing list
> > Users@ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
>
> Sorry for this a bit "off topic" but I've been "resizing" my VM just
> by adding new disks to the VM and then using the LVM tool or just
> adding it to fstab.
> I know that it's not a true resizing but it has been a good solution
> for me. Once a Oracle DB (a XE used for tests:-)) went down because my
> disk went full (it was 8GB) and I added a new disk, moved the dbf to
> this new disk and restarted Oracle, without having to reboot the VM.
>
> Alex
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] "ataX: resetting link" problem with ovirt 3.1 on Fedora Core 17

2013-01-04 Thread Marcelo Barbosa
Yuval,

   Probably Your problem this with version kernel, this version not
compatible with some VDSM version, i recommend alter this is version kernel
of hosts and reboot. If do not know alter, follow the steps below:

Verifie yours vmlinuz's images:

   [root@firehome boot]# ls -l /boot/vmlinuz-3.*
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 4662160 Mai  7  2012
/boot/vmlinuz-3.3.4-5.fc17.x86_64
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root 4839872 Dez 11 16:11
/boot/vmlinuz-3.6.10-2.fc17.x86_64
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root 4839776 Dez  4 11:30
/boot/vmlinuz-3.6.9-2.fc17.x86_64

   Alter your configuration in container "menuentry..." for kernel version
3.3.4*, example:

   [root@firehome ~]# vim /boot/grub2/grub.cfg

   ### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/10_linux ###
   menuentry 'Fedora Linux' --class fedora --class gnu-linux --class gnu
--class os $menuentry_id_option
'gnulinux-simple-f23745bb-fd60-43b7-ac0f-6600ba582ad7' {
load_video
set gfxpayload=keep
insmod gzio
insmod part_msdos
insmod ext2
set root='hd0,msdos1'
if [ x$feature_platform_search_hint = xy ]; then
  search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root --hint-bios=hd0,msdos1
--hint-efi=hd0,msdos1 --hint-baremetal=ahci0,msdos1 --hint='hd0,msdos1'
 508a2fe6-6263-4521-bf7d-83363b71edfd
else
  search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root
508a2fe6-6263-4521-bf7d-83363b71edfd
fi
echo'Loading Linux 3.3.4-5.fc17.x86_64 ...'
linux   /vmlinuz-3.3.4-5.fc17.x86_64
root=/dev/mapper/vg_ovirt00-lv_root ro rd.lvm.lv=vg_ovirt00/lv_root rd.md=0
rd.dm=0 SYSFONT=True  KEYTABLE=us rd.luks=0 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
rd.lvm.lv=vg_ovirt00/lv_swap
rd.lvm.lv=vg_ovirt/lv_swap rhgb quiet
echo'Loading initial ramdisk ...'


   After reboot your host, check:

[root@firehome ~]# uname -a

   Test your storage use, I believe it will be alright.

PS: Get your version this VDSM package, example:

[root@firehome boot]# rpm -qa | grep vdsm
vdsm-python-4.10.0-10.fc17.x86_64
vdsm-bootstrap-4.10.0-10.fc17.noarch
vdsm-xmlrpc-4.10.0-10.fc17.noarch
vdsm-cli-4.10.0-10.fc17.noarch
vdsm-4.10.0-10.fc17.x86_64


Marcelo Barbosa
*mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com*


On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Yuval M  wrote:

> uname -a output:
>
> Linux segfault.home 3.6.5-1.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Oct 31 19:37:18 UTC
> 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> and the other host:
>
> Linux kernelpanic.home 3.6.8-2.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Nov 27 19:35:02 UTC
> 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> if there is any other diagnostic information required I will happily
> supply it, just tell me what...
>
>
> Yuval
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Marcelo Barbosa <
> mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Yuval,
>>
>>What is kernel version ? The oVirt stable version(3.1) run better
>> from:
>>
>>[admin@firehome ~]$ uname -a
>> Linux firehome.no-ip.org *3.3.4-5*.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon May 7 17:29:34
>> UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64GNU/Linux
>>
>> Marcelo Barbosa
>> *mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com*
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Yuval M  wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> We're M.Sc students at Tel-Aviv University trying to setup a basic ovirt
>>> system with 2 hosts.
>>> Both run Fedora Core 17.
>>>
>>> We've run unto a problem that makes the hosts seem down from the web
>>> management UI and stops the VMs that run on them.
>>> this occurs on both hosts at the very same second, which leads me to
>>> believe it's not a hardware problem:
>>> ("segfault" is the name of the server. don't ask.)
>>>
>>> Has anyone seen something like this?
>>> any suggestions?
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Yuval Meir
>>> Limor Gavish
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403596.851539] NFS: Cache request
>>> denied due to non-unique superblock keys
>>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403596.930361] ata1: hard resetting
>>> link
>>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.237778] ata1: SATA link down
>>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.239721] ata1: EH complete
>>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.241759] ata2: hard resetting
>>> link
>>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.548726] ata2: SATA link up 6.0
>>> Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
>>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.559061] ata2.00: configured for
>>> UDMA/133
>>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.559066] ata2: EH complete
>>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: 

Re: [Users] "ataX: resetting link" problem with ovirt 3.1 on Fedora Core 17

2013-01-04 Thread Marcelo Barbosa
Hi Yuval,

   What is kernel version ? The oVirt stable version(3.1) run better from:

   [admin@firehome ~]$ uname -a
Linux firehome.no-ip.org *3.3.4-5*.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon May 7 17:29:34
UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64GNU/Linux

Marcelo Barbosa
*mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com*


On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Yuval M  wrote:

> Hello,
> We're M.Sc students at Tel-Aviv University trying to setup a basic ovirt
> system with 2 hosts.
> Both run Fedora Core 17.
>
> We've run unto a problem that makes the hosts seem down from the web
> management UI and stops the VMs that run on them.
> this occurs on both hosts at the very same second, which leads me to
> believe it's not a hardware problem:
> ("segfault" is the name of the server. don't ask.)
>
> Has anyone seen something like this?
> any suggestions?
> Thanks,
>
> Yuval Meir
> Limor Gavish
>
>
>
> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403596.851539] NFS: Cache request denied
> due to non-unique superblock keys
> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403596.930361] ata1: hard resetting link
> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.237778] ata1: SATA link down
> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.239721] ata1: EH complete
> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.241759] ata2: hard resetting link
> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.548726] ata2: SATA link up 6.0
> Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.559061] ata2.00: configured for
> UDMA/133
> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.559066] ata2: EH complete
> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.559279] ata3: hard resetting link
> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403597.866689] ata3: SATA link down
> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403597.868680] ata3: EH complete
> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403597.868928] ata4: hard resetting link
> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.176588] ata4: SATA link down
> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.178470] ata4: EH complete
> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.178707] ata5: hard resetting link
> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.485535] ata5: SATA link down
> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.487472] ata5: EH complete
> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.487656] ata6: hard resetting link
> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403598.795437] ata6: SATA link down
> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403598.797325] ata6: EH complete
> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403598.797583] ata7: hard resetting link
> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.105616] ata7: SATA link down
> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.107307] ata7: EH complete
> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.109318] ata8: hard resetting link
> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.416217] ata8: SATA link up 1.5
> Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.416650] ata8.00: configured for
> UDMA/66
> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.416769] ata8: EH complete
> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.416922] ata9: hard resetting link
> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403599.722240] ata9: SATA link down
> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403599.722256] ata9: EH complete
> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403599.722545] ata10: hard resetting link
> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403600.027130] ata10: SATA link down
> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403600.027234] ata10: EH complete
> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403600.027483] ata11.00: hard resetting
> link
> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403600.331952] ata11.01: hard resetting
> link
> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.787975] ata11.00: SATA link up
> 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.787989] ata11.01: SATA link down
> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.829480] ata11.00: configured for
> UDMA/133
> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.829487] ata11: EH complete
> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.829638] ata12.00: hard resetting
> link
> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.133734] ata12.01: hard resetting
> link
> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.589741] ata12.00: SATA link up
> 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.589757] ata12.01: SATA link up
> 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.600049] ata12.00: configured for
> UDMA/133
> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.60] ata12.01: config

Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?

2013-01-04 Thread Marcelo Barbosa
René,

   Thanks for return, i go test your solution and realy wish feedback this
about it.

:)

Marcelo Barbosa
*mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com*


On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:42 PM, René Koch (ovido)  wrote:

> Hi Marcelo,
>
> Regarding your 6. point:
>
> I wrote a plugin for Icinga/Nagios to check RHEV 3.0 environment using
> REST-API. At the moment there are 2 bugs (1 fixed in latest svn trunk, 1
> open) to fully work with RHEV 3.1 (and properly oVirt 3.1):
>
> https://labs.ovido.at/monitoring/wiki/check_rhev3
>
> It would be great if you could test it with oVirt and give me some
> feedback :)
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> DI (FH) René Koch
> Senior Solution Architect
>
> 
> ovido gmbh - "Das Linux Systemhaus"
> Brünner Straße 163, A-1210 Wien
>
> Phone:   +43 720 / 530 670
> Mobile:  +43 660 / 512 21 31
> E-Mail:  r.k...@ovido.at
> ====
>
>
> On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 11:46 -0200, Marcelo Barbosa wrote:
> > Dear Itamar,
> >
> >
> >My dreams for oVirt 3.2:
> >
> >
> >1) Packages CentOs 6.x (ovirt-engine, ovirt-guest-agent);
> >2) Resize VM disk from GUI ovirt-engine;
> >3) Spice for Google Chrome, this browser run in anywere O.S. and
> > largest world use;
> >4) Show in Virtual Machines > General > ip/ip's from vm OR Virtual
> > Machines > Network Interfaces > show ip;
> >5) ISO upload from GUI ovirt-engine the best option;
> >6) Monitoring enviroment oVirt to Zabbix and Nagios(total vms, mem
> > clusters, and more...) example:
> > https://github.com/dougsland/nagios-plugins-rhev
> >
> >
> >I think this would oVirt the project to another level, much
> > higher ...
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Marcelo Barbosa
> > mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Soeren Grunewald
> >  wrote:
> > On 01/03/2013 07:04 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> > On 01/03/2013 07:25 PM, Soeren Grunewald wrote:
> > On 01/03/2013 05:33 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> > On 01/03/2013 06:28 PM, Soeren
> > Grunewald wrote:
> > On 01/03/2013 05:08 PM, Itamar
> > Heim wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > as we wrap oVirt 3.2,
> > I wanted to check with
> > oVirt users on what
> > they
> > find good/useful in
> > oVirt, and what they
> > would like to see
> > improved/added in
> > coming versions?
> >
> > A nice feature would be to be
> > able to migrate guests between
> > AMD and
> > Intel host machines.
> > KVM should be able to support
> > it [1]. I don't know if other
> > hypervisors
> > are able/can to support this.
> > Because oVirt aims to support
> > different
> > hypervisors it might be
> > problematic. But I think
> > offline migration
> > should be possible.
> >
> > can you please elaborate what do you
> > mean by offline migration?
> >
> >
> > With offline  migration, I means the guest is
> > not running while moving
> > it from one host to another.
> >
> > I have 2 host machines for testing. One is
> > running on a AMD Opteron and
> > 

Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?

2013-01-04 Thread Marcelo Barbosa
Dear Itamar,

   My dreams for oVirt 3.2:

   1) Packages CentOs 6.x (ovirt-engine, ovirt-guest-agent);
   2) Resize VM disk from GUI ovirt-engine;
   3) Spice for Google Chrome, this browser run in anywere O.S. and largest
world use;
   4) Show in Virtual Machines > General > ip/ip's from vm OR Virtual
Machines > Network Interfaces > show ip;
   5) ISO upload from GUI ovirt-engine the best option;
   6) Monitoring enviroment oVirt to Zabbix and Nagios(total vms, mem
clusters, and more...) example:
https://github.com/dougsland/nagios-plugins-rhev

   I think this would oVirt the project to another level, much higher ...

Thanks.

Marcelo Barbosa
*mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com*


On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Soeren Grunewald <
soeren.grunew...@avionic-design.de> wrote:

> On 01/03/2013 07:04 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>
>> On 01/03/2013 07:25 PM, Soeren Grunewald wrote:
>>
>>> On 01/03/2013 05:33 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 01/03/2013 06:28 PM, Soeren Grunewald wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 01/03/2013 05:08 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they
>>>>>> find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see
>>>>>> improved/added in coming versions?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A nice feature would be to be able to migrate guests between AMD and
>>>>> Intel host machines.
>>>>> KVM should be able to support it [1]. I don't know if other hypervisors
>>>>> are able/can to support this. Because oVirt aims to support different
>>>>> hypervisors it might be problematic. But I think offline migration
>>>>> should be possible.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> can you please elaborate what do you mean by offline migration?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> With offline  migration, I means the guest is not running while moving
>>> it from one host to another.
>>>
>>> I have 2 host machines for testing. One is running on a AMD Opteron and
>>> the other Intel Xeon. Since I can not put both machines in the same
>>> cluster, I have specified a cluster called AMD (for the opteron) and
>>> another called Intel (for the xeon).
>>> Now I would like to move a guest from the AMD machine to the Intel
>>> machine. Since the CPU does not match I can't.
>>>
>>
>> I'm not aware that you can't.
>>
>
> Ok, now is see my problem.
>
>
>  you should be able to move the VM from one cluster to the other.
>> yes, it will see a different cpu model. why is that an issue?
>>
>>
> To move the guest I need to "edit" the guest and than I can change the
> cluster.
>
> Thanks,
> Soeren
>
>
>
>>
>>> I assume the solution for this could be a generic cluster definition.
>>> Something with a limited/specific cpu set equal to the qemu
>>> configuration "-cpu qemu32" or "-cpu qemu64".
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Soeren
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> __**_
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/**mailman/listinfo/users<http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] Package from CentOs 6.3

2012-12-20 Thread Marcelo Barbosa
Sorry,

   I meant ovirt-guest-agent instead of "nome-pacote", thnkz.

Marcelo Barbosa
+55 51 8414 6309
*mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com*


On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Marcelo Barbosa <
mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> I woud like to know where can I download nome-pacote rpm for Centos.
> Does anybody can help me?
>
> Thanks
>
> Marcelo Barbosa
> +55 51 8414 6309
> *mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com*
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[Users] Package from CentOs 6.3

2012-12-20 Thread Marcelo Barbosa
Hi guys,

I woud like to know where can I download nome-pacote rpm for Centos.
Does anybody can help me?

Thanks

Marcelo Barbosa
+55 51 8414 6309
*mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com*
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users