Re: [Users] oVirt 3.4 pre-release and GlusterFS support (F19)

2014-02-20 Thread Gianluca Cecchi
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Brad House wrote:
>
>> The question is  is this expected behavior, and if so, is it because
>> of the hosted engine?  Or is this some form of regression from the
>> advertised feature list of oVirt 3.3?  Anything I should try or look at?
>> I'm obviously concerned about the FUSE overhead with Gluster and would
>> like to avoid that if possible.
>
>
> See this thread I started and the answers.
> HIH understanding better,
> Gianluca

Missed the thread link ;-)

http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2014-January/019797.html
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] oVirt 3.4 pre-release and GlusterFS support (F19)

2014-02-20 Thread Gianluca Cecchi
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Brad House wrote:

> The question is  is this expected behavior, and if so, is it because
> of the hosted engine?  Or is this some form of regression from the
> advertised feature list of oVirt 3.3?  Anything I should try or look at?
> I'm obviously concerned about the FUSE overhead with Gluster and would
> like to avoid that if possible.


See this thread I started and the answers.
HIH understanding better,
Gianluca
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[Users] oVirt 3.4 pre-release and GlusterFS support (F19)

2014-02-20 Thread Brad House

I've been testing the 3.4 prerelease on Fedora 19.  When I create a GlusterFS
(not POSIXFS) storage group and create a VM with a disk image on the storage
group, I see a POSIX mount created on the host.  Upon further investigation,
when evaluating the executed qemu command line, it doesn't appear qemu is
being told to use libgfapi but rather that previously observed POSIX mount.

One other note, I'm specifically testing the hosted engine, and haven't
tested using the non-hosted variant.

The question is  is this expected behavior, and if so, is it because
of the hosted engine?  Or is this some form of regression from the
advertised feature list of oVirt 3.3?  Anything I should try or look at?
I'm obviously concerned about the FUSE overhead with Gluster and would
like to avoid that if possible.

Thanks!
-Brad
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users