[SOGo] Update to 1.3.9 on Centos5

2011-10-30 Thread Christian Naumer

After the Upgrade to 1.3.9 I get the following Error in sogolog:

Oct 30 08:22:44 sogod [11571]: [ERROR] 0x0xa38050c[GCSFolder]
-[GCSFolder fetchFields:fetchSpecification:ignoreDeleted:]: cannot
execute quick-fetch SQL 'SELECT b.c_name,a.c_deleted FROM
sogocn00122006b17_quick a, sogocn00122006b17 b WHERE ((c_lastmodified 
1319959275) AND (c_deleted = 1)) AND a.c_name = b.c_name':
MySQL4Exception: 0xa39c5d4 NAME:ExecutionFailed REASON:Unknown column
'a.c_deleted' in 'field list'
10.9.0.245 - - [30/Oct/2011:08:22:44 GMT] REPORT
/SOGo/dav/cn/Calendar/C4BCF5D8-79F0-0001-57A4-1D2015606F10/ HTTP/1.1
207 125/245 0.013 - - 0
Oct 30 08:22:44 sogod [11571]: [ERROR] 0x0xa24d6b4[GCSFolder]
-[GCSFolder fetchFields:fetchSpecification:ignoreDeleted:]: cannot
execute quick-fetch SQL 'SELECT
b.c_name,b.c_component,a.c_creationdate,a.c_lastmodified,a.c_version,a.c_content
FROM sogocn0012cd4916b_quick a, sogocn0012cd4916b b WHERE
(c_lastmodified  1319959275) AND a.c_name = b.c_name AND (c_deleted !=
1 OR c_deleted IS NULL)': MySQL4Exception: 0xa3d80e4
NAME:ExecutionFailed REASON:Unknown column 'b.c_component' in 'field list'

All calendar content is not displayed in TB or te webinterface.
I had to do a link to gnustep base 1.20 in order to get sogo running as
described in a previous post. Could that be a problem?
This does not happen on a Centos6 with PGSQL.


Thanks

Christian


-- 
Dr. Christian Naumer
Senior Scientist Analytics  Engineering

B.R.A.I.N Aktiengesellschaft
Darmstaedter Str. 34-36, D-64673 Zwingenberg
e-mail c...@brain-biotech.de, homepage www.brain-biotech.de
fon +49-6251-9331-30  /   fax +49-6251-9331-11

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Zwingenberg/Bergstrasse
Registergericht AG Darmstadt, HRB 24758
Vorstand: Dr. Holger Zinke (Vorsitz), Dr. Jürgen Eck
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Ulrich Putsch
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Update to 1.3.9 on Centos5

2011-10-30 Thread Christian Naumer

Am 30.10.2011 08:29, schrieb Christian Naumer:
 
 
 After the Upgrade to 1.3.9 I get the following Error in sogolog:
 
 Oct 30 08:22:44 sogod [11571]: [ERROR] 0x0xa38050c[GCSFolder]
 -[GCSFolder fetchFields:fetchSpecification:ignoreDeleted:]: cannot
 execute quick-fetch SQL 'SELECT b.c_name,a.c_deleted FROM
 sogocn00122006b17_quick a, sogocn00122006b17 b WHERE ((c_lastmodified 
 1319959275) AND (c_deleted = 1)) AND a.c_name = b.c_name':
 MySQL4Exception: 0xa39c5d4 NAME:ExecutionFailed REASON:Unknown column
 'a.c_deleted' in 'field list'
 10.9.0.245 - - [30/Oct/2011:08:22:44 GMT] REPORT
 /SOGo/dav/cn/Calendar/C4BCF5D8-79F0-0001-57A4-1D2015606F10/ HTTP/1.1
 207 125/245 0.013 - - 0
 Oct 30 08:22:44 sogod [11571]: [ERROR] 0x0xa24d6b4[GCSFolder]
 -[GCSFolder fetchFields:fetchSpecification:ignoreDeleted:]: cannot
 execute quick-fetch SQL 'SELECT
 b.c_name,b.c_component,a.c_creationdate,a.c_lastmodified,a.c_version,a.c_content
 FROM sogocn0012cd4916b_quick a, sogocn0012cd4916b b WHERE
 (c_lastmodified  1319959275) AND a.c_name = b.c_name AND (c_deleted !=
 1 OR c_deleted IS NULL)': MySQL4Exception: 0xa3d80e4
 NAME:ExecutionFailed REASON:Unknown column 'b.c_component' in 'field list'

There are some others as well for
a.c_deleted
b.c_component

but there are only c_component fields in the table and no fields with
deleted in there. But this is the same in the working system on Centos6

Anny ideas?




-- 
Dr. Christian Naumer
Senior Scientist Analytics  Engineering

B.R.A.I.N Aktiengesellschaft
Darmstaedter Str. 34-36, D-64673 Zwingenberg
e-mail c...@brain-biotech.de, homepage www.brain-biotech.de
fon +49-6251-9331-30  /   fax +49-6251-9331-11

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Zwingenberg/Bergstrasse
Registergericht AG Darmstadt, HRB 24758
Vorstand: Dr. Holger Zinke (Vorsitz), Dr. Jürgen Eck
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Ulrich Putsch
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Update to 1.3.9 on Centos5

2011-10-30 Thread Christian Naumer

Am 30.10.2011 09:53, schrieb Christian Naumer:
 
 

 There are some others as well for
 a.c_deleted
 b.c_component
 
 but there are only c_component fields in the table and no fields with
 deleted in there. But this is the same in the working system on Centos6

I have to correct this the c_deleted field is not in the quick-table but
in the normal table. So all fields are there it just doesn't find them...




-- 
Dr. Christian Naumer
Senior Scientist Analytics  Engineering

B.R.A.I.N Aktiengesellschaft
Darmstaedter Str. 34-36, D-64673 Zwingenberg
e-mail c...@brain-biotech.de, homepage www.brain-biotech.de
fon +49-6251-9331-30  /   fax +49-6251-9331-11

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Zwingenberg/Bergstrasse
Registergericht AG Darmstadt, HRB 24758
Vorstand: Dr. Holger Zinke (Vorsitz), Dr. Jürgen Eck
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Ulrich Putsch
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] SOGo 1.3.9 Update results

2011-10-30 Thread Dominique

Hi,

SOGo and SOPE upgrade jointly under Ubuntu package release. Should I and 
Is there a way to reupgrade SOPE only ?


Dominique

On 30/10/2011 00:25, Tobias Wallura wrote:

3. The preferences windows does not close properly, and gives an error
regarding a proxy
Proxy Error
The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
The proxy server could not handle the request /POST
/SOGo/so/dcouot/preferences
http://www.solipym.com/SOGo/so/dcouot/preferences/.
Reason: *Error reading from remote server*

I had the exact same problem. Updating SOGo and SOPE to the 1.3.9
version released on 29-Oct-2011 14:37 solved the problem for me.


--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Update to 1.3.9 on Centos5

2011-10-30 Thread Martin (Lists)
Am Sonntag, 30. Oktober 2011 schrieb Christian Naumer:
 Am 30.10.2011 09:53, schrieb Christian Naumer:
  There are some others as well for
  a.c_deleted
  b.c_component
  
  but there are only c_component fields in the table and no fields
  with deleted in there. But this is the same in the working
  system on Centos6
 
 I have to correct this the c_deleted field is not in the
 quick-table but in the normal table. So all fields are there it
 just doesn't find them...

I have similar problems after update. There is no entry in my calendar 
view. I checked the SQL statements in the error log file.

SELECT 
b.c_name,a.c_content,a.c_creationdate,a.c_lastmodified,a.c_version,b.c_component,b.c_title,b.c_location,b.c_orgmail,b.c_status,b.c_category,b.c_classification,b.c_isallday,b.c_isopaque,b.c_participants,b.c_partmails,b.c_partstates,b.c_sequence,b.c_priority,b.c_cycleinfo,b.c_iscycle,b.c_nextalarm,b.c_uid,b.c_startdate,b.c_enddate
 
FROM sogo0017042270b_quick a, sogo0017042270b b WHERE ((c_component = 
'vevent') AND ((c_startdate IS NULL) OR (c_startdate = 1320620399)) 
AND ((c_enddate IS NULL) OR (c_enddate = 1316988000)) AND (c_iscycle 
= 0)) AND a.c_name = b.c_name AND (c_deleted != 1 OR c_deleted IS 
NULL)

And if I change the table names ('b' for the _quick table and 'a' for 
the normal one) it went through smoothly.

Besides this sogod tries to load libgnustep-base.so.1.23 and 
libgnustep-base.so.1.20. The command 'ldd /usr/sbin/sogod | grep base' 
reports:

libgnustep-base.so.1.23 = /usr/lib/libgnustep-base.so.1.23 
(0x047ae000)
libgnustep-base.so.1.20 = not found
libgnustep-base.so.1.20 = not found

This is CentOS 5.7 and SOGo is from package sogo-1.3.9-2.el5. Database 
is MySQL.

Martin
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Update to 1.3.9 on Centos5

2011-10-30 Thread jb
Same problem on SL6.1: sogo seems to attempt fetching fields from the quick
tables that are really in the full tables:

Oct 30 12:46:27 sogod [5457]: [ERROR] 0x0x2d063b8[GCSFolder] -[GCSFolder
fetchFields:fetchSpecification:ignoreDeleted:]: cannot execute quick-fetch SQL
'SELECT b.c_name,a.c_deleted FROM sogojeroen0017efda6cd_quick a,
sogojeroen0017efda6cd b WHERE ((c_lastmodified  1319971586) AND (c_deleted =
1)) AND a.c_name = b.c_name': MySQL4Exception: 0x2cd7e88 NAME:ExecutionFailed
REASON:Unknown column 'a.c_deleted' in 'field list'

Oct 30 12:56:56 sogod [5457]: [ERROR] 0x0x3002298[GCSFolder] -[GCSFolder
fetchFields:fetchSpecification:ignoreDeleted:]: cannot execute quick-fetch SQL
'SELECT
b.c_name,a.c_version,a.c_creationdate,a.c_lastmodified,b.c_component,a.c_content
FROM sogojeroen0025938e41e_quick a, sogojeroen0025938e41e b WHERE (a.c_name =
'1EAEDAD0-78A55DFA-075ECFBC.vcf') AND a.c_name = b.c_name AND (c_deleted != 1
OR c_deleted IS NULL)': MySQL4Exception: 0x305ec58 NAME:ExecutionFailed
REASON:Unknown column 'a.c_version' in 'field list'
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Update to 1.3.9 on Centos5

2011-10-30 Thread Ludovic Marcotte

On 30/10/11 07:03, Martin (Lists) wrote:

And if I change the table names ('b' for the _quick table and 'a' for
the normal one) it went through smoothly.

Besides this sogod tries to load libgnustep-base.so.1.23 and
libgnustep-base.so.1.20. The command 'ldd /usr/sbin/sogod | grep base'
reports:

libgnustep-base.so.1.23 =  /usr/lib/libgnustep-base.so.1.23
(0x047ae000)
libgnustep-base.so.1.20 =  not found
libgnustep-base.so.1.20 =  not found

This is CentOS 5.7 and SOGo is from package sogo-1.3.9-2.el5. Database
is MySQL.
That's probably a sign of having old SOPE packages around after 
proceeding with the SOGo update. Make sure you update all SOPE packages 
to the latest version and restart the SOGo service after.


--
Ludovic Marcotte
lmarco...@inverse.ca  ::  +1.514.755.3630  ::  www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(www.packetfence.org)

--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Update to 1.3.9 on Centos5

2011-10-30 Thread Martin (Lists)
Am Sonntag, 30. Oktober 2011 schrieb Ludovic Marcotte:
 On 30/10/11 07:03, Martin (Lists) wrote:
  And if I change the table names ('b' for the _quick table and 'a'
  for the normal one) it went through smoothly.
  
  Besides this sogod tries to load libgnustep-base.so.1.23 and
  libgnustep-base.so.1.20. The command 'ldd /usr/sbin/sogod | grep
  base' reports:
  
  libgnustep-base.so.1.23 =  /usr/lib/libgnustep-base.so.1.23
  (0x047ae000)
  libgnustep-base.so.1.20 =  not found
  libgnustep-base.so.1.20 =  not found
  
  This is CentOS 5.7 and SOGo is from package sogo-1.3.9-2.el5.
  Database is MySQL.
 
 That's probably a sign of having old SOPE packages around after
 proceeding with the SOGo update. Make sure you update all SOPE
 packages to the latest version and restart the SOGo service after.

Ah, thanks

That did the trick. I had old sope file lying around. Sadly these were 
not updated automatically by yum update (why?). I had to remove the 
following packages by hand:
- sope49-gdl1-contentstore
- sope49-ical
- sope49-cards

This remove sogo as well (dependency). After install sogo again I got 
new sope-card and sope-gdl1-contentstore files. Old versions were 
1.3_20110726 (ical was even older: 4.9-20100721). new Versions are 
1.3.9-2 so they match the one from sogo package. sope-ial seems no 
longer be needed.

Once again, many thanks to you working at SOGo, it is a awesome piece 
of software.

Martin
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


[SOGo] Re: sogo-1.3.9-2 update problems

2011-10-30 Thread Peter Peltonen
Hi,

On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:53 AM, Peter Peltonen
peter.pelto...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 Just ran 'yum update' on my centos6 box and SOGo was updated to version 
 1.3.9-2.

 When accessing my server with the address /SOGo/ I get now no graphics
 displayed in the login page.

 In the sogo.log file I see the errors:

 [Sun Oct 30 00:46:03 2011] [error] [client ::1] File does not exist:
 /usr/GNUstep/System/Library/SOGo/WebServerResources, referer:
 http://localhost/SOGo/

 Looking at the output of locate WebServerResources I think on
 centos6 the correct directory should be:
 /usr/lib/GNUstep/SOGo/WebServerResources ?

So... Is this a bug in the updated package or have I somehow managed
to misconfigure my server?

This is my first installation and the packages were updated by yum in
the middle of the installation process.

Maybe I should remove the packages and start all over again?

Best,
Peter
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Re: sogo-1.3.9-2 update problems

2011-10-30 Thread Ludovic Marcotte

On 30/10/11 10:10, Peter Peltonen wrote:

So... Is this a bug in the updated package or have I somehow managed
to misconfigure my server?

This is my first installation and the packages were updated by yum in
the middle of the installation process.

Maybe I should remove the packages and start all over again?

Adjust your SOGo.conf Apache configuration file accordingly.

Regards,

--
Ludovic Marcotte
lmarco...@inverse.ca  ::  +1.514.755.3630  ::  www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(www.packetfence.org)

--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Update to 1.3.9 on Centos5

2011-10-30 Thread Jeroen Beerstra
Same here, thank you for the quick solution! My sope packages were less
outdated but still outdated. I think the problem yum wise was this: new
version is 1.3.9-2, old version had a higher number so yum considered it
newer.

-- 
met vriendelijke groet,

Jeroen Beerstra
j.beers...@upcmail.nl




-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Re: sogo-1.3.9-2 update problems

2011-10-30 Thread Peter Peltonen
Hi,

On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca wrote:
 On 30/10/11 10:10, Peter Peltonen wrote:

 So... Is this a bug in the updated package or have I somehow managed
 to misconfigure my server?

 This is my first installation and the packages were updated by yum in
 the middle of the installation process.

 Maybe I should remove the packages and start all over again?

 Adjust your SOGo.conf Apache configuration file accordingly.

Thanks for the tip: I found out that the yum update had created a
.rpmnew file for the Apache config. Using that file as the template
for my own configuration I was able to get the SOGo web UI working and
logging in the first time :)

Best,
Peter
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


[SOGo] warning in the sogo log files

2011-10-30 Thread Peter Peltonen
Hi,

I've now got my first SOGo installation finally working with
PostgreSQL and remote Dovecot IMAP server. When I login using the web
UI I see the following warnings in /var/log/sogo/sogo.log :

Oct 30 21:41:57 sogod [29911]: [WARN]
0x0x8a76f0c[SOGoWebDAVAclManager] entry '{DAV:}write' already exists
in DAV permissions table
Oct 30 21:41:57 sogod [29911]: [WARN]
0x0x8a76f0c[SOGoWebDAVAclManager] entry '{DAV:}write-properties'
already exists in DAV permissions table
Oct 30 21:41:57 sogod [29911]: [WARN]
0x0x8a76f0c[SOGoWebDAVAclManager] entry '{DAV:}write-content'
already exists in DAV permissions table
2011-10-30 21:41:58.373 sogod[29911] WARNING: IMAP4 connection pooling
is disabled!
2011-10-30 21:42:20.172 sogod[29911] WARNING(-[NSNull(misc) length]):
called NSNull -length (returns 0) !!!

The last one appears when I use the calendar and it seems to repeated
quite many times. Are these errors something I should be considered
about?

Regards,
Peter
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


[SOGo] PostgreSQL gotchas

2011-10-30 Thread Peter Peltonen
Hi,

For other people trying to install SOGo using PostgreSQL
authentication on CentOS6 here are a few gotchas I encountered:

1) By default PostgreSQL is not accepting TCP/IP connections. You can
enable this by adding

PGOPTS=-i

to /etc/sysconfig/pgsql/postgresql  and restarting the postgresql service

2) If you are running PostgreSQL on localhost using IPv4, use IP
address 127.0.0.1 and not name localhost in .GNUstepDefaults
configuration, as localhost is interpreted as an IPv6 address for
the PostgreSQL URLs. The other option could be to allow IPv6
connections in pg_hba.conf by specifying:

host sogo sogo ::1/128 md5

Hope this helps others trying to setup SOGo with PostgreSQL.

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


[SOGo] BTS activities for Sunday, October 30 2011

2011-10-30 Thread SOGo reporter
Title: BTS activities for Sunday, October 30 2011





  
BTS Activities

  Home page: http://www.sogo.nu/bugs
  Project: SOGo
  For the period covering: Sunday, October 30 2011

  
  
idlast updatestatus (resolution)categorysummary
	
	
	  
	
1471
	2011-10-30 20:32:26
	updated (open)
	Backend Calendar
	Resources auto-accept invitations even with conflicts with recurring events
	
	  
	
1453
	2011-10-30 15:49:34
	updated (open)
	with SOGo
	Wrong synchronization by using sogo-connector-3.106pre1
	
	  
	
1458
	2011-10-30 20:33:10
	closed (not a bug)
	Web Calendar
	SOGoCalendarDefaultRoles