[SOGo] BTS activities for Thursday, August 15 2013
Title: BTS activities for Thursday, August 15 2013 BTS Activities Home page: http://www.sogo.nu/bugs Project: SOGo For the period covering: Thursday, August 15 2013 idlast updatestatus (resolution)categorysummary 2392 2013-08-15 10:49:00 updated (open) Backend Calendar Cannot sync on Android using recommended CalDAV Sync 2328 2013-08-15 09:11:58 updated (open) GUI provide some visual feedback for sync 2393 2013-08-15 09:09:13 updated (open) with SOGo handle periodic sync
Re: [SOGo] Waiting for review for patch #0002311
On 2013-08-15 10:23 AM, Michel RENON wrote: I reported bug #2311 on 2013-05-09 and sent a patch on 2013-05-28. (http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=2311) But since, it seems there was no review. Can you tell me the state of my patch ? I have to confirm to a customer that it'll be integrated in a future version. We'll do and in-depth review your patches next week. I don't see any reason why they shouldn't be integrated. Thanks for your efforts! -- Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3630 :: http://inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://sogo.nu) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org) -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] config SOGoUserSources ldap bindPassword
hello The bindDn and the bindpasswoard are required if : 1) your LDAP doesn t accept anonymous request (you can add an ACL to accept anonymous request from the 127.0.0.1) in this case the DN should be found. 2) Tte DN must be searched if you have a multi level LDAP organisation (example with some ou or o ) in this case the auth make a first search to search the dn and after bind with this DN. Regards Alain Le Mardi 13 Août 2013 04:00 CEST, "(HT) Simon Walter" a écrit: On 08/13/2013 10:15 AM, (HT) Simon Walter wrote:> Is it possible to provide the hash value here? Would not that be safer> than storing the password in clear text?>> Any additional information into this parameter with regards to> security and how others are using it would be most welco me.>Perhaps, I'll end up answering my own question. Though I'd still like tobe sure that this is the case.If I use bindAsCurrentUser, it seems apparent that bindDN andbindPassword is not required. Is that the case? "If bindFields is set,bindDN and bindPassword will still be required to find the proper DN ofthe user." Does that mean if my LDAP schema is non-standard(objectClass:person(?)) that I'll have to use bindFields and therefore require abindDN? (I'm guessing uid and userPassword are what SOGo expects toexist by default.)Are there any other cases in which bindDN and bindPassword are required?Thanks,Simon--users@sogo.nuhttps://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] Patch for #0002328
Hi, I just added a small patch for bug #2328 : http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=2328 Is it ok ? -- Michel RENON www.mr-consultant.net/Blog -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] Patch for #0002393
Hi, A customer asked me to enhance Sogo Connector with periodic sync. So I created a report with my patch : http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=2393 I wrote it in a generic way, trying to create options instead of hard-coding behaviors. My customer expects an integration in a future version. Is it possible ? As it is a relatively big patch (functionality and code), I expect a strong review : I'm ready to answer all your questions and make every necessary change. Cheers, Michel Renon http://www.mr-consultant.net/blog -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] Waiting for review for patch #0002311
Hi, I reported bug #2311 on 2013-05-09 and sent a patch on 2013-05-28. (http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=2311) But since, it seems there was no review. Can you tell me the state of my patch ? I have to confirm to a customer that it'll be integrated in a future version. Cheers, -- Michel RENON www.mr-consultant.net/Blog -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] Outlook versions
Hi all, is Sogo compatible with Outlook 2013? Thank you. Ray Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you! -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Uncaught exception
On 2013-08-15 2:46 AM, Michael Volz wrote: thank you for your answer. That's kind of bad news. Do you mean SOGo 2.1 or OpenChange 2.1? SOGo v2.1 - look at our BTS for marked bugs for the release. Is there a schedule yet? I think it'll take 6 to 8 weeks before delivering that release. Is there a possibility that it would work with a more recent version of OpenChange compiled from source? Using the sources won't change anything. You could follow the bugs and eventually use a nightly build. Thanks, -- Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3630 :: http://inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://sogo.nu) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org) -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Uncaught exception
Hi Michael, I think the RPC over LAN and HTTP proxy over WAN. All authentication settings are same in both method. 2013-08-15 08:33 keltezéssel, Michael Volz írta: Hi Peter, thanks again. I also tried several times with that box checked. But I will try this again. In general: which connection settings are the preferred / most stable ones? RPC or http proxy? Which authentication for each? I systematically tried them all but couldn't recognize big differences. How is that in your long term experience? Regards Michael Am 14.08.2013 19:34, schrieb Szládovics Péter: Michael, Did you check the "Always prompt for user name and password" checkbox at Exchange settings? http://www.sogo.nu/files/docs/SOGo%20Native%20Microsoft%20Outlook%20Configuration.pdf Chapter 8 (Page 17) - Step 8 Please check it again. -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Uncaught exception
Hey Ludovic, thank you for your answer. That's kind of bad news. Do you mean SOGo 2.1 or OpenChange 2.1? Is there a schedule yet? I don't want to rush, but the information would help to judge if and when SOGo can be a sellable alternative to Exchange. Is there a possibility that it would work with a more recent version of OpenChange compiled from source? Currently I use the packages provided by inverse. I wasn't very successful with testing self compiled Samba/OpenChange so far but I can put more effort into making that work. And: Does this mean that my ocsmanager settings are correct / don't matter or can that still be at least part of the issue? Thanks to everyone helping and kind regards Michael Am 14.08.2013 19:32, schrieb Ludovic Marcotte: > On 2013-08-14 12:19 PM, Michael Volz wrote: >> I followed your hint an configured the permissions for the shared >> calendar with the web interface. It works fine there, I can read an >> write the shared calendars. But still it doesn't work in Outlook. > > It's most likely currently broken and needs to be worked on. We aim to > improve this considerably in the upcoming v2.1.0 release. > -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] SOGO hangs trying to connect to external imap-server
Just to keep the list updated, in case anyone ever runs into the same problem: It seems that the problem lies with the IMAP server, which responds to many IMAP commands only with the untagged response and seems to forget to return the tagged OK response. As this seems to violate RFC 3501, I do not think that this is something SOGo should be made to handle. -Marcel Am 08.07.2013 um 18:28 schrieb Marcel Waldvogel : > Can you run wireshark (tshark) on the SOGo server to see what the two talk > about and where they get stuck? > > -Marcel > > Am 05.07.2013 um 19:09 schrieb u...@rumlikon.ch: > >> didn't to the trick. >> >> I've tried with another external imap-server (courier) and it worked great. >> Only this stupid thing we use is not working. I think it's an exchange server >> behind it. >> >> :-( >> -- >> users@sogo.nu >> https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [SOGo] SOGo Sieve Question
Marco,
Marco Benecke schrieb (12.08.2013 14:57 Uhr):
it seems i found a sieve Issue, but i am not sure.
Maybe you could confirm this.
Version:
ii sogo 2.0.7-1
Settings:
:~# sogo-tool dump-defaults all|grep -i sieve
SOGoSieveScriptsEnabled = YES;
SOGoSieveServer = "sieve://198.19.219.18:4190";
I managed my Mails in Subfolders:
lists
|
+--- SOGo Users
|
+--- and so on
Now i try to set a sieve filter, with the WebInterface.
Result in the sogo.sieve:
if anyof (header :contains "List-Id" "users.sogo.nu", header :contains
"subject" "[SOGo]") {
fileinto "lists/SOGo";
}
LogMessage:
sieve: info: started log at Aug 12 11:27:20.
error: msgid=<...>: failed to store into mailbox 'lists/SOGo': Invalid
mailbox name.
sieve: info: started log at Aug 12 11:46:41.
error: msgid=<...>: failed to store into mailbox 'lists/SOGo': Invalid
mailbox name.
proper sieve rule:
if anyof (header :contains "List-Id" "users.sogo.nu", header :contains
"subject" "[SOGo]") {
fileinto "lists.SOGo";
}
Did i miss a configuration option or is this a small Bug.
My sieve filters (Cyrus IMAPd) start with "INXBOX" for folders in my
mailbox:
if header :contains "List-Id" "users.sogo.nu" {
fileinto "INBOX.sogo";
stop;
}
Do you really want to store the messages in a folder under top level
mailbox "lists"?
Does your file work with an upload by sieveshell directly to the sieve
server?
Marc
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Uncaught exception
2013-08-15 00:46 keltezéssel, Jean Raby írta: On 13-08-14 1:30 PM, Szládovics Péter wrote: 2013-08-14 19:18 keltezéssel, Ludovic Marcotte írta: On 2013-08-14 11:05 AM, Szládovics Péter wrote: As far as I excperienced - Thunderbird the one and only MUA for using the most features (with lot of extensions), but neither the sharing resources. Not sure what you mean here but if you install the SOGo Integrator extension in Thunderbird, you can do everything SOGo Web can do regarding calendar sharing from Thunderbird. Once I tried the integrator, but it didn't give username from me (just password) for authentication, and used the OS account. I use lot of mail accounts in one Thunderbird. Perhaps I was wrong, but I haven't tried it since that time. the integrator uses the username from the default mail account to authenticate against the sogo server. OK, in my system I use same account for the system and the first mail account. Anyway I think it is problem. If the integrator uses the default username of tb, then anybody cannot use two (or more) SOGo mailbox with one integrator at same time. It is the similar problem like Outlook vs. exchange accounts. Are you planning the extend this restriction (e.g. configurable username - not only the default)? -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Uncaught exception
Hi Peter, thanks again. I also tried several times with that box checked. But I will try this again. In general: which connection settings are the preferred / most stable ones? RPC or http proxy? Which authentication for each? I systematically tried them all but couldn't recognize big differences. How is that in your long term experience? Regards Michael Am 14.08.2013 19:34, schrieb Szládovics Péter: > Michael, > > Did you check the "Always prompt for user name and password" checkbox > at Exchange settings? > > http://www.sogo.nu/files/docs/SOGo%20Native%20Microsoft%20Outlook%20Configuration.pdf > Chapter 8 (Page 17) - Step 8 > > Please check it again. -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
