Re: [SOGo] Attachments for appointments
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 01:41:54PM +0200 you wrote: > See bug: > https://sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=1758 Ah, thank you. That provides me with strong ammunition to fight against the demand for attachments. ;-) Greetings -- R. Cirksena -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] WOWorkersCount
Hi, I am somewhat confused re. "WOWorkersCount" / "PREFORK". If I set PREFORK = 3 in /etc/default/sogo with WOWorkersCount = 60 in sogo.conf just 3 children of sogod are started. That remains on this number even if users begin to use sogod. The only result is lng time waiting for synchronization. If I set PREFORK higher (10) then performance remains o.k. until all workers are busy. Workers don't increase above PREFORK thus never reaches a value near WOWorkersCount. Something is wrong. Clarification needed. ;-) Greetings -- R. Cirksena -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Attachments for appointments
Section 4.1.3 states that attachments SHOULD be external. If they are internal ... Inline binary contact SHOULD only be used in applications whose special circumstances demand that an iCalendar object be expressed as a single entity. The following example specifies an "ATTACH" property with inline binary encoded content information: ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/basic;ENCODING=BASE64;VALUE=BINARY: MIICajCCAdOgAwIBAgICBEUwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwdzELMAkGA1U EBhMCVVMxLDAqBgNVBAoTI05ldHNjYXBlIENvbW11bmljYXRpb25zIE <...remainder of "BASE64" encoded binary data...> Fact of the matter is, people have been spoiled by Outlook, and it's just so much easier to attach meeting documents to the meeting invite. That's pretty much the only thing I'm missing from my Outlook days. Stephane *From:* Ralf Cirksena" (Ci) *Sent:* Monday, July 18, 2016 2:24AM *To:* Christian Mack *Subject:* Re: [SOGo] Attachments for appointments On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 01:41:54PM +0200 you wrote: See bug: https://sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=1758 Ah, thank you. That provides me with strong ammunition to fight against the demand for attachments. ;-) Greetings -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] WOWorkersCount
Hi Ralf, on Debian and derived distributions (and maybe other distributions with similar mechanics in the init scripts), the `WOWorkersCount` option is overwritten by `/etc/defaults/sogo`'s `PREFORK` option. So `WOWorkersCount` is not used at all. `PREFORK` is actually a little bit misleading here, as it is not a prefork value as for other server systems where additional processes to the ones in use are forked, but instead SOGo's `PREFORK` starts (and maintains) exactly this number of processes, no matter whether they're required (or sufficient). Regards, Jens Am 18.07.2016 um 13:34 schrieb Ralf Cirksena (c...@holmco.de): > Hi, > > I am somewhat confused re. "WOWorkersCount" / "PREFORK". > > If I set PREFORK = 3 in /etc/default/sogo with WOWorkersCount = 60 in > sogo.conf just 3 children of sogod are started. That remains on this > number even if users begin to use sogod. The only result is lng > time waiting for synchronization. > > If I set PREFORK higher (10) then performance remains o.k. until all > workers are busy. Workers don't increase above PREFORK thus never > reaches a value near WOWorkersCount. > > Something is wrong. Clarification needed. ;-) > > > Greetings > -- Jens Erat Universität Konstanz Kommunikations-, Infomations-, Medienzentrum (KIM) Abteilung Basisdienste D-78457 Konstanz Mail: jens.e...@uni-konstanz.de smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [SOGo] WOWorkersCount
Hi Jens, On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 02:18:18PM +0200 you wrote: > on Debian and derived distributions (and maybe other distributions with > similar mechanics in the init scripts), the `WOWorkersCount` option is > overwritten by `/etc/defaults/sogo`'s `PREFORK` option. So `WOWorkersCount` > is not used at all. thank you for this hint. That should be mentioned in the adminstator's manual. Greetings -- R. Cirksena -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Activesync issue - vers. 3.1.4 on CentOS 7 - Folders but no mail
Thanks for the clues - both of them. They were both necessary. I've seen the IMAP debug flag on the mailing list but didn't actually employ it because I couldn't find it's exact syntax in the admin guide. That is what I needed to get things going. After debugging IMAP and even with my Dovecot proxy for some reason the QRESYNC command wasn't available. I ended up upgrading Cyrus IMAP on my actual mail server (scary) by installing from source. After that things just came to life. Additionally I somehow overlooked the word size flag for imapd in the tuning portion - I had to set it to 4096 to get good results in my environment, I have some users with many hundreds of thousands of mail items and mailboxes in excess of 50GB. This also cleared up my calendar issue. I'm assuming the reason it broke was somehow an issue with Outlook logic where since it didn't successfully deal with one thing another also failed? Otherwise I have no clue how the IMAP server issue could have affected the calendar sync. Everything is working pretty well at this point. Thank you again. On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 4:47 AM, "Thomas Fuehrer" wrote: > Hi JR, > > test with following settings suggested in the docs: > > https://sogo.nu/files/docs/SOGoInstallationGuide.html > > [...] > If you have very large mail folders (thousands of messages), you will need > to adjust the word size of your IMAP server. > In Dovecot, the parameter to increase is "imap_max_line_length" while > under Cyrus IMAP Server, the parameter is "maxword". > We suggest a buffer of 2MB. > > [...] > > If this doesn't help set ImapDebugEnabled = YES. > > Regards, > Thomas > > Am Samstag, 16. Juli 2016 22:44 CEST, "JR Dalrymple" (j...@jrssite.com) < > users@sogo.nu> schrieb: > > > I'm trying to retrofit SOGo into an existing mail environment. I started > > testing by setting up a fresh Cyrus IMAP server on CentOS 7, pointed auth > > to the local AD environment, everything worked pretty smooth, including > EAS. > > > > I changed the SOGo machine and pointed it to the production Cyrus IMAP > > server on a CentOS 6 box (Cyrus-IMAP vers. 2.3.16) and everything still > > works pretty well, except EAS it seems. I can connect to EAS successfully > > setting up an account in Outlook. Additionally I can download the folder > > list, but no mail items come in. What debugging I could do found me these > > things: > > > > From the SOGo LOG (with EAS debugging enabled): > > > > [ERROR] <0x0x7fbfd4ca9d50[NGImap4Connection]> Error fetching 425 > uids > > for url: imaps://first.last%40.net@mail. > > > .net/Other%20Users%2F%2FDeleted%20Items%2FIllinois%20Street%2FArtwork/ > > > > I see this type of error for each folder to be downloaded, this is just 1 > > example of a great many alike. When this error is occurring on the SOGo > > server this is what I see on the Cyrus IMAP server: > > > > Jul 16 10:46:48 mailserver imaps[20921]: open: user > > first^last@.net > > opened Other Users//Deleted Items/Illinois Street/Artwork > > Jul 16 10:46:48 mailserver imaps[20921]: open: user > > first^last@.net > > opened Other Users//Deleted Items/Illinois Street/Artwork > > Jul 16 10:46:48 mailserver imaps[20921]: open: user > > first^last@.net > > opened Other Users//Deleted Items/Illinois Street/Artwork > > Jul 16 10:46:48 mailserver imaps[20921]: SQUAT returned 425 messages > > > > Mind you to add to the confusion - SOGo works fine and can pull down all > > the messages without any problems into the web UI. It's only EAS that is > > failing to download messages. > > > > Knowing full well I'm supposed to have a more current version of Cyrus > IMAP > > I did try to proxy through a local dovecot instance at version 2.2.10. > > Doing this yielded no change whatsoever. The EAS mail symptoms remained > > identical (including reactions of the log files), and SOGo's Web UI > > continued to work perfectly fine. > > > > Another peculiarity is that Calendar items can sync from Outlook back > into > > SOGo using EAS, but Outlook is not syncing new items, nor updates in from > > SOGo. If I delete a calendar item created in Outlook from within the SOGo > > Web UI, Outlook *DOES* seem to identify that calendar item's removal. > This > > is only pertinent to deleting the item though, updating parameters of the > > appointment from within the SOGo Web UI does not cause them to be > reflected > > in Outlook with EAS. > > > > Contacts on the other hand seem to work just fine, in both directions > from > > either interface. > > > > All components (except for the test IMAP server which I had no trouble > > with) have valid 3rd party certificates installed and working properly. > > > > This is not urgent as SOGo to me is still in somewhat of a pilot phase, > > however EAS is the main impetus for me to implement SOGo so helping to > make > > that component function properly would be greatl
[SOGo] Dovecot master user (for domain admins)
Hello SOGo, We have an interesting situation here … Would like to allow the domain administrators for their respective SOGo LDAP domains to be able to log in as their users, using Dovecot’s master user. This function works fine using Dovecot authentication, directly accessing through IMAP or POP3. But since we use LDAP authentication in SOGo, this (of course) does not work. Is it possible to configure this type of access through the web interface in SOGo? Thank you! ~ Laz Peterson Paravis, LLC -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] BTS activities for Monday, July 18 2016
Title: BTS activities for Monday, July 18 2016 BTS Activities Home page: http://www.sogo.nu/bugs Project: SOGo For the period covering: Monday, July 18 2016 idlast updatestatus (resolution)categorysummary 3768 2016-07-18 12:10:43 updated (open) Web General Calendar Print button missing. 3767 2016-07-18 10:02:13 updated (open) with SOGo Can´t start service
