Re: [SOGo] FreeBSD port in working order, needs testing
Your welcome, however it's not in ports tree yet. It will be my first port, if I succeed. I don't have a ports commit bit yet. Also, it's only tested on FreeBSD 10.1 so far. Getting it in the prots tree means it has to build on 8.4,9.0-9.3,10.0,10.1 on at least i386/amd64. So there's more work to do yet. But I'll try my very very best. Even if it doesn't make the cut, people can use the one on my github page, it will save them a lot of work. Regards, *Euan Thoms* /The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately and do not copy, distribute or take any action based on this e-mail./ Bruce Marriner wrote: For what it's worth. Thank you :) I'm excited to hear about getting SOGo into the ports tree. On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 05:21 AM CST, Euan Thoms euan.th...@fastrack.com.sg wrote: For any FreeBSD users out there, I have made a FreeBSD port of SOPE/SOGo 2.2.14. It works great on 10.1 (amd64). However ther is one error when using DEVELOPER=yes in /etc/make.conf. This does not stop it working though. I have it in production for a few days now, no problems so far. It's not in the official ports tree yet, since I am not a port comitter yet, nor does the port pas all the regulations yet. Hopefully I can get it submitted soon. However, it is available on github: https://github.com/ethoms/freebsd-ports $ git clone https://github.com/ethoms/freebsd-ports.git I'm looking forward to testing the new version extensively. The last version I have used was 2.0.4b, so there should be some nice improvements. Please let me know if you can get rid of the errors with DEVELOPER=yes. Also if it works on other FreeBSD versions / architectures. I recommend testing it in a jail, since it pulls in quite a few things. Regards, Euan Thoms -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/listsattachment: euan_thoms.vcf
Re: [SOGo] FreeBSD port in working order, needs testing
Bruce Marriner wrote: For what it's worth. Thank you :) I'm excited to hear about getting SOGo into the ports tree. On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 05:21 AM CST, Euan Thoms euan.th...@fastrack.com.sg wrote: For any FreeBSD users out there, I have made a FreeBSD port of SOPE/SOGo 2.2.14. It works great on 10.1 (amd64). However ther is one error when using DEVELOPER=yes in /etc/make.conf. This does not stop it working though. I have it in production for a few days now, no problems so far. It's not in the official ports tree yet, since I am not a port comitter yet, nor does the port pas all the regulations yet. Hopefully I can get it submitted soon. However, it is available on github: https://github.com/ethoms/freebsd-ports $ git clone https://github.com/ethoms/freebsd-ports.git I'm looking forward to testing the new version extensively. The last version I have used was 2.0.4b, so there should be some nice improvements. Please let me know if you can get rid of the errors with DEVELOPER=yes. Also if it works on other FreeBSD versions / architectures. I recommend testing it in a jail, since it pulls in quite a few things. Regards, Euan Thoms -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists Your welcome, however it's not in ports tree yet. It will be my first port, if I succeed. I don't have a ports commit bit yet. Also, it's only tested on FreeBSD 10.1 so far. Getting it in the prots tree means it has to build on 8.4,9.0-9.3,10.0,10.1 on at least i386/amd64. So there's more work to do yet. But I'll try my very very best. Even if it doesn't make the cut, people can use the one on my github page, it will save them a lot of work. Regards, *Euan Thoms* -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/listsattachment: euan_thoms.vcf
Re: [SOGo] FreeBSD port in working order, needs testing
For what it's worth. Thank you :) I'm excited to hear about getting SOGo into the ports tree. On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 05:21 AM CST, Euan Thoms euan.th...@fastrack.com.sg wrote: For any FreeBSD users out there, I have made a FreeBSD port of SOPE/SOGo 2.2.14. It works great on 10.1 (amd64). However ther is one error when using DEVELOPER=yes in /etc/make.conf. This does not stop it working though. I have it in production for a few days now, no problems so far. It's not in the official ports tree yet, since I am not a port comitter yet, nor does the port pas all the regulations yet. Hopefully I can get it submitted soon. However, it is available on github: https://github.com/ethoms/freebsd-ports $ git clone https://github.com/ethoms/freebsd-ports.git I'm looking forward to testing the new version extensively. The last version I have used was 2.0.4b, so there should be some nice improvements. Please let me know if you can get rid of the errors with DEVELOPER=yes. Also if it works on other FreeBSD versions / architectures. I recommend testing it in a jail, since it pulls in quite a few things. Regards, Euan Thoms -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] FreeBSD port in working order, needs testing
For any FreeBSD users out there, I have made a FreeBSD port of SOPE/SOGo 2.2.14. It works great on 10.1 (amd64). However ther is one error when using DEVELOPER=yes in /etc/make.conf. This does not stop it working though. I have it in production for a few days now, no problems so far. It's not in the official ports tree yet, since I am not a port comitter yet, nor does the port pas all the regulations yet. Hopefully I can get it submitted soon. However, it is available on github: https://github.com/ethoms/freebsd-ports $ git clone https://github.com/ethoms/freebsd-ports.git I'm looking forward to testing the new version extensively. The last version I have used was 2.0.4b, so there should be some nice improvements. Please let me know if you can get rid of the errors with DEVELOPER=yes. Also if it works on other FreeBSD versions / architectures. I recommend testing it in a jail, since it pulls in quite a few things. Regards, Euan Thoms -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
