Re: [SOGo] Rebuild SOGo 2.0.1 package on squeeze

2012-10-11 Thread Wolfgang Sourdeau

On 2012-10-11 13:12, Slávek Banko wrote:

Hi all,

When I again added patches for imaps and sieve with mailhost from ldap (see
bugs 1061 and 1866) and rebuild 2.0.1, I was surprised that there are still
same problems with rebuild, as were in 2.0.0.




Hi Slávek,


Jean Raby is on vacation right now and will be back next week. That's 
probably why he did not follow up yet.


Which branch of openchange are you using when building your packages?

--
Wolfgang Sourdeau :: +1 (514) 447-4918 ext. 125 :: wsourd...@inverse.ca
Inverse inc. Leaders behind SOGo (sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org)

--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Rebuild SOGo 2.0.1 package on squeeze

2012-10-11 Thread Slávek Banko
On Thursday 11 of October 2012 20:36:07 Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote:
 On 2012-10-11 13:12, Slávek Banko wrote:
  Hi all,
 
  When I again added patches for imaps and sieve with mailhost from ldap
  (see bugs 1061 and 1866) and rebuild 2.0.1, I was surprised that there
  are still same problems with rebuild, as were in 2.0.0.

 Hi Slávek,


 Jean Raby is on vacation right now and will be back next week. That's
 probably why he did not follow up yet.

 Which branch of openchange are you using when building your packages?

 --
 Wolfgang Sourdeau :: +1 (514) 447-4918 ext. 125 :: wsourd...@inverse.ca
 Inverse inc. Leaders behind SOGo (sogo.nu) and PacketFence
 (www.packetfence.org)

Thank you for your response.

For rebuild debian package I have apt sources for both sogo-stable, and also 
sogo-nightly. I've looked also to Openchange SVN, but there has not been 
carried out related fix - adding include gen_ndr/server_id.h into 
libmapiproxy.h. Therefore, I have patch that adds gen_ndr/server_id.h 
wherever libmapiproxy.h is used in SOGo.

Slavek
-- 
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Rebuild SOGo 2.0.1 package on squeeze

2012-10-11 Thread Wolfgang Sourdeau



Thank you for your response.

For rebuild debian package I have apt sources for both sogo-stable, and also
sogo-nightly. I've looked also to Openchange SVN, but there has not been
carried out related fix - adding include gen_ndr/server_id.h into
libmapiproxy.h. Therefore, I have patch that adds gen_ndr/server_id.h
wherever libmapiproxy.h is used in SOGo.

Slavek


Hi,


Please go into your openchange source direcotry and send me the output 
of svn info.


Thanks

--
Wolfgang Sourdeau :: +1 (514) 447-4918 ext. 125 :: wsourd...@inverse.ca
Inverse inc. Leaders behind SOGo (sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org)

--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Rebuild SOGo 2.0.1 package on squeeze

2012-10-11 Thread Slávek Banko
On Thursday 11 of October 2012 21:34:01 Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote:
  Thank you for your response.
 
  For rebuild debian package I have apt sources for both sogo-stable, and
  also sogo-nightly. I've looked also to Openchange SVN, but there has not
  been carried out related fix - adding include gen_ndr/server_id.h into
  libmapiproxy.h. Therefore, I have patch that adds gen_ndr/server_id.h
  wherever libmapiproxy.h is used in SOGo.
 
  Slavek

 Hi,


 Please go into your openchange source direcotry and send me the output
 of svn info.

 Thanks

 --
 Wolfgang Sourdeau :: +1 (514) 447-4918 ext. 125 :: wsourd...@inverse.ca
 Inverse inc. Leaders behind SOGo (sogo.nu) and PacketFence
 (www.packetfence.org)

I not using SVN versions directly, but using Debian packages from Inverse apt 
sources. For example, libmapiproxy0 is version 1:1.0.r4191.sogo-1~inverse1.0.

Slavek
-- 
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Rebuild SOGo 2.0.1 package on squeeze

2012-10-11 Thread Wolfgang Sourdeau

Ah ok, I understand now.


I have applied a fix in OpenChange, where the issue really lies. Please 
use the next nightly builds. Of course this will also be included in the 
next release.



Wolfgang

--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Rebuild SOGo 2.0.1 package on squeeze

2012-10-11 Thread Slávek Banko
On Thursday 11 of October 2012 21:50:34 Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote:
 Ah ok, I understand now.


 I have applied a fix in OpenChange, where the issue really lies. Please
 use the next nightly builds. Of course this will also be included in the
 next release.


 Wolfgang

Wonderful, thank you.

Anyway, I just regret that to the patches mentioned at the beginning, from the 
SOGo team was no reaction at all - neither positive nor negative, no 
requirements to change patches, just nothing.

Therefore, each new version I rebuild with these patches.

Thank you for your help and effort.

Slavek
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Rebuild SOGo 2.0.1 package on squeeze

2012-10-11 Thread Wolfgang Sourdeau



Wonderful, thank you.

Anyway, I just regret that to the patches mentioned at the beginning, from the
SOGo team was no reaction at all - neither positive nor negative, no
requirements to change patches, just nothing.


Those bloody SOGo spoon benders. Don't ever trust them!


Seriously though, everyone has been quite busy (or on vacation) as 
always, that's the reason why this got forgotten. Next time, please 
fill a bugreport, as it makes patch tracking much easier than on a 
mailing list.


--
Wolfgang Sourdeau :: +1 (514) 447-4918 ext. 125 :: wsourd...@inverse.ca
Inverse inc. Leaders behind SOGo (sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org)

--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Rebuild SOGo 2.0.1 package on squeeze

2012-10-11 Thread Slávek Banko
On Thursday 11 of October 2012 22:00:31 Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote:
  Wonderful, thank you.
 
  Anyway, I just regret that to the patches mentioned at the beginning,
  from the SOGo team was no reaction at all - neither positive nor
  negative, no requirements to change patches, just nothing.

 Those bloody SOGo spoon benders. Don't ever trust them!


 Seriously though, everyone has been quite busy (or on vacation) as
 always, that's the reason why this got forgotten. Next time, please
 fill a bugreport, as it makes patch tracking much easier than on a
 mailing list.


Original patches I had in mind:
+ http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=1866
+ http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=1061

Already filled in mantis, but no response :)
In any case, you have my thanks for your excellent software!

Slavek
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists