Re: spamc/spamassassin = different scores
From: "Morris Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Kevin Curran wrote:
> > Tests show that an email will get a different score depending on whether
> > spamassassin or spamc is called.
> >
> > What's up with that?
> >
> > Thanks!
>
> You probably need to stop spamd and restart it so it rereads the .cf
files.
>
> Cheers,
> Mojo
Do remember that just before Christmas break I characterized a vaguely
similar problem with spamd. With per user rules enabled any given
spamd instance works perfectly the first time. The second time it will
appear to pick up the user rules but not the user scores. This is run
as the user with "DROPPRIVS" in the .procmailrc or as the user running
spanc. It is 100% repeatable here. Fortunately there is at the moment
only one user of the two here moved over to the new installation. So
moving to a direct spamassassin call seems to have eliminated the
problem, for now. I am waiting for someone to say they also can see
this effect. Then I'll go to the web (yuck) and file a BK report on it.
(I don't trust or like web user interfaces. {^_-})
{^_^}
Make test fails installing Storable (t/croak) for SA 3.0.2 upgrade
I'm having trouble install Storable on FreeBSD 4.9 so I can upgrade my SA to 3.0.2. Does anyone have any ideas how to solve the following error during Make? Running test for module Storable Running make for A/AM/AMS/Storable-2.13.tar.gz Is already unwrapped into directory /root/.cpan/build/Storable-2.13 Has already been processed within this session Running make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.2 "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/blessed.ok t/canonical...ok t/codeok t/compat06ok t/croak...Oi! No! Don't change this test so that Carp is used before Storable at t/croak.t line 23. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/croak.t line 25. t/croak...dubious Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) t/dclone..ok t/downgrade...ok t/forgive.ok t/freeze..ok t/integer.ok t/interwork56.skipped all skipped: Your IVs are no larger than your longs t/just_plain_nastyok t/lockok t/malice..ok t/overloadok t/recurse.ok t/restrictok t/retrieveok t/store...ok t/threads.skipped all skipped: no threads t/tiedok t/tied_hook...ok t/tied_items..ok t/utf8ok t/utf8hashok Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed --- t/croak.t255 65280?? ?? % ?? 2 tests skipped. Failed 1/25 test scripts, 96.00% okay. 0/2044 subtests failed, 100.00% okay. *** Error code 2 Stop in /root/.cpan/build/Storable-2.13. /usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK Regards, John Schneider, Information Systems Manager, GVA DAUM Worldwide Real Estate Solutions 123 S Figueroa Street Suite 400 Los Angeles, CA 90012 213-270-2262 Direct 213-947-1431 Fax WEBSITE: www.gvadaum.com EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unsubscribe?
shane mullins wrote: I know what you mean Pete, I work for a public school system, and it is a major fight whenever I introduce an OpenSource solution. By using OpenSource solutions, I have provided better solutions to problems, and saved much money. But, it has not been easy, and there have been few, if any thanks. I know this is an old thread, and also OT by this point but I had to interject here... I used to work for the public school system here, and while I was there, school administration decided that the open source centralized rather inexpensive but very well done, and very usable attendance/grades/financial/discipline database should be moved to a windows based, de-centralized, solution that required a huge ms sql server for synchronization, and a pretty hefty server in each school, we're talking 20 some schools... And it didn't even preform nearly as well... In my opinion, this was a step backwards... Anyway, sorry for the wasted bandwidth!! -Russ --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
Re: spamc/spamassassin = different scores
Kevin Curran wrote: Tests show that an email will get a different score depending on whether spamassassin or spamc is called. What's up with that? Thanks! You probably need to stop spamd and restart it so it rereads the .cf files. Cheers, Mojo -- Morris Jones Monrovia, CA http://www.whiteoaks.com Old Town Astronomers: http://www.otastro.org
Re: spamc/spamassassin = different scores
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Montag, 27. Dezember 2004 08:08 schrieb Kevin Curran: > Hello list, > > I don't know about you all, Well, we don't no anything about your installation. > but I've been getting a lot of false negatives > that have a hit on the ALL_TRUSTED test. So, I disabled that test in > local.cf. Now, I'm running SA on FreeBSD using sendmail and procmail. > When the user's .procmailrc calls spamassassin it seems to honor local.cf. > But when the .procmailrc calls spamc and spamd is running, it seems to > ignore local.cf. 1. Which Version do you use? 2 Can you send an example which shows the difference you mean. 3. How do you start spamd? There are options which enable or disable some tests. So it's not unusal to get different scores. > Tests show that an email will get a different score depending on whether > spamassassin or spamc is called. 3. How do you start spamd? There are options which enable or disable some tests. So it's not unusal to get different scores. 4. How do you call spammassassin? 5. Do you call it with the same userid? 6. When different userids is bayes turned ON or OFF? Network tests turn ON or OFF? BTW: A good question and full accout of the circumstances leads mostly to precise answers. :-) My magical eye is lost somewhere. Thomas [..] - -- icq:133073900 aim:tawhv -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBz+lSHe2ZLU3NgHsRAnWWAJ43rkZ+xuQkxuNOOT4XHn/Y4kOeYQCfTlQD 9ufrGNayuH7gCePA/i2uq9U= =kj4x -END PGP SIGNATURE-
RE: spamc/spamassassin = different scores
|-Original Message- |From: Kevin Curran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Sent: 27 December 2004 07:09 |To: users@spamassassin.apache.org |Subject: spamc/spamassassin = different scores | |Hello list, | |I don't know about you all, but I've been getting a lot of |false negatives that have a hit on the ALL_TRUSTED test. So, |I disabled that test in local.cf. Now, I'm running SA on |FreeBSD using sendmail and procmail. |When the user's .procmailrc calls spamassassin it seems to |honor local.cf. |But when the .procmailrc calls spamc and spamd is running, it |seems to ignore local.cf. | |Tests show that an email will get a different score depending |on whether spamassassin or spamc is called. | |What's up with that? | |Thanks! | It sounds like you didn't restart spamd after you changed the local.cf file. Martin
spamc/spamassassin = different scores
Hello list, I don't know about you all, but I've been getting a lot of false negatives that have a hit on the ALL_TRUSTED test. So, I disabled that test in local.cf. Now, I'm running SA on FreeBSD using sendmail and procmail. When the user's .procmailrc calls spamassassin it seems to honor local.cf. But when the .procmailrc calls spamc and spamd is running, it seems to ignore local.cf. Tests show that an email will get a different score depending on whether spamassassin or spamc is called. What's up with that? Thanks!
