Re: ezmlm warning

[Loren Wilton]

Remote host said: 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to extended inactivity 
new

mail is not currently being accepted for this mailbox.


Dirtlink has been doing this randomly for a month or more now.  I've had 
bunches of complaints that people can't send me mail because of 'due to 
extended inactivity".


I tried sending the dirtlink admin account some earthlink phish the other 
week so they could shut down the sites, and had it bounced back because the 
admin account "due to extended inactivity".


   Loren

RE: ezmlm warning

[Tim Boyer]

> 
> Found this in my inbox this evening, is this just a burp on 
> earthlink's end?
> 
> 

Chris -

I strongly suspect that Earthlink has begun to do some strange anti-spam
stuff - and don't quite have the bugs worked out.  We got this this morning,
for the first time ever:

   - Transcript of session follows -
... while talking to mx1.earthlink.net.:
>>> MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SIZE=6052
<<< 550 550 Dynamic/zombied/spam IPs blocked. Write
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
554 5.0.0 Service unavailable

and we're on a T1, with rDNS for everything, and not on any of the dnsbl
lists.  They delisted us within a few hours.  Better give them a call...

-- 
Tim Boyer 
Director
Information Systems and Engineering Projects
Denman Tire Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ezmlm warning

[Evan Platt]

At 07:43 PM 3/9/2007, Chris wrote:

Found this in my inbox this evening, is this just a burp on earthlink's end?



Due to extended inactivity new
mail is not currently being accepted for this mailbox.


I'd certainly call up earthlink. Who knows what other mail they're bouncing. 

ezmlm warning

[Chris]

Found this in my inbox this evening, is this just a burp on earthlink's end?


Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
users@spamassassin.apache.org mailing list.


Messages to you from the users mailing list seem to
have been bouncing. I've attached a copy of the first bounce
message I received.

If this message bounces too, I will send you a probe. If the probe bounces,
I will remove your address from the users mailing list,
without further notice.


I've kept a list of which messages from the users mailing list have 
bounced from your address.

Copies of these messages may be in the archive.
To retrieve a set of messages 123-145 (a maximum of 100 per request),
send a short message to:
   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To receive a subject and author list for the last 100 or so messages,
send a short message to:
   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Here are the message numbers:

   55952

--- Enclosed is a copy of the bounce message I received.

Return-Path: <>
Received: (qmail 69356 invoked for bounce); 25 Feb 2007 19:35:54 -
Date: 25 Feb 2007 19:35:54 -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: failure notice

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at apache.org.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
209.86.93.228 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to extended inactivity new 
mail is not currently being accepted for this mailbox.
Giving up on 209.86.93.228.


-- 
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C


pgplusw8W3WUp.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: Intergrating RAZOR & DCC to SA

[John Andersen]

On Friday 09 March 2007, Mailing Lists wrote:
> I have done an install of SA version 3.1.7 on SUSE 10.2. 

Whoa, stop right there.

look in /etc/sysconfig/spamd

You will see that the default for Suse is to launch spamd with
command line parameters  "-d -c -L"

The -L is turning off your network tests.

Whack that file, and you are good to go.  Just remove -L



-- 
_
John Andersen


pgpTudUba4UE5.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [2] Bayes Newbie Help

[Nick Leverton]

On Friday 09 March 2007 17:44, lucmonc wrote:
> Thanks John for help, but Goldmine access the mail server with POP3 not
> IMAP. Messages are then stored in the Goldmine own sql database.
> Therefore your solution can't be used in our system.

Our sales force use Goldmine and (assuming it hasn't corrupted its own 
database on that day), when they forward stuff onto us Goldmine discards 
the whole of the message headers just as you say.  It also forwards only 
the rendered form of the message body and I suspect that is all it stores.  
I get the impression its customer email tracking was a badly bolted-on 
afterthought to sales phone call tracking and sales notes.

Ours is on a system I don't have access to, but maybe you can see if there 
is anything usable in the DB which you could write a script to extract.

I think you will probably have to keep a separate copy of all incoming mail 
though.  If you have a support contract with whoever sells it, maybe you 
could ask them to help in extracting un-mangled mail ?

Nick

Re: [2] Bayes Newbie Help

[John D. Hardin]

On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, lucmonc wrote:

> Thanks John for help, but Goldmine access the mail server with
> POP3 not IMAP.  Messages are then stored in the Goldmine own sql
> database. Therefore your solution can't be used in our system.

There is another possibility that may: does Goldmine expose its
mailboxes using a standard protocol (typically and hopefully IMAP)?

If so, you may be able to use a method that is common with Exchange:  
set up shared (public) train-spam and train-ham folders that users can
move messages to, and that the SA host can access remotely via IMAP.

There have been a lot of discussions here about doing this with
Exchange;  it may work for you as well.

--
 John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
---
  Failure to plan ahead on someone else's part does not constitute
  an emergency on my part. -- David W. Barts in a.s.r
---
 2 days until Daylight Saving Time begins in U.S. - Spring Forward

Re: [2] Bayes Newbie Help

[lucmonc]

Thanks John for help, but Goldmine access the mail server with POP3 not IMAP. 
Messages are then stored in the Goldmine own sql database.
Therefore your solution can't be used in our system.

LM




On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, lucmonc wrote:

> My problem is that we use Goldmine CRM as mail cllient and that
> his Message Redirect function rewrite almost completely the header
> leaving only the original "subject" and part of the "from" fields.

Is there a possibility of setting up a mail folder on the server that 
users can just move the messages to? Moving and copying messages 
between folders typically does not mangle them.

Broad outline: if the mail stays on the server and is accessed via 
IMAP, then set up a spam-training and ham-training folder in each 
user's account, and have them copy or move messages to those folders. 
SA can then learn from them directly.


-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Bayes-Newbie-Help-tf3374679.html#a9399167
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: Rbl Problem

[Sietse van Zanen]

Indeed. If your mail is queuing up due to the RBL checks, something must
be going wrong with the DNS queries.

Do a spamassassin -D --lint mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 15:48
To: Emre BALCI
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rbl Problem

Emre BALCI wrote:
> Hii All
> My spamassasin and amavis and postfix working so
> slowly and queue is growing fastly If I set enable
> skip_rbl_check to 1 then computer working fastly this
> problem appeared recently.There isnt connection
> problem.
> I guess there is dead rbl servers ?
> Which rbl servers that enough to stops spam that in
> 20_dnsbl_test ?
>
> Best Regards..
>
>
>  
>


> Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. 
> Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
> http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html 
>
>   
Are your local caching name servers working properly?

Re: GMail is now signing their mail with DKIM

[Frank Bures]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:01:44 +0100, Mark Martinec wrote:

>In case this came by unnoticed, gmail.com is adding DKIM signatures
>to their outgoing mail - for about two weeks now. Some initial
>problems seem to be solved by now.
>
>For verifying signatures stick to the most current versions of Mail::DKIM
>(0.23) when checking from a SpamAssassin DKIM plugin or through dkimproxy.
>

I tried to install the plugin but the perl install of the Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA 
module returns:

Running make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" 
"test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
t/bignumok
t/formatok
t/rsa...FAILED tests 44-45
Failed 2/45 tests, 95.56% okay
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail  List of Failed
- -
- --
t/rsa.t   452  44-45
Failed 1/3 test scripts. 2/119 subtests failed.
Files=3, Tests=119,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.21 cusr +  0.04 csys =  0.25 CPU)
Failed 1/3 test programs. 2/119 subtests failed.
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
  /usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK
Running make install
  make test had returned bad status, won't install without force



Any suggestions?  (Running SA 3.1.8)




Frank Bures, Dept. of Chemistry, University of Toronto, M5S 3H6
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.chem.utoronto.ca
PGP public key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=index&search=Frank+Bures

Please, reply to the above address only.   does not accept replies.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0 OS/2 for non-commercial use
Comment: PGP 5.0 for OS/2
Charset: cp850

wj8DBQFF8YJSih0Xdz1+w+wRAiYRAKDofMw/gFEaWHQAPJSNmF/6IsI7DACg1Odp
MT+nRb337EYFIfxzWcovdiI=
=GXf4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: Intergrating RAZOR & DCC to SA

[Theo Van Dinter]

On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 09:37:02AM -0500, Mailing Lists wrote:
> I also installed RAZOR and DCC but I cant get SA to use Razor and DCC when 
> SA is running as a service, obviously I must have missed something in the 
> installation readme but for the life of me I cant figure out what I missed.

When you say "service" you mean spamd, right?

> But when spamd service is running I dont see razor and dcc invoked (I base 
> this on the logs).

You can run spamd in debug mode.  You don't specify the commandline you're
using for spamd either.

-- 
Randomly Selected Tagline:
"I'm barely holding my fudge right now." - From the movie Buckaroo Bonzai


pgptx3WHj7Hi3.pgp
Description: PGP signature

RE: Rbl Problem

[Sietse van Zanen]

I got this scam right after I e-mailed that Emre guy @ yahoo, very
scary

Especially since SA didn't catch it...

-Sietse

-Original Message-
From: Sietse van Zanen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 16:25
To: Emre BALCI
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Rbl Problem

Indeed. If your mail is queuing up due to the RBL checks, something must
be going wrong with the DNS queries.

Do a spamassassin -D --lint mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 15:48
To: Emre BALCI
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rbl Problem

Emre BALCI wrote:
> Hii All
> My spamassasin and amavis and postfix working so
> slowly and queue is growing fastly If I set enable
> skip_rbl_check to 1 then computer working fastly this
> problem appeared recently.There isnt connection
> problem.
> I guess there is dead rbl servers ?
> Which rbl servers that enough to stops spam that in
> 20_dnsbl_test ?
>
> Best Regards..
>
>
>  
>


> Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. 
> Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
> http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html 
>
>   
Are your local caching name servers working properly?
--- Begin Message ---

 Yahoo! News - 
Lottery  
 Messenger Yahoo! Lottery 
Results You won €500.000! Yahoo! Mail congratulates you! 

 
Yahoo! Mail announce you as one of the 10 lucky winners in the ongoing Yahoo 
Lottery Draw of the New year 2007. 



All 10 winning email addresses were randomly selected from a batch of 
50,000,000 international emails each from Canada , Australia , United States , 
Asia, Europe, Middle East, Africa and Oceania as part of our international 
promotions program which is conducted annually,consequently, you have been 
approved for a total pay out of ( €500.000Euros) 
 
This Lottery was promoted and sponsored by a conglomerate of some multinational 
companies as part of their social responsibility to the citizens in the 
communities where they have operational base.

Further more your details(e-mail address) falls within our Spainsh 
representative office in Madrid Spain, as indicated in your play coupon and 
your prize of ( €500.000Euros) will be released to you from this regional 
branch office in Madrid.

HOW TO CLAIM YOUR PRIZE

These are your identification numbers...

Batch number.Lwh 09445

Lotto number...Lwh09446

Winning number...Lwh09447

Serial numberLwh0094478
 
Yahoo!'s Agent for Notice of claims of copyright or other intellectual property 
infringement can be reached as follows
 
GROUPAMA De SEGUROS S.A MADRID SPAIN 
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel:00 1134 691 715 695,
Contact person Mr Barry Manfred  
Telephone lines are open between the hours of 
8:00am-19:30pm.Monday -Saturday ...Ext..001

 
You are to send the completed verification form below to the our Agent in the 
Madrid Spain whose email address is given above so that you will be advised on 
what to do to get your prize money. Congratulations once more!!
 
1. FULL NAME

2. COUNTRY OF ORIGIN

3. PRESENT ADRESS.

4. DATE OF BIRTH

5. OCCUPATION

6. TELEPHONE NUMBER

6. FAX NUMBER (IF ANY)

7. MARITAL STATUS

8. WINNING NUMBER, BATCH NUMBER AND LOTTO NUMBER.



For security reasons, we advice all winners to keep this information 
confidential from the public until your claim is processed and your prize 
released to you. 
 
This is part of our security protocol to avoid double claiming and unwarranted 
taking advantage of this programme by non-selected winner or unofficial 
personnel.



Yours Sincerely,
  

DR. WILLIAM GERRI 



  
In 5 Schritten zur eigenen Homepage. Jetzt Domain sichern und gestalten!
Nur 3,99 EUR/Monat! http://www.maildomain.web.de/?mc=02214 
 
--- End Message ---

Re: Bayes Newbie Help

[John D. Hardin]

On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, lucmonc wrote:

> My problem is that we use Goldmine CRM as mail cllient and that
> his Message Redirect function rewrite almost completely the header
> leaving only the original "subject" and part of the "from" fields.

Is there a possibility of setting up a mail folder on the server that 
users can just move the messages to? Moving and copying messages 
between folders typically does not mangle them.

Broad outline: if the mail stays on the server and is accessed via 
IMAP, then set up a spam-training and ham-training folder in each 
user's account, and have them copy or move messages to those folders. 
SA can then learn from them directly.

There are refinements, like adding a spam-inbox folder that you save 
high-scoring messages to instead of the user's regular inbox, and 
rotating the training folders monthly so that sa-learn doesn't have to 
wade through a lot of messages it's already seen.

--
 John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
---
  Failure to plan ahead on someone else's part does not constitute
  an emergency on my part. -- David W. Barts in a.s.r
---
 2 days until Daylight Saving Time begins in U.S. - Spring Forward

R: R: Make Bayes more efficient?

[Giampaolo Tomassoni]

> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Chris St. Pierre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Inviato: venerdì 9 marzo 2007 15.30
> A: Giampaolo Tomassoni
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Oggetto: Re: R: Make Bayes more efficient?
> 
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> 
> > Sorry, my English is probably not so good to understand the correct
> meaning
> > of the "ever make it to SpamAssassin". If you mean that only 10K
> messages do
> > reach a mailbox and the others are discarded by SA, you could attempt
> > reducing the flux by adopting some greylisting technique.
> 
> Actually, I meant that, of the 40K messages I receive, about 30K are
> discarded by greylisting, RBLs, HELO restrictions, etc.

Ah, you already greylist incoming messages...

Ok. Thank you for the English lesson. :)


> I can't imagine trying to scan all the mail I get. :)
> 
> Chris St. Pierre
> Unix Systems Administrator
> Nebraska Wesleyan University
> 
> Never send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Rbl Problem

[Richard Frovarp]

Emre BALCI wrote:

Hii All
My spamassasin and amavis and postfix working so
slowly and queue is growing fastly If I set enable
skip_rbl_check to 1 then computer working fastly this
problem appeared recently.There isnt connection
problem.
I guess there is dead rbl servers ?
Which rbl servers that enough to stops spam that in
20_dnsbl_test ?

Best Regards..


 

Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. 
Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html 

  

Are your local caching name servers working properly?

Intergrating RAZOR & DCC to SA

[Mailing Lists]

Hello All,

I have done an install of SA version 3.1.7 on SUSE 10.2. A couple of remote 
mail servers will be connecting to server via port 783 - so far all works 
good from the SA end.


I also installed RAZOR and DCC but I cant get SA to use Razor and DCC when 
SA is running as a service, obviously I must have missed something in the 
installation readme but for the life of me I cant figure out what I missed.


RAZOR and DCC will scan and be invoked if I manually run SA using for 
example echo "test" | spamassassin -D


But when spamd service is running I dont see razor and dcc invoked (I base 
this on the logs).


For DCC I have the following in v310.pre:

# DCC - perform DCC message checks.
#
# DCC is disabled here because it is not open source.  See the DCC
# license for more details.
#
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC

# Razor2 - perform Razor2 message checks.
#
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Razor2

In local.cf I have

# Enable or disable network checks
skip_rbl_checks 1
use_razor2  1
use_dcc 1
use_pyzor   0

# Default Razor settings, hardcoded
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Razor2
razor_config /razor/razor-agent.conf

loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC
dcc_path /usr/local/bin/dccproc

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks much,

William

Re: Make Bayes more efficient?

[Chris St. Pierre]

On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Gary V wrote:

Yes, if you have not tuned MySQL you should. If you have the available RAM you 
can increase performance significantly. In some ad hoc experiments I did I 
increased throughput by a factor of 8 simply by increasing 
innodb_buffer_pool_size. Look for sample files such as my-medium.cnf and 
my-large.cnf on your system for examples. If your tables are InnoDB and you 
are using the default InnoDB settings you are likely hurting performance (but 
saving ram).


Thanks for everyone's suggestions.  I've taken most of them and done
some other tuning; I'll have to wait and see how much things have
improved.  If they haven't improved much, I'll be back on Monday. :)

Thanks again!

Chris St. Pierre
Unix Systems Administrator
Nebraska Wesleyan University

Never send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: R: Make Bayes more efficient?

[Chris St. Pierre]

On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:


Sorry, my English is probably not so good to understand the correct meaning
of the "ever make it to SpamAssassin". If you mean that only 10K messages do
reach a mailbox and the others are discarded by SA, you could attempt
reducing the flux by adopting some greylisting technique.


Actually, I meant that, of the 40K messages I receive, about 30K are
discarded by greylisting, RBLs, HELO restrictions, etc.

I can't imagine trying to scan all the mail I get. :)

Chris St. Pierre
Unix Systems Administrator
Nebraska Wesleyan University

Never send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

GMail is now signing their mail with DKIM

[Mark Martinec]

In case this came by unnoticed, gmail.com is adding DKIM signatures
to their outgoing mail - for about two weeks now. Some initial
problems seem to be solved by now.

For verifying signatures stick to the most current versions of Mail::DKIM
(0.23) when checking from a SpamAssassin DKIM plugin or through dkimproxy.

If using a milter, the dkim-milter is at 0.6.1 now, stick to the most
recent version.

I updated slightly the howto to reflect the current situation:
  http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/amavisd-new-docs.html#dkim



Some selected recent notes from a [dkim-milter-discuss] mailing list,
I hope you don't mind (btw, Murray is the developer of dkim-milter):



Murray S. Kucherawy:
  GMail now signs with DKIM ...and it verifies with 0.6.1.  Good stuff!

Ben Lentz:
  They must have *just* fixed that. I noticed they were doing DKIM a week 
  or more ago, but I couldn't get it to verify. Now it does! Awesome!

Murray S. Kucherawy:
  They had an experimental implementation that wasn't quite right.
  Michael from Cisco was working with them to get it in line.
  Apparently they pushed a patch recently because it's working today.

  I don't think they're verifying inbound (yet) but I would imagine it's
  in the plan.  This is exciting stuff though because it should encourage 
  momentum toward more widespread adoption.  Everyone else was saying "We'll 
  do it when everyone else does it" so we needed one big trailblazer to get 
  the ball rolling.  Maybe this is it.
[...]

  - Yahoo has said they'll move to DKIM as soon as they can get enough 
  developer cycles to do so and the spec has solidified.

  - I'm in discussions with AOL about altering libdkim to meet their 
  integration needs.

Duplicating a bayes database

[kshatriyak]

Hello,

I'm already using spamassassin with a shared bayes database for quite a 
while. As a result, this database is quite well trained for the spam that 
I receive and I'm very happy with the results.


Now, I need to install another server (which will serve other domains), 
the setup is similar and I would like to install SpamAssassin as well 
ofcourse.


My question, can I just copy the bayes database to the "new" server (so 
that it doesn't need training from the start) ? Or is this too tricky, are 
there any caveats I'm not seeing?


Thank you!
K.

Rbl Problem

[Emre BALCI]

Hii All
My spamassasin and amavis and postfix working so
slowly and queue is growing fastly If I set enable
skip_rbl_check to 1 then computer working fastly this
problem appeared recently.There isnt connection
problem.
I guess there is dead rbl servers ?
Which rbl servers that enough to stops spam that in
20_dnsbl_test ?

Best Regards..


 

Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. 
Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html 

Bayes Newbie Help

[lucmonc]

Hi, i'm a spamassassin newbie that has just setup it on our server following
the very good and simple tutorial at
http://www.stearns.org/doc/spamassassin-setup.current.html

After 10 days of good test (anything is working ok) i tried to setup the
"Shared whitelist and bayes databases and autoreporting addresses"

My problem is that we use Goldmine CRM as mail cllient and that his Message
Redirect function rewrite almost completely the header leaving only the
original "subject" and part of the "from" fields.

Below is an example of a spam message redirected to my gmail account:

ORIGINAL SPAM HEADER
-
Oggetto : was at experiment 
Data : Fri, 9 Mar 2007 08:28:00 +0100 
Da : "Mac Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
A :  
X-Mailer : Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.2969 
Versione MIME : 1.0 
Tipo MIME : multipart/alternative;   
boundary="=_NextPart_000_0019_01C7619E.A9D3DE30" 
ID messaggio : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Return-Path : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
X-Spam-Checker-Version : SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on
cassandra.bavicchi.com 
X-Spam-Level :  
X-Spam-Status : No, score=4.8 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,
HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_XBL autolearn=no version=3.1.8 
Received : from fivearea.com ([70.151.183.194]) by 
(8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id l28MOeeZ014441 for ; Thu, 8 Mar
2007 23:24:41 +0100 
Received : from DOT ([126.59.147.170])by 70.151.183.194
(3.08.5/3.08.5) with SMTP id jP0NCkSp5nQcTo;Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:27:28
-0500 
X-Priority : 3 
X-MSMail-Priority : Normal 
X-MimeOLE : Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1158 
X-UID : 409497 
Content-Length : 1437 
-

REDIRECTED SPAM HEADER
-
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: by 10.78.144.17 with SMTP id r17cs810755hud;
Fri, 9 Mar 2007 00:10:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.82.187.16 with SMTP id k16mr2207832buf.1173427829729;
Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:10:29 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: 
Received: from (ourserver.com  [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o53si7506029nfa.2007.03.09.00.10.24;
Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:10:29 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of my addres
designates xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx as permitted sender)
Received: from lucmonc (our server [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx])
by ourserver.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id l298HHmJ016880
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 09:17:17 +0100
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 09:10:22 +0100
From: "Mac Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (thru myadress.com)
Subject: was at experiment
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html
- 

As i can't change how Goldmine rewrite redirected message headers, how can i
use safely the whitelist and bayes autoreporting addresses using correctly
the ""bayes_ignore_header" command ?

Thanks for your help
LM
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Bayes-Newbie-Help-tf3374679.html#a9391177
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.