Re: Confirm configuration settings

2007-11-01 Thread Matt Kettler
Joey wrote:

 Hello All,

  

 After my post Help figuring our why SA is taking like 1.5 minutes to
 filter I decided to kind of clean up my configuration and also get rid
 of RulesDeJour.

Hmm interesting..

Question, what tools do you use to call SA? Do you know for sure what
user SA runs as while scanning mail?

If so, try running a sa-learn --force-expire as that user.

 I noticed these updates go to /var/lib/spamassassin/X.XXX,  my first
 question is does this folder automatically get used by SA when it’s
 looking for rules, so there is no config I have to do?

Yes, it automatically gets used. If you run spamassassin --lint -D it
will show you, among other things, what paths and files SA is using.

  

 Second if I were to update to a specific folder lets say /myfolder I
 know I can pass the parameter on the sa-update of –updatedir
 /myfolder, however do I then have to specify in the local.cf anything
 to insure we are using that folder for rules?

AFAIK, there's no option to over-ride the LOCAL_STATE_DIR, which is what
this directory is, other than at compile time.


 For reference if I have a backup folder within the rules folder called
 backup, will SA look at any of the rules I copied there without having
 a cf file telling it to include any files in that folder?


 In other words does it automatically use any cf files it finds within
 any subfolder of the main rules folder?

No.

 1.   Is there a way for me to have sa-update update the .cf files
 here?

Some of them can be sa-updated. It's really up to the particular ruleset
maintainer to set up the DNS features needed. (sa-update doesn't just
fetch a web page like RDJ does. To save bandwidth it uses DNS to find
out what the latest update rev is before it goes to HTTP)

A lot of the SARE rules support sa-update, as can be found here.

http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/sare/sare-sa-update-howto.txt

 2.   Should I get rid of any of these rules ( tripwire etc)?

None of them look to be bad rules to have. The ones to avoid include
sa-blacklist* (kills your server), bigevil (kills your server),
antidrug.cf (redundant/outdated compared to rules built-in to SA)

 3.   Are there any other rules that do well that I should add?

I like the SARE spec ruleset, but I'd not go adding more stuff till you
fix your performance problems..

http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sare_specific.cf

  

 Anything that can be suggested to improve my configuration is GREATLY
 appreciated!


Everything else looks good, although you might be a bit over-trusting of
the URIBLS by placing them all at 7. Provided you don't mind a rare FP,
that should be fine, but if you are FP averse, I'd avoid that.  I get
about 1 desirable email every 2 months that gets hit by one of them, and
about 2 newsletters that I intentionally subscribe to, but don't care
too much about, that hit one or more URIBL.. I request delisting, and
they generally do, but eventually some other domain gets picked up.. YMMV.

(and note: I get a *LOT* of email, so those frequencies still boil down
to a very low FP rate)




An honest spammer

2007-11-01 Thread Loren Wilton

From the spam:


   Subject: I am sending this to everyone

And I bet he is, too!

   Loren




RE: An honest spammer

2007-11-01 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
 -Original Message-
 From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 2:03 PM
 
 From the spam:
 
 Subject: I am sending this to everyone
 
 And I bet he is, too!

Well, no: I didn't receive it... ;)

Giampaolo


 
 Loren


SA timed out

2007-11-01 Thread Robert Fitzpatrick
I have the following error message in the logs, didn't even notice until
tracking down an email for a user today, but been happening in all my
logs back the last week. All three servers running mail filtering to
pgsql db have this error including the server which hosts the db. I find
no problems with filtering and BAYES scoring seems to be working and is
tagging messages fine. So, I assume this means the learning part is not
working? However, looking at bayes_var in the db, I see token, spam and
ham counts all updating from AWL I assume. Can someone offer feedback to
help determine what exactly is the issue at hand? Thanks in advance.

Nov  1 14:43:31 esmtp amavis[64574]: (64574-02) SA TIMED OUT, backtrace:
at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/PgSQL.pm 
line 679\n\teval {...} called at 
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/PgSQL.pm line 
679\n\tMail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::PgSQL::tok_touch_all('Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::PgSQL=HASH(0x9cfe9d0)',
 'ARRAY(0x9626fd0)', 1193942521) called at 
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/Mail/SpamAssassin/Bayes.pm line 
1284\n\tMail::SpamAssassin::Bayes::scan('Mail::SpamAssassin::Bayes=HASH(0x9b55ed4)',
 'Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus=HASH(0x9bb4d24)', 
'Mail::SpamAssassin::Message=HASH(0xb59d4c4)') called at 
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Bayes.pm line 
50\n\tMail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Bayes::check_bayes('Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Bayes=HASH(0x9fa7f58)',
 'Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus=HASH(0x9bb4d24)', 'ARRAY(0xa7f1cb8)', 0.99, 
1.00) c...

-- 
Robert



Re: SA timed out

2007-11-01 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea

Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:

I have the following error message in the logs, didn't even notice until
tracking down an email for a user today, but been happening in all my
logs back the last week. All three servers running mail filtering to
pgsql db have this error including the server which hosts the db. I find
no problems with filtering and BAYES scoring seems to be working and is
tagging messages fine. So, I assume this means the learning part is not
working? However, looking at bayes_var in the db, I see token, spam and
ham counts all updating from AWL I assume. Can someone offer feedback to
help determine what exactly is the issue at hand? Thanks in advance.


I don't have the time to compare the backtrace to the actual code, so 
I'll guess instead.  Disable bayes_auto_expire and see if the errors go 
away.  It's probably bayes expiries taking longer than the amavis 
timeout limit.


Daryl



Re: SA timed out

2007-11-01 Thread Robert Fitzpatrick

On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 16:28 -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
 Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
  I have the following error message in the logs, didn't even notice until
  tracking down an email for a user today, but been happening in all my
  logs back the last week. All three servers running mail filtering to
  pgsql db have this error including the server which hosts the db. I find
  no problems with filtering and BAYES scoring seems to be working and is
  tagging messages fine. So, I assume this means the learning part is not
  working? However, looking at bayes_var in the db, I see token, spam and
  ham counts all updating from AWL I assume. Can someone offer feedback to
  help determine what exactly is the issue at hand? Thanks in advance.
 
 I don't have the time to compare the backtrace to the actual code, so 
 I'll guess instead.  Disable bayes_auto_expire and see if the errors go 
 away.  It's probably bayes expiries taking longer than the amavis 
 timeout limit.

Thanks for the response. I did not have the setting defined in local.cf,
I added 'bayes_auto_expire 0' and it is still happening. I am using
Postfix + Maia mailguard, which is a amavisd-new 2.2 product. I made the
change and restarted amavisd.

-- 
Robert



I am totally clueless

2007-11-01 Thread Dominique
 i can't figure out how to set this up from my cpanel 10.  i've
configured it but it isn't working.  messages aren't tagged or filtered
when coming thru my ms outlook.


Check only the body with Mail::SpamAssassin

2007-11-01 Thread Olivier Nicole
Hi,

I am wondering if some hiden method exist in Mail::SpamAssassin module
to only check the body of an email?

The problem is the following. I am looking at PDFassassin plugin
http://blog.atmail.com/?p=61 that uses pdftotext and pdftoimages to
extract the text from a PDF file. This text is then formated into a
dummy email message and a new instance of SA is launched to check that
dummy. The only interesting part of the dummy is the body (and further
more it should be without attachement) so it woul dbe faster to run
light SA (body/plain text only).

Best regards,

Olivier


Complete Documentation Of Spamassassin in PDF

2007-11-01 Thread Tarak Ranjan

Hi List,
  Can anyone give me the link where i can download Complete 
Documentation Of Spamassassin in PDF.



--
Thanks  Regards,
__
Tarak Ranjan
IS-Team

Liqwid Krystal

T: 91 80  2509 1790 Ext. 107
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Online Learning|Certification|Learning Solutions :
www.liqwidkrystal.com