RMAIL in Emacs

2008-06-28 Thread Don Saklad
What are the less well known existing RMAIL and Emacs commands for a
single session that might be more useful for nonprogrammers?...

For RMAIL in Emacs using Esc C-s Regexp to summarize by: 
to ferret out patterns is a basic method for deleting
spam messages.

Dotfile programming is complicated for nonprogrammers.
Programming solutions are complicated for nonprogrammers


Re: RMAIL in Emacs

2008-06-28 Thread Sahil Tandon
Don Saklad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 What are the less well known existing RMAIL and Emacs commands for a
 single session that might be more useful for nonprogrammers?...
 
 For RMAIL in Emacs using Esc C-s Regexp to summarize by: 
 to ferret out patterns is a basic method for deleting
 spam messages.
 
 Dotfile programming is complicated for nonprogrammers.
 Programming solutions are complicated for nonprogrammers

This is the wrong mailing list for such questions and declarations.

-- 
Sahil Tandon [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: how to stop SPF checks from going past trusted host?

2008-06-28 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
 Matt Kettler wrote:
 
 [snip]
 if so that fake helo should not be fake :=)
  
 
 Well, it shouldn't be fake, because 206.46.173.3 really is 
 vms173003pub.verizon.net.
 
 However, it would appear that athena.apache.orgdidn't get an answer to 
 its PTR querry.. either that or the headers generated by 
 athena.apache.org are just broken.
   
 
 On 27.06.08 14:45, mouss wrote:
   
 qpsmtpd headers do not show rDNS.

 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
 bad. SA afaik doesn't resolve IPS in headers, it expectd MTA to use it. 
 iirs there was some discussion about MTA's not doing that, Maybe it could 
 do
 that for such MTAs (check list archive)

On 27.06.08 16:00, mouss wrote:
 This would indeed fix the problem. but I'm not sure if it won't cause 
 trouble for those who use fetchmail (given that many rDNS setups are 
 borked, I mean).

IIRC there was already case provided when MTA didn' dns lookup so it was
made to be done via SA (and afaik SA did it before). If my memory is
correct, this would be just another case
(sorry, no time to search archives/bugs/google by now)

 and anyway, there's no reason to believe helo is forged since
 $ host vms173003pub.verizon.net
 vms173003pub.verizon.net has address 206.46.173.3

 sice there's no DNS name in received and SA doesn't translate IP, it
 assumes that there is no DNS so the helo is forged.

 I don't know why Benny got FM_FAKE_HELO_VERIZON.

... and I thought I explained it in the sentence before. Since DNS lookup is
not made by MTA and SA expects it to be, the case where the RDNS is not in 
Received: 
is taken as there is not rdns. Since there is verison's HELO but not RDNS,
it's FM_FAKE_HELO_VERIZON...

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Spam = (S)tupid (P)eople's (A)dvertising (M)ethod