Re: sought rules
Justin Mason wrote: > unfortunately my house renovation is taking longer than planned, and > my net access outside work, at the moment, consists of an iPhone! Construction always takes longer than people plan it to take. It is rather like software in that regard! > Working on anything this way is not particularly practical... Don't worry about it further. You have your task queue full already. Thanks for the update! Bob
OT: Christmas Gift ideas
This is top of my list.. http://www.amazon.co.uk/Constant-Contact-Guide-email-Marketing/dp/0470503416/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1259777127&sr=8-1
Re: Undisclosed recipients :; -- again
On 11/30/2009 03:15 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 27.11.09 14:04, Philip A. Prindeville wrote: > >> for the ruleset: >> > >> header __L_UNDISCLOSED1 To:raw =~ /undisclosed-recipients: ;/ >> > just FYI, sendmail can be configured to do different things when To: is > missing - there's sendmail option NoRecipientAction, configured by setting > confNO_RCPT_ACTION m4 directive. The default value is "none" but e.g. Debian > was setting it to "add-to-undisclosed" which causes MISSING_HEADERS not > hitting (only from milter, which appears to be called before the headers are > "fixed"). > > Maybe you should look at your MTA's configuratioon options if it doesn't > cause different rules hitting/not hitting, e.g. sendmail adds Date: and > Message-Id headers which cause MISSING_DATE and MISSING_MID. I was not able > to find how disable this behaviour in sendmail. > > Odd. This is on FC11: [r...@mail mail]# grep confNO_RCPT_ACTION /usr/share/sendmail-cf/*/* /usr/share/sendmail-cf/m4/proto.m4:_OPTION(NoRecipientAction, `confNO_RCPT_ACTION', `none') [r...@mail mail]# grep NoRecipientAction *.cf sendmail.cf:#O NoRecipientAction=none submit.cf:#O NoRecipientAction=none [r...@mail mail]# Added: define(`confNO_RCPT_ACTION', `none')dnl to the sendmail.mc, made sendmail.cf, did a service restart... will see what happens. I can't remember: if an option is commented, is that showing us the default value typically? -Philip
Re: send spam messages to spam folder
On 12/2/2009 7:06 AM, Walter Breno wrote:
Hi!
I'm using postfix with mailscanner to integrate spamassassin and clamav,
but when spamassassin score a message as spam the subject of the message
is chagnged to {Spam?} subject and i want to send every message that
spamassasin mark directly to the spam folder.
PS.: i'm using cyrus-sasl
We use Dovecot as our LDA along with server-side sieve scripts to
auto-sort messages that score above N into an IMAP Junk folder.
Client-side, it's generally pretty easy to do something similar.
Thunderbird already has a checkbox in Account Options that lets it trust
SA headers (under Junk settings). In other mail clients, you're going
to have to write a rule that looks for X-SpamFlag being equal to "YES".
(Either way, SA just marks the message with the X-Spam-* headers and
leaves the rest of the handling up to the mail server or the email
client. So you may need to ask on the Cyrus mailing list as to exactly
how to do server-side sorting.)
The sieve script might look something like (it only moves messages where
the score is >= 10.0, and avoids the negative sign problem by also
checking X-Spam-Flag):
require ["comparator-i;ascii-numeric","fileinto","relational"];
if allof (
header :contains "X-Spam-Flag" "YES",
header :value "ge" :comparator "i;ascii-numeric" ["X-Spam-Score"]
["10"]
) {
fileinto "Junk";
stop;
}
Re: send spam messages to spam folder
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 09:06 -0300, Walter Breno wrote:
> I'm using postfix with mailscanner to integrate spamassassin and
> clamav, but when spamassassin score a message as spam the subject of
> the message is chagnged to {Spam?} subject and i want to send every
> message that spamassasin mark directly to the spam folder.
It's not up to SA. SA only marks the message. It's MDA (usually
procmail) who should act based on that information (for example by
putting it into a specific folder).
--
d'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'Yb
`b k...@epsilon.eu.org d'
d' http://epsilon.eu.org/ Yb
`b,-,.,-,.,-,.,-,.,-,.,-,.d'
send spam messages to spam folder
Hi!
I'm using postfix with mailscanner to integrate spamassassin and clamav, but
when spamassassin score a message as spam the subject of the message is
chagnged to {Spam?} subject and i want to send every message that
spamassasin mark directly to the spam folder.
PS.: i'm using cyrus-sasl
Re: sought rules
Hi all - I'm afraid the sought rules, and generally most of my time to work on SA, is still on a bit of a hiatus due to circumstances out of my control :( unfortunately my house renovation is taking longer than planned, and my net access outside work, at the moment, consists of an iPhone! Working on anything this way is not particularly practical... On Wednesday, December 2, 2009, Bob Proulx wrote: > Hi Justin, > >> Right now I'm not likely to be able to perform more investigation for a week >> or two. :( > > Any word on your sought rules? They were working so well for me that > I miss them now that they aren't getting updated! Good stuff. > >> Sorry about this -- the perils of volunteer infrastructure! > > I don't want to be annoying or be a trouble maker. I just became > impatient and decided I would ask about them! :-) > > Thanks! > Bob > > -- --j.
Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED SPAMMER
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 15:06 -0700, J.D. Falk wrote: > On Nov 30, 2009, at 12:38 PM, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote: > > > So please, spare me the sob story about what a wonderful idea HABEAS is. > > Talk is cheap, action speaks louder than words. > > Who's sobbing? I'm merely explaining how it works today. > > If you disagree with a particular entry on either the (formerly Habeas) Safe > list or the Certified list, we've made it extremely easy for you to tell the > people who operate those lists. Hint: insulting me on this mailing list has > no effect. > It's far easier to invert the action and use it as a block list. As for insulting you - grow up. You work in the business of sending unwanted junk email. If I were to share with you my thoughts on what I would like to do to someone like you, I'd be locked up again. > -- > J.D. Falk > Return Path Inc > > > >
