Re: update fail

2020-07-18 Thread Kevin A. McGrail 
Are you using 3.4.2 or older?
And these were tested but the warnings only affect older versions.
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171


On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 6:54 AM Reindl Harald 
wrote:

> cool, until today i as not affected and recently my daily lint-check
> triggered a mail - why can't you guys do that *before* push especially
> in context of the stupidity of USER_IN_WELCOMELIST_TO
>
> Jul 18 12:30:03.470 [2184367] warn: rules: error: unknown eval
> 'check_to_in_whitelist' for USER_IN_WELCOMELIST_TO
>
> 15-Jul-2020 10:07:16: SpamAssassin: Update processed successfully
> 16-Jul-2020 10:04:42: SpamAssassin: Update processed successfully
> 17-Jul-2020 10:07:59: SpamAssassin: Update processed successfully
> 18-Jul-2020 10:19:33: SpamAssassin: Update processed successfully
>
>
> Am 17.07.20 um 19:03 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
> > Thanks.  The fix is long since submitted with the rules but rule
> > publishing is not including it.  I have asked two other PMC members to
> > take a look!
> >
> > On 7/17/2020 7:55 AM, Frédéric Nass wrote:
> >>
> >> Ok. 1879934.tar.gz has been published on sa-update.bitwell.fi as I can
> >> download it with wget.
> >>
> >> So I've changed
> >> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.003001/updates_spamassassin_org/MIRRORED.BY to
> >> only use this particular mirror, but sa-update still downloads
> >> 1879882.tar.gz instead of 1879934.tar.gz.
> >>
> >> Here is the debug log :
> >> https://bul.univ-lorraine.fr/index.php/s/CS8z9nnxFncmMYP/download
> >>
> >> Cordialement,
> >>
> >> Frédéric Nass
> >> Direction du Numérique
> >> Sous-direction Infrastructures et Services
> >>
> >> Tél : 03.72.74.11.35
> >> Le 17/07/2020 à 13:29, Frédéric Nass a écrit :
> >>>
> >>> Sorry I meant "I'll let you know when I get 1879934".
> >>>
> >>> juil. 17 13:15:21.107 [21396] dbg: generic: lint check of site pre
> >>> files succeeded, continuing with channel updates
> >>> juil. 17 13:15:21.107 [21396] dbg: channel: MIRRORED.BY file is too
> >>> old, forcing refresh
> >>> juil. 17 13:15:21.107 [21396] dbg: channel: no MIRRORED.BY file
> available
> >>> juil. 17 13:15:21.111 [21396] dbg: http: GET request,
> >>> http://spamassassin.apache.org/updates/MIRRORED.BY
> >>> juil. 17 13:15:21.209 [21396] dbg: channel: MIRRORED.BY file retrieved
> >>> juil. 17 13:15:21.209 [21396] dbg: channel: reading MIRRORED.BY file
> >>> juil. 17 13:15:21.209 [21396] dbg: channel: found mirror
> >>> http://sa-update.dnswl.org/ weight=3
> >>> juil. 17 13:15:21.209 [21396] dbg: channel: found mirror
> >>> http://www.sa-update.pccc.com/ weight=5
> >>> juil. 17 13:15:21.209 [21396] dbg: channel: found mirror
> >>> http://sa-update.secnap.net/ weight=5
> >>> juil. 17 13:15:21.210 [21396] dbg: channel: found mirror
> >>> http://sa-update.space-pro.be/ weight=1
> >>> juil. 17 13:15:21.210 [21396] dbg: channel: found mirror
> >>> http://sa-update.ena.com/ weight=5
> >>> juil. 17 13:15:21.210 [21396] dbg: channel: found mirror
> >>> http://sa-update.razx.cloud/ weight=5
> >>> juil. 17 13:15:21.210 [21396] dbg: channel: found mirror
> >>> http://sa-update.fossies.org/ weight=1
> >>> juil. 17 13:15:21.210 [21396] dbg: channel: found mirror
> >>> http://sa-update.verein-clean.net/ weight=10
> >>> juil. 17 13:15:21.210 [21396] dbg: channel: found mirror
> >>> http://sa-update.bitwell.fi/ weight=5
> >>> juil. 17 13:15:21.210 [21396] dbg: channel: found mirror
> >>> http://sa-update.spamassassin.org/ weight=10
> >>> juil. 17 13:15:21.210 [21396] dbg: channel: selected mirror
> >>> http://sa-update.verein-clean.net
> >>> juil. 17 13:15:21.210 [21396] dbg: http: GET request,
> >>> http://sa-update.verein-clean.net/1879882.tar.gz
> >>> juil. 17 13:15:21.445 [21396] dbg: http: GET request,
> >>> http://sa-update.verein-clean.net/1879882.tar.gz.sha1
> >>> juil. 17 13:15:21.497 [21396] dbg: http: GET request,
> >>> http://sa-update.verein-clean.net/1879882.tar.gz.asc
> >>> juil. 17 13:15:21.551 [21396] dbg: sha1: verification wanted:
> >>> 8f1bb8f6ea5b714bc3402e3fd162eab5fd4405be
> >>> juil. 17 13:15:21.551 [21396] dbg: sha1: verification result:
> >>> 8f1bb8f6ea5b714bc3402e3fd162eab5fd4405be
> >>>
> >>> I tried --channel and --channelfile but whatever the server name I
> >>> specify, sa-update adds a "mirrors." in front of its name and fails:
> >>>
> >>> juil. 17 13:26:55.767 [23345] dbg: dns: query failed:
> >>> 1.3.3.sa-update.spamassassin.org => NXDOMAIN
> >>> juil. 17 13:26:55.768 [23345] dbg: dns: query failed:
> >>> mirrors.sa-update.spamassassin.org => NXDOMAIN
> >>> channel: no 'mirrors.sa-update.spamassassin.org' record found,
> >>> channel failed
> >>> juil. 17 13:26:55.768 [23345] dbg: diag: updates complete, exiting
> >>> with code 4
> >>>
> >>> Thats weird.
> >>>
> >>> Cordialement,
> >>>
> >>> Frédéric Nass
> >>> Direction du Numérique
> >>> Sous-direction Infrastructures et Services
> >>>
> >>> Tél : 03.72.74.11.35
> >>> Le 17/07/202

Re: sa-update for versions 3.4.2 and older fail lint because of description on non-existent rule was Re: update fail

2020-07-18 Thread Marcus Schopen 
Am Donnerstag, den 16.07.2020, 17:43 -0400 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
> Agreed.  1879851 is after I submitted the fix but doesn;t include the
> fix.  I will have to check again after the next rule publishing. 
> Sorry for the false alarm.

Feedback: sa-update without errors now. Thanks a lot!

Cheers
m.

Re: sa-update for versions 3.4.2 and older fail lint because of description on non-existent rule was Re: update fail

2020-07-18 Thread Kevin A. McGrail 
Great, thanks for the update.  With this change we also know how to best
prevent similar issues.

Regards,
KAM
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171


On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 4:59 PM Marcus Schopen  wrote:

> Am Donnerstag, den 16.07.2020, 17:43 -0400 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
> > Agreed.  1879851 is after I submitted the fix but doesn;t include the
> > fix.  I will have to check again after the next rule publishing.
> > Sorry for the false alarm.
>
> Feedback: sa-update without errors now. Thanks a lot!
>
> Cheers
> m.
>
>
>

Re: sa-update for versions 3.4.2 and older fail lint because of description on non-existent rule was Re: update fail

2020-07-18 Thread Benny Pedersen 

Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2020-07-18 23:32:

Great, thanks for the update.  With this change we also know how to
best prevent similar issues.


more nutella :=)

spf fail !

2020-07-18 Thread Benny Pedersen 
Received: from mailroute1-lw-us.apache.org (mailroute1-lw-us.apache.org 
[207.244.88.153])

by mx.junc.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPS
for ; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 00:41:16 + (UTC)

gives spf fails now, be carefull

Re: spf fail !

2020-07-18 Thread Noel Butler 
On 19/07/2020 10:45, Benny Pedersen wrote:

> Received: from mailroute1-lw-us.apache.org (mailroute1-lw-us.apache.org 
> [207.244.88.153])
> by mx.junc.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPS
> for ; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 00:41:16 + (UTC)
> 
> gives spf fails now, be carefull

you'll find other mail rejected as well, since someone changed from
hermes to this mailroute machine... 

infra didnt mention anything about the change

-- 
Regards,
Noel Butler 

This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to
copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate
this message without the authors express written authority to do so. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender then delete
all copies of this message including attachments immediately.
Confidentiality, copyright, and legal privilege are not waived or lost
by reason of the mistaken delivery of this message.

Re: spf fail !

2020-07-18 Thread Kevin A. McGrail 
On 7/18/2020 10:12 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
>
> On 19/07/2020 10:45, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
>> Received: from mailroute1-lw-us.apache.org
>> (mailroute1-lw-us.apache.org [207.244.88.153])
>> by mx.junc.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPS
>> for > >; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 00:41:16 + (UTC)
>>
>> gives spf fails now, be carefull
>>
>>
> you'll find other mail rejected as well, since someone changed from
> hermes to this mailroute machine...
>
> infra didnt mention anything about the change
>
Thanks, I've email Infra.  Appreciate the heads-up.

-- 
Kevin A. McGrail
kmcgr...@apache.org

Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171

Re: spf fail !

2020-07-18 Thread Benny Pedersen 

Noel Butler skrev den 2020-07-19 04:12:


you'll find other mail rejected as well, since someone changed from
hermes to this mailroute machine...


X-Spam-Rules_score: 
HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001,HTML_MESSAGE=0.1,

MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-10.1,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.1,SPF_FAIL=6.419,
SPF_HELO_NONE=2.1,TXREP=-0.673,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001,
USER_IN_WHITELIST=-1


infra didnt mention anything about the change


drovned in chocolate :=)