Re: "Please send us a quote..."?

[Rupert Gallagher]

We get that from face-to-face leads from hell.

 Original Message 
On Apr 7, 2021, 03:27, Grant Taylor  wrote:

I've seen a few where they are asking for samples prior to -- purportedly -- 
submitting an order.

Re: Problem installing sa on my pi 3b+

[spamassassin]

Ok so it seems I cant do anything to get it running on my side.
Funny enough that I use the official raspian which I kept up to date 
with 'sudo apt-get update'
and now the 'sudo apt-get install that claims to use the newest version 
(3.4.2-1+deb10u3) keeps running into such an error.

How to find out who the packet maintainer is?

But hey, I found a crude way around it somehow:
Instead of my 3b+ with 1 gb ram I used my fresh-out-of-the-box PI 4 that 
just arrived via mail.
I simply swapped the sdcard (I dont know if that will cause other issues 
but it did boot).

Guess what:
It did compile and install flawlessly.
I swapped the cards back and keep ignoring some wierd errors that get 
printed on booting but the stuff seems to be running.
I if I had to guess I'd say the thing wont compile on a 1gb thingy 
anymore - maybe earlier, smaller versions did?


Do I need to redo all anew on the PI 4 or can I simply use the working 
setup of my PI 3b+ and slot that card into the PI 4?

Noob-question i think, but heck I dont know.

Kind regards

Re: Problem installing sa on my pi 3b+

[Antony Stone]

On Wednesday 07 April 2021 at 12:05:42, spamassas...@mach2.franken.de wrote:

> Ok so it seems I cant do anything to get it running on my side.
> Funny enough that I use the official raspian which I kept up to date
> with 'sudo apt-get update'
> and now the 'sudo apt-get install that claims to use the newest version
> (3.4.2-1+deb10u3) keeps running into such an error.
> How to find out who the packet maintainer is?

You said somewhere else:

> I am running said packet install from an internet tutorial.

Who wrote that tutorial and where does it point you to get the packages from?


Antony.

-- 
There are 10 types of people in the world:
those who understand binary notation,
and those who don't.

   Please reply to the list;
 please *don't* CC me.

Spamassassin dont send Mail to Spam domain

[mauric]

Hello

after modified the hole mail.cf and master.cf postfix 3.4.14 the flush from 
Mail runs better,  that how fell and see mail.log 😊

one thing, bevor all Spam Email wass delivered to Spam @ domain.ch mailbox, but 
now, this rule don’t have the right effect ☹

 

Thanks for possible update

 

Spamassassin - local.cf

#   Add *SPAM* to the Subject header of spam e-mails

rewrite_header Subject *SPAM*

 

all_spam_to s...@domain.ch  

 

--

 

cat /etc/postfix/main.cf | grep header_checks

smtp_header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks

 

--

 

root@nmail:/etc/postfix# cat header_checks

/^X-Spam-Status: Yes/ REDIRECT s...@domain.ch  

/^Received:/IGNORE

/^subject: *$/   REJECT  Please add subject to your mail.

/^X-Originating-IP:/IGNORE

/^X-Mailer:/IGNORE

/^Received: from .*127.0.0.1*/ IGNORE

 

--

 

master.cf

smtp  inet  n   -   -   -   1   postscreen

-o content_filter=/usr/local/bin/spamassassin

policyd-spf  unix  -   n   n   -   -   spawn

user=policyd-spf argv=/usr/bin/policyd-spf

smtpd pass  -   -   -   -   -   smtpd

dnsblog   unix  -   -   -   -   0  dnsblog

tlsproxy  unix  -   -   -   -   0   tlsproxy

submission inet n   -   n   -   -  smtpd

 

 

 

CHAOS v1.1.1

[Jared Hall]

Released Apr 7, 2021

- Better Unibabble bibber-blabber blockage.
- Improved Title Case sort order.
- Tons of new callouts added to the mailer_check().
- MailChimp header and MS Exchange header spoofing sanity checks.
- Added Microsoft Cab files to the attachment checks.

https://github.com/telecom2k3/CHAOS

May your days be long and without bifurcation.

-- Jared Hall

Re: OT: Re: Unsubscribe link at the bottom.

[Alex Woick]

John Hardin schrieb am 06.04.2021 um 16:34:

On Mon, 5 Apr 2021, Grant Taylor wrote:


On 4/5/21 8:41 PM, Peter West wrote:
I’d agree it’s address verification, as with the Unsubscribe link at 
the bottom.


I'm of the opinion that if I have any inclining of knowledge of the 
company sending the email, and SPF/DKIM/DMARC pass, I'll probably use 
the unsubscribe link.


Recently I ran into a 404 from the unsubscribe link from a company 
that my wife did business with.  *facepalm*


What ticks me off is an unsubscribe link that goes to a 
javascript-heavy page and that *won't work* without javascript.


And an unsubscribe link with a huge identifying key on it, yet the 
unsubscribe page still asks you to enter your email address...


As far as I see it, unsubscribe links from spammers are placebo, because 
the "campaign" or "mailing list" or "newsletter" is created for just one 
mass mailing session, then never used again. You don't need to 
unsubscribe (nor the spammer need to provide a real working unsubscribe 
functionality), because your address isn't used for *this* mailing list 
again anyway. However, it's used for creating a whole new mailing list 
tomorrow and a second one the day after tomorrow, but that's a 
completely different newsletter than the one from today (as the spammer 
would say, why he continues sending although you unsubscribed).

Re: CHAOS v1.1.1

[Rupert Gallagher]

 Original Message 
On Apr 7, 2021, 20:40, Jared Hall <> wrote:

- Better Unibabble bibber-blabber blockage.

This makes sense not.