child processing timeout
Hi In to the log file of my spamassassin I've found more lines like the follow: Oct 12 09:57:24 srv-relay spamd[6935]: child processing timeout at /usr/sbin/spamd line 1085, GEN46 line 61723. Oct 12 09:57:24 srv-relay spamd[6935]: child processing timeout at /usr/sbin/spamd line 1085, GEN46 line 61723. How can solve it? Andrea
Spam Report Message problem
Hi I'm try to change the message in to Spam-Report message. In to the mail detected like a spam I found the follow header. X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system srv-relay.arthis.it, has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. I've try to change in to 10_misc.cf the report message and after I've restar spamd, but the header don't change. Where I mistake? Andrea
use of ram after upgrade
Hi I have upgraded my spamassassin to version 3.1.7 and after the restart of the process I have saw an increment of the use of the ram. I use the default rules of the spamassassin and the following rules: 53K Apr 20 11:00 70_sare_adult.cf 3.8K Jun 2 2005 70_sare_bayes_poison_nxm.cf 24K Oct 5 2005 70_sare_evilnum0.cf 1.6K Jun 2 2005 70_sare_evilnum1.cf 6.9K Jun 2 2005 70_sare_evilnum2.cf 184K Dec 27 2005 70_sare_genlsubj.cf 32K Dec 27 2005 70_sare_genlsubj_eng.cf 376K Oct 30 2005 70_sare_header.cf 8.0K May 21 22:00 70_sare_header_eng.cf 4.4K Jun 2 2005 70_sare_highrisk.cf 105K Jun 4 07:00 70_sare_html.cf 39K Jun 4 07:00 70_sare_html4.cf 3.1K Jun 4 07:00 70_sare_html_eng.cf 155K Oct 1 2005 70_sare_obfu.cf 6.0K Oct 1 2005 70_sare_obfu2.cf 14K Oct 1 2005 70_sare_obfu3.cf 13K Dec 27 2005 70_sare_oem.cf 18K Dec 12 2005 70_sare_random.cf 96K May 28 05:00 70_sare_specific.cf 20K Jul 25 18:00 70_sare_spoof.cf 54K Sep 22 23:00 70_sare_stocks.cf 25K Nov 12 2005 70_sare_unsub.cf 18K Oct 5 2005 70_sare_uri0.cf 24K Oct 11 2005 70_sare_uri1.cf 8.4K Oct 5 2005 70_sare_uri3.cf 5.0K Oct 5 2005 70_sare_uri_eng.cf 49K May 16 05:00 70_sare_whitelist.cf 8.8K Sep 25 19:00 70_sc_top200.cf 104K Jul 31 00:50 70_zmi_german.cf 13K Jun 2 2005 72_sare_bml_post25x.cf 16K May 16 05:00 72_sare_redirect_post3.0.0.cf 79K Sep 25 19:00 88_FVGT_body.cf 50K Aug 27 12:34 88_FVGT_headers.cf 16K Apr 25 17:00 88_FVGT_rawbody.cf 57K Jul 31 20:00 88_FVGT_subject.cf 18K Jul 6 18:00 88_FVGT_uri.cf 55K Jun 2 2005 99_FVGT_Tripwire.cf 12K Jun 2 2005 99_FVGT_meta.cf 776 Sep 29 12:09 99_blacklist_arthis.cf 26K Sep 14 14:19 99_jam.cf 2.0K Sep 14 15:31 99_jam_virus.cf 10K Jun 2 2005 99_sare_fraud_post25x.cf 9.7K Oct 9 08:15 99_whitelist_arthis.cf 5.3K Oct 4 21:54 FuzzyOcr.cf 415 Oct 3 10:15 FuzzyOcr.words 4.7M Oct 10 03:00 blacklist-uri.cf 108K Dec 15 2005 bogus-virus-warnings.cf 23K Jun 2 2005 chickenpox.cf 4.6K Aug 6 03:57 imageinfo.cf 946 Sep 15 07:50 init.pre 1.5K Oct 1 10:39 local.cf 2.2K Sep 21 11:26 mime_validate.cf 4.8K May 25 2004 random.cf 55K Jun 2 2005 tripwire.cf 2.3K Oct 3 10:30 v310.pre 806 Sep 15 09:29 v312.pre 3.8K Jun 2 2005 weeds.cf Bellow I've cut a part of top command on my server. Tasks: 93 total, 1 running, 91 sleeping, 0 stopped, 1 zombie Cpu0 : 0.0% user, 0.3% system, 6.0% nice, 93.7% idle Cpu1 : 0.0% user, 0.0% system, 0.0% nice, 100.0% idle Cpu2 : 0.3% user, 1.3% system, 12.6% nice, 85.8% idle Cpu3 : 0.3% user, 0.7% system, 4.3% nice, 94.7% idle Mem: 6206432k total, 1103800k used, 5102632k free, 108804k buffers Swap: 284k total, 7856k used, 1992228k free,65000k cached PID PPID PR NI S #C RES SHR SWAP TIME COMMAND 12411 7632 15 10 S 0 335m 75m0 0:10 spamd child 7719 7632 15 10 S 0 180m 76m0 0:38 spamd child 14332 7632 15 10 S 0 173m 77m0 0:33 spamd child 14365 7632 15 10 S 1 161m 78m0 0:19 spamd child 14665 7632 17 10 D 3 153m 78m0 0:02 spamd child 14684 7632 14 10 S 0 150m 95m0 0:00 spamd child 7632 1 15 10 S 3 149m 95m0 0:12 /usr/sbin/spamd It's a rules problem? Andrea
RE: use of ram after upgrade
I've try it, but now I've the follow use: Tasks: 83 total, 2 running, 81 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu0 : 0.0% user, 1.3% system, 1.7% nice, 97.0% idle Cpu1 : 0.0% user, 1.3% system, 0.0% nice, 98.7% idle Cpu2 : 0.0% user, 0.0% system, 1.3% nice, 98.7% idle Cpu3 : 0.0% user, 0.0% system, 98.7% nice, 1.3% idle Mem: 6206432k total, 909444k used, 5296988k free, 117224k buffers Swap: 284k total, 7856k used, 1992228k free,70724k cached PID PPID PR NI S #C RES SHR SWAP TIME COMMAND 15404 15386 15 10 S 1 354m 33m0 5:29 spamd child 15405 15386 19 10 R 2 176m 34m0 4:33 spamd child 15626 15386 14 10 S 0 88m 36m0 0:22 spamd child 15645 15386 15 10 S 3 85m 36m0 0:07 spamd child 15386 1 15 10 S 2 73m 36m0 0:03 /usr/sbin/spamd -Original Message- From: Dave Pooser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: martedì 10 ottobre 2006 18.09 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: use of ram after upgrade 4.7M Oct 10 03:00 blacklist-uri.cf Remove this and use URI blacklists instead. Notice how this rule's size is orders of magnitude greater than any of the others you listed? Same goes for its RAM footprint. -- Dave Pooser Cat-Herder-in-Chief, Pooserville.com ...Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in one pretty and well-preserved piece, but to slide across the finish line broadside, thoroughly used up, worn out, leaking oil, and shouting GERONIMO!!! -- Bill McKenna
RE: Stock spam in images
For Debian Users I've found the follow link, a step by step guide in order to implement FuzzyOCR and ImageInfo with spamassassin. http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/image_spam.html Andrea
RE: Ammount of the RAM used by spamd childs
Thanks All! Now I've about 80MB for child Andrea
Ammount of the RAM used by spamd childs
Hi I've the problem with my spamassassin. I'm using spamassassin with exim (MTA) and clamav (AntiVirus). My spamassassin start with the follow command line: /usr/sbin/spamd --syslog=local4 --create-prefs --max-children 10 --max-conn-per-child=100 --helper-home-dir -d --pidfile=/var/run/spamd.pid every child it occupies approximately 450MB of RAM. My server is a GNU/Linux Debian 3.1r2 with spamassassin v3.1.5 and Perl v5.8.4 Aren't it too many every 450MB for single child? Andrea
RE: Ammount of the RAM used by spamd childs
-Original Message- [...] every child it occupies approximately 450MB of RAM. My server is a GNU/Linux Debian 3.1r2 with spamassassin v3.1.5 and Perl v5.8.4 Aren't it too many every 450MB for single child? That is a bit excessive. My first guess is that you have WAY too many add-on rule sets (or you are using old ones that should not be used). Which rule sets are you currently using? I'm usign the default rules of spamassassin 3.1.5 with the follow rules downloaded from rulesemporium: TRIPWIRE ANTIDRUG SARE_EVILNUMBERS0 SARE_EVILNUMBERS1 SARE_EVILNUMBERS2 BLACKLIST BLACKLIST_URI RANDOMVAL BOGUSVIRUS SARE_ADULT SARE_FRAUD SARE_BML SARE_RATWARE SARE_SPOOF SARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM SARE_OEM SARE_RANDOM SARE_HEADER SARE_HEADER_ENG SARE_HTML SARE_HTML4 SARE_HTML_ENG SARE_SPECIFIC SARE_OBFU SARE_OBFU2 SARE_OBFU3 SARE_REDIRECT_POST300 SARE_SPAMCOP_TOP200 SARE_GENLSUBJ SARE_GENLSUBJ_ENG SARE_HIGHRISK SARE_UNSUB SARE_URI0 SARE_URI1 SARE_URI2 SARE_URI3 SARE_URI_ENG SARE_WHITELIST SARE_STOCKS SARE_GENLSUBJ4 OUR_WHITELIST (about 296 entry) OUR_BLACKLIST (about 27 entry) OUR_RULES (about 35 rules that check subject) Andrea
