Re: really slow spamd scan

2006-10-02 Thread Deephay

On 10/2/06, Olivier Nicole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Are you using smapc/spamd or plain spamassassin?
 it is spamc/spamd..

OK, so it should be fast enough.

  And I think there is a way to tell spamassassin to report what tests
  actually take some time to execute, so you can see where you are
  loosing time.
 How can I do that?

Read the manual :)

I think I remember I once read something about it, but honnestly I
have noanswer.

Best regards,

Olivier


Thanks, Oliver.


Re: really slow spamd scan

2006-09-29 Thread Deephay

Greetings,

I think I have diabled the DNS and URI lookups and Razor/Pyzor/DCC,
and it still takes around 1x seconds to scan one email, but we have a
little power supply problem at this moment so I cannot check the
configuration file, I'll check it later.
I still think it may be caused by the UTF-8 locale. Since the load of
that mail server is not high, so may be I just let it there for a
moment if I cannot find where the problem is.

Regards,
Deephay


Re: really slow spamd scan

2006-09-29 Thread Deephay

On 9/29/06, Olivier Nicole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I think I have diabled the DNS and URI lookups and Razor/Pyzor/DCC,
 and it still takes around 1x seconds to scan one email, but we have a
 little power supply problem at this moment so I cannot check the
 configuration file, I'll check it later.

Are you using smapc/spamd or plain spamassassin?

it is spamc/spamd..


And I think there is a way to tell spamassassin to report what tests
actually take some time to execute, so you can see where you are
loosing time.

How can I do that?
thx a lot!


Bests,

Olivier



really slow spamd scan

2006-09-27 Thread Deephay

Greetings all,

I am quite new to SA (a week of SA life), and the SA is working, the
thing is, SA is incredibly slow on my server (2.8GHZ CPU + 2GB Memory
+ Qmail + Qmail-scanner).  Here's a typical scan log:

result: . 0 - SPF_PASS scantime=14.7,size=1689  ...
.

And I have checked the SA wiki and found there is a note saying if you
are using UTF-8 locale,  the performance can be low. What I am
wondering is: Will it be that slow?
Any suggestion is appreciated.

Deephay


Re: really slow spamd scan

2006-09-27 Thread Deephay

On 9/28/06, Olivier Nicole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I am quite new to SA (a week of SA life), and the SA is working, the
 thing is, SA is incredibly slow on my server (2.8GHZ CPU + 2GB Memory
 + Qmail + Qmail-scanner).  Here's a typical scan log:

 result: . 0 - SPF_PASS scantime=14.7,size=1689  ...

Hi,

Problem is not that it is slow.

That SA takes 14 seconds to deliver a message is not an issue, email
is not a real time process anyway and transiting email from one
gateway to another can take minutes or hours.


The scantime=14.7 does not mean the scan time of spamassassin?


Problem would be is SA would make high CPU load on your server.

14 seconds may be just the delay for the various network tests to
respond.

You mean the test form SA? I have googled for this kind of situations
and I found I am the slowest. If I stop the spamd, the delivery will
be much faster.



Bests

Olivier


Thanks very much for the suggestion!

Deephay